(SHPE) conferences.This paper presents both quantitative and qualitative obtained from the 2013-2017 abroadprograms. The quantitative data was collected in the form of pre and post self-assessmentsurveys and institutional retention and transfer data. In the self-assessment surveys, studentsrated their industry skills, civic engagement, global cultural skills, personal and academicgrowth, and engineering skills based on Purdue University’s Engineering Projects in CommunityService (EPICS) Program with a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale. There was an overallaverage increase from 6.84 to 8.80, resulting in a 28.7% increase in the students’ perceived skillset. The retention and the transfer rates of the abroad students were compared to a
growing,dynamic, and economically instrumental industry sectors in the world. In response, manycommunity colleges and undergraduate-serving institutions have established technicianeducation programs to prepare future workers to support AM vitality and innovation. However,in the rush to couple market and training demands, stakeholders have not agreed upon adefinition of the field. Without a central notion of AM, the competencies and professionalidentities of AM workers are likewise unclear. In an effort to address this consensus gap, weundertook an extensive systematic review of AM definitions to chart of sector’s topography, inan effort to understand AM’s breadth and depth. The goals of this study were to: 1) define AM asperceived by policymakers
may haveimportant implications for student recruitment and retention.Introduction The establishment of undergraduate biomedical engineering (BME) programs in the late1960s makes it a relatively new educational option compared to traditional disciplines such asmechanical, electrical, or chemical engineering [1]–[3]. Despite slow growth through the 1990s,there has been a significant increase in the number of undergraduate BME programs and degreesconferred in recent years [1], [2], [4], [5]. Over that time, increasing numbers of BMEdepartments and educators have had to make important decisions regarding how best to educatestudents in this ever-evolving, interdisciplinary field. In perhaps the earliest report on BMEeducation, Harmon
Studies at Kansas State University beginning Fall 2019. Sean’s primary research interests exist at the intersec- tions of organizational communication, new media, gender, and organizing. Within engineering contexts, Sean has examined career issues within the engineering discipline regarding (1) new faculty experiences throughout their on-boarding and (2) educational cultures that impact the professional formation of engi- neers, which was funded by the National Science Foundation. Both projects have been published in the Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education. He has also served as a series editor, contributed to trade publications, and facilitated workshops related to higher education
from multi-cultures, in particular Chinese who have played a dominant role in several advanced technologies. Itis not hard to imagine that biased understanding could pollute collaboration and prevent constructivedialogues and consensus to be achieved, a critical step for global trade and technology governance. This paper urges the importance of re-examining and redesign the global engineering ethicseducation in the context of the US-China trade war. We are interested in how do the profession,identity, practices, and ethics of engineering differ or coincide in US and China? Are these 1 differences or similarities intrinsic or evolving
–they are global in nature. Certainly, they are also self-serving because they indicate that thecompany doing the advertisement can supply either services and/or software or hardware toimplement these (marvelous) applications of technology (they are for profit businesses after all!).Furthermore, many of these same technology companies have web sites specifically devoted to theInternet of Things. IBM touts its Internet of Things Foundation and a quick google search of“Microsoft IoT” or “Microsoft Windows 10 IoT” brings back a variety of web sites devoted toMicrosoft’s products or services that can be used with IoT applications (see screen shot - Figure1). Figure 1. Screen shot of Microsoft web site from google search of “Windows 10 IoT
knowledge about engineering, low self-efficacy, not identifying with the engineeringprofession, and poor academic performance. Literature states the attrition of engineering studentshas been connected to factors such as curricular requirements [1], lack of readiness related to studyand survival skills [2], loss of interest or disappointment in the field [3], poor academic and/orcareer advising [4], unapproachable faculty [4], and academic difficulty with mathematics [5].First-generation students are known to lack support from family [6] [9], lack academic preparation[7], have trouble transitioning into both the social and academic college environments [8], andhave greater financial concerns than non-first generation students [8]. URM students from
the course, reflection on factors that would encourage ordiscourage students from pursuing their projects, and employment status during and after thecourse. The results of the interviews were assessed through thematic content analysis. Theinterviews suggest that (1) that students do not continue with their projects because they cannottake time away from the paying jobs that are supporting their education, (2) that studentscompleting their junior year do not want to take time away from their senior-year studies, and(3) that students completing their senior year do not want to take the risk of pursuing a startupwhen they could instead obtain a “real” job. Additionally, student startups appear to have beendiscouraged by their expectation in the
