. Current engineering curricula are not fully equippingthem to properly deal with these challenges4-9. These concerns, growing electricity demands, andenergy market deregulation have increased the interest in sustainability, distributed generationand renewable energy systems (RES). Given the rapid progress in these areas, there are needs forprofessionals with adequate knowledge, able to plan, design and operate of such energy systems,assess and analyze energy resource potential, or to perform analytic evaluation of their impactson power systems or environment1. Education, training and learning are important aspects thatin taking the necessary steps to reshape our way of living into a more sustainable one. Time isrunning short therefore special
importance of team development and performance. Next, the instructor provided the 3)lecture highlights, 4) example problem(s), and 5) group work as done in the Fall 2014 semester(described above). Three two-stage exams were also utilized as was done in the Fall 2014semester.Table 1. Sample of team-building questions Sample of Ice Breaker Questions What kind of place do you currently live (dorm, house, apartment, fraternity, sorority, etc.)? What is your favorite restaurant and why? What is the most beautiful place you have ever visited? Describe one volunteer experience in the last few years? What adventure did you do in the last year or plan to do in the next year? What is your #1 hobby
we planned to prepare the students for the jigsaw session, but dueto scheduling conflicts, we held the jigsaw in the recitation period directly following an exam.To avoid burdening students already anxious about an exam with the need to additionally preparefor this activity, we decided not to announce the session prior to class. Students were tasked withexplaining their subteam’s work to students from other production phases. We asked them toshare the following in their jigsaw groups: • Update of important findings • What was important to know for your particular phase? • Why was it important for your design?At the end of the jigsaw session, we elicited anonymous feedback, asking the students to writewhat they’d like to see
engineeringstudents, but also helps with engineering focused activities for the College, networks with K-12teachers, creates a wide variety of engineering centered lesson plans, and gives tours to visitingK-12 schools from across the state. The resource is classroom-unaffiliated, meaning it was notcreated for the purpose of supporting the first-year project and is independent of the College ofEngineering curriculum. The formal support provided to first-year projects was implementedyears after the program’s inception and arose out of a desire to help students thrive in their first-year, not as a demand of the current curriculum. This resource is a combination of a peer-led learning and leadership program and thetraditional makerspace concept. The
identify, understand, and adapt to therapidly evolving needs and circumstances of contemporary SVSM.SVSM Research in Higher Education. In the post WWII era, higher education researchattended more to student veteran issues than to student veteran experiences. These issuesincluded the larger impacts of G.I. Bill assistance programs [e.g., 16, 17], curricular design andinstructional delivery needs of veterans [e.g., 18, 19, 20], provisions for awarding college creditfor past military training, courses, and experience [e.g., 17], and the types of supports needed bystudent veterans [e.g., 17, 21, 22, 23]. Few studies of this era attended to student veteranexperience; those that did so chronicled student veteran post discharge academic plans
system in California was established by the 1960 Donahue HigherEducation Act, better known as California’s Master Plan for Higher Education [1]. The structureof the system is in three tiers- the state-wide University of California (UC), the regionallyorientated California State University (CSU), and the locally focused Community Colleges (CC)[7]. Each of these systems has a different enrollment criterion: the UC system being the mostselective and the CC system open to all students who are at least 18 years old or a high schoolgraduate. As established in the Master Plan, the goal of the UC system is to award bachelor’sdegrees to the top 12.5% of high school graduates and the CSU has a target of 33.3% of thepopulation [7].As largest university
others.People form friendships with individuals who resemble them, and individuals coalesce intosocial groups on the basis of common attributes [14]. Furthermore, group identification predictsself-stereotyping. People apply the group’s characteristics to themselves or apply their individualcharacteristics to the group, downplaying differences they may have with group members [15],[16]. As a result, people often feel positive emotions, such as solidarity and unity, whenembedded among similar people.To compare the predictions made by the application of ODT at the individual level (ODT-I) withalternative theories, we planned two self-report studies. These studies have small sample sizesand thus only constitute a preliminary investigation.Study 1The first
