bedeveloped during the grant period. The first one of these, Geometrical Optics, is being createdand is planned to be offered in winter 2014 to a small group of students for the first time. Thecourse includes three hours of lecture and three hours of laboratory. The development of theremaining core courses is scheduled to be completed by fall 2014.c) Development of the Optics and Photonics LaboratoryIn fall 2012 the College was able to assign a dedicated room to house the Optics and PhotonicsLaboratory, which was previously located in the same room as the Electronics Laboratory. Thishas been extremely helpful in preparation for adding the new AAS PLT program which requiresmore equipment and more space. Currently the equipment in the photonics lab
used to support decision making and managerialanalysis. This is a required course for Industrial Engineering Technology students that istypically taken in their junior or senior year. After the introduction of linear programming,students participated in an approximate 10 week case study that aimed to apply networkmodeling to a problem based on real-world events. Inspired by the historical seismic activity ofthe Middle East, the Spring 2023 class case study sought to develop a distribution plan of reliefsupplies (ex., bottled water) from pre-positioned storage facilities in Turkey that could be used inthe event of a natural disaster. The case study involved 4 research assignments the studentscompleted outside of class paired with 4 in-class
understanding; and backward design. Culturalrelevance emphasizes the need to understand students’ linguistic, geographic, gender, racial, andgenerational, among other cultural, knowledge as assets that can be leveraged for curriculum andteaching [3]. Concept-based understanding prioritizes inquiry-based learning and application andtransferability of knowledge versus rote memorization of information or discrete skillacquisition. Backwards design provides an accessible structure for planning assessment andlearning activities in ways that center conceptual understanding and student inquiry [4]. Teacherskept reflective journals, analyzed science and mathematics state standards frameworks, and*1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
activities.Because of their lessons learned through the AREP process, Melissa and Isabella aremaking plans for putting students in more control of club recruitment and activities.Based on their observation that the participation of girls increased when the femalestudents brought in their friends, Melissa and Isabella hope to increase the number offemale students in the STEM Club in year 2 by encouraging the females to spread theword within their social circles to try out the club. This places the students in a positionof leadership with influence on the club’s success. Additionally, Melissa and Isabellafound that many students in the STEM Club were interested in pursuing engineeringcareers but unsure which engineering field. This uncertainty lends itself
as the gig economy [3], their recognition as a valid method for current orpotential employees to demonstrate capabilities is still lagging in manufacturing, particularlyamong smaller-sized manufacturers (P. Mintz, personal communication, February 12, 2023).The project team is currently developing a plan to utilize MEP members from TRACKS-CN tohelp educate small and medium-sized manufacturers about the benefits of micro-credentials. Inan effort to begin to develop best practices for sharing the benefits of micro-credentials withMEP clients, the PI has initiated conversations with regional managers who support the NorthCarolina Manufacturing Extension Partnership.ObjectivesAs previously mentioned, the goal of the ATE project is to enhance
organization with some combination of the organized with concept to arrange by linearly features outlined in 1 within/between branch features outlined in 2 integration and the systematic planning connected. There are and 2. Does not fit well connections. Some, but and 3. Does not fit well possible use of feedback and united effort few (or no) connections into either category. not complete, into either category. loops, if within/between the integration of branches applicable. Sophisticated
thetransfer to a new university easy. Strategies employed by the LINK scholarship program focuson integration of new transfer students into the College of Engineering culture and onprofessional planning and skill development. We recognize that extracurricular involvement andleadership experience while an engineering student are important aspects in professionaldevelopment, but that a two-year timeline makes them difficult to achieve without intentionality.Efforts to integrate new transfers include a zero-credit (no cost) seminar that serves to familiarizestudents with the college and university environment and resources. Resumes are written,evaluated, and edited, and visits from the career services offices make sure that students areaware of support
