, pp. Session AC 2007-894.11 R. K. Yin, Case study research: Design and methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2014.12 J. J. Pembridge, "Mentoring in engineering capstone design courses: Beliefs and practices across disciplines," Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2011.13 M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2002.14 B. Lutz, C. Hixson, M. C. Paretti, A. Epstein, and J. Lesko, "Mentoring and facilitation in entrepreneurship education: Beliefs and practices," presented at the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, San Jose, CA, 2014.15 J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative
Mathematics (STEM) educational researcher with the Georgia Institute of Technology. His educational experience in the Atlanta area for the past twenty years includes high school mathematics teaching, Math/Science Magnet Program Director, Title I educational data specialist, and Associate Professor of Information Technology. As a former US Air Force electronics engineer, Doug was also an engineering project manager.Jason Freeman, Georgia Institute of Technology Jason Freeman is an Associate Professor of Music at Georgia Tech. His artistic practice and scholarly research focus on using technology to engage diverse audiences in collaborative, experimental, and ac- cessible musical experiences. He also develops educational
Scientific Report (Nature Publishing) and also serve as in editorial advisory board member for Molecular Pharmaceutics (ACS).Prof. Andrew Michael Smith, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Andrew M. Smith, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign (UIUC). Dr. Smith received a B.S. in Chemistry in 2002 and a Ph.D. in Bioengineering in 2008, both from the Georgia Institute of Technology. As a graduate student he was a Whitaker Foundation Fellow. He continued his postdoctoral studies at Emory University as a Distinguished CCNE Fellow and NIH K99 Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Smith’s research interests include nanomaterial engineering, single- molecule imaging, and
every semester, etc.For the EET 223-Digital Electronics, the author of this paper made changes only in the theoryclass, being assigned to teach this class only two times in the last three years. Changes in thiscourse are in work and they are coordinated by another instructor in the EET department. In thetheory course, more time was spent on sequential circuits and timing diagrams and less time onreviewing combinational circuits and the specific characteristics of combinational and sequentialcircuits from the 74HC xx and 74SNxx series.In the second part of the course, the electrical DC and AC characteristics of CMOS family werecovered, emphasizing concepts such as low power dissipation, noise margin, rise time, falltime, ground bounce, reading
diverse student population to pursue college and careers inSTEM-related disciplines.Program Components:The three key components of the Aerospace Academy program are: (i) Curriculum EnhancementActivities (CEA) – Hands-on, inquiry-based K-12 STEM curricula (ii) Aerospace EducationLaboratory (AEL) (iii) Family Connection (FC) – parental/guardian involvement and outreach.The program team developed curriculum enhancement activities (CEAs) by adopting a well-established Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) Advanced Career (AC) curriculum andNASA STEM curriculum with problem-based learning at its core and integrated 3D printingtechnology, sensor-based measurement systems, and mini Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)design activities to enhance authentic
circuits’ transient analysis, and monophasic AC circuits analysis.During the fall of 2012, the lead author became interested in testing the PI approach toimprove students’ comprehension of fundamental concepts of electric circuits. The samesemester, the lead author designed a quasi-experimental study for testing this hypothesis.Another instructor of this course agreed on using his two sections as a control group.Instead of using traditional instruction, the lead author implemented PI in his section, and itwas used as the experimental group. The translated DIRECT test was applied to bothgroups before and after the topic of DC circuits analysis was covered. In the data collectionstage, students were allowed 90 minutes to complete the DIRECT test
Environment, 32, 2010, pp. 66–87.13. E. Hunt, “The eco gender gap: why is saving the planet seen as women’s work?” The Guardian, Feb. 6, 2020, Retrieved from .14. J. A. Donnell, B. M. Aller, M. Alley, A. A. Kedrowicz, “Why industry says that engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says,” Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada, Paper AC-2011-1503, 2011. 11Appendix A: Data in Tabular Format Table A.1. Personality Type Data from the ASEE-MBIT Study and Our Study Personality Type Univ. of New Haven First-Year ASEE-MBTI Consortium – All Preference Students
