demonstrate to students that their education is the process of buildingan integrated knowledge base that will ultimately prepare them for applying that knowledge intheir career.Bibliography1. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience,andschool. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (1999)..2. Schwartz, D. L., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J. D. Software for managing complex learning: Examplesfrom an educational psychology course. Educational Technology Research and Development,47(2): 39-59,1999.Every reference must be listed and numbered.3. Watai, L. L., Brodersen, A. J., & Brophy, S. Challenge-based Lab Instruction Improves Interaction in PhysicalElectronic Circuit Labs, 2005
) s = standard deviationEffect size is generally used in studies which employ a well-defined control group forcomparison with the experimental group. In such cases, the standard deviation of the controlgroup is used. Boud’s recommendation for studies which compare student to instructorassessment is to use the standard deviation of the instructors assessment.This statistic is useful in determining how well the students’ self-assessment reflects theperformance of the class as a whole. A value of zero indicates perfect agreement, while apositive value indicates that the students overestimate their proficiency. Boud suggests thatvalues of 0.2 are considered small, values of 0.8 are considered large.A correlation coefficient can be used to
. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 2002, pp. 7Ι2-7'393. Zheng, J. L., Saunders, K. P., Shelley II, M. C., & Whalen, D. F. (2002). Predictors of academic success for freshmen residence hall students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(2), 267-283.4. Takahira, S., Goodings, D., and Byrnes, B., “Retention and Performance of Male and Female Engineering Students: An Examination of Academic and Environmental Variables,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 88, 1998, pp. 297-304.5. Ohland, Matthew W., Sharon A.Frillaman, Guili Zhang, Catherine E. Brawner, and Thomas K. Miller. “The Effect of an Entrepreneurship Program on GPA and Retention.” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct. 2004, pp. 293-301.6. French, B
of Massachusetts designed to increasestudent interest and teacher preparation in STEM subjects. Those STEM Fellows whowished to receive 3 graduate credits (45 hours) were required to attend 2 additional daysin the summer and were required to design and field-test a written lesson plan and thenshare the experience using the lesson with the other STEM Fellows.Objectives of Content InstitutesTeacher-participants would be able to • explain the science, technology, engineering and/or mathematical topics listed in the Topical Syllabus included in the Appendix; • demonstrate the application of the topics to Alternative energy systems; • specify which standard(s) of the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks for Science and Technology
skills of engineering students. Since itscreation in the 1950’s, Bloom’s Taxonomy has been widely studied and accepted as the standardevaluation tool. By using Bloom’s Taxonomy, people not associated with engineering educationcan identify with this multi-disciplinary project and its objectives. Bloom’s Taxonomy forms thebasis for the development of assessment rubrics used as evaluation tools. The assessment evaluation is independent of problem grading. The class grade is basedon the instructor’s objectives, while the cognitive assessment is based on rubrics independent ofthe numerical solution. It was never Bloom’s idea to have his taxonomy used to provide coursegrades. A participating student may demonstrate a high level of critical
Page 13.756.4Figur e 2. Setting for integr ated lectur e and labor ator y in the same r oom Page 13.756.5Figur e 3. NI ELVIS wor kstation vs tr aditional set of instr uments. Same cir cuit is used on each pr ototyping boar d and same gr aph appear s on both oscilloscopes Figur e 4. Bode plots obtained with the ELVIS softwar e for the RCL filter cir cuit being Page 13.756.6 tested Figur e 5. Students wor king on lab pr actice on individual ELVIS wor kstationsThis initial experience with a small group of five
duration, itis not anticipated that any Survey course will fill the entire matrix, but it would be expected thatno row will be entirely blank – if it is, then it will not likely qualify as a good Survey course.Meanwhile, a column could be blank if a technology topic area is not covered due to time limits,but a good Survey will likely cover most of these technology areas.Technological Literacy Focus Courses will go into great depth within one or more technologytopic areas (see Figure 2b) with a higher percentage of C and D values in that column(s) whencompared to a Tech Lit Survey Course.Technological Literacy Design Courses and Critique, Assess, Reflect, or Connect (CARC)Courses will cover these respective rows in the matrix for one or more of the