how a women’s support group in a computer science and engineeringdepartment can provide support for women in personal growth, social encouragement, andacademic exposure.Studies found that the top four influencing factors for whether or not young women decide topursue a Computer Science degree are: social encouragement, self-perception, academicexposure, and career perception [1]. Social encouragement can come from parents, friends,faculty/staff, or peer. It is a major factor in girls’ decision to explore and pursue career in STEMand computing. A support group provides an excellent vehicle for these factors by offeringworkshops, social events, outreach activities, and mentoring.In 2013, we started a support group WiCSE (Women in Computer
Undergraduate Engineering Outreach 1MotivationWhen undergraduate engineering students participate in various forms of community outreachthrough an ambassador-style group, the mission is often to promote engineering and engineering-related careers to K-12 students and their families, and increase interest in engineering amonghistorically underserved populations. Yet, the preparation and delivery of outreach activities mayalso impact the undergraduate students. In this Work in Progress paper we present the earlyfindings of a project seeking to identify common practices among university-based, ambassadorprograms, with a view to informing communities of researchers and practitioners. We exploredthree questions [1]: (1) What similarities and differences are
individual, an individual can then use them(e.g., adopt or reject portions or the whole) as part of the process by which they develop an individualidentity as an engineer [6]. That identity can only exist through an individual’s (i.e., student’s) processof engagement, immersion, and assimilation into engineering [1]. While identity does have dimensionsof process, such as engineering degree programs, that process relies on epistemological boundaries andthe expressions of a cultural relationship via beliefs, practices, and language.Our study adds to an ongoing thread within engineering education: Understanding students’conceptualization of engineering, engineering work, and engineering concepts. Work in engineeringeducation seeks to align expert
and reliability at a possibly lower cost [2, 4].Wireless Sensor Network is an active area of research with various applications. Some of theapplications of WSNs includes homeland security, environmental monitoring, safety, health caresystem, monitoring of space assets for potential and human-made threats in space, ground-basedmonitoring of both land and water, intelligence gathering for defense, precision agriculture, ,civil structure monitoring, urban warfare, weather and climate analysis and prediction, battlefieldmonitoring and surveillance, exploration of the Solar System and beyond, monitoring of seismicacceleration, temperature, wind speed and GPS data [1, 4]. For each application area, there aredifferent technical issues that
identified from market research.I. Introduction"What is truly in the water I am drinking?" A rise in sales of water filters such as Brita or PUR,bottled water, and safer reusable drinking containers (e.g. BPA-free plastics) reflects this concernin drinking water, along with the recent Flint, Michigan water crisis that made headlines [1].However, there are still very few accurate and cost-effective ways to test water or beveragequality. To address this problem, an interdisciplinary team with students from the EngineeringTechnology, Anthropology, and Entomology departments tackled the problem of designing adevice that fit the needs of the market.II. Multidisciplinary team and educational benefitsThis project and team began from an offshoot of another
force. Above all, we emphasize the power of the individual voice in betterunderstanding the experiences of our students.Introduction and BackgroundConcerns about women’s experiences in both engineering classrooms and engineeringworkplaces have been prominent in the literature in recent decades, particularly because theproportion of women entering and persisting in the field plateaued in the 1990s at approximately20%, well below women’s representation in the population at large [1]. At the undergraduatelevel, research has shown that female students often report lower levels of self-efficacy thanmale students despite equal levels of competency, that female students can experience stereotypethreat, and that, despite some cultural shifts, micro
Instrumentation (anElectrical Engineering course) and Software Maintenance and Reengineering from ComputerSciences and Software Engineering department collaborated on five Internet of Things (IoT)projects. The collaboration has revealed both challenges and positive outcomes. This paperdescribes the collaboration, the students’ feedback and lessons learned. 1. IntroductionEngineering projects have become complex in the 20th century and require multiple teams fromdifferent disciplines to work collaboratively to solve problems. Collaboration betweenmultidisciplinary teams has become a standard in industries; however, educational curricula havebeen slow to adapt. Although most engineering programs have a capstone design course as a partof their curricula
