, vol. 11, no.2, 1997,pp.58-70.[2] Whittington, C.D., and Sclater, N., “Building and Testing a Virtual University.” ComputersEducation, vol.30, nos. 1, 2, 1998, pp. 41-47.[3] Dutton, J., Dutton, M., and Perry, J., “Do Online Students Perform as Well as LectureStudents?” Journal of Engineering Education, Jan 2001.[4] McManus, T., “Delivering Instruction on the World Wide Web.” 10 Jan 1996.http://www.svsu.edu/~mcmanus/papers/wbi.html (10 Jan 02).[5] Poindexter, S. and Ferrarini, T. “Web Integration in Courses: Which Factors SignificantlyMotivate Faculty.” Stop Surfing/Start Teaching National Conference, Myrtle Beach, SC.,February 1999.[6] Poindexter, S. and Ferrarini, T. “Does Student Internet Pressure + Advances in Technology= Faculty Internet
Engineering Education, 104(1), 7-34.Hirudayaraj, M., Baker, R., Baker, F., & Eastman, M. (2021). Soft-skills for entry-level engineers: What employers want. Educational Science, 11(641).Hess, D. (2020). Transitioning to a leadership role. Chemical Engineering Progress, 116(1), 46- 49.Hutson, J., Valenzuela, M., Hosto-Marti, B., & Wright, S. (2023). The role of higher education in developing durable skills: Reframing general education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(3), 1-12.Kendall, M., Chachra, D., Roach, K., Tilley, E., & Gipson, K. (2018). Convergent approaches for developing engineering leadership in undergraduates [Paper presentation]. 2018 American Society of Engineering
://peer.asee.org/448413. Evans, M. J., & Esparragoza, I. E. (2019, July), Inspiring and Engaging First-Year Engineering Students at a Small Campus Through International Team Design Projects Paper presented at 2019 FYEE Conference, Penn State University, Pennsylvania. https://peer.asee.org/337144. Walkup, S. L., & Komlos, J., & Waters, K. A. (2021, July), Lessons Learned From Moving a Civil Engineering Fundamentals Course From Second-Year to the First Year Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1- 2—374415. K.P.Brannan and P.C. Wankat, Survey of first-year programs, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Portland Oregon, 2005.6. Clark, A
. Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 2022.² Donnell, J. A., Aller, B. M., Alley, M., & Kedrowicz, A. A. (2011). Why industry says that engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference.³ Bodnar, C. A., & Clark, R. M. (2017). Can game-based learning enhance engineering communication skills?. IEEE transactions on professional communication, 60(1), 24-41.⁴ Harichandran, R. S., Nocito-Gobel, J., Brisart, E., Erdil, N. O., Collura, M. A., Daniels, S. B., Harding, W.D. & Adams, D. J. (2014). A comprehensive engineering college-wide program for developing technical communication skills in students. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
et al.reported an interdisciplinary learning activity between elective courses from different departments:Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, a science elective, and Science Fiction, a general studieselective.4,5 In Nickel et al.’s study, students from both classes were involved in discussions on topicsaround a common theme to understand the societal impacts of new technologies. However, suchcross-disciplinary learning activities typically require the classes to share a common theme toengage students, which makes it challenging to design activities beyond classroom discussions andintegrate them into core courses.The project presented in this paper aims to create a hands-on experience by simulating a real-world"designer/client – technical
Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education 3VLOOKUP and MAX function in Excel and formulated for each of the 720 sequences for eachproblem. S. No Variable Description 1. F* = Total Sum of the six job flowtimes for the sequence chosen by following flowtime the heuristic. yielded by using the heuristic 2. Prob (F≤ F*) Probability that F, the total flowtime for any of the sequences will be less than on equal to F*. Lower probabilities will reflect a result closer to the minimum flowtime job permutation in the population. 3. Rank of
PA2: Group Assignments Assignments PA1: Individual Assignments PA3: Textbook Issues S: Scholarship S0: No subcode S3: Acceptance of paper for conference S7: Dissertation (Publications) S1: Submission of paper for S4: Acceptance of paper for journal conferences S5: Bachelor Thesis S2: Submission of paper for S6: Master Thesis journals R: Research R0: No subcode R2: Unguided research (independent R4: Feeling like a R1: Guided Research (working research student does alone) Researcher
