written surveys, they stopped writing their name or student ID number, and beganwriting their subject number only.Other aspects of their conduct demonstrated that students gained familiarity with biomedicalresearch. In the first visit, they had to be told to take their socks off to step on the impedancescale. In each case, the researchers explained why a measurement must be taken in bare feet. Insubsequent visits, the students did not require instructions to remove their socks. Similarly, theywere dressed more appropriately for the skin-fold measurement assessment. Page 12.7.8Student FAQ’s and commentsAs mentioned, many students asked questions
- Knowledge / Working as in Prof. Org. Writing Conf./ Books / to-date via Skills Consultant Papers Workshops Journals Internet transfer / Seminars from Sr. faculty12. Institutional Affiliation: Figure 2 shows the frequency distribution of respondents’institutional affiliations. The Figure 2 Respondents' Institutional Affiliation 2003 2007 100 90 75 80 67 60
writing. Each program hasa cognizant WIMS faculty or staff member who has responsibility for the educationalinstruction and overall management of the program.For in-school and teacher education initiatives, the WIMS Education Program has formedpartnerships with the K-12 school districts of Ann Arbor, Houghton/Hancock, Okemos andEast Lansing area schools, and DAPCEP (Detroit Area Pre-College Engineering Program, anacademic outreach program associated with Detroit schools), and with university-level outreach Page 12.1330.3organizations. Other individual schools that have partnered with WIMS are Grand Rapids HighSchool, Cass Tech High
Development. In addition, she has developed numerous tools to mentor young women considering engineering as a career and has been involved in the development of a women in engineering role model book for K-12 students.Patricia Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology PATRICIA A. CARLSON is professor of rhetoric at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is a long-time advocate of writing in engineering education. Carlson has been a National Research Council Senior Fellow for the U. S. Air Force, as well as having had several research fellowships with NASA (Langley and Goddard) and the Army's Aberdeen Proving Ground. She has also been a research fellow at NASA's Classroom
the group write down the proceedings (and thus not 8participate) or stop the proceedings to write down what has happened thus far. These “digitaldocuments” are easily shared among group members and the faculty advisor if necessary.Once the brainstorming and conceptual analysis is complete the students have to decide whichconcept best meets the project specifications and should be carried forward to detail design -Phase 3. Each alternative is ranked using a rational methodology, such as Pugh’s method [1],and from the ranking make a recommendation as to which concept best meets the designspecifications and should go forward to detail design. Normally the industrial sponsor would beinvolved at this
development of responsible and ethical nano-engineers, an ethics module was incorporated into ENGR 221. This module contained lecturesthat provided students with an ethical framework, including a discussion of the professionalresponsibility of engineers and conducting risk assessments. A case study based on themanufacture and use of asbestos was completed as a class to reflect on the impact of unethicaldecisions in industry. This case study led into a module covering nanotoxicity, an emerging fieldthat is studying the potential health risks posed by nanomaterials. In conjunction with theseactivities, there was a term-long class assignment to view science fiction movies that showpotential application of nanotechnology and write a paper that reflects
students couldstudy and reflect on their role as a citizen of the increasingly interconnected world.The expanded themes of global economy, sustainable development, and responsible globalcitizenships guided the lesson plans for the 2005 and 2006 GTI Study Programs. In addition,studies on the cultural, political, and economic issues that deepen students’ understanding ofChina and Taiwan were included in the study program.2.2. Study Program Student SelectionIn selecting student participants, preference was given to student leaders with strong academicrecords, with the expectation that these students would more readily disseminate what they hadlearned from the study program and, consequently, influence their peers. As for the class ofparticipants
comparison of our findings withthe findings of Atman et al.1 showed that the student team’s approaches to the design problemwere different than the Atman data (see Figure 2b). Our data indicate that students working inteams spend more time gathering information than students working individually. Although theseare preliminary findings, it appears, in fact, that novices act more like experts in terms ofinformation gathering20 when they work in teams. This finding is supported by research oncollaborative learning situations where group interactions and peer argumentation result in bettersolutions compared to individual problem solving21. It is also an observation comparing ourstudent team profiles to those from the Atman data representing freshmen
