Technology had on theparticipants’ career paths. Over the nine years, there have been 131 undergraduate students whoparticipated. Ninety nine (76%) of these students were supported via funding from the NationalScience Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates program. The other 32 (24%)were supported through institutional funds. More than half of the students (56.5%) were female,26.7% of the students were from underrepresented groups, and 52.7% students without previousresearch experience. The undergraduate research program understudy is a 10-week engineeringresearch project working in research laboratories at the University or a collaborating MedicalSchool. A tiered mentoring structure was developed within the participating laboratories
Paper ID #11972Improving Student Technical Communication via Self ReflectionMr. Kenneth P Mineart, North Carolina State University Kenneth Mineart received his Bachelor’s degree in Chemical & Biochemical Engineering from the Uni- versity of Iowa. Currently, he is a doctoral student in Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University where he works in the field of block copolymer science with Professor Richard Spontak. Kenneth has regularly served as a graduate teaching assistant for a variety of courses including: Unit Operations Laboratory, Material and Energy Balances, Introduction to
Paper ID #12018A Blocks-based Visual Environment to Teach Robot-Programming to K-12StudentsMr. Raghavender Goud yadagiri, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering Raghavender Goud Yadagiri received his B.Tech degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from JNTUH, Hyderabad, India, in 2011. After obtaining his B.Tech he worked as an Embedded As- sociate at Thinklabs Technosolutions Pvt. Ltd for two years. He is currently pursuing a M.S degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering with specialization in Computer Engineering. Raghavender con- ducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory at NYU Polytechnic
Paper ID #13186Enhancing Accessibility of Engineering Lectures for Deaf & Hard of Hearing(DHH): Real-time Tracking Text Displays (RTTD) in ClassroomsMr. Gary W Behm, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Gary W. Behm, Assistant Professor of Engineering Studies Department, and Director of NTID Center on Access Technology Innovation Laboratory, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology. Gary has been teaching and directing the Center on Access Technology Innovation Laboratory at NTID for five years. He is a deaf engineer who retired from IBM after serving for 30 years. He is a
: m.e.ssemakula@wayne.edu Page 26.676.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Ensuring Safe Use of the Machine Shop by Students1. IntroductionAs Engineering Technology educators, we pride ourselves in providing relevant hands-onexperiences for students in our courses. Hands-on experiences are important in ensuring thatstudents can apply the theoretical concepts they learn in class to practical engineering situationsnot only in the laboratory, but especially in industry. Because equipment in a typical machineshop can be dangerous and even fatal when misused, it is imperative to put in
Paper ID #12552The Chisel Test: A Simple, Scalable Learning Activity to Compare ColdWorking, Hot Working, and Quench Hardening of SteelsProf. Julia L. Morse, Kansas State University Salina Julia Morse is Associate Professor and Program Coordinator for Mechanical Engineering Technology at Kansas State University, K-State Salina. A Certified Manufacturing Engineer (CMfgE) and a Certified Enterprise Integrator (CEI), she teaches lecture and laboratory courses in the areas of computer-aided design, manufacturing and materials, and automation systems. Prof. Morse earned a B.S in Industrial Engineering from the University of
generalized models of electric vehicle charging circuits for use in a tool designed to aid distribution engineers in planning electric vehicle charging installations.Mr. Timothy D. Gulzow, Portland State University Tim is seeking a bachelors degree in electrical engineering and is a research assistant in the PGE Founda- tion Power Engineering Education Laboratory at Portland State University.Dr. Robert B Bass, Portland State University Robert Bass, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Portland State University. His research focuses on electrical power systems, particularly distributed utility assets and the overlaying control and communications architectures that
engineering program to the Six Sigma green belt standard. The map shows that programs generally deliver essential statistical methods and content. Other topics in the standard, such as ‘Piloting your solution’, are more suited to experiential activities in laboratories and projects. The outcome of the paper is an indication of how the standard manufacturing curriculum supports the Six Sigma standard. In addition, the paper will highlight aspects of the standard that do not require the addition of new courses but can enhance traditional topic coverage. 2. Six Sigma Green Belt Body of Knowledge The topics listed below are summarized from the American Society for Quality Body of 1Knowledge for