shows the title of 13 projects and the changes of CTQs. 6 teams (Team 2,4,5,6,7and 9) improve their CTQ greatly than what they have targeted. Table 3. Results of the group projects Page 13.1174.7 Figure 3. A result of the group project (Team 9)For example, team 9’s project—'Reassignment of the copy room'— is one out of the projectsthat reaches the goal. Students measured how long it takes to make a copy. The objective is toreduce that time. The solution is replacing the copy room. As the result of this project, they savethe process time up to about 45
AC 2008-1816: AN INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS COURSE: MAKINGCONCRETE STAND UP TO THE TASKDavid Cottrell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte DR. DAVID S. COTTRELL is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1978 and retired in 2000 after more than 22 years of service with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Studies at Texas A&M University resulted in an MS Degree in Civil Engineering in 1987 and a PhD in 1995. He is a registered Professional Engineer and has taught courses in statics, dynamics, mechanics of materials, graphic communications, engineering economy, and
student math and science performance has beento use inquiry learning for promoting teachers’ deep understanding of foundational STEM(science, technology, engineering, and math) concepts and the processes and the connectionsbetween them. Research shows that STEM teachers in U. S. schools lack content knowledge andmastery of subject-related pedagogy that enables them to teach content most effectively1. Theyalso lack a sense of the connections among concepts that reveal mathematics as an internallylogical and coherent system of knowledge2. This forces teachers to use lectures to deliver Page 13.241.3content, which emphasizes procedure over engagement
Toughness Vs Strength Plot from Ashby et al (2007) Page 13.869.8 •REFERENCESAshby, M. F. (2005), Material Selection in Mechanical Design, 3rd Edition, Elsevier ButterworthHeinemann, Burlington, MAAshby, M. F., Shercliff, H., and Cebon, D. (2007) Materials: Engineering, Science, Processing andDesign, 1st Edition, Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, Burlington, MAGranta Design (2007) CES EduPack , Cambridge, UK.Irwin, G. R. (1963), “Fracture of Pressure Vessels,” in Materials for Missiles and Spacecraft, McGrawHill, New York, pp. 204-229.Kitagawa , H. and Takahashi, S (1976),” Applicability of fracture mechanics to very small cracks or thecracks in the early stage,”. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Mechanical Behavior ofMaterials
project in effect between 2003 and 2006that primarily relied on anecdotal evidence of success. This project was extremely effective in creatingsixteen NCJETS (North Carolina Junior Engineering and Technology Society) high school clubs in sevencounties of the Central Piedmont region of North Carolina. Clubs were established with a math, science ortech ed teacher (or teachers) serving as club sponsor(s) and were encouraged to develop individualidentities that best served their populations. DiET also established the basis for annual competitions heldon the UNC-Charlotte campus, as well as offering high school summer camps through the UNC-Charlottesummer programs office.Phase II of this effort, Enhancing Diversity in Engineering Technology (NSF
present some of the empirical observationshere: 1. Inherent Social Constraints: The Jordanian women were affected with all the inherited social constraints that may deviate their thinking from getting involved in certain activities. Some of these activities do not welcome women. For instance, attitude tests in the 1970’s demonstrated that social implications and social responsibility issues have a significant effect on girls’ choices, but little on boys’1. This is in spite of the fact that studies indicated that men and women are attracted to the engineering profession for similar reasons, including ability in mathematics and science, career opportunities, challenge, and good salary prospects. 2. Cultural
“innovativeness”. Themeaning of these terms is rarely (one might even venture to say “if ever”) defined ahead of time,leading us to wonder: exactly what expectations are the students being asked to meet with regardto creativity, and what rubric(s) are their instructors using to assess them? Without a betterframework for defining creativity (in design and elsewhere), instructors cannot evaluate theirstudents accurately and objectively or guide them towards improved performance.Sorting Things Out: Problem Solving and the Distinction between Level and StyleTo help resolve this dilemma, we turn to Kirton’s Adaption-Innovation (A-I) theory12, a well-established branch of problem solving theory that offers rigorous definitions and cleardistinctions between