. Donndelinger joined Baylor Universityˆa C™s School of Engineering and Computer Science as a Clinical Associate Professor after 23 years of experience in the automotive and cutting tool industries. During his 16 years as a Senior Researcher at General Mo ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Session XXXX The Impacts of Reflective Writing on Peer Evaluations in Engineering Design Courses Adam D. Weaver Electrical and Computer Engineering Department
evolution, standards, and infrastructure associated with vehicle-to-everything communications by internet of vehicles." IEEE access 8 (2020): 117593-117614.22 Coccia, Mario. "The theory of technological parasitism for the measurement of the evolution of technology and technological forecasting." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 141 (2019): 289-304.23 Almgren, Richard, and Dmitry Skobelev. "Evolution of technology and technology governance." Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6, no. 2 (2020): 22.24 Craps, S., Pinxten, M., Knipprath, H., & Langie, G. “Exploring professional roles for early career engineers: a systematic literature review. “European Journal of Engineering Education
theoreticalframeworks in engineering education: An anti-deficit and liberative approach.Education Sciences, 8(4), 158.Revelo, R.A. & Baber, L.D. (2018). Engineering resistors: Engineering Latina/o studentsand emerging resistant capital. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(3), 249-269.Rodriguez, S.L. & Stevens, A.R. (2023). Exploring computing identity development forLatinx students at a Hispanic-serving community college. Journal of Diversity in HigherEducation.Rincón, B.E. & Rodriguez, S. (2021). Latinx students charting their own STEMpathways: How community cultural wealth informs their STEM identities. Journal ofHispanic Higher Education, 20(2), 149-163
-occupational- injuries/number-and-rate-of-fatal-work-injuries-by-industry.htm[2] G. M. Waehrer, X. S. Dong, T. Miller, E. Haile, and Y. Men, “Costs of occupational injuries in construction in the United States,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1258–1266, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.012.[3] “Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2022 - 2022 A01 Results.” Accessed: Jan. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cfoi.nr0.htm[4] J. E. Roughton, OSHA 2002 recordkeeping simplified. Amsterdam Boston: Butterworth- Heinemann, 2003.[5] “What is OSHA’s Definition of a Near Miss? - OSHA.com.” Accessed: Jan. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.osha.com/blog/near-miss-definition[6] E. A.-L
: Request for Your Feedback on Class Visits by UTREE1. Please describe how effective the UTREE students were at communicating the material of the class period(s) that they taught for you this semester? In particular, please describe their strengths as well as any ways in which their teaching could be improved.2. How would your students describe the effectiveness of the UTREE students at communicating the material of the class periods? On what basis, do you make this evaluation?References1. Neal A. Whitman and Jonathan D. Fife (1988). Peer Teaching: To Teach Is to Learn Twice. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Number 4. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.2. K. J. Topping (1996). The effectiveness of peer teaching in
socialization to the academic career. Journal of Higher Education 73, 94-‐122, (2002). 2 Patterson, B. J. et al. A Leadership Elective Course Developed and Taught by Graduate Students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 77, 11 (2013). 3 Goodlad, S. Responding to the perceived training needs of graduate teaching assistants. Studies in Higher Education 22, 83-‐92, (1997). 4 Linse, A., Turns, J., Yellin, J. M. H. & VanDeGrift, T. Preparing future engineering faculty: Initial outcomes of an innovative teaching portfolio program. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
provide numerically accurate results and there are undoubtedly certain shaftgeometries and loadings that might be more amenable to one method or the other. Somemethods were appropriate for the classroom such as the graphical methods when drafting wasstill taught, but they are more difficult to use today.The method presented here is based on the work of Professor F.D. Ju as presented in his 1971article “On the Constraints for Castigliano’s Theorem” [7] and the notes of one of the authors asa student in Professor Ju’s class in the mid 1980's. In his article Professor Ju provides twoextensions to the application of Castigliano’s theorem. First, it is shown how to incorporateconstraints in the form of the equations of equilibrium (e.g., ΣF=0 and ΣM=0
