opportunities for students to learn prototyping and design-thinking tocomplement the more formal, in class engineering education. Student led workshops arepresented as the start of a systemic series of extracurricular design learning experiences.IntroductionThe number of academic makerspaces has grown rapidly in the last five years. Many of thesespaces focus on developing engineering design skills and nurturing a design thinking mindset byproviding students with space, resources, and training. Extracurricular activities have beenshown to play an important role in design and innovation learning, particularly in makerspaces[1]. Moreover, peer-to-peer learning in classroom and project-based courses like senior capstonedesign have been found to play a
Consultant for the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT). His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Academic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work
varies, but one common objective is toimprove students’ creative thinking skills. In this paper, we sought to quantify changes in studentcreativity that resulted from participation in a mechanical engineering course targeted atintegrating engineering, technology, and the arts. The course was team taught by instructors frommechanical engineering and art. The art instructor introduced origami principles and techniquesas a means for students to optimize engineering structures. Through a course project, engineeringstudent teams interacted with art students to perform structural analysis on an origami-based artinstallation, which was the capstone project of the art instructor’s undergraduate origami course.Three engineering student teams extended
fourth-year students with first-year students for anevening of “myth busting” conversations. The fourth years offered brief presentations on theirtechnical capstone projects, as well as the human and social dimensions that were critical tothose projects. Then the fourth years engaged in informal conversations with the first-yearsabout the requirements for the different majors, types of capstone projects offered and futurecourses that addressed the human and societal aspects of engineering. The Discussion Sectionswere seen as a great opportunity to foster deliberation between the incoming and outgoingstudents about the relevance of the course and the need to consider human and societal factorsduring the engineering and design processes
and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. His work has been cited more than 2200 times and he has been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant at Arizona State University. She is a third year student in the Educational Policy and Evaluation program. Her research interests focus on
, including Chairperson of the Board of Directors for the National Association for Campus Activities, Member of the Board of Directors for the Counsel for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS) and President of the Westminster (MD) Wolves Soccer Club. EdD Morgan State University MS Southern Illinois University at Carbondale BS Southern Connecticut State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Tools for Creating and Managing Student TeamsEric Rice and William SmedickCenter for Leadership EducationJohns Hopkins UniversityAbstractCollaborative projects are a means of instruction in engineering, both to gain content specificknowledge within an engineering discipline and to
teaching and learning strategy thatintegrates meaningful community service with instruction and reflection to enrich thelearning experience, teach civic responsibility, and strengthen communities” [5]. Weare interested in SL for two main reasons. The first being that there are efforts toinvestigate whether SL and volunteering has a positive impact on students inmeasures of social responsibility [2],[6]. Yet a caveat is that understanding whichspecific factors contribute to changes in social responsibility attitudes is lacking.Second, engineering and computing programs typically include a capstone project ordesign-based course as a degree requirement. Our project may shed light on SLcomponents that could be integrated into the design of such
; and the resilience toovercome obstacles [31].Central to the vision of IEP is our definition of what engineering is: “[Engineering is] the art andpractise of changing the physical world for the benefit of all.” Its main relevance to ourleadership philosophy is that it frames engineering as a creative profession that has an impactbeyond the profession itself. We emphasize this framing during the first two years of theprogram through authentic, active-learning opportunities in the form of nine problem-based/project-based learning (PBL/PjBL) activities that run in parallel with and connect closelyto discipline-specific core technical, applied mathematics, and professional skills modules.The cornerstone and capstone projects of the program, the
Paper ID #23060Community Cultures: Broadening Participation By Understanding How Ru-ral Communities Support Engineering as a College Major ChoiceDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co
framework for critique by our peers so that we can incorporate their feedback duringthe pilot. We also hope to raise awareness of this project to encourage additional colleges toadopt the framework in the future.We define research-based teaching practices as pedagogical strategies that have been tested usingeducational research methods and published in peer-reviewed literature. Future faculty aregraduate students and post-doctoral fellows who aspire to faculty positions that include teachingresponsibilities, however, current faculty will also be invited to participate in the DLCs.The motivation for this NSF-funded project is that research-based teaching practices have beenshown to improve student learning compared to traditional methods like
boxes, antennas and light and heavy fabricated structures, for communication, TV telecast, natural disasters management and Telemedicine application. Dr PS, designed and manufactured various types of antenna’s weighing from 200 pounds to 100,000 pounds. He was also actively involved in configuring the antenna controls and selection of motor and motor controllers. Dr PS, has advised more than 40 senior/capstone projects. One of his project won the national award from Airforce Research Laboratory in spring 2017. Project was on ”Design of the Load Carrying Vehicle (LCV)”- The project solution is a fully electric, autonomous, all terrain, load carrying vehicle. c American Society for
