, anddemonstrated deeper understanding of subject matter. They found that service-learning is moreeffective over four years and that the messiness inherent in helping solve real community-basedproblems enhances the positive effects (Eyler & Giles, 1999).Astin et al. found with longitudinal data of 22,000 students that service-learning had significantpositive effects on 11 outcome measures: academic performance (GPA, writing skills, criticalthinking skills), values (commitment to activism and to promoting racial understanding), self-efficacy, leadership (leadership activities, self-rated leadership ability, interpersonal skills),choice of a service career, and plans to participate in service after college. In all measures exceptself-efficacy
AC 2011-528: BEST PRACTICES FOR STUDENT ROBOTIC CAMPSMarilyn Barger, Hillsborough Community College Dr. Marilyn Barger is the Principal Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Center of Advanced Technological Education, funded by the National Science Foundation and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida since 2004. FLATE serves the state of Florida as its region and is involved in outreach and recruitment of students into technical career pathway; curriculum development and reform; and professional development for technical teachers and faculty. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes Scott College and both a B.S. in Engineering Science and a Ph.D. in Civil
Women in Science & Engineering Speaker: A post-doctoral researcher in organic chemistry, Oct. 4 Transfer Agreement Guarantee (TAG) Workshop, Sept. 22, Sept 1, August 24 Student Panel – Student to Student: Experiences in Summer Internships, Sept. 9 Industry Speaker – Career Path from MESA to a Job! A professional Civil Engineer who works as a Transportation Engineer for the City of Menlo Park and also owns a consulting company, Sept. 2 Financial Aid – FAFSA Help – every Tuesday the Financial Aid Office helps students complete Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), Weekly The Guaranteed 4.0 Workshop, Mar. 21-22 Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society
in Technology1.0 - AbstractWhat is the long-term experience of Master’s degree graduates after completing an acceleratedweekend masters degree program (WMP)? This paper shares the results of a longitudinal follow-up study of nearly 300 professionals, most from business and industry, who graduated fromPurdue University’s Center for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Research(ProSTAR) programs. This cohort-based set of programs employs a hybrid classroom anddistance-supported, innovatively-delivered graduate degree (MS) in technology. An onlinesurvey collected the data and cross-tabulation and frequency analysis identified the findings.Consequences; with respect to career experiences, advancement and salary; are reported
AC 2011-908: STEM INTEGRATION IN A PRE-COLLEGE COURSE INDIGITAL ELECTRONICS: ANALYSIS OF THE ENACTED CURRICU-LUMAmy C. Prevost, University of Wisconsin-Madison Ms. Prevost is a doctoral student in Education Leadership and Policy Analysis at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research is focused on the STEM career pipeline, especially related to engi- neering, engineering education and the molecular biosciences. In addition to her work in education re- search, she is also the Director of scientific courses at the BioPharmaceutical Technology Center Institute in Madison, WI, where she coordinates curricula in the area of molecular biology.Mitchell Nathan, University of Wisconsin, Madison Mitchell J. Nathan, BSEE
academy where there are successful practices for helping students develop anidentity, more specifically a military identity, to settings where such intentional practices do not Page 22.69.2exist. While a military identity is not the same as an engineering identity, it is a professionalidentity and is related to future career work. The military academy in this study is located in thenortheastern United States. The primary comparative university setting is a private university inthe mid-western United States where students have a strong identification with their university’sreputation. A secondary comparative setting included a public university in
financial support from the program due to low GPA or major change. During thetwo years of Phase 2, 13 scholars participated with seven chosen as second semester freshmenand six chosen as second semester sophomores.The one-on-one mentoring element of the program was directed by the ExxonMobil liaison whoselected ExxonMobil engineers and matched them with an LSU ExxonMobil scholar.Additionally, the liaison coordinated workshops with the mentors and protégés, and these eventswere utilized to communicate expectations, roles and responsibilities of each person. Thementors helped the scholars with professional development and career planning. Feedback forthis part of the program was obtained through discussions during Phase 1, and a formal survey
