that some skills were more commonly associated with specific activitysystems across different project teams, not for quantitative analysis. TABLE I PROFESSIONAL SKILLS PLACED IN THE ACTIVITY SYSTEM Category Professional Skill Community Networking (11), Teamwork (5), Interpersonal Communication (2), Communication, Cross-Cultural Skills, Public Speaking Objective Strategy (6), Creativity (5), Global Awareness (3), Problem Solving (3), Public Speaking (3), Teamwork (3), Written Communication (3), Interpersonal Communication (2), Critical Thinking, Cross-Cultural Skills, Ethics
is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Physics and Engineering Department at Biola University. She has over ten years of experience in undergraduate engineering education, mainly in engineering ethics, scientific writing and general engineering/ civil and environmental engineering. Her research interests include on-site water treatment systems for developing countries, water defluoridation systems, and engineering education. Dr. Wong is a member of Engineers Without Borders, AEESP and IWA. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Engineering programs that are in traditionally liberal art schools have to overcome unique challenges tobolster their curriculum and be competitive
obstacles; commitment to absolute responsibility to deliver on time, pursuing necessary follow-up. 4. Resourcefulness – Get it Done: Focus on the tasks at hand, with passion, discipline, intensity, and flexibility. 5. Ethical Actions and Integrity: Adherence to ethical standards and principles, and the courage to act ethically and with integrity. 6. Trust and Loyalty: Commitment to actions that will instill trust, and to the principle that loyalty to the team yields loyalty to the leader and vision. Working to empower those around you, to make the people around you successful. 7. Courage: Face difficult/high-risk actions head-on. 8. Vision: Creating compelling images of the future, identifying what could and
approachesused in smaller programs. Finally, only syllabi from common first year engineering courses wereused; we did not include any major-specific introductory engineering courses.FindingsLearning Outcomes as Habits and MindsetsMost introductory engineering course syllabi emphasized teamwork, communication, problemsolving, design, engineering tech/tools, and ethics (Table 2). Teamwork and communicationstood out as nearly universal to introductory engineering curricula, followed by engineeringdesign & process as an approach to problem solving indicating that these skills are highly valuedacross introductory engineering courses (Table 2). The consistent inclusion of engineering-specific tools and technology indicated an early commitment to building
curriculum at Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan, through thelens of the Sheffield Graduate Attributes framework—a global model assessing innovationcompetencies across technical, social, and cultural dimensions. Technical attributes focus onapplying theoretical knowledge, social attributes on teamwork and communication, and culturalattributes on ethical responsibility and global problem-solving.Analysis of nine core courses reveals a pronounced emphasis on technical skills, with 78% oflearning outcomes tied to computational tools and structured problem-solving. Courses like“Mechanical Design with CAD” and “Multiphase Systems” exemplify this trend, equippingstudents to execute predefined solutions but offering few opportunities for open-ended, real
indicates a significant difference across most questions between the expecteddistribution of responses and the observed responses. Only ABET SO 1 and one part of ABETSO 6 (related to conducting lab experiments) showed no significant difference.These results contrast with previous studies [2] [4] [6] that typically found a positive correlationbetween student performance and surveys used to gauge self-efficacy. This discrepancy may bedue to the inclusion of a broader range of ABET outcomes in our study, including aspects oftenoverlooked, such as ethics, professionalism, and teamwork skills.Table 3: Chi-Square Test Results ABET Student Outcome (and summary of the outcome) h-value p-value 1 – Ability to solve complex
- sponsoredprogram for the 2008-2009 student projects. The mechanical engineering capstone designcourse is intended to be a unique experience for senior engineering students. Students arerequired to complete a two- semester capstone design course sequence involving the applicationof their theoretical knowledge to solve pressing real-world problems. Each project includes the 1development and use of design methodology, formulation of design problem statements andspecifications, consideration of alternative solutions, feasibility considerations and detailedsystem descriptions. Projects include realistic constraints, such as economic factors, safety,reliability, maintenance, aesthetics, ethics, political and social
practices. The results suggest a need for University [7]. A study on the impacts of AI tools on,better awareness and guidance on effectively utilizing AI tools in specifically, mechanical engineering curriculum underscorestechnical education. This study may guide educators in the importance of acknowledging the growing impact ofpromoting the adoption of AI tools in engineering education advanced GenAI tools in education and professional settings.while encouraging critical thinking, ethical use, and a balance The study concluded that rather than dismissing them outright,between AI reliance and traditional learning approaches. institutions, educators, and organizations should adopt a
development of future engineers.Many AI writing tools are freely available to students at no cost, making this resource accessibleto all. Despite the advantages, AI may provide students with some misleading information andoutdated data. AI tools are also highly dependent on the phrasing of the prompts, potentiallyleading to suggestions that stifle creativity or misinterpret students' intentions. AI-generated textis unable to capture the nuance, context, and subjective nature of writing, making the AI responseshave a voice distinctive from the voice of the individual. In addition, like any other evolutionarytechnology, there are increasing concerns regarding the ethical implications of AI in education thatmust be carefully studied.With these factors
