gatekeeping courses. Among many factors to this failure, an important one isattributed to the lack of engaging pedagogy inside and outside classrooms. Through this NSFWIDER Program sponsored planning project, a team of faculty and administrators at AlabamaAgricultural and Mechanical University (AAMU) are implementing evidence-based instructionalpractices in foundation courses in STEM curricula. Recognizing that it is essential to implementeffective pedagogy in gateway courses where most attrition occurs, this project has conducted apilot study, which focuses on: (1) collecting baseline data about the extent to which evidence-based practices are currently being used in STEM gateway courses; (2) redesigning threefoundational gateway courses in
pipeline” with the goals of increasing students’ early interest in STEMcareers, enhancing student academic and professional preparation in the green energy industryand increasing retention rates in undergraduate STEM courses. The SMART team set a plan todevelop and deploy a series of outreach programs and a university green learning and discoverymodel to connect with a broader range of students from middle school, high school, communitycollege to undergraduate/graduate students by 1) moving beyond traditional STEM topicsthrough the exciting themes of green energy and environmentally friendly designs, 2) exposingstudents to careers in the green energy industry, 3) emphasizing the social and moral impact ofscientists and engineers involved in the
and come up with potential designs that would then be presented to their peers at variousstages for feedback and critique. In one week students identified an idea, researched existing andpotential solutions, developed a design, built a prototype and presented their solution. Theprocess included competencies such as ideation and brain storming, team forming and roleassignment, project planning, critical thinking, evaluation and reflection, constructive critique,verbal and written skills, visual sketching, engineering design, prototyping and debugging,entrepreneurship, and innovation. The students were given the opportunity to work in a group orindividually. Even if students chose to work individually, they were required to participate in the
complex activity with skills ranging from motivational psychology, intricate repertoire, rehearsal and logistical planning, to score reading and error perception required for success. The conductor's demeanor and physical appearance are important in building and maintaining rapport with the performers, and as such are important aspects of the conductor’s physical performance. However, the critical information about when to perform – tempo and its modifications, cuing and ensemble entrainment, and how to perform – interpretation of dynamics and changes of dynamics, attack and release variables, what we lump under the word "style," are communicated largely independent of demeanor and physical
project report Minimum Basic Level Developing Proficient Advanced (40%) (55%) Level (65%) (75%) (100%)Technical Report presents and, includes a and includes a and, includes a and, includes adetails of the relevant bill of materials description of preliminary risk assessmentdesign technical details (BoM) listing special project plan for andsolution with of the design in all major manufacturing procurement, management text descriptions components, steps and the construction
studies widely. 3. Educational ContextWPI has long been a leader in project-based STEM education, since the establishment in theearly 1970s of an innovative curriculum that is today called The WPI Plan. Students at WPIenroll in four seven-week terms during each academic year. The Plan allows students openchoice in course work and requires them to complete three significant undergraduaterequirements: the Inquiry Seminar which is a humanities and arts course with a significantwriting requirement, typically completed in the second year, the Interactive Qualifying Project(IQP), which is the subject of our work here, typically completed in the third year, and the MajorQualifying Project (MQP) which is a project completed in the students’ major area
Paper ID #12205Teaching and Assessing Professional Skills in an Undergraduate Civil Engi-neering CurriculumDr. William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel William J. Davis is a professor in Civil & Environmental Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. He received his Ph.D. in civil engineering from Georgia Tech and is a registered professional engineer. His research interests focus on transportation infrastructure planning and design, highway safety, and active living by design. He teaches courses in engineering management, transportation engineering, geographic information systems, and land surveying.Dr. Dimitra
billion Life Sciences Initiativeenacted by the Massachusetts Legislature in June 2008, put out a request for proposals atapproximately the same time (2013) for initiatives to enhance the life science’s workforce for thestate of Massachusetts. The college’s Grants Office applied for and received a relatively modestplanning grant to develop curricula and plan out capital equipment and facility needs for threeidentified tracks that were related to the biomedical/life sciences industry. The three tracks weretentatively named: Biomedical Instrumentation Technology, Biomedical ManufacturingTechnology, and Biotechnology. The first two tracks would be for new programs that had beentopics of discussion with the Beacon Alliance for the last two years while
