occur incidentally rather than as purposeful engagement in the EDP. Clear Evidence Clear evidence that students engaged in particular stage of EDP. Student behaviors clearly indicative of EDP engagement.Figure 3. Matrix Illustrating EDP Engagement During Elephant Task by GroupTable 2. Illustrative Examples: EDP Engagement During the Elephant Performance Task EDP Stage Code Definition Illustrative Example Identify Student(s) review and/or discuss the problem When one student in Group 6 begins using materials to build a model of the box car, statement. Includes any statements students another student re-focuses
theHispanic female students at the PWI, an interview from a Hispanic female student from theHBCU indicated one situation that contained hidden language. Students at both the HBCU andPWI experienced projected stereotypes; however, the students at the PWI recalled moreencounters perceived as microaggressions. Ascription of intelligence was also prevalent amongstboth sites, and one Black female student at the HBCU explicitly recalled when ascription ofintelligence is most prominent. Students at the HBCU did not discuss examples of silence andmarginalization experiences. Table 3 Excerpts from the data Identified Identity S Quotes from
. Educ., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 136–150, 2001. [11] D. Riley, “LGBT-Friendly Workplaces in Engineering,” Leadersh. Manag. Eng., vol. 8, no. 19–23, 2008. [3] J. Spring, Education and the Rise of the Global Economy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998. [12] S. Cho, K. W. Crenshaw, and L. McCall, “Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis,” Signs J. women Cult
connected plant(s). Fortesting purposes, only one moisture sensor and pump pair will be used.Conceptual DesignOne of the objectives of this senior design project was to design and build a cost effective and simple purewater irrigation system for indoor applications. Figure 1 shows the conceptual design of the proposedsystem. The overall design of the system was changed very little from the beginning phase of the projectto the finish. There are three main sections listed as the Brain Box, the water reservoir, and the connectedplant(s). Each of these parts consists of smaller components that allow the system to function properly. Figure 1. The SCEIIS pure water plants conceptual designSCEIIS Parts and SpecificationsThe main
engineering education, like engineers, remain overwhelmingly White and middleclass,[9] we argue that additional validation strategies are needed for these researchers whenworking with underrepresented groups. This theoretical paper draws from our own experiencesin working with culturally diverse youth, as well as methodological literature on qualitativeinquiry writ large, to expand Walther et al.’s framework by making it account more robustly forlinguistic and culturalism pluralism, and specifically for linguistic and cultural differencesamong researchers and participants in engineering education.In this paper, we use Walther, Sochacka, and Kellam’s framework as a starting point foridentifying strategies for ensuring quality in qualitative research
CURE section. For thisreason, we did not advertise or inform students about the planned difference between thesections. Out of a total of 134 students (40 in the CURE section, 94 in the traditional lecturesection), only two changed sections after the first day of class, and this was for schedulingreasons. We note that for this pilot semester, the CURE section started with 110 available seats,and the traditional section had 100 available seats. We think the large difference in studentsregistered was a function of schedules for the S’18 semester.Pilot Program: Research Activities & AssignmentsIn the CURE section of IE271, there are now four research experiences involving the followingtopics: time study and line balancing, ergonomic risk and
this study. (Note: the original TAS was on a4-point Likert scale and the enjoyment of teaching STEM subjects (Enj) was inadvertentlyomitted from this survey.) Subcategories in the survey include relevance of engineering (RoE),pedagogy for teaching engineering (Ped), when to teach engineering (WtTSE), characteristics ofengineers (SoE), and improving abilities to teach engineering (IAtTE).In general, the Teacher Attitude Survey for this group of summer camp team lead participantswas slightly higher than the teachers in Lachapelle et al.’s sample [14]; for each subcategory,scores were 2-5% higher for the summer camp teachers than post-tests for teachers who hadengaged in Museum of Science engineering professional development (see Table 2). This