]. However, NSF has had only limited success in reaching deeply within all elements of theUS population and across the diversity of institutions of higher education.Although the overall percentage of STEM workers compared to the general employed populationincreased from 4.4% in 1983 to a high of 5.6% in 2001 [4] and the STEM labor force grew fasterthan the general workforce in the second half of the 20th century [5], approximately one quarterof Science and Engineering (S & E) degree recipients and 40% of those with Ph.D. degrees in S& E fields are approaching retirement age [5]. As the overall number of STEM jobs is expectedto increase over the next five years [5], it is imperative to recruit and retain enough students inthe STEM fields to
, p. 96.5. Bloom, B. S. 1984. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Pearson Education.6. Champion, R. 2002 Taking Measure: Choose the right data for the job. Journal of Staff Development, 23(3).7. Heron, J., 2000, “Co-operative inquiry: research with rather than on people,” in P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, London: Sage.8. Honey, P., Mumford, A., 1982, “Manual of Learning Styles,” London: P. Honey.9. Jensen, E., 2000, Brain-Based Learning. San Diego: Brain Store Incorporated.10. Laurillard, D., 2001, “Rethinking University Teaching,” 2nd ed., London: Taylor & Francis.11. Meyers, K., S. Bert, 2007, “A Technique for Program-Wide Direct Assessment of
Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE, Portland (2005).2. Wilhelm, L., Puckett, K., Beisser, S., Wishart, W., Merideth, E., and Sivakumaran, T., Lessons learned from the implementation of electronic portfolios at three universities, TechTrends 50, 62 (2006).3. Brumm, T. J., Ellertson, A., and Mickelson, S. K., Using ePortfolios to develop and assess ABET-aligned competencies, in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, ASEE, Nashville Tennessee, (2003).4. Brodeur.D.R., Using Portfolios for Exit Assessment in Engineering Programs, in 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, ASEE/FIE, Boston (2002).5. Challis, D., Towards a mature eportfolio: Some implications for higher education, Canadian Journal of
SD BayStack 650 Wir eles s Ac ces s Point BayStack 650 Wir eles s Ac ces s Point Bay Networks Bay Networks Figure 1. Polycom network and Ethernet network system, and Wide Area Network among Servers
AC 2008-1442: SOME INTERESTING ENGINEERING PROBLEMS WITHOBJECTS OF SIMPLE GEOMETRY AND RELATIVELY COMPLEXMATHEMATICAL FORMULATIONB. Sridhara, Middle Tennessee State University Dr. B. S. Sridhara is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Studies at Middle Tennessee State University. He received his B.S.M.E. and M.S.M.E. degrees from Bangalore University and Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. He received his M.S.M.E. and Ph. D. degrees from Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, and Auburn University, Alabama. Dr. Sridhara has published several peer-reviewed articles in the areas of Acoustics, Vibration, finite element methods, and
environment).CurriculumAs in any academic program, the development of a cohesive curriculum is important, particularlywhen the program extends across departments, learning environments and academic institutions.The perspective of the community college on curriculum and the transferability of courses can bequite different from that of the 4-year institution. During the process of developing anarticulation agreement, it is not unusual for the community college to ask for a number of corepre-engineering courses (e.g., calculus, physics, chemistry, Engineering Design) that thecommunity college student could use to transfer into the engineering (and computer science)program/s at the 4-year institution. These core courses are selected so as to reflect the
K-12 and Outreach Issues C. Curriculum Reform and Evaluation Issues D. Outside Resources and Influences E. Research Topics and IssuesThus, some consensus of topics could be construed. It should be noted that there is no guaranteethat 100% of all thoughts and comments were captured from the twelve Section YOD events. Table 2: Topics Discussed at the Section YOD Panels E S G P P N S N Il/ NM M R T Total Cate- Topic
AC 2008-1667: IFOUNDRY: ENGINEERING CURRICULUM REFORM WITHOUTTEARSDavid Goldberg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign David E. Goldberg is Jerry S. Dobrovolny Distinguished Professor in Entrepreneurial Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Andreas Cangellaris, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Andreas C. Cangellaris is M. E. Van Valkenburg Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Michael Loui, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Michael Loui is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Raymond Price, University of Illinois at Urbana
anundergraduate electronics engineering technology class in which case studies are utilized.Examples of the cases used, their sources, and the method used to incorporate these cases intoclassroom teaching and learning are provided. In addition, students’ comments on the benefitsassociated with the use of cases as a learning tool will be provided and a general summary of thecomments will be presented.Developing Cases for Use in the Engineering ClassroomA case is a narrative account of a situation, problem or decision usually derived from actualexperience. Cases are often a reflection of real world situation and issues which decision makers,such as managers and engineers encounter in formulating plans aimed at finding solutions to agiven problem(s) 6. In
