should be responsible for teaching this code of ethics to new engineers? How does this code of ethics apply to those engineers who cannot or choose not to become licensed as a Professional Engineer (PE)? (note: PE licensure is not available for all disciplines) What happens when engineers fail to follow these guidelines?After discussing the applicable Code(s) of Ethics, participants shift back to case studydiscussions. “Tweaking the Data” asks participants to consider how the power differentialbetween a supervisor/employee or mentor/mentee can impact the gathering and reporting of data.In this scenario, an inexperienced engineer is tasked with collecting data that ends up surprisingand puzzling the project manager
at the University.Many students measured this lack of course opportunities based on Advanced Placement (AP)options at their home high school. Of the seven participants, students reported between one andseven AP courses at their high schools, which they felt was less than the other students in theircourse of study. Even at the high end of this range, Student A mentioned: “So I guess, also partof that is the classes that we can take, like, the opportunities, because, you know, we only hadmaybe six or seven AP classes.... But then I talk to people that took, you know, 10, 12, you know,even more.” Student D noted that his school only had one teacher qualified to teach AP courses:“We don't have a lot of AP courses and [Teacher]’s, the only one
, superficial preparation assigned material observations, questions Quality of Comments are relevant and Comments sometimes Comments reflect little Contributions reflect understanding of: irrelevant, betray lack of understanding of either the assigned text(s) or preparation, or indicate lack assignment or previous remarks assignments; previous of attention to previous in seminar remarks of other students; remarks of other students and insights about assigned materials Impact on Class Comments frequently help
of community would increase throughout the three course sequence as each course buildsupon the previous course(s). Entry and exit surveys already exist for each of the introductoryprogramming courses participating in this study; the participants and specific questions used forthis study are detailed in the next sections.Participants and CoursesThe entry and exit surveys were administered to students in four different large-enrollmentcomputer programming courses at a large, public research institution.Course 1a is a CS1-type course and is required of all engineering students and is taken in the firstyear of study; the students in Course 1a were offered a small amount of extra credit to completethese surveys. Course 1b is also a CS1-type
Industrial c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #30121 Technology from 2007 to 2010. Prior to her appointment at Purdue University in 1993, she spent seven years teaching for Texas A&M University’s Department of Engineering Technology. Dr. Newton has a Ph.D. in Educational Human Resource Development, a Master’s degree in Business Administration, and a B.S. in Industrial Distribution, each from Texas A&M University.Dr. Carmen Torres-S´anchez CEng, Loughborough University Dr Torres-S´anchez is an Associate Professor at the University of Loughborough, England, United King
AC 2007-983: INTEGRATING THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEAMWORK,DIVERSITY, LEADERSHIP, AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS INTO ACAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEJoseph Hanus, University of Wisconsin-MadisonJeffrey S. Russell, University of Wisconsin-Madison Page 12.929.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Integrating the Development of Teamwork, Diversity, Leadership, and Communication Skills into a Capstone Design CourseAbstractThe development of teamwork, diversity, leadership, and communications (TDLC) skills in ourprofessional domain is critical to our engineering education program and profession. We solveproblems in teams which are
teaching.Facilitate and Support Faculty in Acquiring Relevant Practical Experience: Encouragefaculty members, particularly the young, to get involved with the practice in their locale, anddevise equitable system(s) that allow faculty to gain the engineering experience they desperatelyneed, in order to keep up with new developments in their areas of specialization. Thus assertingthe view that engineering faculty “with practical experience under their belt” would, in general,make better teachers. Administrator (deans, chairs, and decision makers in general) shouldinvestigate ways for helping new faculty members gain industrial experience by spending asemester on-site at a cooperating industry, using summer release time to work within industry, or
of the design throughout the various stages of the process, leading to a product that is validated against design requirements 2. Design systems in a team environment where multiple disciplines or ME specialty areas are used. 3. Understand the ethical responsibilities associated with the mechanical engineering profession. 4. Prepare formal written design documentation (e.g. memos and technical reports) and present effective oral presentations. 5. Utilize a variety of sources in researching the field(s) and concepts appropriate to the design and benchmarking (e.g: US Patent and Trademark Office, vendor catalogs, Thomas Register, library, and Internet). 6. Utilize modern engineering
Solomon Hollister introduced intoprofessional engineering education at Cornell University in the 1950’s. This advancement hasproven successful for over 50 years, as have many of the graduates of this then uniqueprofessional educational approach for creative engineering practice.From an educational and financial analysis, the ASEE-National Collaborative initiative is botheducationally sound, proven, adaptable to all regions of the nation, and is extremely cost-effective. Feasibility analysis to date indicates that the National Collaborative’s approach ofintegrating professional graduate engineering education with on-going creative engineeringpractice and project-based learning in industry will generate [median] technological returns ofover 10 to 1
AC 2007-1883: FACULTY SCHOLARSHIP AND TECHNICAL CURRENCY: 2007STATUS REPORT ON A NATIONAL SURVEY OF ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY FACULTYAhmed Khan, DeVry University Dr. Ahmed S. Khan is a senior Professor in the EET dept. at DeVry University, Addison, Illinois. He received his M.Sc (applied physics) from University of Karachi, an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management., and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, Outcomes Assessment, and Application of Telecommunications Technologies in Distance Education. He teaches Wireless Engineering, Network Engineering