scores, financial need status, involvement inextracurricular activities, recommendation letters, essay writing skills and whether the candidatewas from an underrepresented group in engineering. Each committee members’ rankings wereaggregated equally to figure out the overall student eligibility ranking.Finally, the candidates were contacted with official scholarship offer letters. The selection ofseven candidates whom all accepted the offers were realized in two rounds of selection cycle. Inorder to implement an evaluation plan with the purpose of measuring this project’s early impactin attracting and recruiting students for careers in nuclear related fields, a first semester intakesurvey of not only award candidates but their peers in the
instructional method was an exploratory studio journey of discovery with a graphicalemphasis. The student outcomes included spatial organizations (floor plans), visualizations(elevations), and basic detailing (sections). One observation was that BIM provided a logicalapplication to an otherwise unscientific design journey. The studio assessments werequalitative. This created some apprehension as the grading appeared subjective. The assessmentwas based on a qualitative relative grading system [27, pp. 434-435]. The course contributed todemonstrating the ABET performance criteria of “ability to design a system . . . within realisticconstraints;” (2) “ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessaryfor engineering practice
) Coalition building Q136_4 Investigating and securing resources needed to implement new Coalition building & Idea ideas. (Secure resources) realization Q136_5 Developing adequate plans and schedules for the Idea realization & implementation of new ideas. (Develop plans) Transfer/diffusion Q136_6 Selling a product or service in the marketplace. (Sell product) Transfer/diffusionIndividual innovative behavior: Individual innovative behavior is the central variable inthis research study. As described earlier, individual innovative behavior is summarized as allindividual actions that contribute to
SCCT predictors contributedsignificant variance in satisfaction and persistence outcomes, with self-efficacy and supportsserving as reliable predictors [4]. We found nonsignificant, single-group differences inassociations within the model (i.e., Latinxs vs. Whites); however, intersectional differences werefound. Specifically, we found contextual differences for Latinx engineering students (i.e.,differences between Latinxs attending HSIs and PWIs). These results suggest that interventionsaimed at broadening Latinxs’ participation in engineering need to be tailored for Latinx studentsubgroups.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Strategic Plan identifies developing a diverse STEMworkforce as a key objective [5]. Despite this, slow
would be interested in listening tomore episodes in the future.The students were allowed to select the two episodes for the assignment. Table 3 shows abouthalf of the students listened to episodes on being an early career engineer (Episode 1), civilengineering (Episode 2), and mechanical engineering (Episode 4). One-third of the studentslistened to the episode on being a senior-level engineering student (Episode 5), while less than10% listened to the episode on being an engineering instructor (Episode 3). The students seemedto select topics that are most relevant to their current situation and future plans since the twomost common majors in the study were civil engineering and mechanical engineering, moststudents would become seniors in a few
earlyCS exposure also positively impacted math majors: many minored in CS or took more CScourses than required; many opted for a BS in Applied Math or chose upper-division electiveswith a computational or applied focus. Our hypothesis is that early CS exposure improves theexperience of math majors by expanding their awareness of career options and by developingskills that enhance their conceptual understanding and problem-solving capabilities.RecruitmentOur recruitment plan has three stages.First, we invite students to apply to the CS/M Scholars Program. The invitees have alreadyapplied to our university, have demonstrated an interest in majoring in computer science ormathematics and have shown academic potential. We determine a student’s
] J.M. Keller,”Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design,” Journal of Instructional Development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2-10, 1987.[12] M. G. Moore, “Theory of transactional distance,” Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, vol. 1, pp. 22-38, 1993.[13] D. R. Garrison, T. Anderson, & W. Archer, “The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective,” The internet and higher education, vol. 13, pp. 5-9, 2010.[14] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, & T. W. Knott, “An analysis of motivation constructs with first‐year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 319
areas of strength, such as creativity and risk-taking, while acknowledging challenges, participants build self-esteem and realize they are not alone. The following parent quote shows the value of this approach: “I’m so glad [he] was engaged throughout the week. I so appreciate the opportunity given to him and the other students. Having an ADHD diagnosis made him feel different (in a negative way) from his peers and I believe affects his confidence at times. The experience at the camp the other week somehow “normalized” the diagnosis allowing him to embrace it rather than hide it.”• Participant-centered planning- Observations from the high school program showed that in order to