2005, the USF President’s Award for Faculty Excellence in 2003, IBM Faculty Partnership Awards in 2000/2001, a National Science Foundation CAREER Award in 1999 and the IEEE MTT Society Microwave Prize in 1996. His current research interests are in the areas of RF micro electromechanical systems, development and application of microwave materials, and integrated circuit design. He has thirteen U.S. patents and over 150 professional journal and conference publications.Jeff Frolik, University of VermontPaul G. Flikkema, Northern Arizona University Paul G. Flikkema received the PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Maryland, College Park. From 1993-1998 he was an Assistant Professor at the University of
AC 2011-1724: TRANSITIONING AMERICA’S VETERANS INTO SCI-ENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM)ACADEMIC PROGRAMSSarah A Rajala, Mississippi State University Sarah A. Rajala is currently professor and dean of engineering at Mississippi State University. Previously, she served as department head of electrical and computer engineering at Mississippi State University, professor, associate dean for research and graduate programs, and associate dean for academic affairs in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. From 1987-1998, she held a visiting ap- pointment in the School of Electrical Engineering at Purdue University. During her career she conducted research on the analysis and
the University of Texas at Austin, in 1998. She served as an Assistant Professor at the University of Alabama from 1998 to 2002, when she moved to Arizona State University. In 2008 she was promoted by ASU to Associate Professor. Dr. Husman has been a guest editor of Educational Psychology Review, has served on editorial board for top educational research journals, and currently sits on the editorial board of Learning and Instruction. In 2006 she was awarded the U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER grant award and received the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers. She has conducted and advised on educational research projects and grants in both the public and private sectors, and served as
, too few people are choosing engineering careers, and many engineering facultiesare attempting to address this problem by reaching out to schools. This paper describes how ahome-grown, web-based software tool, already used successfully in university-levelengineering and physics courses, is being modified for high-school use. The softwarepackage, OASIS, comprises a large question database and server-side program that deliversindividualized tasks, marks student responses, supplies prompt feedback, and logs studentactivity. OASIS can be used for both skills practice and formal assessment. Because the Webserver carries out all processing, students need only a computer with internet access and astandard browser, making OASIS well suited to student
and self-examination. The three basic components1 of EL are illustrated in Figure 1. The “partner” in this figurerefers to the community partner. In order for EL projects to be effective in achieving specificgoals they must be based on sound instructional methods and design of the respective curriculumto satisfy the accreditation criteria for that educational program. Students who complete ELprojects exhibit personal growth through increased self-esteem and confidence, personalresponsibility, and sense of personal efficacy. They also acquire active exploration of careerinterests, understanding of the work environment, specific job skills, hiring advantage overothers greater confidence in career choice, increased interpersonal skills
program, the Green DesignApprenticeship, including the overarching goals and learning objectives. The main focus of thepaper is on the method and results of a far-post assessment survey completed 2-3 years afterstudents participate in the program. The results indicate that the program content is having animpact on students’ daily activities, and is helping students make decisions about fields of study.We also provide some strategies for initiating far-post assessment in outreach programs.The Green Design ApprenticeshipThe Green Design Apprenticeship, offered since 2004 by the Green Design Institute at CarnegieMellon University, is an outreach program for gifted and talented high school students interestedin learning about academic and career
).” Page 22.259.3 7. “A research project, which enhances one's knowledge of a particular field, and how it relates to my expectations/perceptions.” 8. “It's like a research paper, except it attracts students' interests, and makes them want to pay more attention to the topic.” 9. “Learning that is embedded in mind even after a certain subject is over.” C. Somewhat Understand 1. “A project that has some effect on your life, whether it be understanding material better or something for your career” 2. “Learning something that will help you later in life not just learning something and using it for the test.” 3. “Life Long Learning is
talent is important for the future vitalityof scientific research. This development is essential because demographic trends show that in thenext 20 years minorities will constitute an increasing portion of the US population, especially inthe pool of potential college students. Despite the growing number of STEM careers in theAmerican economy, education statistics suggest that far too few Hispanic students are beingencouraged and enabled to take advantage of opportunities in technical disciplines. According tonational statistics, Hispanics are not only the largest minority in the United States but also one ofthe fastest growing.This paper describes the Catalyzing and Supporting Minority Talent Development modeldeveloped to attract and retain