ussed tosubmittinng online ho omework fo or a physicss course. T This is usuaally where sstudents beggin tostruggle because app plying physiics concept knowledge k tto homeworrk problems is differentt thanmost hom mework from m other courrses in their academic hiistory. It is ccrucial that tthe students haveaccess too one-on-onee or small grroup tutoring g and instrucctor supportt to coach thhem about hoow toproperly approach th heir physics problems. p As A has becoome evident a crucial parrt of Physicss Jamare the student s tutorrs who aid the main in nstructor to
Engineering from the University of Illinois, and a Doctorate from the University of Texas at Austin. After receiving her PhD, she spent two years as a post-doctoral researcher at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Her academic career began in 1994 when she became an Assistant Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In 1999, she accepted a position in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Virginia Tech where she was promoted to Professor in 2003 and was recognized as the William S. Cross Professor of Mechanical Engineering in 2005. In 2006, she was appointed and continues to hold the position of Head of the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University
below in Table 2. Table 2. Topics covered in the AE course.Week Date Instructor Topic(s) Location 1 TBA TBA Introduction: NDT and the Acoustic Emission Method TBA Demonstration: AE from Plexiglas Microstructure and AE Sources in Unflawed Materials 2 TBA TBA Microstructure and AE Sources in Unflawed Materials TBA Lab: AE from Brass Tensile Specimen Load, Stress, Strain and Materials AE Source Physics: Energy, Motion and Signal Amplitude 3 TBA TBA AE
teammember’s efforts throughout the project. Originally these peer evaluations were merely used forfeedback purposes to the instructor, but over time, it became clear that some team members werenot contributing their fair share to the required project activities, therefore, based on theircontribution to the final product(s), the author felt that these students should not receive the samegrade on the project deliverables as other high-performing members of the project team. Withinthe past year, the results of the required Peer Evaluations are now being incorporated directly intothe grading structure for the project.In order to assess the quality and scope of each team member’s efforts within the project, studentsare asked to provide a fair and
Learning, 44: 52–59, 2012. [2] S. Brownell and K. Tanner. Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and tensions with professional identity. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11:339–346, 2012. [3] C. R. Graham. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Page 24.1148.11 Bonk and C. R. Graham, editors, The Handbook of Blended Learning, chapter 1, pages 3–21. Pfeiffer, San Franciso, CA, 2006. [4] E. Hargittai. Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1):92–113, 2010. [5] E
classificationsystem.The data indicate that the current information fluency instruction in Engineering 101 is effective.Students have demonstrated a level of mastery in information fluency skills which will benefitthem not only during college but throughout their professional career. The librarians willcontinue to partner with the freshman engineering instructors to make sure that the informationfluency portions of the course integrate well with the syllabus while giving them data to continueto assess what the students are learning. Page 24.1185.10Bibliography1. Bracke, M. S., & Critz, L. J. (2001). Re-envisioning instruction for the electronic environment of
, height and the number of stories,will affect the fire protection systems required, means of egress and so on.Building’s occupant group (s), mixed or single-use: based on activities, age, the possibility of havingalcoholic liquor, a determination of the building’s primary occupancy group can be made. Single, mixed,or separated occupancy of the building need to be identified.The building need to be classified in which of the five types of construction is associated. Fornoncombustible (concrete or metal) construction the design team has several alternatives for constructiontype (I or II), depending on the level of fire-resistance (a or b) the team is willing to incorporate into thedesign
encountered. For this reason the TFs wereassigned to engage in one or more sessions of the outreach programs offered to the middle andhigh school students in the local community.Obj 3: Emphasize best practice teaching techniquesParticipation in the outreach programs began with instruction and mentoring by a facultymember who has been active in these programs for many years. A half-day session was devotedto discussion of content preparation and a demonstration of a typical program activity. The TFsrole-played the students they would be teaching when they supervise a session during theoutreach program to which they were assigned.Each TF met with a Faculty mentor(s) to become familiar with two or three hands-on STEMprojects that would be their