Engineer in NJ, NY, and PA with over 25 years of design experience. He is the PI of the NSF S-STEM program ”Scholarships Advancing Mercer STEM Students (SAMS)” and well as the PI for two Innova- tion Grants: ”Transforming Engineering Access for Mercer Students (TEAMS),” and ”Engineering TLC- Tutors and Learning Communities.”Prof. Laura Blinderman, Mercer County Community College Laura Blinderman is a Professor of Biology at Mercer County Community College. She received her MS degree in from San Diego State University where she studied molecular evolution. She has served as Science department Chair since 2016 and is a co-PI on a Robert Noyce grant to increase STEM educators in middle and high schools.Prof. Helen Tanzini
Education Center at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Her degrees in Materials Science and Engineering are from Michigan State University and MIT. Her research interests include pre-college engineering education and equity in education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Community: Voices from a Small CohortAbstractPEEPS (Program for Engineering Excellence for Partner Schools) NSF S-STEM scholarship wasdesigned to support students from low socioeconomic, first generation and/or underrepresentedgroups in obtaining an undergraduate engineering degree at California Polytechnic StateUniversity in San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly). Students receive up to $10,000/year to aid in
the academic and socialengagement provided by peer mentoring aspects of the program may be positive predictors ofretention for first year female students in science and engineering.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.7686640. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] A. E. Bell, S. J. Spencer, E. Iserman, and C. E. R. Logel, "Stereotype threat and women's performance in engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, pp. 307-312, 2003.[2] N. M. Else-Quest, C. C. Mineo, and A. Higgins, "Math
enhance the students’ understanding of microcontrollers andmicroprocessors, and (3) add one or two EET251 lab(s) with C programming experiences canhelp student better transition from PIC16F84A to ARM M4 which is covered in EET 418. With the help of this new curriculum and the common hardware platform, CPET studentsat PVAMU had the opportunity to practice embedded system hands-on experiments withoutundue stress in connecting basic peripheral interfacing circuits. The problem that we perceivedwas that it was difficult for students to write C program code for the ARM microcontrollerbecause of the complexity of ARM technology. It will be helpful to introduce simplemicrocontroller, such as PIC16FXXX, in both ASM and C coding in some previous
for example [40]–[43]). This line of research couldbenefit from the use of Faulkner’s and Kendi’s frameworks to investigate specific instances ofindividual and structural racism. To illustrate, we look to Murphy et al.’s assessment of GeorgiaTech’s summer bridge program, the Challenge Program, and its role in the higher likelihood ofgraduation for underrepresented minority students involved [42]. Georgia Tech is aPredominantly White Institution (PWI). Murphy et al. found that there was a significantrelationship between participation in the Challenge Program and increased retention/graduationrate [42]. Quantitatively, they recognized the need for summer bridge programs and theprogram’s importance in retention. What their study was not designed
teaching experiences across all spaces. His focus on the user experience and data, has led to development and adoption of design strategies that measure learning and teaching efficacies across his service in various institutions of higher education. A geophysicist by academic training, he began to design multimedia applications for teaching and learning in the late 1990’s, developing his first online course in 1996. Since then, he has helped a few hundred faculty from varied disciplines develop hybrid and online courses. He has also taught traditional, hybrid and online courses ranging in size from 28 to 250. He is also co-developer of a Digital Academy which c American Society for Engineering
, Engineering for Human Rights: Opportunities, Risks and Responsibilities. Webinar, Engineering for Change, AAAS, ASME. June 13, 2012. https://www.engineeringforchange.org/webinar/video-engineering- for-human-rights/ [Accessed Jan 29, 2019][12] United Nations (UN). Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/sections/what- we-do/protect-human-rights/ [Accessed Jan. 29, 2019][13] S. McFarland, “International differences in support for human rights,” Societies Without Borders, vol. 12 (1), pp. 21. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb/vol12/iss1/12 [Accessed Jan. 28, 2019].[14] H. Rindermann and N. Carl, “Human rights: Why countries differ,” Comparative Sociology, vol. 17, pp. 29-69, 2018
this group was a combination of the fact that the areaof advanced manufacturing was identified as a gap in the workforce necessary to enableconsistent U. S. economic growth [12-15] in this globally critical area, and of the interest inguiding veterans towards STEM careers. The current project was conducted by a research teamof faculty members from the colleges of engineering and education at Old Dominion Universitywith broader areas of expertise: mechanical engineering with focus on robotics and bio-inspiredrobots in particular, digital thread, additive manufacturing, electrical engineering,microprocessor based design, material and technology engineering, as well as engineeringeducation. The team has also broad expertise in working with
