participants identifying as biracial. The interviews were semi-structured, in-person interviews that lasted approximately onehour. As of the date of this study, two interviews in the series of planned interviews had beencompleted per student. The first interview occurred in the spring semester of students' firstcollege year (spring 2023) and was designed to understand students' perceptions of themselves asengineers, how they experienced the classroom and other spaces on campus, and theirattributions about their self-efficacy for student success. The second interview occurred in thefall semester of the second college year (fall 2023) and was designed to understand students'experiences as they transitioned into their majors, and made sense of
Paper ID #38440A New Normal: Pedagogical Implications for Physics and STEM Teachingand Learning in the Post-Pandemic EraDr. Teresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Director and Faculty Liaison to the Combined Plan Dual-degree Engineering Program at American University. Dr. Larkin conducts educational research and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as a learning and assessment tool in her introductory physics courses for non
will happen anyway. Hence, the need to bepurposeful, act with deliberation, and to plan ahead.On Distance EducationSeveral panelists comment on the significance and challenges of distance education.On Educating EducatorsDr. Watford emphasizes how important educating educators is … they are challenged to educatedifferently, yet are not prepared to do so. She also comments on how long ‘active learning’ hasbeen part of engineering education transformation, but questions how pervasive or wellimplemented such approaches are on a large scale. Students are not responsive to ‘old’methods. We must learn how to teach using the tools and methods we are challenging students tolearn. She uses the VLOOKUP function in Excel as an example. How many professors
, followed by the Clean Air and Water Acts, was part of a broader plan to protect the environment from any point source of pollution or contamination.” (Ramirez, 2021).The article points out the limits of the law when it was created in that it omitted to include civilrights protections. Ramirez then traces a history of the environmental justice movement and howits roots lay with Black communities. Through several case studies, Ramirez traces the activismby various communities to then detail the development of environmental policies that have comeafter NEPA. Ultimately, the Vox article discusses the limits of NEPA as it does not addressdisparate harm to disadvantaged communities. Even if developers put together an environmentalimpact
material (e.g., when they address assigned homework).Office hours outside of class suffer from logistical difficulties associated with aligning time of availabilitywith times of student need. Further, the students most in need of help are often least likely to seek it out.The traditional environment often has a competitive aspect in which the only measure of success is anexam grade.The course redesign process involved a period of planning and discussion among the faculty assigned toteach the courses and some faculty who taught the downstream courses that depend most directly on theoutcomes from the mechanics courses. Implementation of the new course elements was gradual.Dynamics was the first course to undergo the complete redesign. This choice
sessions with content ranging from “Getting Started inEarSketch” to “ Racial Discourse in the Classroom.” These sessions range from 1-2 hours, arefacilitated by YVIP curriculum directors, include hands-on activities, and are recorded for futurereference. MethodsEvaluation Framework The evaluation was conducted following the principles of the participatory evaluationframework, defined as “applied social research that involved a partnership between trainedevaluation personnel and practice-based decision makers, organization members with programresponsibility, or people with a vital interest with the program” [15]. These various stakeholderswere involved in the planning and design of the evaluation
engineering) is the work of Guerin and hercolleagues [20]. Borrego and her team also examined motivational factors to consider master’sand Ph.D. degrees separately. For instance, they found that “for every one-unit increase instudents’ self-efficacy, they were over eight times more likely to plan to enroll in a master’sprogram and 13 times more likely to plan to enroll in a Ph.D. program relative to not attendinggraduate school” [8, p. 154].Therefore, the body of literature on women in graduate degrees in engineering remains extremelylimited, especially disaggregated on each graduate degree (MSc, MEng, or Ph.D.) or engineeringsubfields. In order to address systematic challenges that threaten EDI, specifically in engineeringgraduate programs, it is
, assumptions in their model, and how realrockets and rocket scientists might address these issues.Early plans for this activity shifted too much responsibility onto students and teachers to learnnew material. The first iteration had little scaffolding and only a short video that presented theactivity. There were plans to have options for both python and spreadsheet plotting, but at highschool PD events teachers explained that they, as well as the students, need more practice andexperience in both software. Even with limited experience in spreadsheet software, teachersexpressed excitement during the demonstration of the plotting in Google Sheets activity. Sincereceiving this feedback, the course was adjusted to include extra tutorial videos for the
papers that summarized the main idea or argument in that section. Revisiting our message box • Identified and defined the problem to be addressed in the paper. • Defined our audience. • Organized our thoughts to address the problem and create a solution. • Implemented the planned solution to fulfill our goal to solve the defined problem. • Discussed benefits of the defined solution to the problem. Improving our message and • Continued to improve upon the message box from previous workshops by those of other teams comparing our message box to
