vine andvegetation growth on the walls of a structure to conserve energy by providing shade andinsulation. Green roofs can be traced through history, even to the Hanging Gardens of Babylon,and create a beautiful and natural space.Perhaps the most desirable and marketable attribute of green roofs is that they conserve heatingand cooling energy. The vegetated layer not only protects the roof from wind, frost, andmechanical damage (almost doubling the expected roof life), but it also acts as an excellentinsulation layer. Green roofs keep houses cooler in the summer and warmer in the winter. Ascited on the “Livingroofs” website, a Nottingham Trent University research project found thatwith a mean daily temperature of 18.4° C, the temperature
vine andvegetation growth on the walls of a structure to conserve energy by providing shade andinsulation. Green roofs can be traced through history, even to the Hanging Gardens of Babylon,and create a beautiful and natural space.Perhaps the most desirable and marketable attribute of green roofs is that they conserve heatingand cooling energy. The vegetated layer not only protects the roof from wind, frost, andmechanical damage (almost doubling the expected roof life), but it also acts as an excellentinsulation layer. Green roofs keep houses cooler in the summer and warmer in the winter. Ascited on the “Livingroofs” website, a Nottingham Trent University research project found thatwith a mean daily temperature of 18.4° C, the temperature
coursework (final exam, exams, quizzes, homework etc.),only such measures are discussed.Data collectionDuring the data Collection phase, assessment tools are administered to and collected fromprogram constituencies, as shown in Figure 1. Table 2 summarizes the general types ofassessment tools defined for evaluating program outcomes. Such data is collected everysemester for CET courses.Several of current tools that are being used to assess outcomes and objectives require a rubric-based analysis of an activity (final exam, homework, report, presentation, term project etc.). Forthe purpose of this document, a rubric is defined as a scoring guide that specifies the skill orcategory being assessed with an associated numerical rating scale indicating the
compared to entering the job market with a high school diploma.Overview of Austin High School StudentsThe DREAM program originated at Stephen F. Austin High School where the authors hadalready developed collaborations with Rice University through tutoring in math and science andassistance with science fair projects. Austin High School (AHS) is a Title I school (as defined bythe United States Elementary and Secondary Education Act, for the purpose of distributingfunding to schools and school districts with a high percentage of students from low-incomefamilies) in the Houston Independent School District [10]. AHS is located in the largelyHispanic Second Ward of the city.In the 2007-2008 school year the total enrollment was 1,895 students with a
location where language would notbe a barrier was particularly critical if the students were to maximize benefits from the officeexperience. Secondly, London’s status as a major economic center, its reputation for culturaldiversity, the richness of its historic architectural works, and the large numbers of recently builtand in many cases highly acclaimed architectural projects, were among other factors thatinfluenced the selection. These factors were important considerations in meeting courseobjectives beyond those related to the cooperative education requirement.Course Structure:As previously noted, while a primary objective of the course was to provide a curricular parallelto the college cooperative education requirement, other activities
engineering design to teach content, more typicallyidentified methods of engineering integration in curriculum are: teaching engineering separatelyfrom science and math as a stand-alone course, i.e. Project Lead the Way (Katehi et al., 2009);using engineering as a culminating activity to use physics science concepts (Roehrig & Moore J.,2012); using engineering design to set up a context that can be typically solved by tinkering, notrequiring new science content (Dare et al., 2014; Katehi et al., 2009; Roehrig & Moore J., 2012);engineering instruction devoid of experiment, where testing is not systematic, or allowingtinkering or trial and error to suffice in solving the problem (Dare et al., 2014); and teachingengineering concepts instead of
reforms that help to realize the democratic possibilities of engineering.The language of peace in these reform proposals prioritizes engineers’ social responsibilities tothe safety, health, and welfare of humans and the Earth over that of war and corporate profit.21 22This approach includes everything from practical advice on career paths and how to declineworking on ethically dubious projects, to more structural critiques of engineering firms’relationships to state violence. One of the most influential efforts to scale the language of peaceinto engineering education and profession is George Catalano’s 2004 proposition to modify theABET Criterion 3, which deals primarily with student learning outcomes such as “ability todesign and conduct
