defense industry,interpreted diversely by the student body. Theprevalence of these organizations, as reflected in thestudent quotes, suggests that the Clark School heavilyleans on this network for career opportunities,influencing the perceptions of student’s professionaltrajectories post-graduation, as the following participantquotation captures, “It's for all engineering majors, but it is Figure 7: Image of Corporate Sponsors especially for aerospace, and it's the constant and Military Organizations Associated dilemma and ethical tension about what to do with the Engineering School with all this military-corporate attraction. And I would say that opportunities from the Clark School grow very
engagement and motivation, and self-regulation.Dr. Angela Minichiello, Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research examines issues of access, equity, and identity in the formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary 21st century engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering.Dr. Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University Dr. Oenardi Lawanto is a professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, USA. He received his B.S.E.E. from Iowa
evidence collected, from student artifacts, writtenreflections, class observations, etc. (see Table 1) points to system maps as an effectiveintervention that lies at the intersection of design and social justice.From the faculty perspective one of the most valuable aspects of having student teams createsystem maps is the side conversations that occur. As mentioned previously, the course is taughtin a flipped classroom modality so students work on their system maps during class, enablingrich conversations between faculty members and the design teams. These conversations serve asopportunities to illustrate to students how their engineering work recreates existing social issues.For example, one team wanted to build a system to test water in
learningDBEL – Design-based engineering learningCAD – Computer-aided design 1 Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering EducationIntroductionImproving the quality of education is motivation for many who pursue careers in academia, andtwo common topics that appear are active learning and student self-efficacy. Active learning putsstudents in a position where they are discovering knowledge on their own rather than passivelyreceiving information from an educator. Knowledge transfer through active learning strategieswhether it be design-based
Paper ID #42377Evaluation of Transfer of Learning in a Pre-College Engineering Short Course(Evaluation)Jose Capa Salinas, Purdue University Jose Capa Salinas is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Lyles School of Civil Engineering at Purdue University. He did his undergraduate degree at Universidad Tecnica Particular de Loja. His research interests include structural health monitoring, infrastructure inspection, drone applications, the behavior of steel and concrete structures, the effect of natural hazards in infrastructure, machine learning in engineering, student success, and difficult concepts in engineering. He is a member of
reflectivepractices, common in the liberal arts, will help students to improve learning and critical thinkingskills. Such a “bridging of two cultures” a la C.P. Snow demonstrates the effectiveness of liberalarts in STEM disciplines.1a IntroductionDeveloping critical thinking skills among college students is often touted as a primary goal of highereducation. Educational advocacy groups, accrediting bodies, employer groups, and higher educationcommissions have identified critical thinking as an essential skill for an informed and “career ready”person.1,2,3,4 Despite intense interest, there is not an agreed-upon definition of critical thinkingwhich has made it difficult for academics to respond. Paul, Elder, and Bartel
, whereinover 9,000 students from the top 21 doctoral-granting institutions in the U.S. were surveyed. Theresults indicated that while every respondent recognized a faculty advisor, 43% of Black doctoralstudents in STEM reported that they did not have a mentor, compared to 24% of their Whitecounterparts [10]. Furthermore, the attrition of doctoral students remains remarkably high in STEM anddisproportionately so for those who hold marginalized identities in their fields [11]; some studiesestimate that over 50% of doctoral students will not finish their degrees [12], [13]. It may not comeas a surprise that insufficient mentoring can negatively impact graduates students’ decision topersist in their degree programs, among a myriad of other factors
students, with a particular focus on the experiences of international women of color. I am deeply committed to improving the well-being of underrepresented groups in STEM, as I personally identify with this mission. As part of my previous work, I had the privilege of co-authoring a paper presented at the 2023 ASEE conference titled ”It’s No Mystery, So It Must Be Intentional: How Institutions Fail to Support Black STEM Doctoral Students’ Mental Health.” I am an enthusiastic member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and I remain dedicated to my field. If you’d like to get in touch or explore potential collaboration opportunities, feel free to reach out to me at mdarvis2@asu.edu.Dr. Brooke Charae