to support engineering students in reflecting on experience, how to help engineering educators make effective teach- ing decisions, and the application of ideas from complexity science to the challenges of engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: Practice-Facing Equity Bifocals for University Makerspaces[I’m thinking about... ] Nasir’s work on achieving equity throughdiversity, “successful learning contexts also attend to students’ need fora sense of belonging and identification” through the organization of thepractice itself and the social interactions that occur [1]. How was thiscontext not a place where this student felt he could ask which machine hecould
learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WORK IN PROGRESS - The Development of Agency in a High-School Maker Class: Evidence from InterviewsThe Work-in-Progress Paper examines youth self-efficacy, as an aspect of youth agency, in thecontext of participation in maker education activities.There is growing interest in making and the “maker movement” as context for the developmentof both cognitive and affective factors related to engineering. Maker experiences can lead peoplegain interest in design and technology [1] and provide experiences that can foster thedevelopment of adaptive expertise [2]. Another hypothesized benefit of engagement in hands-on,do-it-yourself, or “maker
semester GPA and their cumulative graduating GPA. Theuse of grades and GPA as a proxy for academic success have been used widely in a large numberof studies, and this study focuses on documenting how students’ grades fluctuate with time andthe role this play in students’ persistence. We apply Ordinary Least Squares and Ordinal Logisticregressions to a longitudinal database to identify the characteristics of that population. Thispopulation is a subset of the database and included 52,946 engineering students from 14 U.S.universities. In the United States there has been an urge to improve the number of engineeringgraduates in preparedness and numbers for over a decade [1] [2] [3]. Furthermore, the Bureau ofLabor statistics projected increase
Engineering Education, 2019 1 Work In Progress (WIP): Development and Validation of the Ambassador QuestionnaireMotivation and BackgroundEach year, thousands of undergraduate engineering students engage in co-curricular outreachactivities using a common model known as ambassadorship, in which students are trained todesign and deliver presentations and hands-on activities to middle and high school students.Because the ambassadors’ mission is to promote diversity among the future STEM workforce,interactions focus on pro-social messages about engineering that appeal to young audiences andstudents from historically underrepresented groups. Ambassadors also
concurrent resilience scales. An exploratory factor analysis was performed toexamine the latent factors that underlie items on the instrument. The analysis demonstratedadequate reliability among the examined factors. Directions for future study are discussed.IntroductionResilience is an important psychological trait that generally describes an individuals’ ability topositively respond to adversity. Resilience is the ability to cope effectively in the face ofadversity in the bid to overcome a risk or stress factor. It is a desirable attribute that determineswhether an individual weathers an undesirable situation and goes on to succeed, or whether theyfail to persevere [1]. The Medical Research Council identify resilience as an important factor
States calling for improvements to K-12 STEMEducation have been prevalent in the past decade. Rising Above the Gathering Storm [1] initiatedthe current reforms calling for efforts to prepare more students for STEM careers in response tothe argument that the continued prosperity and progress in the global market place depend on ourability to prepare the future generation of STEM professionals. The President’s Council ofAdvisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) points to improvements in STEM education ascritical in responding to the workforce needs and challenges of the 21st century [2]. The numberof STEM jobs is growing three times faster than non-STEM jobs [3], [4] and this may result in ashortage of up to 1 million STEM workers in the United
proposed: The changes that are being proposed to the UD SoE’s P&Tdocument represent a significant departure from the current policy (School of EngineeringCriteria and Procedures Policy for Faculty Evaluation and Promotion and Tenure, adoptedSeptember 25, 2001, last approved on December 7, 2011). Although numerous changes arebeing proposed, the most substantial changes are in three areas: (1) Developing the document tobe formative, as well as evaluative where faculty members, with guidance and input from theirChair, and Department and School Faculty Development Committees create a ProfessionalStrategic Plan (PSP) that helps a faculty member plan their career trajectory and serves as theframework for which the faculty member will be evaluated
, feedback should be immediate2,3. We setout to increase the usefulness of instructor feedback by adding an oral report with discussion before thewritten report. The discussion portion is important. This is a time to go in depth with the studentsstarting from their level in the hierarchy of development of critical thinking with the aim to move themup one level by the time they write the written report. We noticed a shift in mean grade distribution ofthe first written report by approximately 2.5 points, as measured by 1 tailed student t-test of equalvariance (p<0.03), when the oral discussion period was added to the course.In this Scholarship of Teaching and Learning work, instructor time is shifted from grading rewrites tograding oral reports