in both the public (as an educator) and pri- vate sectors before returning to postgraduate study and embarking on an academic career. As with many South Africans, growing up under Apartheid has had a profound impact on my worldview and life choices. This has included influencing the choice of a career in education, both as a practitioner and scholar. I cur- rently convene a postgraduate programme in Engineering Management and teach undergraduate courses in Engineering Management. I draw on multiple theoretical constructs for the design of learning contexts, including complexity and systems theory. My research is primarily focussed on student experience of learning events and student learning more broadly both in
skillsnecessary to embark on successful careers and to contribute to the advancement of the currentstate of bioengineering. To this end, at our institution we have conducted an extensiveexamination of our undergraduate bioengineering program. The goal of this study was to utilizea variety of assessment techniques in order to enhance our understanding of the strengths andlimitations of our curriculum and to identify any aspects of the curriculum which could beoptimized to better meet the needs of the modern bioengineering undergraduate student.In this paper, we present our comprehensive approach to assessing the effectiveness of thecurrent curriculum at the University of Washington. We describe the multiple methods of self-analysis implemented over the
UniversityRadian G Belu, Drexel University (Eng Tech.) Dr. Radian Belu is Assistant Professor within the Engineering Technology (ET) program - Drexel Univer- sity, Philadelphia, USA. Before joining to the Drexel University Dr. Belu hold faculty and research posi- tions at universities and research institutes in Romania, Canada and United States. His research interests included power system stability, control and protection, renewable energy system analysis, assessment and design, power electronics and electric machines for wind energy conversion, radar and remote sens- ing, wave and turbulence simulation, measurement and modeling, numerical modeling, electromagnetic compatibility and engineering education. During his career, Dr
future career.4 In addition to earlyengineering exposure, a more practical aspect of attending an introductory engineering program may beto earn college credits from Johns Hopkins University (JHU). College credits have three utilities: (a)enhances the student’s college application, (b) makes college education more affordable, and (c) reducesthe course load in the initial year and allows the student to settle into college at a convenient pace.5,6 Atpresent there are a large number of introductory engineering programs, however, rarely are theseprograms ABET accredited and provide transferable college credits to high school students. On the otherhand there are a vast number of courses at community colleges and universities, which allow high
reviewed by the committee: Table 1: Stated Curricular Objectives of Prevalent Engineering Curricula Enhance the study of science or mathematics or both Develop problem-solving skills through interdisciplinary learning experiences Connect science and mathematics to real-world problems and demonstrate their application in technical careers Teach technological literacy Develop design, creativity, iterative design, and critical thinking skills Increase awareness of the engineering disciplines and careers from an early age Provide rigorous curricula to prepare students to pursue engineering or engineering technology programs in college
course: 1) each instructor represents a unique engineeringdiscipline and collectively the team provides a foundation for a broad introductory curriculum,2) each instructor is physically located at a different regional campus, mimicking thegeographical dispersion of students and supporting student learning and engagement, and3) together, the interplay of the multi-disciplinary, geographically dispersed instructor teamrealistically depicts today’s engineering workplace and promotes the field as a viable,meaningful career choice through open discussion and learner discovery. Results from studentcourse evaluations and surveys, and instructor reflections are used to comment on and assess thebasic effectiveness of the instructional approach.Team
AC 2011-696: MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM-BASEDSTEM PROJECT LEARNING AMONG HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ANDTEACHERSFelicia Chong, Michigan Technological UniversityDouglas E. Oppliger, Michigan Technological University Mr. Oppliger is a professional engineer and a lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. He is the director of the High School Enterprise program which has a mission to increase the numbers of students pursuing post-secondary degrees and careers in STEM fields. At its core, this program supports K-12 teachers who are leading teams of students in long-term STEM projects. This work is the latest in Oppliger’s history of working in K-12 STEM areas. For the past 10