to develop criterion-referenced tests. Thesemeasure the learners’ accomplishment of the objectives using absolute (not relative) standards ofachievement. These might include homework, quizzes, design problems, final exam, oralpresentations, group exercises, laboratory exercises, or project deliverables. This step makessense when considering how one will measure whether the course objectives have been attained.The measures chosen should best relate to the cognitive level the objectives are attempting toachieve. Lower cognitive level tasks requiring recitation, comprehension, or application caneasily be measured with a quiz or test. Higher cognitive level tasks requiring analysis, design orevaluation may necessitate a lab report, design
learn from prior coursework or project-based experiences inboth individual and team settings7-12. Recently, Sepp et. al12 reviewed the role of reflection inengineering education as detailed in ASEE conference proceedings. The most prevalent types ofreflection activities used in engineering education are essays and portfolios12. The reflectionexercises described here involve essay assignments that ask students to reflect on their priorexperiences regarding a variety of non-technical skills. The prior experiences are not restricted toany specific course or project context and may be from students’ personal or academicbackgrounds.The aims of the self-reflection assignments are to promote student awareness of non-technicalskills, motivate students
TQFP package, but it would also reduce time required in class, and this trade-off should be considered. Two boards were designed at Oregon Institute of Technology. The Sidewinder was designedto be a low-cost replacement for an aging Digital Logic I course. The OwlBoard was designedto be a board that students build in class. The experiences encountered while developing andusing these boards are documented in the following sections.4.2 Sidewinder: Board designed for outside manufacturing This board was originally designed by a student, Dustin Henderson, as part of a indepen-dent study project in PCB design. It was then modified for manufacturing. With all of the troubles encountered when shipping the Sidewinder design
Paper ID #20271Engineering Technology Education in the United States: Findings and Rec-ommendations from an NAE StudyMr. Greg Pearson, National Academy of Engineering Greg Pearson is a Scholar with the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) in Washington, D.C. Greg currently serves as the responsible staff officer for the NSF-funded project ”The Status, Role, and Needs of Engineering Technology Education in the United States.” He is also study director for the Chevron-funded project, Guiding Implementation of K-12 Engineering in the United States. He was the study director for the NAE and National Research Council project
throughout their on-boarding and (2) educational cultures that impact the professional formation of engi- neers, which was funded by the National Science Foundation. Both projects have been published in the Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education. He has also served as a series editor, contributed to trade publications, and facilitated workshops related to higher education administrators’ work experiences. Sean is also actively engaged within mentoring activities, and has served as an advisor to multiple student leadership organizations including Beta Theta Pi, which he has received both campus and international awards for his service and mentoring to the Purdue chapter.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue
research questions driving this project are “What are the research supports neededby CEE researchers during the whole research lifecycle?” and “What can academic libraries do toimprove services to meet these needs?” We specifically focus on the faculty members who areconducting research in the Civil and Environmental Engineering field at a private university. Thisresearch is part of a larger series of studies coordinated by Ithaka S+R1 on the research supportneeds of scholars by discipline.This study used a grounded theory guided approach consisting of the initial and focused codingsteps. Grounded theory is defined by Corbin and Strauss [10] as “a specific methodologydeveloped by Glaser, Strauss and Strutzel [11] for the purpose of building theory
pictorial representation of the system; 4) listingcritical assumptions; 5) using assumptions to reduce model complexity; 6) creating amathematical representation; 7) implementing a computational solution; 8) interpreting theresults of the computational solution; 9) conducting a sensitivity analysis; and 10) describinglessons learned from the modeling exercise. A unique aspect of this course was the integration ofDiplomacy Lab from the US Department of State as the subject material for term-length projects,including: 1) using the internet of things to assess threats from dirty bombs; 2) usingepidemiology to assess threats from outbreaks of communicable disease arising from populationsof co-located prisoners; or 3) using actuarial science to assess