active learning teachingpractices in their classrooms. We will continue to evaluate the data from additional coursestaught by the faculty participants to provide more robust and definitive answers to the researchquestions. This data combined with additional RTOP classroom observations will providegreater insights into the impact of the faculty development program on low-SES engineeringstudents and will be presented at forthcoming ASEE conferences and through additionalpublications.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support of this work by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. 1524527.References 1) Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderith, M. P. (2014
, “Critical Race Methodology: Counter-Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Education Research,” Qual. Inq., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23–44, Feb. 2002.[4] C. Baillie and G. Catalano, “Engineering and Society: Working Towards Social Justice, Part III: Windows on Society,” Synth. Lect. Eng. Technol. Soc., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–124, Jan. 2009.[5] S. Hurtado, C. L. Alvarez, C. Guillermo-Wann, M. Cuellar, and L. Arellano, “A Model for Diverse Learning Environments,” Springer, Dordrecht, 2012, pp. 41–122.[6] M. A. Franco and S. Hernández, “Assessing the Capacity of Hispanic Serving Institutions to Serve Latinx Students: Moving Beyond Compositional Diversity,” New Dir. Institutional Res., vol. 2018, no. 177, pp. 57–71, Mar
experiences that contribute to their individual views of themselves asengineers. Currently, we plan conduct our Phase 3 interviews in Spring 2020 which willcomplete our developmental investigation.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 1664264 and 1664266. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998.[2] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, “An analysis of motivation constructs with first‐year
. Diversity, equity and inclusion workis difficult, yet rewarding when successes are achieved. Members of the project team are happyto share lessons learned with change agents on other campuses.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 1726268, 1725880 and 1726088. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. Page, The Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.[2] Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.[3] Institute for
. “Adaptive Thinking & Leadership Simulation Game Training for Special Forces Officers.” I/ITSEC 2005 Proceedings, Interservice/ Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference Proceedings, November 28-December 1, 2005 Orlando, Florida, USA. 3. Aebersold, M. and D. Tschannen. “Simulation in Nursing Practice: The Impact on Patient Care.” The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2013. 4. Shaw, Carolyn M. "Designing and Using Simulations and Role-Play Exercises." The International Studies Compendium. Ed: Robert A. Denemark. Wiley – Blackwell, 2010. 5. S. Kumar, and J. K. Hsiao. Engineers Learn “Soft Skills the Hard Way: Planting a Seed of Leadership in Engineering Classes.” Leadership
. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.4. Ohland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., & Layton, R. A., Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs, Journal of Engineering Education, 2008, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 259-278.5. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B., Leaving engineering: A multi-year single institution study, Journal of Engineering Education, 2012, Vol. 101, No. 1, pp. 6-27.6. Atman, C. J., Sheppard, S., D., Turns, J., Adams, R. S., Fleming, L. N., Stevens, R., Streveler, R. A., Smith, K. A., Miller, R. L., Leifer, L. J., Yasuhara, K., & Lund, D., Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the center for the
, we suspect that the increasein overall retention was impacted by an increase in sense of belonging. To benefit sense ofbelonging and reduce chilly-climate issues that appear to impact females’ pathways more thanmales’, it is recommended that faculty development, particularly for creating an inclusiveclassroom environment, be implemented at the institution studied.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1226586.Bibliography1 M. W. Ohland, G. Zhang, B. Thorndyke and T. J. Anderson, "Grade-Point Average, Changes of Major, and Majors Selected by Students Leaving Engineering," in Frontiers in Education, Savannah, 2004.2 E. Judson, B. Smith, J. Erzen , S. Krause, J. Middleton and