college life, alook at career opportunities, and a chance to meet professional engineers as well asengineering faculty. Students work on several projects, attend lectures, write reports,code programs, give presentations, and do problem solving and design. The IEPcounselors assist the students in their projects during the sessions in the EngineeringLearning Center, and help enforce the rules in the residence halls.Seven of the nine IEP counselors were engineering students at Notre Dame (the other twowere a pre-med student and a business student), and eight of them had either previouslyattended the camp back when they were in high school, or had worked as IEP counselors
help help help help1. Class activities for each week Page 12.1043.132. How parts of the classwork, labs, reading, orassignments related to each other 123. The grading system for the class A little Moderate Much Very muchH. Individual support as a learner NA No help help help help help1. The quality of contact with the teacher2. The quality of contact with the TAs3. Working with peers outside of
automatically created when the students login with their clickers. If desired, points can be assigned for attendance and sent to a CSV file thatcan be read by a spreadsheet.Review QuestionsOne of the strongest uses of the clickers in my opinion is for review questions during lectures.By asking questions and viewing the results, the instructor can gauge how well the students areunderstanding a concept. Just as importantly, students can see how well they are doing withrespect to their peers, because if the instructor desires, the CPS software will display bar charts ofthe results after the question has been completed. Figure 3 shows a series of questions that wereasked of students during the next class period after complex power was covered. The bar
graduatecurriculum. The class is intended primarily for aerospace engineering students, but mechanicaland electrical engineers along with engineering physics majors have taken the class. The oneprerequisite for the class is senior standing. Students are graded on the quality of their Phase Aspacecraft proposal, along with their formal presentation of the design at the end of the semester.The student’s individual grade comprises their individual contribution to the proposal, the overallquality of the completed proposal itself, and peer evaluations from their team. Ten years agothere was a homework component to the class, and each lecture had an assignment pertaining tothe lecture, but not related to the proposal effort. That homework has been removed in
• organize, participate in, and document team meetings • participate as a contributing team member in the design and problem solving processes Page 12.1432.4They should also understand and be able to • apply graphical 2-D and 3-D drawing principles • use a 3-D drawing software package • use the principles of good oral communications to effectively communicate ideas • use Microsoft PowerPoint software to aid oral presentations • use Microsoft Project for creating a simple Gantt Chart • use principles of good technical writing to effectively communicate major ideasThe IED Culminating ProjectThe goal of the IED team project is to
this synergistic relationship industryis very willing to then serve on advisory boards and respond to needs of the department. Thisoften results in additional projects for students from these industrial partnerships and the synergyof this relationship can rapidly expand the number of projects available. This closer relationshipand demonstrated community link is very important to the future of any university.The Case for Undergraduate ResearchThe quest for knowledge is the driving force behind undergraduate education no matter whatfield is being studied. Typically this means a lot of reading from a textbook, completinghomework assignments, conducting laboratory experiments, listening to lectures, taking exams,and writing reports. Unfortunately
counterparts. For instance, ourstudents’ teamwork is enhanced by their heritage in the etiquette of Arab friendship, and oralpresentations are strong and natural as a result of an oral cultural orientation. On the other hand,writing skills are naturally impeded by the fact that English is their second language. Thedesign-and-build nature of the projects is often hindered by a lack of familiarity with tools andconstruction techniques. And so on. The authors are constantly adapting and modifying thecourse content and delivery methodologies in order to provide appropriate learning outcomes forour students.Rationale for the Development of a New Model in STEPS IINeed to Develop Independent Open-ended Problem-solving SkillsAs part of a two-semester sequence
, anddevelopment schedule. Such pre-coordination is necessary to help ensure we offer studentsprojects which are suitably challenging in both size and content.With regard to project size and scope, we endeavor to provide projects employing all phases ofthe software development cycle, having approximately 800 to 1200 man-hours of work effort,and also requiring at least a modest attempt at independent research beyond our programs’course curriculums. Once all candidate projects are approved by the faculty, we develop a briefpresentation for each one to give to our senior students on the first class day. Students then rankorder the projects in which they have the most interest. At the same time, they also identify whoamong their peers they would like as team