America Modern,” Wiley (1996).9. Bloomfield, L., How Things Work: The Physics of Everyday Life, 2nd Edition (Wiley, New York, 2001).10. Bloomfield, L., Explaining the Physics of Everyday Life. University of Virginia. 11. Carlson, W. Bernard, “Technological Literacy And Empowerment: Exemplars From The History Of Technology,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2006). American Society for Engineering Education. .12. Converging Technologies at Union College, Union College, .13. Daniels, S., M. Collura, B. Aliane, J. Nocito-Gobel, “Project-Based Introduction to Engineering – Course Assessment, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
, SecondReiff Implementation: http://www.manuelglasl.de/index.php?article_id=1/.[8] Virtual Chemistry at the Brigham Young University: http://chemlab.byu.edu/Tour.php.[9] Freitas, S. D., (2006), “Learning in immersive worlds: a review of game-based learning”, Prepared for the JISC e-Learning Program.[10] Wang, G. G., “Bringing games into the classroom in teaching quality control”, Online document at: http://www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/engineering/mech_and_ind/prof/wang/index_files/Game-8-25-03.pdf.[11] “Source” game engine: http://www.valvesoftware.com/.[12] Arango, F., Chang, C., Esche, S. K. & Chassapis, C., (2007), “A scenario for collaborative learning in virtual engineering laboratories”, Proceedings of the 37th ASEE/IEEE
J. Turner, "Growing a Garden Without Water: Graduate Teaching Assistants in Introductory Science Laboratories at a Doctoral/Research University," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 41, pp. 211-233, 2004.[2] E. Seymour, Partners in Innovation: Teaching Assistants in College Science Courses. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.[3] D. M. Shannon, D. J. Twale, and M. S. Moore, "TA Teaching Effectiveness: The Impact of Training and Teaching Experience," Journal of Higher Education, vol. 69, pp. 440-466, 1998.[4] D. A. Torvi, "Engineering Graduate Teaching Assistant Instructional Programs: Training Tomorrow’s Faculty Members," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 83, pp. 1-6, 1994.[5
rapid understanding of this tool in the academic Page 13.576.8environment. This will lead to enhancing not only the students’ teaming experience but theengineering learning environment.References 1. “Engineering Education for a Changing World,” Report prepared by the ASEE Engineering Deans' Council and Corporate Roundtable, Washington,D.C., ASEE, 1994. 2. ASTD, "Workplace Basics: The Skills Employers Want," American Society for Training and Development and U. S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, 1988. 3. Evans, D. L., G. C. Beakley, P. E. Crouch, and G. T. Yamaguchi, "Attributes of Engineering
: How responsive has the engineering curriculum and accreditation requirements been to cultural and societal changes?Authors investigate the conditions of three time periods namely: 1800’s to pre-world war II(apprentice, vocational focused), World War II to 2000 (engineering Sciences focused), and2000 to present (outcome focused). The guiding questions that helped answer the main researchquestion are the following: • What experiences did a typical student have prior to entering an engineering program in each time period? • What were the accreditation requirements during each of the time periods? • What was a typical curriculum within each of the time periods?Findings from this effort will provide recommendations to
they generallycompleted two items at the same time, they were asked to give them the same rank number.There were 19 different strategies used to complete the textbook material. Analyzing the order inwhich students completed the activities, the top three strategies were:1. Watched the voiced-over PowerPoint(s), read and reviewed the chapter(s), and then completed the WebCT Vista assessment (30%).2. Read and reviewed the chapter(s) and then completed the WebCT Vista assessment (11%).3. Read the chapter(s), watched the voiced-over PowerPoints, and then completed the WebCT Vista assessment (7%). Page 13.602.8Students completed the solid modeling
Page 13.14.3assessment tool that would have value to the community as well as the academicpartner. In doing so, it will focus upon the tools that are of value to the teacherand overall service learning program more than the students and it will also seekout the types of questions and answers that serve the clients’ needs.Literature Review: Service Learning as PedagogyService Learning charts a relatively new avenue in pedagogical research. It hasonly seen a surge in research activity since the 1990’s 3, so it suffers from ashortage of literature steeped in the discipline. Even leaner is the amount ofmaterial that addresses client satisfaction or community partner assessmentstrategies related to service learning projects.It is best to begin with