Summer 1- Cultural Immersion with a community Project in Project & Design 1Community CoreEngagement Year 1- Social Justice, Environmental Sustainability, Sciences Conceptual Design, Community Engagement Design Ethics & Summer Zero Thinking Social Summer 0- Design thinking, Empathy & Design, Team& Empathy Justice Work, Personal Identity as an Engineer
degree inCivil or Environmental Engineering. The goal of sustainable engineering is to create ecologicallyand socially appropriate solutions within the capacity of nature without compromising futuregenerations. This certificate provides students breadth in the areas of ethics and resource equity(HU Elective), interactions between technology and society (SS Elective), engineeringconnections with the environment (CE or BA Elective), engineering materials andwater/sanitation (CE 4900/4905), all at a global perspective. Students begin the certificate withthe colloquium on sustainability which introduces each of these concepts, and finish with theinternational senior design experience that requires students to work on an engineering problemset in the
ideation techniques to process to meet desired needs within realisticx Develop detailed design specifications. explore a variety of alternative solutions. constraints such asx Design to match a set of detailed specifications. economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andx sustainability Form a team to define and solve an open ended (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teamsx engineering problem. Define their team roles and evaluate their performancex on a team
Assignment: Lab Experiment 2 Justification: Lab Experiment 2 requires the student to (a) set up node-client communication and (b) send the state of a sensor from the node to the client. Lab experiment 2 measures the ability to conduct experiments and perform measurements (PI_6_2), and the ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions (SO_6).SO_4: An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global
. a. Make connections across math, physics, and engineering courses. b. Re-inforce the importance of developing quality writing skills. c. Show how other subjects such as history, ethics, and musical improvisation may cross paths with or support engineering views and mindsets. 4. Overview of first-year engineering core/foundation courses. a. Share ABET student learning outcomes and expound on expectations. b. Conduct a detailed explanation of common course topics for first-year courses to include expected prerequisite knowledge. c. Identify support resources available to students. 5. Explore industry sectors, highlighting various majors involved in each. a. Link to
participants to acclimate to their research projects before the programstart.Throughout this work, participants were able to gain or further develop skills in some of thefollowing areas: Ethical Hacking, Data Science, Intrusion Detection Systems, Linux, MachineLearning, Networking, and Python, as well as interact with a designated smart device and testingenvironment. In the first summer, participants were assigned a smart glucose meter and taskedwith 1) exploiting the potential threats associated with installing smart devices onto unsecurednetwork configurations via address resolution protocol (ARP) poisoning, and 2) exploring socialengineering tactics through cloning the device user application. Additionally, in the followingsummer, participants
Polmear, University of Florida Madeline Polmear is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. She completed her B.S. in environmental engineering, M.S. in civil engineering, and Ph.D. in civil engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on bridging technical and nontechnical competencies to support the professional preparation and ethical responsibility of engineering students.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, PMP, LEED-AP is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. She has over ten years of construction and civil
tasks or projects to gain experience or knowledge. Attempt task Newly hired engineers complete their work tasks, √ independently understand the roles or methods of the jobs on their own. Positive Attitude Cultivating Have good Newly hired engineers maintain professionalism by √ √ work ethics working hard, doing high-quality work, and finishing tasks on time. Have self- Newly hired engineers remind themselves that their √ √ assurance opinions are valuable and to be
, Ethics: techniques for incorporating ethics in computer curriculum specifically in data science curriculum and programs/curricula: evaluating Data Science programs in the US and China.Dr. Duo Li, Shenyang City University Dr. Duo Li is the chief research scientist of Green Island Hotel Industry Research Institute of Shenyang City University. Duo Li is the member of ASIST&T and his research interests are focusing on Human- Computer-Interaction, Big Data, Data Analytics, Social Networking, and Hospitality Management. QUALIFICATIONS: Skilled professional experienced in big data, data analysis, bibliometric, social net- working sites, statistic software, and online learning system. Full skilled in establishing
toosmall to be SL. Thus, the use of SL as aneducational tool, especially in higher education,is to both to teach and to serve in equal measure. Figure 1. Conceptual diagram explaining theConsidering a broad sampling of SL in STEM uniqueness of service-learning (SL).education as provided in peer-reviewed literature, SL has shown beneficial outcomes particularly withregard to the types of learning objectives that have generally been more challenging to achieve in traditionalengineering coursework. These objectives include instruction in ethical responsibility, engineeringsolutions in a global context, and contemporary issues5. SL has documented effectiveness for instructionin related ideas including effective learning of sustainability6, broadened
numbers have stayedrelatively stagnant. Research on engineering culture suggests that we must look inside theengineering classroom in order to understand why engineering in the U.S. remains largely whiteand largely male [2], [3]. In order to successfully increase diversity in engineering in asustainable and ethical way, we must not only examine but work to change the culture ofengineering. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated challenges around diversityand inclusion in engineering, but also provided an opportunity to either challenge or uphold thedimensions of engineering culture as courses and programs underwent rapid change. Manystudents face more barriers than before as they juggle COVID-induced challenges with theireducation, while