seminar sections; as previously stated, 311 (94%) gave consent to use their academicrecords data for the study. The response style varied significantly per student as some wrote verylittle content and didn’t use the time allotted for the activity, while others provided longer Page 26.1338.6responses and used most or all of the time given. Further analyses are planned to find if theamount of writing has any relation to other variables, such as generational status and GPA.The DEI student panel activity was conducted in a subsequent class period, as soon after the VAIas was feasibly possible. Due to scheduling constraints, the time elapsed between
flyer and application materials of the TRP and SEW workshops weredistributed to all students enrolled in the two-year Pre-Engineering Program, the B.S. SystemsEngineering Program and LCC students who intends to transfer to TAMIU Engineeringprograms at the beginning of the spring 2014 semester. All applicants were asked to submit a200 to 300 word typed essay describing their educational goals and career plans; their collegetranscripts were also requested. Apart from the carrier plan essay, completion or in-progress ofthe following courses were needed: Foundations of Engineering I and II, Calculus I, II, and III,and University Physics I and II, became the focus of consideration for their applications being
feedback, and (d) plan personaldevelopment.AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENTFor assessment to be authentic, performances must be conducted and observed in contexts that are similarto those in which future performances will occur5,6. Therefore, students must be assessed in the context ofrealistic engineering projects, which are often found in capstone design courses. To match professionalpractice, most projects should be the responsibility of a team of students with backgrounds suitable for theproject, typically requiring multiple engineering disciplines and students or consultants with businessand/or social science expertise. Projects should have real stakeholders with whom students interact andsome to whom students are accountable. Suitable projects will be
workflow process has its origins in manufacturing,when flow charting enabled engineers to follow the measured or monitored variables. It now isalso applied to business processes when complex activities or plans involve decision-making, Page 26.203.4infrastructure and human tasks36.Using flow chart software, a detailed profile can illuminate the scale, scope and decisions of anorganization’s diversity actions37. A simple workflow process is typically linear, without muchbranching into other process avenues. As shown in Figure 1, a basic, general workflow processdiagram shows an action or intervention designed to meet stated goals and which follows
also research about engineering global preparedness and engineering innovation. She also has research expertise in STEM K-12 and in STEM assessment. She chairs USC’s STEM Consortium.Dr. Cheryl Matherly, The University of Tulsa Dr. Cheryl Matherly is Vice Provost for Global Education at The University of Tulsa, where she has responsibility for the strategic leadership of the university’s plan for comprehensive internationalization. Dr. Matherly’ directs the NanoJapan program, funded by the National Science Foundation in order to expand international research opportunities for students in STEM fields. She is the recipient of two Fulbright grants for international education administrators (Germany and Japan.) She has an
scholarship, a student’sfamily contacted the camp director with their request (formal documentation of financialinformation was not required).Only local students were selected for admission to the camp, as we plan to follow up with thesestudents in the future and desire to use the summer camp program to build relationships withlocal high schools for possible mentoring and outreach opportunities.InstructorsA core instructional group of the camp director (staff program coordinator) and two instructors(faculty lecturer and graduate student) gave introductory lectures and led activities throughoutthe camp. In addition to the core instructors, guest instructors (including faculty, undergraduateand graduate students, and research scientists) facilitated
the Outreach Chair of the OSU American Society of Engineering Education Student Chapter. His research interests include: (a) technology use, (b) diversity and inclusion, and (c) retention and success, with a particular focus on students in STEM fields. To contact Dr. Long, e-mail long.914@osu.edu.Dr. Joseph Allen Kitchen, The Ohio State University Dr. Joseph (Joey) A. Kitchen is a postdoctoral researcher and program coordinator with the Center for Higher Education Enterprise (CHEE). Dr. Kitchen manages CHEE’s longitudinal, mixed-methods study of college outreach and academic support programs. He earned a Ph.D. in Higher Education and Student Affairs, a Master’s of City and Regional Planning, and a Bachelor’s in