she has worked for the University of Texas at Dallas, University of Texas at San Antonio, Rutgers University, and Politehnica University of Bucharest. She is a senior member of the IEEE, serves as associate editor for IEEE Communication Letters, and has served in the technical program committee for the IEEE ICC, WCNC, RWW, VTC, GLOBECOM, and CAMAD conferences.Dr. Murat Kuzlu, Old Dominion University Murat Kuzlu (Senior Member – IEEE) joined Old Dominion University (ODU) of Electrical Engineer- ing Technology Department as an Assistant Professor in 2018. He received his B.Sc., M.Sc., and Ph.D. degrees in Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering from Kocaeli University, Turkey, in 2001, 2004, and 2010
Tips for What Makes Cover Examples Way to Negotiate Acing Your a Great Letter for Follow Up and First Job Resume? (with Students + After an Counter a Interview Examples Quick Interview Job Offer and Tips) TipsAfter analyzing each SCALE University Partners’ professional development resources for eachtopic area, there were specific criteria and
]. While this paper is focused on minorities in construction, the existingliterature provides insight into what is currently collected and reported. As of 2010, there wereapproximately 1.5 million persons in U.S. engineering roles, and they identified as 72% White,1% two or more races, 4% Black, 17% Asian, and 5% Hispanic [19], as depicted in Figure 3.Hispanic persons were not identified separately in Figure 3 but are 13.5% Hispanic and 86.5%non-Hispanic [15]. Figure 3. Construction Manager Workforce by Race [15]United States Minority College DemographicMinorities represent a significant portion of the U.S. demographics. According to the U.S.Census Bureau [20], minorities (non-white alone) represent 41.1% of the population in
). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2023-2024/[2] ASEE ADRP. ASEE Diversity Recognition Program. Retrieved from https://diversityrecognition.asee.org/[3] N. N. Heilbronner, “Stepping onto the STEM pathway: Factors affecting talented students' declaration of STEM majors in college.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted, vol. 34, no.6, pp. 876- 899, 2011.[4] E. C. Kokkelenberg & E. Sinha, ‘Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students.” Economics of Education Review, vol. 29, pp. 935–946, 2010.[5] A. B. Hunter, “Why
feature allows students to learn at their own p ace, creating amore flexible and responsive learning experience.3 MethodologyThis research introduces a structured, multi-step framework tailored to enhance the learning experience ofundergraduate students studying NLP in Figure 1. The methodology combines theoretical instruction withinteractive tools, interdisciplinary case studies, and targeted applications in low-resource languages. Withdiverse teaching methods and innovative features, the framework addresses both the technical aspects andethical considerations inherent to NLP, aiming to give students a well-rounded understanding of the field.3.1 Research QuestionsA. What combination of theoretical and practical instruction best facilitates
Paper ID #27192 the editorial boards of The Journal of College Student Development, The Journal of Diversity in Higher Education and the College Student Affairs Journal. Recent work examines within group experiences of native and non-native Blacks in higher education as well as issues of campus racial climate. Dr. Fries- Britt is one of the faculty co-leads and authors of the recently published ACE report Speaking Truth and Acting With Integrity Confronting Challenges of Campus Racial Climate. Her research has been funded and supported by the Lumina Foundation, National Society of Black Physicists and the National Science Foundation.Dr. Darryll J. Pines, University of Maryland, College Park Darryll Pines became
initiative to ”Raise the c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21723 Bar” for entry into professional engineering practice. Dr. Lenox’s awards include ASCE’s ExCEEd Lead- ership Award, ASEE’s George K. Wadlin Award, ASCE’s William H. Wisely American Civil Engineer Award, and the CE News’ ”2010 Power List – 15 People Advancing the Civil Engineering Profession.” He is a Distinguished Member of ASCE and a Fellow of ASEE. In January 2014, Dr. Lenox retired from his staff position with ASCE. He continues to serve the engineering profession as an active member of ABET’s Board of