. from Stanford University in 2008 and 2012, respectively. Her current engineering education research interests include engineering students’ understanding of ethics and social responsibility, sociotechnical education, and assessment of engineering pedagogies.Dr. Tyrone Vincent, Colorado School of Mines Tyrone L. Vincent received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Arizona, Tuc- son, in 1992, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, in 1994 and 1997, respectively. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, at the Colorado School of Mines, Golden. His research interests in- clude
; engineering responsibility to society and environment; ethics; individual andteamwork; communication; project management and finance; as well as lifelong learning; andcoping skills. The survey included 52 items, on a 6-point scale ranking their responses withrespect to how well their degree had prepared them in relation to each specific topic: from “veryinadequately” to “very adequately”. Their sample size consisted of 19 responses [10].The study by Male et al. (2011) derived a statistical 11-factor generic engineering competencymodel by comparing experienced engineer’s perspectives to the industry leaders’ in Australia.The resulting model included communication, teamwork, self-management, professionalism,ingenuity, management and leadership
improvement in learning through the taking of personal responsibility forthe outcome; a knowing of how to learn complex material; an enhanced capability for problemsolving; a deeper analytical thinking; and an increased commitment to their discipline. Studentswith professional practice backgrounds also exhibit improved employability traits compared totheir colleagues, including: elevated work ethic, enhanced social development, improved projectplanning skills, and advanced interviewing skills [34]. Finally, it has been suggested thatprofessional practice students develop a stronger ethical sense, a deeper awareness of who theyare, and an improved understanding of their own self, over their peers without relevantprofessional work experience [35
that it leadsdirectly or indirectly to an improvement in our quality of life, must work within the constraintsprovided by technical, economic, business, political, social, and ethical issues.” (p. 7). In someways this echoes the language of the Mann report but acknowledges that as Technology hasincreasingly become integrated into all infrastructures that a systemic, rather than industry-focused, perspective is necessary. The systemic focus is noteworthy since systems need to beunderstood either through functional decomposition—the basis of outcome development—orholistically as they become more complex.As has been pointed out by others [12] engineering education adapts to the times; it must bydefinition do so since the role of engineers has
Vignesh Subbian is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Systems and Industrial Engineer- ing, member of the BIO5 Institute, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation in engineering and computing. Subbian’s educational research is focused on asset-based practices, ethics education, and formation of identities in engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Asset-based Approaches to Engineering Design Education: A
integrity [3]. Such a system needs the buy-in ofthe whole academic community and specifically, the example and influence of the administrativeleaders. Such leadership must be prioritized at the institutional level. “…the importance of fundraising for today’s higher education administrators, we suspect that commitment to an ethical culture may take a back seat to other commitments and skills. That’s why it becomes so important to institutionalize integrity as much as possible into multiple cultural systems. Also, because most senior administrators are extraordinarily busy, we are convinced that development and/or maintenance of a culture of academic integrity must be a significant portion of some
range of audiences. Q3-b: Participating in the Service-Learning Project activities in FYSE, I have improved my ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. Q4-a: The Service-Learning Project activities in FYSE provided me with an opportunity to improve my ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. Q4-b: Participating in the Service-Learning Project activities in FYSE, I have improved my ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of
Paper ID #28454Sustaining Faculty Collaboration: An Exploratory Process-Based Study ofResearch Collaboration Across UniversitiesMr. Yousef Jalali, Virginia Tech Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He re- ceived a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include interaction between critical thinking, imagination, and ethical reasoning, interpersonal and interinstitutional collaboration, diversity, equity, and inclusion, systems thinking, and chemical en- gineering learning systems. Yousef taught
encouraging faculty to provide mentoringand providing opportunities for “real-life” applications [6]. Additional criteria are included toensure alignment of the experience with the student’s Grand Challenges theme area, and clearlydefine the expected effort and time commitment.Multidisciplinary CompetencyThe Multidisciplinary Competency focuses on the development of interdisciplinary perspectivesneeded to understand the global challenges facing society and to create effective engineeringsolutions. This includes understanding the connections between engineering and other areas suchas policy, economics, ethics, business, law, and human behavior. At ASU this competency maybe achieved through a combination of courses and experiences, so criteria have
that activity as an introduction to examine the development of scope and cost for general conditions.– Using a program management contract to organize group activities and provide a concurrent examination of project activities to develop an awareness of ethics in construction management.– Using webinars from the EPA Sustainable Materials Management program and LinkedIn Learning as virtual tutorials for project development.– Coordinate class presentation and discussion with regularly scheduled group tutorials and the creation of an online Request for Information inquiry file that was available to the entire class for examination and discussion during scope development and verification. When the class evaluation