environmental issues in particular. This method therefore avoids bias in the studentresponses, since leading questions were not posed. The interview questions asked students whatthey had been doing the previous year in courses, outside of classes, and summer internships.The interviews also asked questions about students’ views of social responsibility and futurecareer plans. The interviews were transcribed. Emergent themes related to the research questionsaround environmental issues were identified in the interview transcripts. The themes werediscussed by the two authors to establish convergent opinions.The relevant context of environmental opportunities at each of the three institutions initiallyattended by the environmentally-motivated students in
being introduced in pre-college settings. These pre-collegelearning experiences are opportunities to develop students’ interests further and continuallytransform their identities [19], [20]. This period of development increases the importance ofintroductory pre-college engineering activities that are “inviting and engaging for all students,particularly those who are underserved, underperforming, or underrepresented in STEM fields,including girls, minorities, students from low socio-economic backgrounds, students withindividualized education plans, and English-language learners” [21, p. 117]. In pre-collegesettings, positive collaborative experiences situated with engineering concepts could promoteinterests and continued engagement with pathways
biomedical engineering program.Figure 1: Design thinking process plan for larger NSF research grant (adopted from [4]). Thecomponents of the design sessions conducted in BME are highlighted within the red box.Diversity and Inclusion in EngineeringIntegrating diversity and inclusion into an engineering program is a complex challenge. One ofthe reasons behind the persistent lack of diversity could be the presence of systemic exclusionarymindsets and behaviors that permeate various cultures of engineering and requires institutional-level reforms [5] and shifts in culture [6]. One model of such institutional reform has beendescribed by Winters [7]. Winters defines inclusion as follows: “Inclusion is a value, and as suchmust be inherent in and integrated
solutions tostudent-defined problems is held in the last week of class. The IoT-based lab includes an accessibledevelopment environment, a structured lab delivery, and a layered learning environment to furtherenhance the retention of students within ECE.We have used qualitative and quantitative measures to evaluate the success of the lab modules.Qualitative measures include anecdotal evidence and student evaluation of the course. The quanti-tative analysis is performed by measuring the improvement of student grades in a follow-on course.Our long-term plans are to disseminate our experience, expand the target audience, and publiclyrelease the lab manuals and supporting documents (link to the labs omitted for the blind reviewprocess).GoalsBelow, we
design project were piloted by co-author VanderGheynst. Asummary of the course lecture plan is provided in Table 1. The course was hugely successful interms of student engagement and viability of the learning content. Adjustments were madeduring winter 2017 implementation, particularly with the inclusion of two mid-term prototypetesting assessments in a competition-like setting (Table 2). 3Table 1. Lecture topics for ENG 3 in winter 2017 Week Communication topics Design topics Listening skills, and individual and group Engineering defined and the role of social 1 values and their importance in problem
their path to the Architectural Engineering (ARCE) major, (2) explaining thecomponents of earning an ARCE degree from KU, (3) describing what they learned over thesemester about the field and profession, and (4) exciting their audience about the field andprofession. The videos were to be designed with high school and middle school students as theintended audience. Students first submitted a project plan approximately five weeks before thefinal due date, and a draft of the submission due approximately 2 weeks prior to the final duedate. The video lengths were set for between 12 and 15 minutes long and were developed andrecorded individually. Detailed project requirements are provided in Table 2.Table 2. Class Project Video Description
interdisci- plinary emphasis in Public Policy and Administration from Boise State University. Her thesis was entitled, ”Nanomanufacturing Outside of the Lab: An Academic-Industry Partnership Case Study.” She also re- ceived her B.S. in Materials Science & Engineering from Boise State in 2014. In the Spring of 2016, Ann was recognized as part of the first cohort of University Innovation Fellows at Boise State, and has worked as a Fellow to collect and incorporate student feedback into future plans for makerspaces on the Boise State campus. As an undergraduate and graduate student, she has been involved with the Society of Women Engineers, and also taught a materials science laboratory course as a graduate teaching