Shear Wall Building Felipe J. Perez1, Yasser S. Salem1, Brittany J. Myers1, Cristian Aguilar1, Garrett Jones1, Daniella Ginocchio1, Edwin Medina1, and Kevin Chin1 1 California State Polytechnic University, PomonaAbstractThis paper presents results of a capstone senior project at California State Polytechnic University,Pomona. Students conducted a vulnerability assessment of a five-story building constructed inSouthern California. The structure has non-ductile concrete shear walls at the core and gravityframes at the perimeter. Partial infilled walls exist within the perimeter frames, creating captivecolumns. Students studied as-built plans for the structure and conducted an assessment of
research techniques, we sought to address the research question,“What aspects of engineering students’ innovation experiences were critical to the developmentof their ways of experiencing innovation?”Conceptual BackgroundThis study builds upon a previous study that explored differences in the ways engineeringstudents experienced innovation13. The current study expands the previous by exploring criticalincidents that led to new or refined understandings of innovation, but it is necessarily rooted inthe theoretical underpinnings and findings of the previous study. In this section, we summarizethe previous study and discuss how it informs the current investigation.The genesis of this project was a phenomenographic analysis of innovation among
Paper ID #22797Innovative Mars Exploration Education and Technology Program: Develop-ment of an Informal Learning Curriculum (Work in Progress)Mr. Srujal Patel, Georgia Institute of Technology Mr. Srujal Patel serves as the research faculty at Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering (AE) at Georgia Institute of Technology. Mr. Patel earned his dual M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mathematics at Georgia Tech with specialization in Applied Numerical Analysis and Computa- tional Fluid Dynamics/Aerodynamics. After joining as the research faculty, Mr. Patel worked as project manager for the Manufacturing
an attempt to better align the curriculum and instruction with the practices ofprofessional engineers [1] - [4]. Within higher education, collaborative learning first manifestedas senior design capstone projects then expanded to include team-based design projects in first-year engineering courses and informal in-class collaborative activities. In each of theseclassroom interventions, students are expected to work together with a diverse group of theirpeers (e.g., cultural upbringings, race, gender, ability, and more) to solve a problem. Researchsuggest that students learning through collaborative engagement can result in positive influenceson student achievement [3], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [15], persistence [8], [9], [10], [11], [12
these spaces through a mixed-method study. A quantitative longitudinal studyof students in a mechanical engineering program collected data on design self-efficacy,makerspace involvement, and user demographics through surveys conducted on freshmen,sophomores, and seniors. In this paper, the student responses from three semesters of freshmenlevel design classes are evaluated for involvement and self-efficacy based on whether or not a 3Dmodeling project requires the use of makerspace equipment. The study finds that students requiredto use the makerspace for the project were significantly more likely to become involved in themakerspace.These results inspired us to integrate a qualitative approach to examine how student involvementand exposure to
at the undergrad-uate curriculum level is slow and elementary [9], [10]. Few hands-on, lab-based teaching materialsexist in this area both for the undergraduate faculty members and the students. Seeing the value ofSDN through our recent study (Senior Capstone Project), we believe it is a great opportunity anda critical mission to identify and enhance the right tools and platforms that enable educators andstudents to teach, learn, and stay up-to-date on SDN. We also believe that it’s imperative to demon-strate how these tools may be effectively utilized and applied through the development and deliveryof fully tested hands-on labs and exercises to our undergraduate inter-networking classes.The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we
and stay engaged with the material introduced in the course. Theplot shows the % of students giving a rating of either “Strongly Agree” or“Agree” (% Agreement). Out of a scale of: Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral,Disagree, Strongly Disagree. * p < 0.05.Although significant increases were not seen across other student responses of thecourse’s learning methods, there was a general increasing trend across the years studied,with students assessing the course more highly in contributing to their ability to work ona team, develop their projects, and learn new skills and techniques helpful for theircareers.Course ContentTo assess student’s perceptions of how well the course content prepared students fortheir Capstone senior design course, and how
issues, these specifications are conducive for use in design or capstone coursesbecause they mimic the real world of preparing proposals. In the guidelines, the teams areencouraged to document their interactions with aviation experts from professional organizationsand the evaluation criteria have scores for those interactions.In the 2017 winning packages available online, two teams did their projects as part of anundergraduate capstone design experience and two teams did their projects as one part of agraduate aviation sustainability course [13]. In the Resources tab at the ACRP website [13],there are video tutorials, links to documents and reports, list of expert advisors for the teams tocontact, tips from past winners and evaluators, and a