exploring two additional outcomes, long-term benefits to students’ personal lives andachieving work/life balance after graduation, within the context of stacking multiple high-impactpractices.These analyses are made possible with the use of an alumni survey at Worcester PolytechnicInstitute where all undergraduate students complete multiple projects in order to graduate.According to an externally conducted study in 2018, 70% of faculty reported using PBL in theircourses. By 2021, 98% of surveyed alumni indicated that they had projects in at least 25% oftheir courses. In addition to course-based projects, all undergraduate students complete twomajor projects. One is a team-based project addressing a problem at the intersection oftechnology and
through ROLE has influenced their decisions aboutremaining in engineering and increased the possibility of furthering their education with graduateschool. More academic information and navigational skills are needed to ensure that Latinaengineering students make informed decisions and take advantage of the multiple opportunitiesthat an engineering career can offer.AcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation through the BroadeningParticipation in Engineering (BPE) Program, Grant #2131875. References[1] National Girls Collaborative Project, “State of girls and women in STEM,” Feb 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ngcproject.org/sites/default/files/downloadables
themresponsible for learning as a group, as based on Vygotsky’s theory of social constructivism [7].In capstone learning, student agency supports the ability to make decisions during design,especially during problem framing [8]. Agency is also essential for students in defining andmaking meaning of their personal identities, experiences, and narratives as engineers [9].Therefore, we examine the role of agency Student-led discussions have value for collaborativelearning and reflection of ethics. In a systematic review of peer teaching in healthcare education,both direct and indirect peer-based teaching methods were identified including student-ledlectures, feedback, and problem-based learning [10]. However, few studies have focused on peerlearning as an
paper shows thatusing art as a medium, students can interact with manufacturing technologies in a creative andengaging way.2.1 Project-Based Learning Established in 1965, Problem-Based Learning (PBL) emerged from the collaborative effortsof five faculty members in the Health Sciences, with the visionary leadership of founding DeanJohn Evans at McMaster University [19]. This innovative pedagogical approach places studentsat the center of their learning experience, fostering problem-solving skills within the context ofsmall group dynamics under the guidance of a tutor [19]. In the PBL framework, the learning process is intricately student-driven, with the tutorassuming a facilitating role. This methodology is rooted in an educational
Paper ID #44078Engineering Learning among Black and Latinx/e/a/o Students: ConsideringLanguage and Culture to Reengineer Learning EnvironmentsDr. Greses Perez, Tufts University Greses P´ rez is the McDonnell Family Assistant Professor in Engineering Education in the Civil and e Environmental Engineering Department at Tufts University with secondary appointments in Mechanical Engineering and Education. She received her Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design with a focus on Engineering Education from Stanford University. As an Afro-Latina engineer and learning scientist, she has dedicated her career
INCLUDES-funded Women of Color in Engineering Collaborative, whose mission is to work cooperatively with other organizations to provide resources to create a supportive, encouraging, and inclusive environment in the engineering workplace. Her SWE research centers on equity issues in STEM education and the workplace, with studies on gender bias, the development of an engineering identity, and the community college transfer pathway. Prior to joining SWE, she worked in higher education policy research and on programs focused on faculty productivity and student success. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, MBA and M.S. in Information Management from Arizona State University, and
undergraduate students perceive industrial partnershipsin engineering capstone courses?MethodologyContext of studyThe study was conducted on students enrolled in a third-year capstone engineering coursefocusing on industrial design at a university. At the start of the course, the students wererandomly grouped into teams of 6 – 7 and tasked to solve a problem provided by a company. Theproblem statements were randomly assigned. Each team was guided by an industry mentor and afaculty member for the duration of 13 weeks as they tackled the problem statement. The teamsmet both faculty and industry mentors weekly to gather feedback on their projects. At the end ofthe course, the teams were assessed by both supervisors.Participants and Data CollectionWe used