) from an academic program must prepare their graduates with “an ability to communicateeffectively” (SO k), and the “ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze andinterpret data” (SO b), and others [6]. In fact, the new ABET student outcomes, effective in2019-2020, have a stronger emphasis on team efforts: “An ability to function effectively as amember or leader of a team that establishes goals, plans tasks, meets deadlines, and creates acollaborative and inclusive environment” (SO “3”)[6]. All these outcomes can be assessedthrough the Unit Operations Laboratory; however, the main challenge is to implement practicaltools for a team, either assigned or self-selected, to function properly throughout the semester.For instance
planning support activities. Drawing from Bandura’s sources of self-efficacy [4], engineering educators can be intentional about designing mastery experiences,providing explicit social encouragement, and creating environments that foster a positiveinterpretation of somatic and emotional responses, particularly for URM and women students.The presence or absence of URM women role models in the classroom, administration, alumni,and campus speakers could have an outsize impact on vicarious experience as a path toincreasing ETSE.Our results also suggest that URM status must be considered alongside gender when interpretingself-efficacy and self-confidence measures. A 2014 study, based on a large dataset of 7,833students across 21 institutions, similarly
., Hein, S. F., & Knott, T. W. (2010). An analysis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 319–336.6 Raelin, J. A., Bailey, M. B., Hamann, J., Pendleton, L. K., Reisberg, R., & Whitman, D. L. (2014). The gendered effect of cooperative education, contextual support, and self-efficacy on undergraduate retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 599–624.7 Maton, K. I., Beason, T. S., Godsay, S., Domingo, M. R., Bailey, T. C., Sun, S., & Hrabowski, F. A. (2016). Outcomes and processes in the meyerhoff scholars
March 2018 in conjunction with the 2018 ECEDHAconference. A panel of junior professors is planned. Also, more time is allocated to the studentposters to allow for more interaction time with the chairs.We would like to increase the participation of the students in the surveys. During the March2018 conference, we plan to put more emphasis on the value of the survey as an important tool toevaluate the effectiveness of the program and modify it to maximize its value. Although thesurveyed students will most probably not be the direct beneficiaries of the improvements, theirfeedback will benefit future students. Therefore, the survey can be viewed as an opportunity forthe participants to contribute to the cause of improving the diversity of the ECE
, intensivepractice, and skill mastery.Short-form (1-2 hour) workshops are often the most universal offering for training. They are theeasiest to book rooms for (or offer online as webinars), find instructors for, and create materialfor. For the participant, one hour is a reasonable amount of time to find in their day and there arerarely any follow-up requirements. Thus, there is very little risk of making a bad time investmentfor the learner, and the instructional team has a lot of flexibility in repeating the training andexperimenting with content. From research methods to retirement plans, this format is anexceptional platform for learners to explore new tools and services. Even though hands-onpractice can be quite limited in this format, this discovery
course content. On his way to completing adegree in Psychology, mathematics presented a serious obstacle. Unless he could succeed in thePre-Calculus Algebra course mandated in his degree plan, he would not be able to complete thedegree. This student reached out to the academic support services unit at the university andpartnered with members of the mathematics tutoring staff to create tools that would allow him tosucceed. The outcome of their efforts was the development of PDM. This fully audio method ofmath instruction and assessment allowed the student, whose motor control deficits precluded hisuse of braille and math braille, to fully control the solution processes for all of the topics heencountered in his college math courses.Although PDM
Professor ofElectrical and Computer Engineering, while WISE honors courses are taught by affiliated STEMfaculty and staff. The majority of WISE students are residents who live together freshmen year ina designated dormitory, which is designed to promote social acclimation to campus and major.WISE first-year students all take one-credit introductory seminars on university life and STEMcareer planning; specific science and mathematics coursework varies by major, for example,engineering students begin with physics, mathematics, and introductory engineering. During thefirst year, WISE students joined five or six additional first year WISE students in a weekly studyand discussion group led by an upperclass undergraduate mentor; the mentors were trained
Columbia University and the Cooper Union in New York City. She received her PhD from Columbia University in 2006, where her research focused on the mechanical and frictional properties of articular cartilage. Dr. Basalo ’s teaching experience includes Thermodynamics, Computer Graphics, Materials Science and laboratory courses. Since 2015 she has been actively involved in the University of Miami College of Engineering’s ”Redefining Engineering Education” strategic plan on educational innovation. As part of this plan, Dr. Basalo worked with 2 other faculty members to organize inaugural Senior Design Expo in May 2017, an exposition where over 200 senior students showcased their Capstone projects to the University of Miami