Group since 2010, working on a longitudinal study of over 200 graduate students in the life sciences.Her major research project, the National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded ”FIRSTS (Foundation for Increasing and Retaining STEM Students) Program: A Bridge Program to Study the Development of Science Identities,” examines mentoring relationships, identity development, and the role of outside-of-college commitments in persistence among students coming to STEM majors with limited financial support.Dr. Christopher Wagner, The College of New Jersey Dr. Wagner is currently Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ), where he has taught students at all levels of the curriculum
marketing. He received a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from UC Santa Barbara, studying with the inventor of the blue and white LED, and an MBA from the University of South Carolina, Moore School of Business.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with
: Barbara helps teams generate creative environments. Companies that she has worked with renew their commitment to expanding paths from creativity to innovation. She also helps individuals answer challenging questions when she teaches some of her methods to engineering, design, business, medicine, and law students. Barbara sometimes uses her storytelling methods as a form, and storytelling as rapid prototyping to help student and industry leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to delivery. Barbara also uses story as a projective prompt in her experiments. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Challenge Me, Disagree with Me: Why
environments in different ways thantheir male peers altering their continued interest in computer science.Personal FactorsPersonal factors such as motivation, sense of belonging, personal fulfillment, and identity caninfluence persistence to degree. Research shows that while these personal factors are unique toeach student, educational environments can be structured or altered to influence some personalattributes in ways that positively impact retention.Motivation can impact how students face and persevere through challenging concepts and coursework. Research using project based computer game development has shown that assignmentscan be structured to facilitate student motivation and encourage them to work through difficultmaterial [13]. Motivational
. Randy Russell. He provides expertise in Out of School Time (OST) programming with student supports and STEM education. Ristvey coordinates each of the teams and lead the design team as well as the work of the advisory board. He has conducted extensive research and development work in STEM OST projects such as Cosmic Chemistry (Institute for Educational Sciences, Department of Education) and NanoExperiences. Ristvey was the PI for three NSF-funded projects: NanoLeap, NanoTeach and NanoExperiences. He also was the lead developer for the Dynamic Design series of engineering modules for NASA’s Genesis mission. He holds a Master’s degree in Secondary Science Education from University of Houston, Clear Lake, TX.Dr. Randy
think-aloud findings24, and resulted in 62 key heuristics articulated aspotential directions for instructional change in instructional settings for organizations. Anexample of an instructional heuristic in this study is negotiate the scope of the project with theclient and create a statement of work upfront, emphasizing the importance of consensus aboutthe expectations of the work ahead of its implementation. However, determining which heuristicswere actually used in practice was beyond the scope of this study.Other studies of instructional design practices show common approaches, with varying researchmethods across a variety of settings and in a variety of instructional design tasks. Visscher-Voerman26 extracted 16 principles demonstrated by
Paper ID #26385How Educators Implement Engineering Curricula in OST Settings (Funda-mental)Dr. Nena E. Bloom, Northern Arizona University Dr. Nena Bloom is an evaluator and education researcher at the Center for Science Teaching and Learning at Northern Arizona University. The primary area of her work is evaluating STEM education projects that focus on opportunities for, and retention of, K-20 students in STEM areas, majors and fields. She also conducts education research focusing on questions about professional development for educators and how educators support student learning in STEM.Dr. Elisabeth Roberts, Northern
period at NYU, Dr. Rahman served as the lead robotics instructor for the Center for K-12 STEM education, and leaded the implementation of a large NSF-funded project entitled “DR K-12: Teaching STEM with Robotics: Design, Development, and Testing of a Research-based Professional Development Program for Teachers”. During that time, Dr. Rahman received license from the New York City Department of Education to conduct robot-based K- 12 STEM education research in different public schools across New York City, trained about 100 public school math and science teachers for robot-based K-12 STEM education, and reached more than 1000 K-12 students across New York City. He then worked as an assistant professor of mechanical
practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Principlist Approach for Framing Conversations with Diverse Stakeholders About Engineering PracticeAbstractA recent report from the National Academies of Science and Engineering with the Institute ofMedicine highlights an emerging shift in thinking about the process of technology development.The report, commissioned by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, focused newattention on the conversation about social contexts and impacts of engineering, particularly thedesigning and implementation of new technologies. This report suggested a need for changes inthe content of the conversation about social impacts of engineering