data collectionexercises. The goal of the research presented here is to determine if an outdoor field laboratoryexercise that collects traffic engineering data can be translated to a VR environment using 360-degree videos.The paper presents the work being done to translate the experience of live field laboratoryexercises to a virtual reality environment through the use of 360-degree video.The research for the overall project can be broken into three major research objectives: 1. Develop a VR 360-degree video environment 2. Develop methodology to assess how the student learning experience changes between a live field exercise and a lab-based VR 360-degree video environment 3. Conduct an experiment to assess how the student learning
data literacy is becoming an increasingly important concern in higher education[1, 2]. For engineers, statistics is probably more aligned with the concept of information literacythan any other course that will be studied. While it may be going too far to say that the entiretyof an introductory statistics course is a vital component to every undergraduate engineeringprogram, it is probably safe to say that certain statistics topics are essential. For engineers,working with data and experimentation are just a fact of life. This fundamental realization,coupled with an opportunity stemming from recent changes to the university’s general educationprogram, has motivated us to begin a process to redesign an introductory statistics course thatresides
incidents investigated by the Chemical Safety and Hazard InvestigationBoard (CSB) [1]. The CSB is an independent federal agency that analyzes the root causes ofincidents that occur at industrial facilities and gives feedback to the regulation and enforcementagencies. These investigations are not a comprehensive list of incidents, but they do identify theroot causes that need to be addressed and indicate the need for process safety education.The ABET (the program accrediting organization) chemical engineering program criteria requiresafety hazards to be addressed in the chemical engineering curriculum. Incorporating chemicalprocess safety into the curriculum can been approached using two methods. The first is to createa new course. This approach
discussed regarding thenecessity for engineers who can work on multidisciplinary teams, produce engineering solutionsthat balance multiple perspectives, synthesize knowledge to solve complex problems, andcommunicate their ideas to diverse audiences [1]-[2]. More importantly, the Engineer of 2020report described the importance for engineers who can be open to “nonengineering disciplinessuch as science, social science, and business [2, p. 50].” This highlights the need to investigatehow students become aware of interdisciplinary engineering education as an option, as well as tounderstand the experiences of students who do not identify with the curriculum structures oftraditional engineering disciplines.Prior engineering education work has
materialThe proof of concept is being explored using Area Moments of Inertia and Products of Inertia.This paper presents the initial feedback from students and instructor and plans for the future.Introduction:The idea that hands-on models can improve learning is not new: Felder and Silverman famouslyincluded hands-on models as an example of an active teaching.[1] The notion that 3D printingcan make such opportunities more available is not new either.[2] As makerspaces become regularon-campus tools for students, educators have been trying to figure out how to bring thatcapability into the classroom.[3,4]I work principally with Statics in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at NCState University where my goal has been to increase the
approaches, and professionalism within design classes. Dr. Allen also serves as PI and director for an NSF-funded Multi-Scale Systems Bioengineering REU site at U.Va. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: A clinical immersion program for broad curricular impactProblem identification remains a significant challenge in the education of biomedical engineerssince access to clinics and clinicians is limited. A popular approach to overcoming this limitationis the clinical immersion experience [1]–[6], which fall under the umbrella of “high-impacteducational practices” – activities that have especially significant effects on learning
approaches to curricula in the first-year in engineering [1]. Someinstitutions admit students directly to their engineering discipline or major. Others focus on ageneral engineering curriculum before students select their engineering discipline or major [2].Research shows that engineering programs that require students participate in First-YearEngineering (FYE) programs have greater retention for engineering [3]. FYE programs providestudents opportunities to engage in mastery experiences related to engineering before committingto a specific engineering discipline. Participating in the mastery experiences provided throughthe FYE program should contribute to student motivation to persist in engineering. This workwill take a look at one FYE program