--- --- 100% --- 1:1 Mentorship: Grow Your Network --- --- 50% 50% Parenting as a Professor --- --- --- 100% COVID-19 Check-In --- --- 100% ------ = 0%Survey results also revealed participants found the sessions to provide information beneficial totheir academic career planning process, as nearly 100% of the sessions were rated as “beneficial”or “very beneficial” (see Table 3). The How to Write Stellar Research Articles session wasidentified by all participants as “very beneficial.”Table 3. Session Information was Beneficial for Academic Career Planning Session Title
paths that could lead to success. Our second goal is to improve thestructure of the Decision-Making Competency Inventory (DMCI) so that it can explain student'sdecision-making competency in more detail and in congruence with the Self-Regulation Modelof Decision-Making. This instrument will be used to map decision-making competency toacademic choices and outcomes. The third goal is to develop an Academic Dashboard as a meansfor sharing relevant research results with students. This will allow students to have access to thestrategies, information, and stories needed to make and implement adaptive decisions. This paperhighlights our progress in the fifth year of the project and our plans going forward.Mapping Pathways - Studying OverpersistenceThe
Dublin, Ireland, in 2003 and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2006 and 2010. He has been the recipient of over a dozen invention, entrepreneurship, and student mentoring awards including the MIT $100K business plan competition, Whitaker Health Sciences Fund Fellowship, and the MIT Graduate Student Mentor of the Year.Dr. Donal Padraic Holland, University College Dublin D´onal Holland is an Assistant Professor in the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Uni- versity College Dublin, and an Associate at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. His research interests include engineering design education, methodologies for
students each semester, and mentor incomingfreshmen during the bridge camp and introductory courses. Mentors are also encouraged topursue their own ideas and passions, and they are given support to plan and carry out novelprograms. Mentors have written proposals and been given seed funds for innovative activitiessuch as a the first 24-hour computer hackathon in Louisiana, a weekend bootcamp forsophomores in chemical engineering, and a 3-day robot build, each demonstrating leadership andcommitment to the community. Analyses have shown that mentors are retained and graduate in engineering at a 30-40%higher rate than their CoE peers. Over 80 mentors have graduated since the beginning of thisprogram and are now employed across a spectrum of
Paper ID #21337Student Career Decision Making Approaches and Development of Profes-sional Engineering TrajectoriesDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Nichole Ramirez, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Nichole Ramirez is a postdoctoral researcher in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue
underrepresented groups.Open Space Technology WorkshopUsing the open space technology (OST) model, the unconference will self-organize its questionsand activities around these goals. OST is a self-organizing practice of collective activity that is inkeeping with maker culture.In order to work well, an unconference or OST workshop requires: ● A powerful theme, ● Interested and committed group, ● Space to meet with full group and for break-outs, ● Time to achieve desired results (Owen, n.d.).The creativity and leadership of participants emerge as they initiate sessions on topics that matterto them, engage in inquiry, reflection, and learning, and develop plans, recommendations, and arecord of the proceedings as the process unfolds. These
planned to obtain Stayed Same 55.6% 54.5% 55.0% Increased 44.4% 36.4% 40.0%Based on the results shown in Table 3 and 4, it seems like there is no difference between the firstand second year. However, when comparing the pre and post survey results for 19 differentquestions, there are some differences between the two years. Each question asks REUparticipants’ confidence in one type of ability, such as formulating a research question. Byconducting two-tailed t-test for the first year’s results, only one question (Dealing withunanticipated delays in conducting research) shows significant improvement with p-value of 0.03.For the second year, there are four questions show
project.Next stepsAs we finish year two and plan for the third year of the funded programming, bridging thefindings between teacher and student outcomes and collaborative processes will become moreimportant. At the end of year one, we were able to bring together individuals from ourpartnership organizations at a summer summit to engage in collaborative curriculumdevelopment. Although the university still had a heavy hand in finalizing the classroom activitiesfor year two, this model of engagement allowed for more teacher buy-in with the material,consistent with our goals for sustainability. Another summit is planned for the end of year twoand, informed by our preliminary research findings, we seek to further scaffold classroomresponsibility to shift