the main teaching platform. However, when presented with options,students never use this platform for class projects or capstone projects. Surveys showed that thiswas due to the fact that the laboratory experiments were topic specific and did not present asystem design approach which made it difficult for students who attempted to use thismicrocontroller [1]. A new platform, the C-Stamp microcontroller, was introduced as analternative for their design. This development boards provide a pre-assembled hardware platform,which include common peripheries in addition to programming libraries. These benefitsencouraged some students to implement the C-Stamp microcontroller in their senior designprojects with fairly successful outcomes [1]. The
career in automotive research as a product development engineer at the University of Windsor/Chrysler Canada Automotive Research and Development Centre (ARDC), conducting vehi- cle durability studies and associated research activities in the Road Test Simulation (RTS) laboratory. In 2005, she joined the University of Windsor as an Experiential Learning Specialist, focusing on teaching and educational research in hands-on learning and cooperative education as it relates to undergraduate engineering. She has developed neural network models for automotive rubber bushings for incorporation in durability simulations with the goal of accelerating product development. Additional work related to the field of composites
Paper ID #11975Closing Achievement Gaps using the Green-BIM Teaching Method in Con-struction Education CurriculumProf. Jin-Lee Kim P.E., California State University, Long Beach Dr. Jin-Lee Kim, Ph.D., P.E., LEED AP BD+C, USGBC Faculty, is an Associate Professor of the De- partment of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering Management at California State University Long Beach. He is a director of Green Building Information Modeling laboratory. His research interests include advanced construction scheduling techniques for optimization, green buildings, building informa- tion modeling, cost estimating methods
to vary the curriculum according to the peculiarities of differentcountries. Two other reports of the ASEE Forum agenda are devoted to the introduction of IGIPsystem in Russia.Table. IGIP TC Curriculum Credit Points (at Module Description least) Core Modules 7 M1 Engineering Education in Theory 2 M2 Engineering Education in Practice 3 M3 Laboratory Didactics 2 Theory Modules 5 M4 Psychology
(more motivated) in an active learning approach. Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11,2015 Villanova University We believe that this updated pedagogy will help the students to become more confident and well equipped to share ideas and learn in a group-related laboratory activity. This active learning approach was implemented in a sophomore level electronics course, “ECE 2550: Intro to Electronics & Applications,” in the spring semester of 2014. In this flipped-lab setup, lab modules using a Multisim circuit simulator and a myDAQ data acquisition unit from National Instruments (NI) were developed to (1) provide opportunities for faculty to challenge the students to perform more complex electronic circuit
different historical contexts.Rather than require students to write the standard history term paper, we assigned a term projectto study the relationship of design to performance in ancient naval vessels in the Aegean. Thestudents were challenged to make connections between their hands-on experiences and the largerhistorical and geographic contexts. In other words, interdisciplinary, experiential learning wasapplied not to the technical component of engineering education, but to the societal contextcomponent. The preliminary results were encouraging. Plans are underway to adjust and re-offer the course, and to disseminate it more broadly.KeywordsHistory, society, laboratory, engineering, educationBackgroundAs the authors have discussed previously1
problemswhile facilitating communication with different specialists in a team. As one of the leading collegesof engineering, our mission is to link theory and practice via our learning-by-doing philosophy.To be in alignment with this mission, students in both areas of engineering technology can take atechnical elective course in robotics and applications during their senior year. In this course, theylearn the basic principles of the science of manipulation along with basic control of roboticmanipulators. In the laboratory portion of the course, they work in interdisciplinary teams andbuild a robotic manipulator with the interface to teleoperate it by using a haptic device. They applythe system for specific tasks of activities of daily living (such as