STEM and STEM Education.” [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2023/nsf23593/nsf23593.htm[6] ASCE, “Code of Ethics,” Code of Ethics. Accessed: May 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.asce.org/career-growth/ethics/code-of-ethics[7] ASEE, “Persons with Disabilities Leadership Roundtable,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[8] E. A. Cech, “Engineering ableism: The exclusion and devaluation of engineering students and professionals with physical disabilities and chronic and mental illness,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 462–487, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20522.[9] M. Svyantek, “Missing from the classroom: current
towards disability in general public and patientpopulations [10]. Development of fair AI/ML-enabled medical devices and performing bias-freeresearch of ML is significantly challenging the applicability of AI/ML in BME. [11] The U.S.Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognized the necessity of addressing bias in clinicalmachine learning systems, first in the proposed regulatory framework published in April 2019[12] and later as a guiding principle in October 2021 [13].However, ML courses in BME programs around the U.S. are still rare, and teaching of bias inML systems remains largely scattered in computer science and ethics departments, which oftenfocus on privacy [14]. At the BME department of UC Davis, we recognize the importance ofarming our
intention to major, which reinforces theimportance of curricular structures that enable students to experience a sense of community andconnection.” While the National Academy of Engineering in [14] states the system to educateengineers should include several elements including “the economic, political, ethical, and socialconstraints as boundary conditions that define the possible range of solutions for engineeringproblems and demand the interaction of engineers with the public.[14, p. 18]” The NationalAcademy also stated that surveys of pre-college students consistently demonstrate an interest incareers where “helping-others” is a key aspect and that it would be “particularly helpful if theengineering community could successfully communicate the
CEAE Department (2008-2018). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education.Katherine Ramos (Teaching Assistant Professor)Rebecca Komarek (Graduate Student) Rebecca Komarek is the
past few decades, there has been a push for engineering curriculum to better engagewith the global, ethical, and societal impacts of the field and to prepare students to engage in amulticultural and diverse workspace and world. In an effort to introduce diversity in design andto troubleshoot the concept of the universal user, we adapted the display compatibilityquestionnaire from Smith’s study of display-control stereotype designs, and presented the samedesign questions to 21st century first-year engineering students, non-engineering students, andnon-engineering professionals. This work explores current societal impacts such as gender, age,and occupation on the user expectation of a control’s display and user-interface design.Additionally, the
engineering programs with? This study examinessociotechnical dimensions suggested by students in a real-world problem-solving exercise at theearly stages of their academic engineering careers.While several studies have documented a decline in engineering students' public engagement [7],sociotechnical thinking [8], and ethical considerations [9] from their first to final years inundergraduate engineering, there is less examination on students' complex problem-solvingability at these early points in their academic careers. Seemingly, students come in with a moreintegrated understanding of the technical and social dimensions in problems but learn throughthe curriculum what is valued and what is not in an engineering degree and profession [7], [10],[11
University Chicago American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Engineering Curriculum Rooted in Active Learning: Does It Promote Engagement and Persistence for Women? Leanne M. Kallemeyn, Gail Baura, Francisca Fils-Aime, Jana Grabarek, and Pete Livas Loyola University ChicagoStructured AbstractBackground - Active, problem-based learning is increasingly being used in engineeringeducation. Group projects to design and build devices and ethical case studies sensitize studentsto real world experiences. They also
- disciplinary perspectives. Learning Outcomes for Majors 1. Demonstrate an understanding of engineering as a socio-technical activity; 2. Apply multi-disciplinary perspectives to understand, formulate, analyze, and develop sustainable solutions for complex problems; 3. Demonstrate an understanding of ethical leadership and professional responsibility; 4. Integrate multiple and diverse perspectives in defining and solving engineering problems in cultural context; 5. Work effectively in teams; and 6. Explain and communicate effectively solutions using visual, oral and written techniques to diverse audiences.Figure 1. Current mission and learning outcomes for the Engineering
software forthe following categories.20 Table 3: ABET Criteria 3 - Student Outcomes a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility
Intrapersonal skills: self-management, time management, self-development, self- regulation, adaptability, flexibility, executive functioning, core self-evaluation, work ethic, persistence, study skills, ethics & integrity, and citizenship.Gaven, et. al. further specifies: “Researchers agree that cognitive intelligence or technical skillsare needed, but not sufficient to have success in executing complex professional tasks and thatinterpersonal and intrapersonal skills improve performance. Some authors hold that the cognitiveskill is the basic determinant of labor market outcomes. In contrast, others researchers havestated that “Non-cognitive ability is as important, if not more important, than cognitive ability.”Globalization
for the first of the two course sequence.Specific requirements for this Senior design experience are that the students need to complete aproject based on the following criteria: 1. The project must be based on the knowledge and skills related to the design process acquired in earlier course work. This explains the lengthy prerequisite list. 2. The project must incorporate engineering standards and be responsive to local codes and regulations. This explains why proposals are presented by practicing engineers. 3. Consideration must be given to the recognition of reasonable constraints imposed by economic, environmental, sustainability, manufacturability, constructability, ethical, health, safety, reliability, social