? In what language(s) did you program?1.2. What OOP concepts did you use while programming at work? Give specific examples. What software-related concept(s) did you realize during the course of a specific project? (In other words, you knew the concept theoretically, but actually applied it while working on the project). What “best” programming practices did you follow/learn?1.3. Explain your thought process during a typical programming session (This is an open-ended question)Examination:2.2. Explain, with examples, OOP concepts and design patterns that you have used in this class.Reflection: Similar to the reflection section in Table I UnLecture IV: Software Testing and Code Maintenance In this session, students with software
Swithenbank, S. B., and DeNucci, T. W.AbstractA flipped classroom approach was applied to a select number of topics in a sophomore levelundergraduate Newtonian dynamics course. Although the theory and benefits of the flippedclassroom model are discussed, the primary focus of this paper is to present the approach and thepractical implementation of using this model. Advantages, such as student retention and reducedfaculty tutoring, are discussed, as well as disadvantages, such as the investment of time neededfor making the videos and the amount of time needed to learn the software. Lastly, best practicesand lessons from the experience are shared.Background and TheoryIn recent years the concept of the flipped classroom has gained popularity and has been
billing. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Dr. Steven Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering Steven S. Holland (M ’13) was born in Chicago, IL, in 1984. He received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), Milwaukee, WI, in 2006, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, in 2008 and 2011 respectively. From 2006 to 2011, he was a Research Assistant working in the Antennas and Propagation Laboratory (APLab), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst. He was then a Senior Sensors Engineer with the
experience is the involvement with the projectsponsor, graduate mentor, and faculty adviser in addition to the necessary technical design. Alsovaluable is the emphasis on autonomy and teamwork, and the creation of professionally prepareddesign deliverables. The students and the sponsors alike have enjoyed the opportunity to worktogether in this unique environment, and have found it a mutually beneficial experience.References 1. Todd, R.C., Sorensen, C., & Magleby, S. (1993). Designing a senior capstone course to satisfy industrial customers. Journal of engineering education, 82 (2), 92-100. 2. Fairchild, G. F., & Taylor, T. G. (2000). Using business simulations and issue debates to facilitate synthesis in agribusiness
s at in ic ist M ys er m ne Ph he
industrial and student side.However, now that the course itself it better established, more instructor time should beavailable to coordinate such activities. A related stretch goal is to have the problemsthemselves proposed by local industry. This has not been attempted in part due to thelimited ‘laboratory’ available for the class, but will hopefully be an option for futureofferings as plans for addition of a kitchenette to one of the classrooms are underway. Page 23.929.9Bibliography 8 1. Armstrong RC, Brennecke J, Butts S et al. How is the Discipline of
through WebAssign.WebAssign was chosen because it offers customizable pre-coded questions from a wide range ofmath and science textbooks along with easy-to-use tools that allow instructors to create their ownquestions (Figure 2).14Each participant was given a laptop, a physics textbook, a headphone, and an access code forWebAssign. Although Summer Physics Jam was a self-paced program, it was designed such thata student would be able to finish all the topics covered in a physics course if s/he followed theschedule. Page 23.978.5 List of the assignments Figure (2) List of assignments for both physics
theircollaboration with former teaching assistants who have helped run the program in past years andmaintained reports on seminar topics, student feedback, and performance.BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Norris, P. M., & Palmer, S. C. (1998). Effectiveness of the Woodruff School Doctoral Teaching Intern Program.Journal of Engineering Education, 87(3), 223-226.2. Wankat, P. C. (1999). Educating engineering professors in education. Journal of Engineering Education, 88,471-476.3. Wankat, P. C., & Oreovicz, F. S. (2005). Teaching prospective engineering faculty how to teach. InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 21(5), 925.4. Utecht, R. L., & Tullous, R. (2009). Are we preparing doctoral students in the art of teaching? Research in HigherEducation Journal