moments.Increased Awareness of Parent Reactions to Child EmotionsOne primary theme that emerged amongst participating parents was an awareness of themselvesand their methods of handling frustration or set-back. This recognition often occurred throughobserving their children’s frustration or failure and reflecting on their approach oracknowledgement of it. Children’s frustration was often readily perceived by parents andsubsequently understood or supported as a natural or even beneficial component to learning. Inacknowledging their children’s frustrations and moments when things did not go according tooriginal plans (i.e., failures), many parents chose to model tactics for working through it orsuggested ways that children might move beyond frustration.One
carried out a solid waste management planning activity for a population. We had to estimate the mass of waste per capita and then by population, and the distance to the nearest landfill was considered, cost of transportation, and recycling use. We chose the population. (Student A, Colombian University)Focusing less on the design of sanitation facilities, students had to work in a ‘real-life’ contextto diagnose the current conditions and, based on that, propose solutions to ensure an adequateand sufficient supply of services, considering cultural and contextual variables. One educatorexplained: The students realise that there are populations with sanitary units but do not treat wastewater or do not have sanitary
resources for multiple internet accesses and private physics informationservices. Our university is planning to purchase the McGraw Hill Publishing Proctoriotechnology. Student Government Newspapers articles were up in arms with objections,consistent with more anxiety. The student cheating and plagiarism issues in online coursesduring the COVID challenge could be alleviated using the divergent thinking exercises describedabove. The asking of a graphic solution is less likely to be found on pay-for-answer websitessuch as Chegg.com, and the asking of a graphic solution would then be more likely to preventplagiarism. While grading is a legal contractual obligation, the assessment at second priority is aprofessional obligation. Exercises with full
world how similarities Analyze the rate of Conduct research Develop a plan that around them guides and differences technological to inform incorporates technological among scientific, development and intentional knowledge from development and mathematics, predict future inventions and science, engineering design engineering, and diffusion and innovations mathematics, and technological adoption of new other
more substantial engagements, such as in the aforementioned Economicscourse, would be most beneficial to students. Such “checkpoints” could be structured as guestlectures and/or course modules that focus on specific communication competencies that fit intothe structures and lesson plans of existing engineering courses. For example, courses that useteamwork could import teamwork specific modules Dr. Olukemi Akintewe is the Director of theFoundations of Engineering Lab course, which is required for all first-year engineering students.Drs. Akintewe and Burchfield collaborated to investigate how students might be impacted by ashort, targeted lecture on intercultural communication and teamwork prior to being assigned totheir course project teams
the product realization process (i.e. implementation tomeet the product requirements for the customer) ending with delivery to the customer. Themanagement processes include key activities such as planning, decision analysis, and technicaldata management which are key to the current research. Figure 1 - System Engineering Technical and Management Processes for Defense Systems ( DAG - Defence Acquisition Guidebook) [4].University of Berkeley, CA, further expanded the V-diagram life cycle timeline model with amore detailed definition of both decomposition and integration sections as shown in Figure 2below [5]. Figure 2 – Detailed Phases of Systems Engineering [5]Among the Cross-Cutting activities noted
can attempthard problems early. Based on their challenge experienced, it is believed that they will learnevaluative and creative service design concepts earlier. To assess whether this is true, we plan tonot only rely up final course feedback, but also a mid-course survey. The survey questions willuse a Likert scale to solicit feedback from students. While the survey is not fully developed, hereare examples in consideration. Table 1. Mid-Course Student Sentiment Regrading RTES Simulation I have found that simulation-based workloads where I must apply fixed priority RM policy have helped me to think critically about service design and apply RMA. # students polled
with, and learn from others; thinkcritically about the topics in the context of their positionality, and interrogate the impacts of thesetopics on both their identities and others’.Course implementationThe course was piloted in the fall 2020 semester and was offered in the subsequent spring 2021and fall 2021 semesters. While initially planned as an in-person course, university restrictionsdue to the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in fully remote implementations in the first twosemesters (2020-2021 academic year). Creating a remote course required several considerations.First, class lectures were held via Zoom. However, the university Zoom license did not includeclosed captioning in the 2020-2021 academic year, which meant that students needing it