undergraduate civil engineering programs address sustainability, it tends to belimited to individual courses, and resiliency concepts are rarely incorporated. To address theseshortcomings, we are incorporating sustainability and resiliency conceptual threads and activitiesthroughout our curriculum, from our first-year engineering course through senior design.To understand the effectiveness of this initiative, at the beginning of this project we conductedinterviews with senior civil engineering students to collect baseline data on our current students’views and understanding of sustainability and responsibility. Thematic analysis of theseinterviews suggests that there is significant variability in students’ understanding ofsustainability, with some
without a laboratory. In the rare cases of existing labs, such hardware based teaching labslack the flexibility to evolve over time and adapt to different environments.Supported by a NSF TUES type II project, we have developed a series of software defined radio(SDR) based mixed signal detection laboratories for enhancing undergraduate communicationand networking curricula. In our previous NSF funded CCLI project “Evolvable wirelesslaboratory design and implementation for enhancing undergraduate wireless engineeringeducation”, we have developed and demonstrated the first nationwide example of evolvable SDRbased laboratories for three existing undergraduate courses.In this project, we are developing new lab components that can be adopted by
Paper ID #21922LED Timing Light Upgrade for Synchronous Machines Laboratory Equip-mentDr. Herbert L. Hess, University of Idaho Herb Hess is Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Idaho, where he teaches subjects in He received the PhD Degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1993. His research and teaching interests are in power electronics, electric machines and drives, electrical power systems, and analog/mixed signal electronics. He has taught senior capstone design since 1985 at several universities.Mr. Sean Gordon Daniel, University of Idaho I am an Electrical Engineering student at the
the industry. A study reported that when external judgesand faculty judges both graded the same capstone project, the external judges gave higher grades[16]. Other studies have conflicting reports about whether tenured versus non-tenured facultygraded easier [5], [7], [8]. Additionally, a study showed that bias might occur if grading isextended over a long period and breaks are taken between grading sessions, but the bias is notpredictable nor significant [17]. This is a type of interrater reliability that occurs when a grader isnot consistent in his or her grading over time [18].Knowledge Gap Filled There are many factors that can affect how exams are graded for civil engineeringstudents, especially in design-based courses. The
Computer-Aided Design and Additive Manufacturing 6 Composite Design, Manufacturing, Inspection & Repair 8 CNC Machining and Manufacturing 6 UAV Construction and application 4 Technical Electives 2 Capstone Degree Project 3 Total 67Table 2 provides a list of Advanced Manufacturing practical courses focusing on contentinvolving Computer-Aided Design, Computer-Aided Manufacturing, Composite StructuralManufacturing, Inspection & Repair, CNC Machining and Manufacturing
: One Water, Transportation, and Energy, and each of these aresupported with a single “module”, as shown in Table 1. A Fundamentals module was created tointroduce students to the basic concepts, and the Capstone module is intended to tie the entirecourse together with case studies. Note that in Table 1, the lessons in the One Water module,which is the focus of this paper, are highlighted. Table 1: Overview of CIT-E Introductory Infrastructure Course What is infrastructure and why do 1 22 Transportation I we care? Transportation Module
Paper ID #22002Assessing Faculty and Organizational Change in a Professional DevelopmentProgram with Workshops and Disciplinary Communities of PracticeProf. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include faculty development, evaluating con- ceptual knowledge change, misconceptions, and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials
assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up a large part of that vision and our future.Celena Arreola, American Society for Engineering Education Celena Arreola graduated on May 13, 2017 with
coursesannually, and prepare a summary as detailed in the Evaluating/Reporting Section for assessmentThe assessment methods for the construction management program employs a variety ofassessment methods to measure the students’ achievements of outcomes and graduates’achievements of objectives. The assessment methods described are a mixture of directmeasures, which are defines as quantified observations and ratings of student performance, andindirect measures, which are qualitative evaluations of student achievement, such as survey data.The assessment of the SLO Program outcomes is performed primarily with direct measures,including evaluations of specific samples of student work, targeted examination questions, andevaluations of capstone projects. These
the context of real (and messy) engineering work [20].Laboratory. Students enroll in a three laboratory sequence during their third and fourth-yearcurriculum. The majority of tasks are completed in teams. The hands-on experimental activitiesinclude experimental design, equipment assembly and trouble-shooting. A virtual lab may alsobe completed, which simulates and allows for many more experimental runs and data collectionthan a hands-on lab [21]. The lab curriculum becomes more open-ended with increased need forexperimental design as the students progress through the lab sequence.Design. Two terms of discipline-specific senior design are completed during the fourth-yearcurriculum. Typically, the major projects are open-ended and team based. A
incoming freshmen excited about data analytics and the many career opportunities awaiting once those students complete the program.The curriculum committee made sure that there was, in each year of the program, that is, at eachof the four levels, from the 100-level non-technical popular intro to data science, to the 400-level“capstone (senior design) project”, at least one novel, unique to the data analytics programcourse. The senior capstone project was designed to address serious practical data-intensiveproblem in a given application domain or industry, and to involve both academic facultymentors, and mentors (and, whenever possible, sponsors) from the industry. Just like withexisting Computer Science or Electrical Engineering senior design