Research Design. Research Design and Analysis Consultation, CareerWISE.Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University Professor, Counseling Psychology, Women and Gender Studies Principal Investigator, CareerWISE re- search program Page 22.660.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Exaggerating the typical and stereotyping the differences: Isolation experienced by women in STEM doctoral programsAbstractThis paper describes the initial results of a qualitative, longitudinal study designed to understandhow career and educational choices unfold for women in
AC 2011-700: UNDERWATER ROVS IN PRE-COLLEGE EDUCATION:UNIVERSITY-K12 PARTNERSHIPS THAT GO BEYOND THE COMPE-TITIONSDouglas E. Oppliger, Michigan Technological University Mr. Oppliger is a professional engineer and a lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. He is the director of the High School Enterprise program which has a mission to increase the numbers of students pursuing post-secondary degrees and careers in STEM fields. At its core, this program supports K-12 teachers who are leading teams of students in long-term STEM projects. This work is the latest in Oppliger’s history of working in K-12 STEM areas. For the past 10 years he has developed and taught first
, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National En- gineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of re- cruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University ARMANDO A. RODRIGUEZ is the co-PI of the NSF METSTEP grant to work with non-metropolitan community colleges to produce more engineers, especially female and underrepresented minority engi
class without aninstructor and the EPICS Program scrambling to fill that slot. By developing the partnershipwith the company’s management and the EPICS Program, we are able to work together toreplace employees as they move through their careers and maintain the academic support duringthe school year. Some corporate volunteers cannot commit to a weekly meeting and they serve as designreviewers. Twice each semester, every EPICS team conducts a design review, at the midpointand end of the semester. Corporate representatives serve as the design reviewers for the teamsand provide valuable feedback to the students. Each design reviewer is given training andstandardized forms to provide feedback and the teams are scheduled so that a reviewer
definition of quantitative and precise metricsthat reflect changes in the program. A second is the data collection and the action definitions thatshould minimize or, at least, allow the resolution of interdependencies and correlations amongthem. While these form an intellectually interesting modeling and feedback problem, one mustalso be prepared to accommodate some faculty resistance, indifference, or simply lack of time toperform such tasks. Viewing automation and consistency as a key for the success of continuousimprovement, we have implemented this feedback process for the last four years and here wepresent some of our experiences.1. IntroductionObjective and meaningful evaluation of student performance and career success is a complicatedproblem
multiple sources forenergy and climate data (DOE, NASA, NOAA, etc.), simulation results from global climatemodels, and results from their own simulations utilizing climate models (EdGCM). Extensiveuse of MS Excel and Matlab are required for processing and analysis of the large data sets. Theimpacts of the course on the students were assessed with a combination of quantitative andqualitative approaches. Substantial quantitative gains were made in the students’ climate literacy,especially in knowledge areas. Students also showed gains in their self-reported feelings thatthey could solve a new problem or tackle a challenge, were good at interpreting charts andgraphs and manipulating databases, and were interested in pursuing a career in science
of achievement,persistence, direction, and self-efficacy2-4; all are important in the field of engineering educationas many students, especially underrepresented minorities, leave before reaching their goal ofgraduating with an engineering degree.5 Because goal setting and monitoring involve reflection,both introspective and prospective, they can be difficult for engineering students to engage insince students are often uncomfortable with, and even resistant to, reflective activities. 6-8However, we observed that students began to engage in goal setting and monitoring as naturalby-products of the development of a professional portfolio. The professional portfolio is ademonstration of students’ preparation for an engineering career, and thus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) where women make up 51% of its science undergraduates and 35% of its engineering undergraduates. For women to participate to their full potential across all science and engineering fields, they must see a career path that allows them to reach their full intellectual potential. Much remains to be done to achieve that goal.”6In 2004, the Board of the InterAcademy Council formed an Advisory Panel on Women for Science. In 2007,the study Women for Science: An Advisory Report7, funded by L’Oreal Paris, the Netherlands Ministry ofEducation, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and an anonymous donor, was prepared by the InterAcademyCouncil.It shows the concern is global, stating: “The low representation of women