, which they tend to speak about morethan others. We also probe more deeply into how and why the most effective teams or groupswork for students. In a mixed methods approach, our quantitative (survey) data first show whichacademic communities students participate in and how active they are in these communities. Ourqualitative data (interviews and focus groups) then explain how the most influential communitieswork for students. Our results show that while students reported participating at various levels,ranging from minimally to very active, in a broad range of academic groups available throughtheir home departments and colleges, most (53%) are active or very active in laboratory groupsand a large number (42%) are active or very active in
Zeeh1 1. Students, University of Southern Maine, Gorham, ME 2. U.S. Navy, former students, University of Southern Maine, Gorham, ME 3. Professors, University of Southern Maine, Gorham, MEProf. Daniel M Martinez, University of Southern Maine Dr. Daniel M. Martinez received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering at the University of Rochester in western New York. He continued there to pursue a Ph.D., and after qualifying for entry into the program left for NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland to conduct his graduate laboratory research. At Goddard he studied nucleation phenomenon, specifically vapor to particle conversion of metals in a gas evaporation condensation chamber. At the end of his Ph.D. work, Daniel became
. The program includes sustainability emphasis that attempts toengage students with the awareness of how and why a diversity of values, viewpoints, andactions might assist them in developing into flexible, creative practitioners, with the capacity toenact sustainability in a diverse array of future professional contexts4. Additionally, the programincludes many opportunities for experiential education in the form of labs and hands-on projects.We consider a Madison Engineer to be alumni that successfully combine these attributes.ENGR 314: Materials and MechanicsMaterials & Mechanics is a four credit hour lecture/laboratory core (required) course within theMadison Engineering curriculum. ENGR 314 is generally taken in the junior year and
Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD). Dr. Wood completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in the Division of Engineering and Applied Science at the California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Dr. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in September 1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufacturing, in addition to a teaching laboratory for prototyping, reverse engineering measurements, and testing. During his academic career, Dr. Wood was a Distinguished Visiting Professor at the United States Air Force Academy. Through 2011, Dr. Wood was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Design
Paper ID #13037Mechatronics Experential Learning for Broadening Participation in Engi-neeringMr. Ashley Guy, University of Texas at Arlington Ashley Guy is a doctoral student with the Robotics, Biomechanics, and Dynamic Systems Laboratory at the University of Texas at Arlington. He holds B.S. degrees in both Biology and Mechanical Engineering and is currently pursuing his Ph.D. with Dr. Alan Bowling. His research includes micro- and nano-scale dynamics.Prof. Alan Bowling, University of Texas at ArlingtonProf. Panayiotis S. Shiakolas, University of Texas, Arlington
near industrial technology laboratory building at Sam Houston StateUniversity were the vibration source. The building used for this project is a combined laboratory Page 26.599.4and shop and classroom facility with two condenser units–one single fan and one twin fan. Theinitial study employs the twin fan unit. Initially, the AC condenser unit was studied, and potentialpaths of the study were generated.Figure 3. R-410A XP series 6-1/2 ton 60Hz AC Condenser UnitFigure 4. Pictorial of AC condenser unit showing waste energy sources for energy harvestingViewing the unit from above, the rotation of both fans is clockwise. The fan blade length
engagement and formal cooperative learning, are being utilized tointentionally cultivate these habits of mind across courses in 5 disciplines. They are based on acommon architecture in all ESTEME@OSU classes: larger “lectures” punctuated by small sectionstudio workshops (or laboratories). The relationship of EBIPs, environment, and learning goals isshown in Table 1.Table 1. Relation of evidence-based instructional practice to learning goals Evidence-based Practice Environment Leaning Goal Interactive Engagement with Lecture Conceptual Understanding: Well-Connected Knowledge frequent formative feedback Studio Workshop Formal Cooperative Learning
in the engineering classroom.Dr. Paul B Golter, Washington State University Paul B. Golter obtained an MS and PhD Washington State University and made the switch from Instruc- tional Laboratory Supervisor to Post-Doctoral Research Associate on an engineering education project. His research area has been engineering education, specifically around the development and assessment of technologies to bring fluid mechanics and heat transfer laboratory experiences into the classroom.Prof. Robert F. Richards, Washington State University Dr. Robert Richards received the PhD in Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. He then worked in the Building and Fire Research Laboratory at NIST as a Post-Doctoral Researcher