, it is not about the technique, it is about understanding the theories from thesciences of learning and teaching that will allow the technique to be powerful. Engineeringeducators could greatly help each other by discovering the overarching characteristics that canguide instructors in their artful choices of implementing these new methods.Works Cited1. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and Learning. In D.C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (15-29). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.2. Krantz, S. G. (1999). How to teach mathematics (2nd ed.). Providence, RI: American mathematical Society.3. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind
an average of 0.7, which seems to indicate a significant improvementin the minds of the students. When asked what courses helped and didn’t helped, students werealmost as likely to indicate their first-year composition course. Many frequently mentioned theECET courses that have comprehensive lab reports as helping them improve their writing. Thisseems to be borne out by the response to questions 3 through 5. Question 3 asks whether theEnglish and Comm classes helped and the responses are in the low 3's. Questions 4 and 5, withscores typically above 4, indicate the students believe the curriculum provides sufficientopportunities for them to improve and the ECET professors provide them with feedback Ingeneral, these results seemed to indicate
development.Robin Adams, Purdue University Robin S. Adams is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is also leads the Institute for Scholarship on Engineering Education (ISEE) as part of the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE). Dr. Adams received her PhD in Education, Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Washington, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Washington, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Dr. Adams' research is concentrated on understanding design knowing and learning (particularly iterative cycles in design
identify and define our key coding categories, briefly discuss the implications ofthese different activities in terms of learning, and, finally, show examples of participantinteraction that illustrate the ideas captured by the coding category. These examples are labeledwith the associated session number (in terms of week), section identifier (Tuesday orWednesday), and participant code (Tuesday participants were indicated with S followed by anumber while Wednesday participants were indicated with T followed by a number). Thecategories are shown in alphabetical order so that no particular activity is privileged in thelisting. The next section focuses on the alignment between our results and three relevant theoriesof learning.Audience. Participants
agility: while we have used BME and ECE as novel and existing areas,respectively, the approach can easily be modified and implemented by any engineering program,on any novel content – and then be updated for other emerging areas as they appear – simply bysuitable choice of experiments. 4. Implementation Our proof-of-concept implementation of the proposed approach includes a total of eightexperiments to be incorporated into the ECE core curriculum, along with a new technicalelective with its own project(s). Depending on the specific class and the complexity of theparticular laboratory exercise, the experiments can take anywhere from 1 week to an entiresemester of 15 weeks. We should re-emphasize that an important objective of our effort
of the Academic relevant content standards, and focused on the big ideasContent and foundational skills critical to future learning in the targeted discipline(s). Learning experiences challenge students to develop higherQuality of the Cognitive Task order thinking skills through processes such as inquiry, problem-solving, and creative thinking. Learning experiences place students in learningConnections to STEM Careers environments that help them to better understand and personally consider STEM careers. Learning experiences often
. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.IX. References[1] Koretsky, M.D., Amatore, D., Barnes, C., & Kimura, S. (2008). Enhancement of student learning in experimental design using a virtual laboratory. IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(1), 76–85.[2] Koretsky, M.D., Kelly, C. & Gummer, E. (2011). Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially-situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 540–573.[3] Koretsky, M.D., Kelly, C. & Gummer, E. (2011). Student Learning in
expected ofgraduates. Programs are required to demonstrate that students are graduating with thedemonstrated attributes, and that a continual improvement process is in place, “thatdemonstrate(s) that program outcomes are being assessed in the context of the graduateattributes, and that the results are applied to the further development of the program” (CEAB). Page 25.594.4The CEAB has described the investigation and communication attributes as follows: Investigation: an ability to conduct investigations of complex problems by methods that include appropriate experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of information in
, despite all the efforts during the past years, a 2010 revisit of the2005 report entitled “Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly ApproachingCategory 5”2 stated that the U. S. scientific and technical global competitiveness position hadcontinued to deteriorate in the previous five years (p. 2).Meanwhile, social media sites such as Twitter and Facebook have become important venues forthe young generation to communicate and exchange information. A Pew Research Center report3indicates 93% of young adults (age 18-29) use the Internet and 72% of them use socialnetworking sites. The public conversation online has accumulated large amount of real-time datagenerated in informal settings that can bring valuable insights into students’ college
Interface PWM – Pulse Width ModulationCPLD – Complex Programmable Logic Device QEI – Quadrature Encoder InterfaceCT – Capacitive Touch SPI – Serial Peripheral InterfaceEPI – External Peripheral Interface SSI – Synchronous Serial Interface (SPI compatible)ETH – Ethernet Controller SW – SwitchesFPGA – Field Programmable Gate Array USB – Universal Serial Bus controllerGPIO – General Purpose I/O U(S)ART Universal (Synchronous) AsynchronousI2C – Inter Integrated Circuit Interface Receiver and TransmitterI2S – Inter Integrated Sound Interface