professional integrity.The time commitment was a challenge for me personally due to a variety of emergent personaland professional commitments. In future projects, having scribe support would be helpful toreduce the number of contact hours needed for the industry representative. One idea would be topair a student with an engineer that is working in industry, have the student do one or a fewworking sessions to discuss a single case and a resulting decision tree, and to then present asummary of the instance and the solution to their peers. This would allow a faculty member togather case studies, would make it easier to find industry contributors due to the decreased timecommitment, and would give engineering students a deeper understanding of at least
often place undue emphasis on the categorization ofknowledge and skills, while not sufficiently addressing the process through which studentsnavigate and act on ethical dilemmas. This, we posit, is an area that needs redefining, given thatethical decision-making is rarely a linear process with single objective “right” answers and ofteninvolves iterative reasoning and interactive engagement with the problem. As such, we havedeveloped a suite of ethics-driven classroom games that have been implemented and evaluatedacross three universities, engaging over 400 first-year engineering students over the past 3 years.Now in the grant’s final year, we are finishing the design of two of the game-based ethicsinterventions to (1) more accurately align with
task is encapsulated by ABET Criterion 5 which states that an effective team includes“members [who] together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment,establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” (2023). For the most part, this education inpractice consists of combining students into groups and letting them explore teamwork dynamicsthrough self-determination (i.e., figuring it out as they go). This sort of situational, experientialeducation mimics to some extent what happens in the engineering workplace, where individualswith unique skill sets are tasked with working together to achieve a common goal. However, theoutcomes of this educational approach can be highly variable, resulting in students who have
, conference attendance in the early years of undergraduate education may assist studentretention in computing majors.However, conference attendance requires additional pre-conference and during-conference supportby faculty members. [25] found that supplementing student attendance with a course designedspecifically to students attending the Grace Hopper Celebration for Women in Computing (GHC)or the CMD-IT/ACM Richard Tapia Celebration of Diversity in Computing Conference(https://tapiaconference.cmd-it.org) was helpful for students and faculty alike. This courseprepared students for the experience, engaged students in diversity, equity, and inclusion relatedconversations, and empowered self-exploration among the students participating
collaborative research projects focused on broadening participation in STEM academia. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on the creation of optimal higher education policies and practices that advance faculty careers and student success, as well as the schooling experiences of Mexican-descent youth in the mid-20th century.Jennifer Tygret ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Improving University Postdoctoral Affairs Offices: Viewpoints from Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars of ColorAbstractAn instrumental case study (Stake, 1995) explores the perceptions and opinions of engineeringpostdoctoral scholars of color about ways to improve university postdoctoral affairs offices tobetter
), American Society ofMechanical Engineers (ASME)), EnvE activities are dispersed across an array of professionalsocieties. Key professional societies that EnvE faculty engage with often have a narrower focuson their particular research interests. A number of these groups are partners in the SPACESeffort (see Table 1). The Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors(AEESP) is comprised primarily of academics including faculty and graduate students. AmongAEESP members, 89% engage in research on water/wastewater, 26% on soil and sediment, 21%on energy, and 14% on air (on average, each respondent identified 1.7 topics among optionsprovided in a recent survey) [3].Table 1. Examples of EnvE Related Professional Organizations
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Development and Impact of Research Efficacy in an Undergraduate Teaching Assistant Certification Class1. IntroductionResearch experiences and opportunities are growing in availability and significance forundergraduate students. Furthermore, undergraduate students can offer a distinct perspective anda unique form of assistance compared to graduate students and faculty. This also applies to theclassroom. Participation in research in the undergraduate years, shows to provide all engineeringstudent populations (including marginalized groups) to consider a job in the academic andresearch fields.At a mid-size minority serving institution, undergraduate students are highly encouraged
factors that negatively affected it and consider how your motivation may have changed over time. 5. How did teaching an online lesson rather than an in-person lesson change the way this project affected you? For example, do you think you learned more or less as a result? Did you learn different knowledge or skills than you would have learned by preparing for and teaching a face-to-face lesson? Please explain your response. 6. What did you learn from working with the education students? Please explain. 7. How did this project affect your vision of teaching careers? 8. How has your understanding of fluid mechanics changed as a result of this project? As explained in detail in a previous publication [18], when analyzing