ideas and make a plan, they are invited tomanipulate materials swatches, gesture, draw, and talk with their partner to share their ideas anddecide on a plan. YES materials are also designed to promote language development. Drawingfrom best practices for language learners, all units provide visual scaffolds, have studentsgenerate language in group discussion, and provide tips for educators about strategies that canenhance students’ communicative abilities.Engineering IdentityTaken together, socially engaged engineering, authentic engineering practices, and asset-basedpedagogies, foster educational experiences that can lead to improved learning of disciplinaryknowledge and an engineering identity and mindset. Figure 1 shows how these three
curricula have the potential to engage students, teachers playa critical role in the kinds of opportunities that are afforded to students. Teachers may useengineering curricular materials as planned by the designers or make customizations to fit thespecific contexts of their students (e.g., Guzey et al., 2017; Van Haneghan et al., 2015). Forexample, teachers can make instructional decisions to bring in and value their students’ culturesand ideas within engineering projects (Wilson-Lopez & Garlick, 2017). In this way, teachersnecessarily filter the ways that engineering curricular materials are implemented in theirclassrooms (e.g., Lilly, Chiu, et al., 2021; Remillard, 1999).However, teachers, and specifically elementary teachers, can face
previous experience with RStudio, 8.57% hadminor experience, and only 1.43% had significant experience. Furthermore, 91.43% of studentshad no internship experience applying the topics taught in this course, but 64.29% plan to in thefuture or during their career.Course Overview The course we decided to focus on for this study is an introductory applications-basedstatistics course. It is a foundational statistics course that includes heavy theoretical concepts aswell as the use of the software RStudio. The class meets three times a week. Two of the sessionsare 100 minutes long, while the third session is 50 minutes long. Of the weekly class time,approximately four hours are spent on instruction and approximately one hour is reserved for a
the impacts that the Covid-19 pandemic, in particular the social isolation and requirement ofvirtual instruction, was having on students’ academic and emotional well-being. The successfulimplementation outcomes of the new curriculum design were well appreciated by thecorresponding engineering department, who supported the initiative to create a new introductoryengineering course under the degree plan of the Engineering Leadership and Education department.Objectives and Scope of WorkThis paper aims to present the outcomes from the first implementation of a new curriculum design,which was recently adopted for an introductory engineering course to increase the self-empowerment of first-year undergraduate students at a Hispanic Serving
learners to managetensions inherent in their environment. Because most students already live in such environmentsteaching definable or enumerable outcomes makes less sense than helping student to bemetacognitive and reflective how they manage and relate with technology.IntroductionThis paper uses technological literacy as a foil, to reflect back a vision of technology andengineering education that can lay claim to be better than what currently exists. Making a claimto be better sets up several conditions on the claimant – to identify what needs to be improvedand why; to craft a credible plan explaining why the situation will be improved in some specificway; and that any change will not have unpredicted negative consequences, particularly forgroups
# Objects # Objects Section 1 Section 2 Career Refers to videos, plans of studies, and external links 69 69exploration that were designed to help students explore the different engineering disciplines.Assessment Refers to any traditional grading object, such as 48 41 quizzes, homework, and activities for extra credit for which the students receive a grade. This category was left out from the modeling, as it was directly related to the learning outcome.Miscellaneous Refers to links or content objects related to
interested inapplying to Stanford an opportunity to strengthen their graduate school applications and speak toprofessors they may be interested in working with. I got involved in planning both the 2020 and2021 installments of the program – in 2020, it was able to go international for the first time sinceit was entirely virtual due to the pandemic. I think programs like SERGE reduce the intimidationbarrier of applying to Stanford and increase confidence in students who might be experiencingimposter syndrome despite being very accomplished. Helping plan these events made me evenmore sure of my place in building up the next generation
each student with a peer rating average score that rangesfrom 0 to 5. The tool generates a report that presents students with anonymous feedback fromtheir peers. Students then use this report in developing an action plan to improve on theirstrengths and weaknesses. A team debrief session is held during one of the lab sessions.Project Ownership Scale:Students’ feelings of intellectual and emotional project ownership were measured using A 16-item Likert style survey was developed based on Hanauer et al. 2-year study (D. I. Hanauer et al.,2012). The survey consists of two subscales: the cognitive ownership subscale, a 10-item five-point scale that assess the degree to which students feel they have intellectual ownership overtheir work & the
control interface relies on personal experiences, then theindividuals in the room hold great responsibility to cultivate a diverse experience directory.Stereotypes and biases within the design will stem from the designers. The students have crackedthe conversation that users have different experiences and knowledge, but now we need to exposethem to how designing incorporates societal considerations as well.Pilot Conversations: Social Dimension of Design Future/Next StepsA curriculum is being developed by a joint collaboration between the School of Engineering andDepartment of Sociology at our institution to drive the conversation of social and educationalinfluences in human-centered design biases. Our plan is to create a pedagogical tool to