internal stresses in the member. If you cannot measure the structure, object or member, estimate the sizes to calculate the stress. For tension and compression, determine the change in length of the member due to your assumed loads. For beams, draw shear and bending moment diagrams of the member that is bending. STEP 3 – Describe and Evaluate your system, structure or object For each of your photographs: Write ½ to 1 page describing the object of the photograph. Include descriptions of where it is located, its function, and the material from which it was constructed or fabricated. Using your analysis results, state whether you think the design is a good one or not, and why (e.g. Was the material a good choice? Is the
medicine, law, and education, particularly W.J.McGlothlin’s “Patterns of Professional Education.” 2 We were inspired by the work and writings oflandmark educators such as Lawrence Kubie3 and especially Abraham Flexner4, whose work hadrevolutionized medical education at the beginning of the last century. Flexner’s slogan, “we learn bygoing about” became my own byword.I should also mention the stimulation provided by the amusing "The Saber-Tooth Curriculum,”5 byHarold Benjamin (aka J. Abner Peddiwell) --a series of (imaginary) discourses on professionaleducation that take place between a professor and his former student. These informal ‘lectures’happen while the two are sipping many tequila daisies in "the longest bar in the world," located
, we seek to identify and value differencesamong our cadets and to leverage those differences to enhance understanding for the group. We also seekto help cadets to value the differences among their peers, subordinates and leaders. The need to produceleaders of character is a direct complement to the academic requirements. USMA’s educational process focuses on the development of the whole person. The academic, military,physical, and moral/ethical development of each cadet is accomplished through an immersive 47 monthexperience. The stated goal of the academic program [3] is to enable graduates to anticipate and respondeffectively to the uncertainties of a changing technological, social, political, and economic world. As aresult, the curriculum
elicit responses that reflect aspects of their engineeringknowledge and skills, and second to reveal how they apply this learning to engineering-designpractice. In their first and third years, students were given ten minutes to write their answers tothe question, “Over the summer the Midwest experienced massive flooding of the MississippiRiver. What factors would you take into account in designing a retaining wall system for theMississippi?” The purpose of this performance task was to analyze the breadth to which studentsframed an engineering problem. This is important, because defining the problem is as importantas solving it14 and framing is among the most difficult aspects of engineering design to assessand teach.3During the first year of the
participating in MEPs were retained at higher rates and earned GPAsaveraging one letter grade higher than non-participating students. The fundamental success-enabling principle of an MEP model is the idea of building an education environment thatfacilitates collaborative learning, which has been shown through extensive research17 to improvestudents’ satisfaction with the learning experience, self-esteem, academic performance, andretention. Based on this principle, MEPs eliminate the causes of retention problems and lowacademic performance: lack of peer support, lack of role models, and low faculty expectations.MEPs foster student involvement and motivation through four programmatic structures:clustering of students in common sections of their key
thinkingand writing skills, dividing students into two sessions: a 12 day camp for 11th and 12th graders23,and a 9 day camp for 9th and 10th graders24, which focus on critical thinking skills in academicactivities: college level writing, research skills, logical thinking/argumentation, study skills, timemanagement, course/major selection, note taking, critical reading, and presentations. EducationalUnlimited21 and Sally Ride Science Camps25 sponsor a camp for girls for girls entering 6th to 9thgrades, are overnight 10-day camps held on college campuses designed to interest girls inscience, technology and engineering using the Sally Ride Science Curriculum. Entering 11th and12th graders can earn college credit and be introduced to the university
intensive dissemination of case studies and case study based teaching and learning strategies. Other implementation will include publication of papers in ASCE and related peer-reviewed journals, and presentations at national and international conferences. • Assessing learning and evaluating innovations – the major change to this project from the prior proof-of-concept work will be the development and implementation of formal assessment strategies and instruments, as discussed in detail below.Goals of the program In order to address the need described above, the research team has established thefollowing goals: 1. Greater breadth of