theypropose, undertake, and complete projects for a variety of clients. The tenor of the sequence focuses on theunderlying principle that engineering is a profession in which services for clients are rendered in an equitable,economical and ethical manner. This paper describes the learning objectives, evolution, current status, andassessment of the four-course sequence. This paper details the content, implementation, activities, teaching loads,assessment, and student reactions to the design sequence.Index Terms – Creativity, Teamwork, Design, Project, Professional.Introduction“. . . the proper study of mankind is the science of design . . .”, Herbert A. Simon1In the mid-90’s, the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Rose-Hulman Institute
ethical responsibility; andunderstanding the impact of engineering solutions within a contemporary and societalcontext. Furthermore, IUPUI, like many universities, explicitly recognizes theimportance of critical thinking as a component of undergraduate education by identifyingit among the university’s Principles of Undergraduate Learning (PULs). However, theability to think critically and independently is cited by employers as one of the greatestdeficiencies in recent engineering graduates [1, 2]. We may believe we are fosteringcritical thinking skills in our engineering and technology curricula – but are ourundergraduates developing those skills as we intend?Background and Motivation“Critical thinking” is the ability to analyze carefully and
laboratory data collection and report writing,team forming and experiences, improved (technical) writing skills, and designexperiences. Table 1. Course Objectives1. Explain the engineering profession and engineering ethics.2. Use technical communication skills to explain the results/analysis of introductorylaboratory exercises in Civil, Mechanical, and Electrical Engineering and ComputerScience.3. Explain engineering analysis and design.4. Analyze data collected during laboratory exercises.5. Analyze the impact engineering has had on the modern world.6. Design a simple engineering device, write a design report, and present the design aspart of team
at LOA 5 – Synthesis - is not easily fulfilled by all current civil engineeringgraduates, so the response could merely reflect that some programs are skeptical that allgraduates have demonstrated an ability to design a complex system or process. The lowerresponse for that outcome in Table 1A could also be a function of the rubric specified. The rubricidentifies LOA5 - Synthesis as incorporating “realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.”Some of the surveyed programs may not expect graduates to consider more than one constraintin their designs. Thus, the graduates may be able to “design a complex system or process to meetdesired needs,” but not
commonly for each specialty. Students are advised by faculty members in theirdiscipline. In the mechanical engineering specialty, we commonly have two students per project,but when appropriate, as in this project, we will have three students. The student learningoutcomes, associated ABET outcomes, and performance criteria for the course are listed in Table1. In addition to fulfilling the departmental objectives, this course also incorporates thefollowing university core curriculum (UCC) objectives:A. Enhancement of Cognitive Abilities- composition, speech, and math,B. Enhancement of Individual Development- ethics,C. Enhancement of Cultural and Natural Awareness - environmental, economic, health and safety, sustainability aspects of projects, as
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions resultingfrom operation of campus buildings has been developed and is being taught at RowanUniversity as part of Sophomore Engineering Clinic. The goals of Sophomore Clinic areto develop design and communication skills. This paper will discuss the framework ofthe class, with specific emphasis on how the project fits into the objectives of SophomoreClinic, and disclose details to allow implementation of the project in similar project-based courses at other institutions. The technical aspects of conserving energy are wellsuited for introducing design. Introducing ethics and professionalism are also goals ofthe clinic sequence and a project on reducing greenhouse gas emissions is compatiblewith these
: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h)the broad education necessary to understand the
’ technical, social, political, ethical social contextsWilliams Co-taught course on Question-posing; Students “to determine which tools applied science exploring intersections [engineering, ethical] they will need to applications of technical and ethical solve [a given] problem” involving the dimensions of application of advanced technologies technology applicationsSmith Two versions of intro Stages of engineering Impacts of engineering on society; engineering course for design plus technology
students to determine if these perceptions could beused to enhance Veteran retention in engineering. Social responsibility is embodied in theEngineer’s Creed and is directly related to engineering ethics [10], so much so that theengineering accrediting agency ABET requires that graduates can approach their work in asocially responsible manner [11]. The principles of social responsibility are what attract manystudents to engineering, specifically those from underrepresented groups [12]. Matusovich et al.[13] and Mehaffy [14] identified the need to incorporate students’ personal values, such as socialresponsibility, into the engineering curriculum to allow them to personally connect with theirengineering identity and thereby increase retention. The
professionalism, ethics, and trust/ trustworthiness in professional-client relationships. A licensed engineer with over 35 years experience in engineering education and practice, Dr. Lawson has provided project management and technical oversight for geotechnical, construction ma- terials, transportation, environmental, and facilities projects nationwide.Theodore G. Cleveland, Texas Tech University Dr. Cleveland combines laboratory and field methods with information management, experimental design, and computational modeling. He is an experimental researcher, modeler, and teacher. His technical background includes environmental and civil engineering, and his research work is focused on water resources problems encompassed in