Inclusive Delivery Method for Course Content in Higher EducationAuthors: Vijesh J. Bhute*, Ellen L. Player, and Deesha ChadhaAffiliation: Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, SouthKensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK*Corresponding Author: Dr. Vijesh J. BhuteAddress: Room 1M17A, ACE Extension Building, Department of Chemical Engineering,Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UKEmail: v.bhute@imperial.ac.ukAbstractCourse books containing mathematical equations and images when delivered as physicalcopies, scanned ebooks or PDFs are not screen reader accessible. Current frameworks forclassification of learning resources assume ‘equal’ access and ‘uniform’ engagement
. Rose, “Accommodating Graduate Students with Disabilities,” Council of OntarioUniversities, Toronto, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.cags.ca/documents/highlites/AC-Working-Paper---Accommodating-Graduate-Students-with-Disabilities---May-2010-1.pdf[11] V. Farrar, “Equal to the task: Disability issues in postgraduate research study,” inTowards Inclusive Learning in Higher Education, 1st ed., M. Adams and S. Brown, Ed. London,England: Routledge, 2006, pp. 176-186, doi: 10.4324/9780203088623.[12] D. C. Appleby and K. M. Appleby, “Kisses of death in the graduate school applicationprocess,” Teach. Psychol., vol. 33, pp. 19–24, 2006, doi
seven Information Technology textbooks, over 100 peer reviewed journal articles and conference papers, and she gave numerous presen- tations at national and international professional events in USA, Canada, England, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Germany and Romania. She is the founder director of the Auburn University Educational and Assistive Technology Laboratory (LEAT), Co-PI of NSF EEC ”RFE Design and Development: Framing Engineering as Community Activism for Values-Driven Engineeringan”, Co-PI of NSF CISE ”EAGER: An Accessible Coding Curriculum for Engaging Underserved Students with Special Needs in Afterschool Programs”, institutional partner of AccessComputing (http://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/), Ac
engineering and science education for K – 12 students, as well as assess the learning outcomes of these programs. Post-graduation, Rebecca has continued to explore her interest in K-12 engineering education by participating in the ACE (Architecture, Construction and Engineering) Mentoring Program, during which she teaches high school students about the concepts of engineering and sustainability.Pamela L.B. Clark, PLB Clark Consulting LLC Consultant who works with local and national non-profits for grant writing, evaluation, and technical assistance. Board member of the National Foundation for Teen Safe Driving and NJ State Contact for Students Against Destructive Decisions (SADD). Twenty years of experience in program
Paper ID #13107Constructing ”calculus readiness”: Struggling for legitimacy in a diversity-promoting undergraduate engineering programKevin O’Connor, University of Colorado Boulder Kevin O’Connor is assistant professor of educational psychology. His scholarship focuses on human ac- tion, communication, and learning as socioculturally organized phenomena. One major strand of research has explored the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilemmas encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories
the Department of Civil Engineering at Daffodil International University in Dhaka, Bangladesh. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) and a Master of Science (M.Sc.) degree in civil engineering from the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). Currently, he is pursuing a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Civil Engineering at the University of Oklahoma (OU) in Norman, USA. In addition to his academic pursuits, he also serves as a graduate research assistant at OU. His research interests encompass diverse areas such as traffic incident analysis and prevention, traffic flow theory, autonomous connected electric shared (ACES) vehicles, big data analytics, network science, natural hazards, machine
experiences with the transition of our engineering technology programsto engineering programs, because we found very little guidance from the literature for either ac-crediting new programs [1-2] or transitioning from engineering technology to engineering [3].Therefore, we relied on anecdotal information through personal connections with acquaintances atprograms that either transitioned engineering technology programs to engineering programs oradded engineering programs to engineering technology programs and our own efforts. This paperbriefly explains the engineering technology programs’ history leading up to the transition to engi-neering programs. It then explains why we believed that transitioning to engineering programswas the right decision for