specialized knowledge in subject and can involve in professional activities. 8. Demonstrates specialized knowledge in adjoining disciplines including knowledge in a new discipline or profession. Levels for Specialized Skills 1. Demonstrates basic cognitive and practical skills to perform tasks within stipulated rules. 2. Demonstrates skills needed to establish correlations among functions and tasks. 3. Demonstrates cognitive and practical skills for perform tasks and problem solve. 4. Demonstrates ability to select alternative actions based on reciprocal effects on other functional areas. 5. Plans and evaluates processes while considering alternatives and impacts. 6
Faculty Connections [7] Faculty Support [9] Professional Development [21] STEM Career Development [7] Cost-of-Attendance Support and Planning [7] Extracurricular Support [14] Academic Peer Support [6] Graduate Student Connections [5] Additional Support [16] Developing a Local Network [5] Engaging with Professionals [5] STEM Peer Connections [5] Extracurricular Information [6]Limitations & Future WorkAs the project is ongoing and developmental in nature, we do not currently have any limitationsto report. However, we do plan to pilot version 2.0 of our survey instrument with a broader set ofSTEM students and institutions in spring 2019. Our target sample for the second is
(summary of the Water, Earth, and Biota initiative as a 2000highlight for Geosciences), Geotimes, 46(7), 25-26.4. Hooper, R., and E. Foufoula-Georgiou (2008), Advancing the Theory and Practice of Hydrologic Science, EosTrans. AGU, 89(39), doi:10.1029/2008EO390005.5. CUAHSI (2010). Water in a Dynamic Planet: A Five-year Strategic Plan for Water Science(http://dx.doi.org/10.4211/sciplan.200711).6. Shaw, S. B., and M. T. Walter (2012), Using comparative analysis to teach about the nature of nonstationarityin future flood predictions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16(5), 1269–1279, doi:10.5194/hess-16-1269-2012.7. Meselhe, E., McCorquodale, J.A., Shelden, J., Dortch, M., Brown, T.S., Elkan, P., Rodrigue, M.D., Schindler,J.K
practice. K-12 science teachers are increasingly pressured to include engineeringdesign in their curriculum; however, there are relatively few engineering-focused professionaldevelopment programs in comparison to those for traditional science and mathematics. [3] [4] Professional development can improve teacher practice,[5] [6] especially if the programsare content specific,[7] inquiry-based, and learner-centered. [8] [9] Successful professionaldevelopment provides teachers with content, pedagogical knowledge, and training; training thatincludes guidance, support, feedback, and time for reflection and planning.[10] [11] In addition,effective professional development approaches include peer support, teacher-developed researchexperiences, and
the use ofadditional resources about research-based teaching and learning3 to scaffold their discussions.Each instructor chose a new (to them) interactive teaching strategy to use in an upcoming course.Groups met regularly throughout the school year to discuss and plan their teaching. The group Page 26.765.2leaders continued meeting throughout the year (again via phone conference), as well. Conferencecall meeting notes, longer narrative descriptions written by group leaders, and survey data werecollected to study the design of the groups.ResultsResearch Question #1- Faculty Development ModelThe survey results indicated that the faculty
assist in instrument testing andvalidation; 3) to complete a literature and prior art review and construct our test instrument informs appropriate to both engineering students and practicing engineers with the assistance ofpsychometric experts; and 4) to develop an instrument testing and validation plan appropriate toour research goals and contexts.Significant ResultsIn this section, we summarize the following: 1) Delphi Study key findings; 2) results ofcollaborator recruitment efforts; 3) a summary of our instrument research, instrumentconstruction process, and face validity study; and 4) the design of our unique testing andvalidation process
vary with respect to first-year engineering structure, content, andtiming describe their experience participating in engineering communities of practice and theiremerging engineering identities?” Data is being collected through a baseline survey of first-yearengineering students, three-phase interviews with students following their FYE courses, andfocus groups with FYE instructional staff. This executive summary and poster focus on thelongitudinal memos which have assisted in our ongoing analysis of participant interviews.Additional details regarding work completed to date and future plans are also discussed.Theoretical LensFor this work, identity and community are conceptualized using Wenger’s Community ofPractice [5]. We conceptualize
the establishment of a number of academies with STEM-related pathways Renewed emphasis on rigor, relevance and relationships by o Focusing on developing a deeper understanding of a subject versus just learning facts, o Connecting with local business and industry to make education more relevant, and o Developing caring and supporting connections with faculty Emphasis on graduates being college and career ready and beginning that emphasis early on, not just in high school Increased emphasis on project- and problem-based and other forms of experiential learning as an instructional method Development of educational and career plans for the futureThe