Austin BME graduate recruitment efforts.References1. Bell, S. M., Blumstein, J., Brose, K., Carroll, A., Chang, J., Charles, J., ... & Smith, R. (2014). Defining success in graduate school. Molecular biology of the cell, 25(13), 1942-1944.2. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological bulletin, 127(1), 162.3. Ehrenberg, R. G. (2003). Method or madness? Inside the USNWR college rankings. Working Papers, 42.4. Howell, L. L., Sorenson, C. D., & Jones, M. R. (2014). Are Undergraduate GPA and General GRE Percentiles Valid Predictors of
traditional, with lowcommitment to research and development. Internally, there have been difficulties incommunicating the project goals and orientations. The project seems huge and with a not clearset of priorities. Finally, hallways and informal talks mention that faculty leaders are seen asbelonging to a clique close to the top administration, which risks the wide adoption of theprogram.The Clover 2030 Engineering Strategy: A joint venture between UC and UTFSMNew Engineering for 2030 has been the opportunity that UC-Engineering was expecting tovalidate its efforts to create world-class education in Chile. Along CORFO' s intention totransform Chilean engineering schools towards national competitiveness and productivity, UC-Engineering had already
engineering degrees and reported thatunderrepresented ethnic minorities held 12.6% of B.S. degrees, 7.9% of M.S. and 4.6% of thePh.D.'s, and less than 10% of the faculty positions. Similarly, although women held 18.4% ofthe B.S degrees and 22% of the Ph.D.'s; only 13% of the faculty was women; of which only8.7% held the rank of full professor.19 Studies have also shown that the gap between male andfemale faculty was narrower in early career and widens significantly by 15 years after theirPh.D.18 Underrepresented minorities, both ethnic and gender based, need to comprise at least15% of academia before they can influence the culture and agenda.7The Computing Research Association for Women (CRA-W) has several mentoring programs forwomen in computer
Navigation,” U.S. Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-4462, May, 2008.5. Tanner, H.G. and Christodoulakis, D.K., “Decentralized Cooperative Control of Heterogeneous Vehicle Groups,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 55, No. 11, pp. 811-823, 2007.6. Fechheimer, M., Webber, K., Kleiber, P. B., “How Well Do Undergraduate Research Programs Promote Engagement and Success of Students?,” CBE Life Sciences Education, Sundberg, MD, 2011.7. Anderson, N., Hagenauer, B., Erickson, R., and Bhandari, S., “Flight Testing of a UAV Airplane for Autonomous Operation using Piccolo II Autopilot,” Proceedings of AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Honolulu, HI, 18-21 August 2008.8. Bhandari, S., Pernalete, N., Bettadapura, A
Wednesday Work on projects Work on projects 7/23 Mr. Luis Portilla - Rheem Mfg Thursday Work on projects Plant 7/24 @ 3:30 PM Friday Ms. Rosa E. Trevino @ 1:30 USDA tour @ 10:00 AM 7/25 PM Monday Mr. Adrian Uresti - AEP Mr. Peter S. Davis – 7/28 @ 10:00 AM
selected from VECTERS as seedsof conversation among faculty members. Discourse about not only the strategy but the specificsof value, expectation, and cost, are anticipated to enrich dialogue. This type of deeper discussionwill hopefully aid instructors in developing introspection regarding their own beliefs andperceived obstacles of implementation.AcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge support of this work by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 1524527References 1. Branford, J. D., & Donovan, S. M. (2005). How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom. National AcademiesPress, Washington. 2. Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I
Paper ID #14976Transforming the Culture of Internship Experiences through Social LearningCommunitiesDr. Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida Dr. Lisa Massi is the Director of Operations Analysis for Accreditation, Assessment, & Data Adminis- tration in the College of Engineering & Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. She is Co-PI of two NSF-funded S-STEM grants and program evaluator for two NSF-funded REU programs. Her research interests include factors that impact student persistence and career development in the STEM fields.Ms. Jenna Christie-Tabron, University of Central Florida Ms
: Lessons Learned From Community College Transfer Scholarship Recipients AbstractWith funding from the National Science Foundation’s S-STEM grant program, the ECASE(Engaging the Community to Achieve Success in Engineering) Scholarship at Seattle PacificUniversity (SPU) has targeted transfer students from urban and rural community colleges in theregion. For the past nine years, this program has provided scholarship and other support funds toassist these transfer students in obtaining a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering.The goal of the ECASE Scholarship is to provide pathways for financially needy, academicallytalented transfer students to thrive in the university environment, enter the workforce as well-trained