overlapping curriculum was developed for elementary, middle and high schoolcounselors that encompassed: STEM skill sets and job opportunities; micromessaging;neuroscience; ―all about STEM;‖ and the EbD articulation initiative.The original plan was to conduct a two-day 16-hour workshop for counselors, but afterdiscussions with the BCPS Coordinator of the Office of School Counseling, it was decided tocondense the training into one-day sessions targeted for the three school levels. As a part of thePD, counselors are connected to the Baltimore County Division of Workforce Development(DWD). The DWD, in concert with the county’s Department of Economic Development, acts asa broker for initiatives designed to develop a skilled workforce. Similar
professional and personal backgrounds.Engineering schools and departments play a very important but often implicit role in thedevelopment of an engineering identity by students. By giving deliberate attention to theengineering identity development of our students we can help participate in these three processesin ways that result in the more inclusive attitudes and practices that are needed in modernengineering. We plan to shape our students’ perceptions of engineers and engineering byshowing them that in order to do their work engineers must learn a variety of skills. This showsbeginning engineers that technical knowledge alone is not enough to design high qualitysolutions. We want to teach our students how to interact with each other in ways that
the topic in general,they can be much more thorough in their research. This debate helps them discover and exploremuch more than they learn in the lectures. Knowing how to solder electrical components could be a worthwhile skill for constructingsome of the projects. With this in mind, a laboratory session is planned for the students about thebasics of soldering, as well as the basics of electronic devices. This aids their attaining a morepractical perspective of the theoretical concepts that they have heard. For the practice session,each of the students and teachers is given a soldering kit containing instructions and materials tobuild a basic 555 timer circuit. This practical work is fun and interesting, given the fact that theyall have
. Both researchers then reviewed the data together for inter-raterreliability.Students were asked to respond, in writing, to seven, open-ended questions: background story,reason for choosing the institution and the program, impact of the program, impact of thefinancial support provided by the program, plans after graduation, and best program memory aspart of the program evaluation process. The question of interest related to the value-addedprogram activities was the students’ responses to “best program memory” (RQ1, RQ2). Promptsfor “best program memory” were: “talk about working with your mentor, interaction with othersin the program, etc.” The prompts served as stimulants to recall types of most-memorableexperiences. Woike’s21 study on the
-level course instructors will continue to be encouraged during thefollowing terms. The current usage for TA and faculty office hours varies widely.E. Plans for Growth ACE continues to expand its course support and monitor hours of usage to keep the spaceoperating within its capacity. The university is interested in ACE expanding its course support toimprove the retention of first year students which has ACE expanding to provide tutoring supportfor non-engineering courses such as physics and chemistry. ACE is limited by its own facilitiesin terms of student traffic but also by the financial constraints of the college.II. Methodology Student utilization of ACE is tracked and stored using a card scanner and operationssystems developed
objectives within the curriculum. They recommend BIMfind its way into multiple courses in the construction curriculum. Since this study was local toAuburn, the authors recommended expanding the study’s geographic scope and including moreindustry influence. This study did not identify the specific skills and competencies required forthis integration, a limiting factor for a school planning to implement BIM.Implementation of BIM into university curriculum requires understanding of industryexpectations of CM’s in the field BIM. Without knowing what the desired outcomes are fromindustry, academia cannot properly prepare students in this area. A method of curriculum andcourse development uses an instructional design (ID) process. The first phase of ID is
crystal structures. These activities aid students’ visualization skills,allowing them to physically manipulate atoms rather than relying on spatial reasoning. However,these activities are limited in the types of views and planes that can be visualized, and are alsodifficult to scale to large-lecture situations. One alternative is to use the plan view, which showsspecific slices through a unit cell and provides information about crystal symmetry [5]. Thisclarifies atomic positions for students, but does not allow students to visualize any plane of theirselection.Computer-based activities can provide students with more flexibility in manipulating structures.In 1996, Foley [6] developed a computer program, CrystalVis, to teach students about