promising young science and engineering graduate studentsfinancial support and stipend for three years of their graduate studies. The GRFP requires twowritten documents as a part of the application package, one of which is a research statement bywhich students propose their intended graduate research project. The criteria by which thewritten documents are assessed are by the intellectual merit of the project—or the potential of theproject to “advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across differentfields”, and broader impacts—“the potential of the project to benefit society and contribute to theachievement of specific, desired societal outcomes”1. The fellowship program is open to U.S.citizens or permanent residents in their
modeling with experiment), and on thedesign objectives of the data acquisition system and their effects on student learning. Inparticular, we discuss the data logger used for the final student field project, its history, designobjectives, and the effects on student outcomes.BackgroundIn experimental work, it is important to record and store measurements. In the past, this has beendone by manually reading measurement values from various instrumentation. These values, andthe times at which the data were taken, were recorded in ink in a paper laboratory notebook.Rough plots of data were often sketched by hand in these notebooks, or were mechanicallyplotted using strip chart recorders. The advent of the microcontroller led to sampling anddigitizing of
. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Oregon State University Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She is currently participating in a project that supports the use of evidence-based instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses through developing communities of practice. Her research interests focus on understanding how organizational change occurs in higher education with respect to teaching and learning in STEM courses.Ms. Christina Smith, Oregon State University Christina Smith is a graduate student in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineer- ing at Oregon State University. She received her B.S. from the University of Utah in chemical engineering
Paper ID #14457Redesigning Computer Engineering Gateway Courses Using a Novel Reme-diation HierarchyProf. Ronald F. DeMara, University of Central Florida Ronald F. DeMara is a Professor in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) with 23 years of university-level faculty experience in Electrical and Computer Engineering disciplines. He has completed 180+ technical and educational publications, 34 funded projects as PI/Co-I, and established two research laboratories. He serves as the Computer Engineering Program Coordinator, the founding Director of the Evaluation and Proficiency Center (EPC) in CECS, and
, she worked on facility design projects involving mechanical systems that included heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and energy conservation systems, as well as R&D of air conditioning equipment for Navy ships. Additional research interests include the investigation of relationships among components of the indoor environment, occupants, and energy usage. Specifically, the effects of the indoor environment on occupant health and well-being and in parallel, how socially-mediated energy-saving strategies can increase awareness of energy use and/or increase energy saving behaviors.Dr. Jeffrey G. Soper, Montreux School of BusinessDr. Donald H. Horner Jr., Jacksonville University
and partnerships.Mr. Victor Manuel Camara-Poot, Yucat´an Ministry of Education Camara-Poot is Head of Planning and Strategic Projects at the Department of Higher Education in the Ministry of Education, Government of the State of Yucat´an. For six years he has worked in the field of higher education, first with projects within universities, and then with the government, to develop programs and policies at the state level. He seeks to boost the development of human capital in the region and increase the knowledge of science and technology. He has been part of teams that are working on ways to increase opportunities for young Yucat´an and Mexican students to have international experiences, ranging from short stays to
andrelationship of individual course components in the inverted model (recorded lecture videos,concept quizzes, problem sets, laboratory exercises, and design projects) are presented. Impactson faculty planning and preparation are discussed. A review of the changes made between eachsuccessive course offering based on lessons learned is also provided.In addition to the authors’ (faculty) perspective, the students’ perspective is also addressed basedon the results of extensive end-of-the-semester surveys asking students for feedback on theinverted model. Student responses to numerous multiple choice “rating” questions about courseformat and course components are provided. Student performance is also addressed through abroad comparison of examination grades