low-income families, we have implementeddiverse support programs, including co-curricular and outreach activities. These initiatives weremade possible through the NSF’s S-STEM grant, awarded to us in August 2022. The project aimsto prepare talented minority and underrepresented students to successfully enter computing-relatedworkforce or graduate program to meet local and national needs, which would be also helpful forincreasing the diversity of computing field. The purpose of this paper is to spotlight our ongoingefforts, provide an overview of the outcomes achieved through these initiatives, and outline ourforthcoming plans for continued support and enhancement.Program Description and Supporting ActivitiesOur S-STEM program aims to empower
tenets. First, change and healing in any system beginwith the individuals in the system changing and healing through reexamining assumptionsand mental models, including beliefs and values. Second, since individuals make up asystem and culture, as individuals change, heal, and re-engage, the system will alsochange and heal. Evidence suggests that a change process that begins with individuals’mental models—especially leaders’ [7]—and that accounts for emotions and desires [8], iseffective to successfully bring forth change in an organization.Initial StepsAs fundamental culture change is a difficult and involved process, the first year of the granthas largely focused on planning and logistics to build the foundation for a successfultransformation
skills and an interdisciplinaryfocus, such educational experiences have deeper and more meaningful effects. Our MontclairState University NSF Research Experience for Teachers (RET) grant (NSF Award Number:#2206885, IRB Number: 22-23-3003) exposed teachers to a program integrating solar weather,data science, computer science and artificial intelligence, and STEM pedagogy. The cohortcomprised nine middle- and high-school teachers with diverse academic backgrounds anddemographics from northern and central New Jersey. The teachers interacted with and wereadvised by faculty from Montclair and two other institutions, and by outside experts, to learn thebasics, develop lesson plans, and present these to and interact with a learning-intensive summercamp
a demographic andleadership questionnaire. Additional sections include logistics reminders for researchers, aprobing question plan, and engineering and leadership identity checklists. To ensure the focusgroup runs smoothly, at least two recording devices are utilized to capture focus groupdiscussion, participants are sent multiple reminder emails and texts, and the interviewers’ tone iskept friendly and conversational. In Focus Group 0 all three researchers interviewed REUstudents. In Focus Group 1 and Focus Group 2 two researchers interviewed participants whilethe REU students and one researcher observed from a viewing room.IntroductionThe introduction is based on standard practice for an IRB exempt study. Participants arewelcomed as they
on Lifelong STEM Learning Julie is the Associate Director of the the Oregon State University Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning. In this role she focuses on investigating and enhancing the quality of research impacts, working to redefine undergraduate success, and working across campus to support transformation of undergraduate STEM education practices. Julie brings experience working with research organizations at OSU including Oregon Sea Grant and the Institute for Natural Resources. Prior to her work as research administrator Julie spent many years working for non-profit organizations and as a U.S. Peace Corps Volunteer on marine conservation issues including state and regional research planning and
Oregon Sea Grant and the Institute for Natural Resources. Prior to her work as research administrator Julie spent many years working for non-profit organizations and as a U.S. Peace Corps Volunteer on marine conservation issues including state and regional research planning and policy initiatives, citizen-science water quality monitoring and enforcement, marine habitat restoration, marine reserves establishment and monitoring, endangered species conservation and management, and community-based conservation pro- graming in the Pacific Islands. Julie has a MSc. in Marine Resource Management from OSU. She serves as an advisor to the office of research development, and serves on the National Alliance for Broader Impacts
regarding time, rules, and regulations. Schools also have constraints for days and times and even “better” or preferred months during the school year and even times of day for students to leave a school. Listening to these stakeholders and honoring their constraints and limitations is one step in organizing a good and effective tour. The Tour Process (before, during, after) Generally, a tour process has three stages: pre-tour planning, the tour event day, and post tour follow up and activities. All of these are equally important to provide good experiences for all participants (industry hosts, students, parents, and teachers, and third party organizers or