., & Diller, K.R. (2005). Teaching for Adaptive Expertise in BiomedicalEngineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 11(2), pp. 257-276.Martin, T., Rivale, S.D., & Diller, K.R. (2007). Comparison of Student Learning in Challenge-based and TraditionalInstruction in Biomedical Engineering. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 35, pp. 1312–1323.Martin, T., Baker Peacock, S., Ko, P., & Rudolph, J. J. (2015). Changes in Teachers’ Adaptive Expertise in anEngineering Professional Development Course. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 5(2),Article 4.McKenna, A. F., Colgate, J. E., Olson, G. B., & Carr, S. H. (2006). Exploring Adaptive Expertise as a Target forEngineering Design Education. In ASME 2006
to design and conduct experiments to analyze and interpret experimental dataC-2 to use modern engineering tools, software, and laboratory instrumentationC-3 to communicate effectively through written, oral, and graphical presentationsStudent Outcomes for Objective D: Students will be introduced to the following issues throughtheir undergraduate education in this department and will gain:D-1 an ability to work in teams to solve multi-faceted problemsD-2 an ability to understand and contribute to the challenges of a rapidly changing societyD-3 an understanding of ethical and societal responsibilities of professional engineersD-4 an understanding of the need for lifelong learning and continuing professional educationThe department
of Engineering and Computer Science where she is studying retention of undergraduate engineering students. She has extensive experience using qualitative and mixed-methods research in Engineering Education. Before joining UTD in September 2020, Laura worked at the University of San Diego on their RED grant to study institutional change efforts and redefine the engineering canon as sociotechnical. She has a background in environmental engineering and received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Utah State University with a research focus on the ethical and career aspects of mentoring of science and engineering graduate students and hidden curriculum in engineering.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan
] writes, “In the Nazi regimethe technology served both the purposes of the state and the ethical values of the technologicalprofessionals.” This brings Katz to the question, “how does an engineer know that the values[they] embod[y] through [their] technological products are good values that will lead to a betterworld?”The contemporary use of technologies such as facial recognition and predictive algorithms in thecontext of law enforcement and incarceration make Katz’s question both relevant and urgent.Software such as the predictive policing tool PredPol reinforces biases within U.S. lawenforcement [5]; as one study noted, “PredPol is a tool for that aids law enforcement as itcurrently exists, and around the country, law enforcement targets
Paper ID #33189 soybean crop yields in Dr. Kristina Wagstrom’s Computational Atmospheric Chemistry and Exposure (CACE) laboratory. For the past two summers, Thomas has worked two internships: the first as an en- gineering intern at Allnex in 2019, and the second as an Environment, Health and Safety Intern at Pfizer in 2020. Working at Pfizer especially developed Thomas’s work ethic and passion for chemical engineer- ing, influencing him to seek further related chemical engineering positions after graduation where he can apply the knowledge he has learned in school to the pharmaceutical or manufacturing industries. Thomas is now seeking a full-time position with an engineering firm starting summer 2021 where he can
reports simply called for even more modernengineers.Figure 1: A visual depiction of new competencies needed by engineers upon review of theGrinter Report (1995) and the Vision of the Engineer of 2020 Reports (2004 and 2005).Even from an accreditation perspective, in 1997, ABET released Engineering Criteria 2000which made it clear that engineering education needed to include these global, societal,economic, and environmental mindsets in future engineers [4]. The incorporation of what arecommonly termed “soft skills” in engineering curriculum, including teamwork, communication,ethics, and social consciousness, were soon considered a necessity. Engineering coursework hadalready garnered a reputation as being content-heavy, so innovative and unique
curation,(2) mathematical foundations, (3) computational thinking, (4) statistical thinking, (5) data mod-eling, and (6) communication, reproducibility, and ethics. The recursive data cycle of obtaining,wrangling, curating, managing and processing data, exploring data, defining questions, performinganalyses and communicating the results lay at the core of the bootcamp, [2-4].The topics covered included: • coding in python and BASH • coding in python and BASH • data preprocessing: Pandas • data exploration and transformation • feature engineering • filtering • wrapper and embedded methods • machine learning, Scikit-learn, TensorFlow • data storage: Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, AWS RDS • data warehouse server: Microsoft SQL
Science Foundation (NSF) and industry.Dr. Jacqueline A. Isaacs, Northeastern University Dr. Jacqueline Isaacs joined Northeastern in 1995 and has focused her research pursuits on assessment of the regulatory, economic, environmental and ethical issues facing the development of nanomanufacturing and other emerging technologies. Her 1998 NSF Career Award is one of the first that focused on environ- mentally benign manufacturing. She also guides research on development and assessment of educational computer games where students explore environmentally benign processes and supply chains in manufac- turing. She has been recognized by Northeastern University, receiving a University-wide Excellence in Teaching Award in 2000
Paper ID #32355Penalized for Excellence: The Invisible Hand of Career-TrackStratificationDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director of Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership in university and workplace settings as well as ethics and equity in engineering education.Dr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a