, communication skills, andprofessionalism. As a foundation for sustained success in mechanical engineering, additionalcourse topics include: lifelong learning, time management, community and professional service,and career development. Laboratory: two hours.Course Objectives: Students who successfully complete the course requirements should be ableto: 1) Explain the engineering profession and engineering ethics. 2) Use technical communication skills to explain the results/analysis of introductory laboratory exercises. 3) Explain engineering analysis and design. 4) Analyze data collected during laboratory exercises. 5) Analyze the impact engineering has had on the modern world. 6) Design a simple engineering device, write a design
Experience of Undergraduate Students; and Engineering Outreach Service Learning courses, among others. She is also a faculty advisor for the California Water Environment Association (CWEA), Engineers Without Boarders (EWB), and Society of Hispanic Professionals Engineers (SHPE) student chapters. Additionally, Dr. Palomo is the CE Water Analysis laboratory director and coordinates all teaching, research and safety training activities in the engineering laboratory. Dr. Palomo conducts research in surface water quality improvement via natural treatment systems, water and wastewater treat- ment processes, and water education. She is involved in outreach programs for K-12 students to increase the participation of Hispanic
. Page 26.1345.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Revitalizing an Electromechanical Energy Conversion CourseOur University’s Electrical and Computer Engineering Department has offered an electivecourse in “Electric Machinery” for decades. It is a 4-credit course offered each fall term forjuniors and seniors, with a laboratory component. Prior to fall 2013, this course had been lecture-heavy due to school scheduling requirements, and it suffered from use of old laboratoryequipment that was difficult to maintain. With increasing focus on renewable energy and powerelectronics in the curriculum, we felt the need to modernize this course so that it provides a betterlearning experience and
organizations, these teams often rely principally on their university’s or college’sguidelines to develop a set of standard operating procedures. Though these set a base for theteam, the guidelines are no substitute for training that is specific to the safety risks associatedwith work the team is doing. At times, there is limited faculty supervision for such teams in theactual work bays and laboratories, unlike a lab associated with a class which will have onsitestaff, teach assistant or faculty oversight when the physical work is being executed. It is alsodifficult to convince student team leaders to invest time into training team members who may notparticipate on an ongoing basis. In this work a safety training system was implemented at auniversity
contain hands-on laboratory activities to emphasizecourse concepts4, it became apparently that this course should contain similar learningcomponents for teaching professional skills, mainly using simulations. This was supported by theadaptive nature of this course, which is continually redesigned to maintain its relevance in thearea of technology. Thus, new technology components are implemented every two years, whilemaintaining the historical elements of industry practices that do not waiver, such as the history ofthe Internet and Circuitry.The course under examination not only contains a lecture component, but a hands-on computerlab component, which include the simulations. The hands-on lab component allows students theopportunity to actively
manufacturing preferences. A generic manufacturing engineer isharder to educate and to fit into the workforce generic mechanical engineer. These regionalpreferences are best identified through the inclusion of a vibrant Industrial Advisory Committeethat collaborates with the faculty and helps to guide their decisions on curriculum.Finally, a third major challenge to creating a Manufacturing Engineering program is establishingworking laboratory and fabrication spaces and facilities to support the curriculum. Since bydefinition manufacturing requires the fabrication of a product, tool or system, by definition thereneeds to be equipment and technical staff to support fabrication activities.Overview of the programs at Western Washington University and
inimplementing their models by means of domain-specific software (e.g., Virtual Kinetics ofMaterials Laboratory (VKML), Gibbs, MATLAB); they also validated their own implementedmodels by comparing and contrasting them upon existing simulations, empirical data fromjournal articles, test cases provided by the instructor, or theoretical models described ontextbooks. Problem implementation phase: in this stage students use their validatedimplementation to solve the problem or design challenge. The four stages of problem solvingused are shown in Fig 1. Figure 1. The four stages of problem solving, adapted from the “integrated model of problem solving” (Van Meter et al., 2006)MethodsInstructional ContextThe course