between early program students and professors from their major,helping to foster a sense of student ownership and belonging in the department, which can bebeneficial for student retention [7]. The discipline specific approach was chosen to allow contentand projects to directly align with each area of specialization, to facilitate as much considerationof this material as possible including the project-based element, and to initiate relationshipsbetween faculty from each specialization and the incoming students.Integrating Design ExperiencesA project-based design experience was added to the course for the following reasons. Designexperiences are already an important part of engineering curricula at many universities. In manydegree programs senior
lesson development by providing ideasfor creating assignments (for both before and after class), discussion points, activities, and otherlesson materials to teach undergraduate and graduate students about the effects of infrastructureinequities and how to mitigate negative effects. The framework will provide a solid foundationfor faculty to take a case study or historical example and create lesson objectives, design studentexercises to be used before, during, or after a class session, and create materials to supportstudent learning. The CIT-E community of practice is also applying this framework to createseveral lessons using case studies that are currently under development and will be available foruse by any faculty member in the
projects aligned with active research areas ofPurdue faculty members and national, international, and industry-sponsored design challenges.VIP teams are multi-disciplinary and vertically-integrated (first-year through seniors) withfaculty and graduate student mentors and extend over multiple semesters or years. Because theprojects and teams within this program span a wide variety of contexts and require very diverseknowledge and skill development, the project work is supplemented with ProfessionalDevelopment (PD) workshops. The PD workshops are short modules ranging over a variety ofprofessional topics that complement traditional curriculum and are intended to provideopportunities for students to learn skills needed for their projects and their
International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #42511 ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018. He is serving as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET). He is interested in conducting engineering education research, and his interests include student retention in online and in-person engineering courses/programs, data mining and learning analytics in engineering education, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of
research activities outside the classroom, such as participatingin summer research internships, fellowships, programs, and guided research projects.Undergraduate research experience serves as a valuable platform for fostering students' interestin research, attracting more individuals to pursue advanced degrees in Science, Technology,Engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-related fields, and cultivating a well-trained and diverseworkforce in STEM careers. The impacts and benefits of the REU program have been confirmedby several large-scale surveys [1-6].Recognizing the importance of involving undergraduate students in meaningful research andscholarly activity alongside faculty members [6], numerous REU sites have garnered supportfrom various agencies
in Spring 2024. The Design Spine at UNL has an emphasis onpromoting essential teamwork, communication and holistic thinking skills in an effort to produce moreengineering graduates who are prepared for the future challenges facing the engineering industry.Furthermore, as this course is new to the civil engineering major, the instructor also wanted to ensuresufficient opportunities for student feedback coupled with flexibility to alter the schedule as needed asimplementation occurred. The instructors therefore focused on five semester projects with clearlydelineated rubric components in alignment with learning outcomes. Details of each project are providedin the result section and sample rubrics are provided in the Supplemental Information
impossible to truly learn without the learner being active in someway [2]. Active learning helps students to ascend above the initial cognition levels of rememberand understand from the revised Bloom’s taxonomy [3], requiring learners at the least to applyand analyze. Project-based learning is an important active learning technique, which allowsstudents to build upon what they already know from previous courses [1] and further deepentheir knowledge as they evaluate and create. In addition to deepening their knowledge of specifictechnical competencies from the engineering curriculum, project-based learning allows studentsto acquire skills that will be vital to them throughout their careers, including problem solving,communication, teamwork as well as