College of Basic Sciences both provide a residentialeducational program for high school students. The minority engineering program within theCollege of Engineering has offered an induction program, Recruit into Engineering of HighAbility Minority Students (REHAMS), for approximately 8 years. Each summer approximately35 to 40 high school students reside on the university campus for 3 weeks for an intensiveacademic “boot camp” to prepare students for the challenges of university life. Students arerequired to take a math course, either calculus or college algebra, physics and chemistry.Students are also introduced to resume and portfolio writing, study skills, and the academicentrance policies. Participants tour several engineering labs and
student, Mandy Plumley, has been active in MentorNet forfour years. She appreciated the informality of communicating with the mentor; i.e., not puttingon a professional demeanor that she perceived a face-to-face contact would include; therefore, “Ican be more myself.” Especially during her first two years of school when she did not have aprofessor who she knew well enough to ask personal questions, Plumley valued the support andinfluence of her mentors. At times that meant help with homework, resume writing, andinterpersonal situations. She valued hearing about the reasons behind her mentors’ decisions tochange positions or to go back to school. Her first three mentors felt like “an experienced peer”;females who were flexible with communicating
percentageincrease [18]. Network structures, like those used in distance education and online networks, ifadapted for face-to-face and blended learning environments, hold promise for solvingassessment, workload, and scalability problems in higher education.2.2 The Capstone Industrial Design ClinicProject-based engineering design has been part of this ABET-certified mechanical engineeringprogram for more than a decade. In its current form in the School of Mechanical and MaterialsEngineering at Washington State University, student groups work on industry-sponsoredengineering projects ($80-$120,000 annually) for one semester. Students are responsible forevery aspect of project management, from specification writing to delivery, including budget,travel, and
21 Credits (Choice from 1-3 cores) General education courses to meet requirements of the appropriate college.The Innovation Core is 27 Credits, geared toward innovation and entrepreneurship; a keycomponent is the multi-disciplinary, long-term team activities over the sophomore, junior andsenior years. Teams are expected to include students from all years, possibly including graduatestudents. The teams will have dynamic membership and the roles of team members will changeon a regular basis. The innovation core also includes an overview course of innovation, acourse on entrepreneurship, a variation on the technical writing course focused on proposalpreparation, a course
academic quarters (22 weeks). The MSD experience is a studio course in that it adopts ageneral approach to student interaction that is hands-on, instructor facilitated, and student-centered [1]. Refer to companion paper by Walter et al, 2007 [2]for more details on the overallMSD program at RIT. Like its peer institutions, RIT strives to continuously improve curriculumstructure, integration, and assessment. The MSD course sequence is particularly crucial to thisongoing improvement due to its culminating nature. Accordingly, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) Criterion 3 Program Outcomes and Assessment states thatengineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain the following set of attributesupon graduation
writing the requirements and specs would take too long. So that part is missing unless you put the framework around it. So if we make this sort of a convincing little iPod, then what I'm hoping they'll do is if there's an ambiguity in the requirements either that I've put it in intentionally or unintentionally, and both are in there, they'll figure out what would be the answer that makes the better end product, and they'll shape the requirements according to some understanding of the end goal…” (SD107, Full professor) Page 12.441.10The third example shows how an instructor based decisions about delivering content on
-processingalgorithms, data evaluation and modeling. The fact that they were entrusted with thegeneration of a tool facilitating a recently developed method in nuclear solid state physicsproved to be highly motivating.Based on the demand to educate the students to high academic standards, the results of ascientific project have to be properly disseminated. In order to provide students with aplatform for scientific publications several journals for undergraduate researchers werefounded in the last decade. These journals comply with the same directions and qualitystandards as conventional scientific journals, as for instance a peer review system. In this waystudents become familiar with scientific writing in early stages of their academic education.Moreover