the first author. Thesecond author was a visiting scholar who spent several months on our campus. He is anindustrial engineer with research interests in engineering and social justice. Consistent with thevision of introducing changemaking themes in required classes in the majors, the initial plan wasto do this in several ways including: Introducing some lecture topics in the context of changemaking Rewriting some homework problems to include themes related to changemaking Create two new cases with social justice, humanitarian, or sustainability foundationsIn the end, these goals proved to be overambitious. The first goal was met with modest success,but the last goals proved too difficult for reasons that will be discussed below
Paper ID #21441Multidisciplinary Research Efforts in Post-Earthquake Civil InfrastructureReconnaissanceMr. Jack Bergquist, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jack Bergquist is a undergraduate student at California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo with a major in architectural engineering and minor in Italian. He has formally been engaged in earth- quake engineering and reconnaissance research for the past year, and has a specific interest in the seismic performance of historic and vernacular structures. After graduation, he plans to continue working in this field as a structural
(baseline models) that are in current formats A project where variety of systems could be feasible Available local codes from municipalities Available utilities plans and rates for the area Structural 60’≥ high above grade or some unique configuration to force complex loadings Available geotechnical reports Lighting/Electrical Variety in the types of spaces for different lighting conditions Opportunity for daylighting Mechanical Opportunity for energy savings Construction A semi-realistic to real project budget/final price A
. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Ebony Omotola McGee, Vanderbilt University Ebony McGee, associate professor of diversity and STEM education at Vanderbilt Universityˆa C™s Peabody College, investigates what it means to be racially marginalized in the context of learning and achieving in STEM higher education and industry. In partic ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Development of the Persistence of Engineers in the Academy Survey (PEAS)AbstractThis paper reports the
Learning, by Brown, Roediger, and McDaniel6, has recently made this ideapopular as a guide in improving both teaching and learning practices. There are many tactics forshattering this illusion and enabling more permanent learning, many of which can be summed upby the three “big ideas” put forth by Make It Stick: 1. Learning works by getting it out, not getting it in. 2. Difficulty is desirable. 3. A growth mindset motivates.In this paper, an engineering course is examined for symptoms of illusions of learning, andimprovements to the curriculum and teaching methods are incorporated and reviewed. Thecourse of interest is MFG 480: Manufacturing Process Planning and System Design, a 3-creditengineering course for seniors that has been taught for
her tenure as an AAAS fellow, she served as a science advisor to the US EPA in the National Center for Environmental Assessment and in the Immediate Office of the Assistant Administrator of the Office of Research and Development.Dr. Michelle Marks, George Mason University Dr. Michelle Marks is the Vice President for Academic Innovation & New Ventures at George Mason University. In this capacity she is responsible for identifying, launching, and sustaining educational ini- tiatives that fulfill Mason’s strategic plan and generate financial resources to support students, faculty, and the educational mission. Charged with creating accessible student pathways and bringing learning science innovations to campus, Dr
- versity of Miami. Prior to joining the University of Miami in 2014, she worked as an adjunct professor at Columbia University and the Cooper Union in New York City. She received her PhD from Columbia University in 2006. Since 2015 Dr. Basalo has been actively involved in the University of Miami College of Engineering’s ”Redefining Engineering Education” strategic plan on educational innovation.Gemma Henderson, University of Miami Gemma Henderson is a Senior Instructional Designer for the LIFE (Learning, Innovation and Faculty En- gagement) team in Academic Technologies at the University of Miami (UM). Gemma partners with fac- ulty members, academic units, and other university stakeholders to create innovative, effective
training. Furthermore, the EngineeringGoldShirt Program collaborated with several other diversity serving summer bridge programs oncampus to design and implement a full day workshop which reinforced the principles that theseprograms foster and to build connections with other programs’ mentors.During the two week summer bridge program, the mentors served both as residence advisors(RA’s) in the residence halls and teaching assistants (TA’s) in the classroom for the summerbridge classes. This duality allowed the mentors to recognize and encourage students where theyneeded it most on an individual basis. Mentors planned social and group identity buildingactivities for the protégé’s. As a result of a demanding schedule and workload during summerbridge