and entrepreneurialleader research [17, 22, 23, 28]. The storytelling cue methodology comes from the 1943 TAToriginally designed by Murray to diagnostically categorize unconscious images with a picturetest [10, 14, 15]. Notably, the TAT has been demonstrated as a valuable method for captur-ing underlying motives [10]. Applications for the workplace began when Atkinson [13] suc-cessfully used it to measure achievement motives. More recently, the TAT has been ac-claimed for validly testing compatibility and employee-workplace fit, productivity and lead-ership in the workplace [18, 20].The “cue storytelling line” prompt offers interpretations of actions, styles, narrative expres-sions, and symbols that provide useful data. Analysis of the story
institutional approach,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2011, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2010.518231.[5] J. Cowan, “Quality Assurance in European Engineering Education: Present and Future Challenges,” in Engineering Education Quality Assurance: A Global Perspective, A. S. Patil and P. J. Gray, Eds. Springer, 2009, pp. 29–40.[6] G. Augusti, “EUR-ACE: the European Accreditation system of engineering education and its global context,” in Engineering Education Quality Assurance: A Global Perspective, A. Patil and P. J. Gray, Eds. Springer, 2009, pp. 41–49.[7] H. V Le and K. D. Nguyen, “Quality assurance in vietnam’s engineering education,” in Engineering education quality assurance: A global
BhadouriaOlivia Saebyul KimJillian R. Frost, The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art Bachelor’s Degree in Chemical EngineeringAngela HuangPoorna DuttaAndrea VernengoDr. Jennifer Weiser, The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art Dr. Jennifer Weiser is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering. She received her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (2006). She received her M.S. (2010) and Ph.D. (2012) in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 An Inquiry-Based Learning Tissue Repair Module for STEM OutreachAbstractBioadhesives are an important subset of biomaterials, which aid wound healing
NegusseRichard DamoahMaajida MurdockDr. Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University Dr. Oludare Owolabi, a professional engineer in Maryland, joined the Morgan State University faculty in 2010. He is the assistant director of the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineer- ing Research (CATIER) at Morgan State UniversitJonathan Wilson, Morgan State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Strategic Outreach for Nuclear Workforce Pipeline Development and Maintenance at a Historically Black College University (HBCU)AbstractOur HBCU has a well-established record of providing a wide array of quality
Redshirts 2013 (UW) (STARS) Program Washington State University WA STate Academic Redshirts 2013 (WSU) (STARS) Program Boise State University (BSU) SAGE Scholars Program 2017 University of California, San Academic Community for 2017 Diego (UCSD) Engineering Success (ACES) Program University of Illinois, Urbana- Academic Redshirt in Science and 2017 Champaign (UIUC) Engineering (ARISE) Scholars ProgramThe Redshirt model
Arizona State University. Her interest in ancient construction practices led to a National Science Foundation grant to explore the construction techniques of the Inca, specifically the Inca road throughout Peru. This research is part of a Smithsonian exhibit at the Museum of the Native American Indian through 2020. She was recognized as an Engineering News Record Top 25 Newsmakers of 2010 for her research on the Inca Road. Additionally, Dr. Fiori was featured on the Science Channel in an Episode of Strip the City pertaining to Machu Picchu. Dr. Fiori led the Con- struction Engineering and Management program and also facilitated the service learning programs for the Myers-Lawson School of Construction. She has led
students of allbackgrounds is key to this effort. Measuring the additional effects of theseextracurricular resources can incline more universities to include them on theircampuses.References[1] K. Meyers et al, "AC 2008-1226: PERSPECTIVES ON FIRST YEAR ENGINEERINGEDUCATION," Age,vol. 13, pp. 1, 2008.[2] A. Dreyfuss et al, "Getting past the first year: Retaining engineering majors," inFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015 IEEE, 2015, .[3] E. Godfrey and L. Parker, "Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education,"Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, (1), pp. 5-22, 2010.[4] J. Liou-Mark et al, "The peer-led team learning leadership program for first year minorityscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics students