ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1 - 30 of 32 in total

← Previous
1
2
Next →

Connectivity at RIT - Developing & Delivering an Effective Professional Development Workshop Series for Women Faculty in STEM

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology; Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COS); DeLois Kijana Crawford, Rochester Institute of Technology; Wendy A. Dannels, Rochester Institute of Technology (NTID)
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

) for the RIT NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant. The goal of this large-scale ($3.4M), multi-year university-level organizational transformation effort is to increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty. At the university level, she serves as Senior Faculty Associate to the Provost for ADVANCE and co-chairs the President’s Commission on Women.Prof. Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Professor Maureen Valentine, P.E. has been a faculty member at the Rochester Institute of Technology for 23 years. She has served in many rolls, including teaching faculty, Department Chair, Director of Women in Technology and Associate Dean of the College of Applied Science and

Relevance Score: 0.25216144

A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering Identity

Conference Session: Engineering Cultures and Identity
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Anita Patrick, University of Texas, Austin; Maura Borrego, University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

these identity frameworks in the broaderliterature. To be fair, in the broader literature there have only been a few claims that identity isexplicitly distinct from other constructs such as self-efficacy2 or the expectancy-value theory ofachievement motivation.3 However, in the last five years some have made this distinction. Forexample, Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G.4 expand on Bandura’s theory of self-efficacyto the extent of illuminating the importance of self-efficacy in academic persistence. While thisis not explicitly identity, self-efficacy is a theoretically relevant construct that had to be takeninto consideration in this review as it is often associated with identity measures.Table 1 Categorization of Identity Studies by

Relevance Score: 0.014385512

How do Male and Female Faculty Members View and Use Classroom Strategies?

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; James A Middleton, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University; Robert J Culbertson, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Yong Seok Park, Arizona State University; Bethany B Smith, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

instruction. College teaching, 44(2), 43-47.  2. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS 11 (23), 8410- 8415.3. Jungst, S., Likclider, L. L., & Wiersema, J. (2003). Providing Support for Faculty Who Wish to Shift to a Learning-Centered Paradigm in Their Higher Education Classrooms. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3(3), 69-81.4. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College teaching, 44(2), 43-47.5. Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research

Relevance Score: 0.01427912

Engineering Students’ Self-Concept Differentiation: Investigation of Identity, Personality, and Authenticity with Implications for Program Retention

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Changing Engineering Culture
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kylie Denise Stoup, James Madison University; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

under Grant No.0846468 (NSF CAREER) and 0824337 (NSF BRIGE). Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.1. US Congress Joint Economic Committee. (2012). STEM Education: Preparing for the Jobs of the Future. Washington DC.2. Statistics. (2015). National Girls Collaborative Project. Retrieved June 15, 2015, from http://www.ngcproject.org/statistics.3. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. (2015). Retrieved June 15, 2015. From www.nsf.gov4. Burke, P.J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56, 836-849.5

Relevance Score: 0.013861103

Empowering Male Students as Allies for Gender Equity Within an Engineering College

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Changing Engineering Culture
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lisa Abrams, Ohio State University; Suzanne Grassel Shoger, The Ohio State University; Lauren Corrigan, Ohio State University; Steven Y. Nozaki, Ohio State University; Mitsu Narui, The Ohio State University Multicultural Center; Adithya Jayakumar, The Ohio State University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

planned and implementedwith the goal of making adjustments in real time for maximum outreach impact.The ultimate aim of AWE is to be a sustainable endeavor that promotes gender equity in theCOE. Short-term plans include continuing the cohort program for subsequent years. In addition,as an extension to the program, plans are underway to embed it in the university curriculum inthe COE through the creation of a class based on the existing model. Current students in thecohort will be used as teaching assistants for the class and future teaching assistants will comefrom the class. Collectively, these efforts are expected to create meaningful and lasting changefor all students in the College of Engineering.Bibliography1 Litzler, E., Jaros, S

Relevance Score: 0.013861103

The Relationship Between Course Assignments and Academic Performance: An Analysis of Predictive Characteristics of Student Performance

Conference Session: Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Deborah Ann Pedraza, Texas Tech University; Mario G. Beruvides P.E., Texas Tech University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Economy

605 .58 598 .48 Regents English IV Boys 429 .47 430 .43 406 .36 Girls 229 .58 229 .58 224 .42 Total 658 .47 659 .53 630 .43 Rank in H. S. Class* Boys 253 .47 264 .43 226 .34 Girls 157 .60 157 .62 145 .56

Relevance Score: 0.01320105

Making Changes: Application of an NSF-ADVANCE PAID Grant at a Predominantly Undergraduate Institution (PUI)

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Theresa M. Vitolo, Gannon University; Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University; Lori D. Lindley, Gannon University; Elisa M. Konieczko, Gannon University; Weslene Tallmadge, Gannon University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

information science; her industry experience includes systems analysis and cognitive science applications. She is one of the Principal Investigators on two NSF S-STEM and one NSF ADVANCE-PAID grants. With a life-long interest in technology and its potential for enhancing human capabilities, her research includes advances in analytics, motivated system energetics, and other topics relative to knowledge-intensive systems.Dr. Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University Dr. Karinna Vernaza joined Gannon University in 2003, and she is currently a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department and Associate Dean of the College of Engineering and Business. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in mechanical engineering from the University

Relevance Score: 0.01320105

First Generation Students Identification with and Feelings of Belongingness in Engineering

Conference Session: Engineering Cultures and Identity
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Hank Boone, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

*** AMR of college/university personnel before college -0.07 0.03 * Perception of Future 0.19 0.06 ** Connectedness -0.15 0.06 * Being a Female -0.35 0.15 * College expense provided by parent(s), guardian(s), or family -0.13 0.05 ** College expense provided by oneself -0.18 0.06 ** R2=0.23, p-value=3.91e-07 Legend: * = <0.05, **= <0.01, ***= <0.001The entire model is significant

Relevance Score: 0.011899266

Into the Light: Diffusing Ccontroversy and Increasing Transparency in the Faculty Salary Equity Study Process

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty. At the university level, she serves as Senior Faculty Associate to the Provost for ADVANCE and co-chairs the President’s Commission on Women. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Into the Light: Diffusing controversy and increasing transparency in the faculty salary equity study processABSTRACTWomen are underrepresented in most science, technology, engineering and math (STEM)disciplines within academe and the workforce. In response, the National Science Foundationlaunched the ADVANCE grant program in the early 2000’s to fund efforts which increase therepresentation of women STEM faculty and academic leaders

Relevance Score: 0.011807378

Leaning into Engineering: Tenured Women Faculty and the Policies and Programs that Support Them

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Deborah Ilana Karpman, University of California San Diego
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

any credence or acknowledge it. We’rehere to do a job.” However, she stated that at times she felt like she was “back in the 1980’s.”However, another faculty member said that she had not felt either advantaged or disadvantagedfor being a woman in engineering. Finally, an associate professor in a different department alsoreported a strong amount of support from both male and female colleagues at ResearchUniversity I. Yet, she described a “systemic bias” during her graduate and postdoctoral careerthat caused some of her female peers to decide not to seek a faculty position. She recalled, “I hada lot of friends who wanted to be faculty and they just got tired. They got tired of constantlyfighting.” At Research University III, women faculty

Relevance Score: 0.011079253

Understanding Female STEM Faculty Experiences of Subtle Gender Bias from Microaggressions Perspective

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Yang Lydia Yang, Ph.D., Kansas State University; Doris Wright Carroll Ph.D., Kansas State University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

racial and ethnic microaggressions scale (REMS): Construction, reliability, and validity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 470–480.8. Pierce, C., Carew, J., Pierce-Gonzalez, D., & Willis, D. (1978). An experiment in racism: TV commercials. In C. Pierce (Ed.), Television and education (pp. 62–88). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.9. Harwood, S. A., Choi, S., Orozco, M., Browne Huntt, M., & Mendenhall, R. (2015). Racial microaggressions at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Voices of students of color in the classroom. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.10. Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressive impact on education and teaching: Facilitating difficult dialogues on race in the classroom. In

Relevance Score: 0.01056084

The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity

Conference Session: Engineering Cultures and Identity
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

practices of constructing an engineering identity in a problem-based learning environment. Eur J Eng Educ. 2006;31(1):35-42. doi:10.1080/03043790500430185.7. Meyers KL, Ohland MW, Pawley AL, Silliman SE, Smith KA. Factors relating to engineering identity. Glob J Eng Educ. 2012;14(1):119-131.8. Chachra D, Kilgore D, Loshbaugh H, McCain J, Chen H. Being and becoming: gender and identity formation of engineering students. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition; 2008.9. Johnston S, Lee A, McGregor H. Engineering as captive discourse. Techné Res Philos Technol. 1996;1(3/4):128-136.10. McNair LD, Paretti MC, Kakar A. Case study of prior knowledge: Expectations and identity

Relevance Score: 0.010478009

Dialogues Toward Gender Equity: Engaging Engineering Faculty to Promote an Inclusive Department Climate

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: J. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University ; Joel Alejandro Mejia, Angelo State University; Maja Husar Holmes, West Virginia University; Rachel R. Stoiko, West Virginia University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.010436347

Retaining Diverse Students in Civil Engineering and its Subdisciplines: Challenges and Opportunities

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retention Programs for Diverse Students
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Abbie B Liel P.E., University of Colorado, Boulder; Eva Leong
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

. Analternative hypothesis is that there are more women and minorities starting civil or structuralengineering studies now than there were in the past, so the graduate student diversity willincrease as these students continue through the pipeline. However, nationwide data shows that, ifanything, women and minority representation among students in science and engineeringdisciplines has decreased slightly over the past 10 years2,5, making this hypothesis unlikely.Table 1. Demographic data obtained for university students and faculty in civil (C) and/or structural (S)engineering. FACULTY UNDERGRADUATE GRADUATE STUDENTS

Relevance Score: 0.010436347

Cross-sectional Survey Study of Undergraduate Engineering Identity

Conference Session: Engineering Cultures and Identity
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alexis Prybutok, The University of Texas, Austin; Anita D. Patrick, University of Texas, Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin; Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin; Mary Jo Kirisits, University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

an Analytic Lens. Journal of Research in Science and Teaching 2007, 44, 1187-1218. 2. Meyers, K. L.; Ohland, M. W.; Pawley, A. L.; Silliman, S. E.; & Smith, K. A. Factors relating to engineering identity. Global Journal of Engineering Education 2012, 14 (1), 119-131. 3. Ohland, M. W.; Sheppard, S. D.; Lichtenstein, G.; Eris, O.; Chachra, D.; & Layton, R. A. Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs. Journal of Engineering Education 2008, 97 (3), 259- 278. 4. Meyer, M.; Marx, S. Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 2014, 103 (4), 525-548. 5. Godwin, A.; Potvin, G.; & Hazari, Z. The Development

Relevance Score: 0.010331456

Systematic Team Formation Leading to Peer Support and Leadership Skills Development

Conference Session: Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Corey Kiassat, PhD, MBA, PE P.E., Quinnipiac University; Xiaoyue Jiang, Quinnipiac University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Economy

theindividual students’ roles. CATME is a short, web-based survey that collects and analyzes self-and peer-evaluation feedback. A behaviorally-anchored rating scale is utilized to assesscontributions of each team member in five areas based on the team effectiveness literature (Ohlandet al., (2012)23. The grade for each team-based component is multiplied by the CATME factor foreach student and that is the score entered for the student. As such, if a student does not pull his/herweight, s/he is penalized by the rest of the team and gets a lower grade than the rest of the teammembers. Conversely, if a student goes above and beyond the norm, s/he is recognized by theteammates and gets a higher grade than the original team score.It should be noted that

Relevance Score: 0.010331456

Systematic Review of the Funds of Knowledge Framework in STEM Education

Conference Session: Engineering Cultures and Identity
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Dina Verdin, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brenda Capobianco, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

undergraduateengineering programs? Do first-generation students’ funds of knowledge shift or change as theyassimilate to their undergraduate engineering programs? We believe that future work in this areawill significantly improve retention for first-generation students within engineering and open waysfor them to feel like they fit in engineering.Table 3. First Round of Data Extraction for Primary SourcesTitle/Author(s) Source Purpose of Study Type of Study Setting/ Data Collected Summary of Findings PopulationAntonellis (2013). ProQuest This research was intended as Qualitative

Relevance Score: 0.009145956

Oral History Project of Underrepresented Leaders in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Development Opportunities for Diverse Engineering Students
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kelsey Morgan Irvin, Washington University in St. Louis; Elizabeth Hiteshue, University of Pennsylvania; Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology; Michael Geselowitz, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

and build the "Bombe," a machine that was successfully used by the United States during the war to analyze and “crack” encoded communication messages from the German Naval Enigma machine. While Desch’s work and contributions to the design and manufacturing of such machines led him to be awarded the Presidential Medal for Merit by President Harry S. Truman in 1947, it was not until 1992 that this work was declassified. 8|P a g e In this interview, Anderson discusses her life and career, such as the difficulties of being a woman in the STEM fields. Although not of a STEM profession, she provides encouragement to continue

Relevance Score: 0.008855534

Gaining Insights into the Effects of Culturally Responsive Curriculum on Historically Underrepresented Students’ Desire for Computer Science

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Changing Engineering Culture
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Omoju Miller, UC Berkeley
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

work should be built. Appropriating the turtle in 1 It is important to note, this is the first CS course, since UC Berkeley has been tracking student course data, thathas ever achieved that feat.the LOGO programming environment gave children a way to think about the principles ofcomputation and the practice of programming.Design of an Inclusive CS0 CourseAt UC Berkeley, there are two separate ways a students can get a CS degree. They can either get aBachelor of Arts (B.A.) through the College of Letters and Sciences (L&S), or get a Bachelor ofScience (B.Sc.) through the College of Engineering. The major difference between the two tracksis that students who get the B.A. get to take breadth requirements that gives them exposure tomore

Relevance Score: 0.008855534

Teamwork in Engineering Undergraduate Classes: What Problems Do Students experience?

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Development Opportunities for Diverse Engineering Students
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon University; Elizabeth A. Powell, Tennessee Technological University; Seth Schlisserman; Alexandra Kirshon
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.008731674

Exploring Barriers in the Engineering Workplace: Hostile, Unsupportive, and Otherwise Chilly Conditions

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Rachel Yonemura, University of Washington ; Denise Wilson, University of Washington
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

about your engineering workplace experiences. • Tell me about critical moments for you related to engineering. What experiences have tended to draw you towards, or push you away from, engineering? Phase 2 • What led you to your original degree ? • Does anything tempt you to leave your position as ? • Could you describe in as much detail as possible your present work environment? • What is the worst work environment you’ve ever had? What made it “the worst”? • What do you see as barrier(s) to advancement in your present workplace

Relevance Score: 0.00808396

More than Increased Numbers: A Mentoring Program for Females in Science and Engineering

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retention Programs for Diverse Students
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lisa Carlson, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Shaobo Huang, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cassandra M Birrenkott, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Sarah Folsland, Woment in Science and Engineering
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee
Tagged Divisions: Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

. Indianapolis.8. Perez-Castilleos, R, & Santhanam, P. R. (2014). Student-led Mentoring Program Fostering Retention of FemaleUndergraduate Students in STEM Fields. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education. Indianapolis.9. Clark, J. I., Godd, S. L., Des Jardins, A. C., Foreman, C. M., Gunnink, B. W., Plumb, C., & Stocker, K. R. (2015).Peer Mentoring Program: Providing early intervention and support to improve retention and success of women inengineering, computer science, and physics. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education. Seattle.10. Kim, D. L., Lee, Y. H., & Oh, M. S. (2012). Effect of Women in Engineering Programs on the Retention ofFemale Engineering Students. Presented at the Inaugural International

Relevance Score: 0.008002711

Interdisciplinary Seminar Series: Increasing Awareness for Research, Recognition of the University, and Professional Development Opportunities

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jamie J Newman, Louisiana Tech University; Mary E Caldorera-Moore, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

top researchers across the country. It is preciselythis type of success that ADVANCE grants like ours are designed to foster. Supporting thesuccess of women faculty increases the success of us all. We are thrilled to have been one ofthe catalysts of this effort.” It is the hope that the events that have been created will serve asa model for students, new faculty, and other universities to pursue their passion, collaboratewith colleagues across departments, and engage with the community to create a rich,dynamic, and energizing academic culture.References:1. Anderson, W.A., U. Banerjee, C. Drennan, S. Elgin, I. Epstein, J. Handelsman, G. Hatfull, R. Losick, D. O'Dowd, and B.M. Olivera, Science education. Changing the culture of

Relevance Score: 0.0074676415

"Turning away" from the Struggling Individual Student: An Account of the Cultural Construction of Engineering Ability in an Undergraduate Programming Class

Conference Session: Engineering Cultures and Identity
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Stephen Secules, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

things.Methodological overview The methodological approach for this project came about via both theoretical (literature)and practical considerations. While the cultural construction literature tends to emphasize theoryand analysis, we tried to assemble a robust and consistent methodological approach to investigatecultural construction in a particular setting. In McDermott’s early writing at the time of his datacollection (1970’s) he aligned himself methodologically with three primary traditions:ethnography, ethnomethodology, and discourse/interaction analysis17,18,19. As an investigation ofculture, the work relies on ethnographic methods and approaches, such as the incorporation ofmultiple qualitative data streams, ethnographic field noting20, and one

Relevance Score: 0.0073796115

Role of Gender and Use of Supplemental Instruction in a Required Freshman Chemistry Course by Engineering Students on their Course Grades and Subsequent Academic Success

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retention Programs for Diverse Students
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Rachel Lauren Shapiro, Northeastern University; Emily Olina Wisniewski, Johns Hopkins University; Emma Kaeli, Northeastern University; Tyler Byrne Cole, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

Average, and Changes of Major of Female and Minority Students Entering Engineering," in IEEE Frontiers in Education, Indianapolis, IN, 2005. [6] M. A. Hutchison, D. K. Follman, M. Sumpter and G. M. Bodner, "Factors Influencing the Self‐Efficacy Beliefs of First‐Year Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 39‐47, 2006. [7] F. Aloul, I. Zualkernan, G. Husseini, A. El‐Hag and Y. Al‐Assaf, "A case study of a college‐ wide first‐year undergraduate engineering course," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 32‐51, 2015. [8] T. J. Bowles, A. McCoy and S. Bates, "The effect of supplemental instruction on timely graduation," College Student Journal

Relevance Score: 0.0068594664

The Changing Role of Professional Societies for Academics

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University; Daniela Faas, Harvard University; Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University; Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Diane L Peters P.E., Kettering University; Rebecca M. Reck, Kettering University; Mary C. Verstraete, The University of Akron; Deborah J. O'Bannon P.E., University of Missouri, Kansas City
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

, Susan; Wiens, Gloria J.; Kazerounian, Kazem; Allen, Janet Katherine; and Jacobson, Kathy. Broadening Participation: A Report on a Series of Workshops Aimed at Building Community and Increasing the Number of Women and Minorities in Engineering Design, .Mechanical Engineering Conference Presentations, Papers, and Proceedings 2013, Paper 11.3. Williams, W. M. & Ceci, S. J. National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 5360-5365, doi:10.1073/pnas.1418878112 (2015).4. Hager, M. A., Engagement Motivations in Professional Associations. Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol 43 (2S), Pg. 39S-60S (2013).5. Parker, M., Welch