Paper ID #36470Resistance to advocacy around hidden curriculum in engineeringDr. Victoria Beth Sellers, University of Florida Dr. Victoria Sellers is a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida. Her current research is focused on determining how engineering students respond to hidden curriculum. Victoria has previouslDr. R. Jamaal DowneyIdalis Villanueva Alarc´on, University of Florida Dr. Villanueva Alarc´on is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the Uni- versity of Florida. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering
sociocultural contexts, the impact of critical consciousness in engineering practice, and the development and imple- mentation of culturally responsive pedagogies in engineering education.Dr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Diana A. Chen, PhD is an Associate Professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated En- gineering at the University of San Diego. She earned her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University. In collaboration with colleagues, Dr. Chen is designing a new engineering curriculum to educate changemakers who understand that engineer- ing is an inherently socio-technical activity. Her passion is studying and encouraging culture
conflict while avoiding falling into an echo chamber.4.0 Course Alumni InsightsAlumni of the course were invited to contribute to this paper as co-authors to share their insightson the class and how it fit into the traditional engineering curriculum. Their perspectives areincluded in the subsections that follow.4.1 Kevin KuckMy name is Kevin Kuck (pronounced 'cook'). At the time of writing this, I am a 5th-year senior atGeorge Mason University pursuing an undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering. Before Iexplain this class's profound impact on me, I need to provide context as to why. Until Spring 2022,I had no real intention or desire to be more involved at Mason. I knew very few people within thedepartment and even fewer people in my
experience and belongingness8 16C o N E C D 2 0 2 4Here is how we got here…• An overview of significant event at the University-level • 2016 – Tigers ADVANCE grant activities begin supporting women in STEM • 2016 – Clemson achieves R1 status • 2016 – Clemson hires first Chief Diversity Officer (CDO) and special assistant to the president for inclusive excellence • 2018 – University implements Grad 360 curriculum • 2023 – New VP Diversity and Inclusive Excellence (Dr. Felicia Benton-Johnson)• An overview of significant events within CECAS that directly
Paper ID #40688Faculty Perceptions of Key Concepts in Degree Curriculum: Identifyingthe Role of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and JusticeApril Townson, Rowan UniversityDr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship.Dr. Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University Kaitlin Mallouk is an Associate Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University
making sure every student graduate and the course curriculum and all that stuff.Drawing from our findings, EIF are not just restricted to their primary duty of teaching, they arealso involved in multiple other roles across the leadership spectrum in engineering education.One of the EIF that typifies this is Victor. Victor is the associate department chair; as such, heenumerates the number of leadership roles he takes on in his department. I'm the associate chair in the department, I am in charge of the undergraduate curriculum. I support several of the tasks such as scheduling, managing personnel, laboratories. Also, I am, in part of academics, I'm an ABET accredited program evaluator. So, during the last cycle, I
Paper ID #40726Mycorrhiza Framework: towards an Engineering Education framework forSocial and Environmental JusticeJorge A Cristancho, Purdue Engineering Education Jorge A. Cristancho studied Electronic and Computer Engineering and using bioinspired methods, he received a master’s in Electronic Engineering and Computers on Control and Automation at Los Andes University. Curious about teaching, he formally started as a teaching assistant in 2011 and continued as a teacher at three different universities in Colombia. He is a second-year Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He keeps a balanced life
range of available services, resources are frequently under-utilized (especially amongthose who would benefit most) [20]. Even though some degree of siloing occurs in most collegesand universities, research suggests that institutions can improve coordination and communicationby integrating services and collaborating to support student success through a more horizontal,holistic, and coordinated approach [16]. An important part of this change is addressing campusculture and how leaders support and work towards equity and incorporate collaborative strategies[21]. Holcombe and Kezar [14] call for creating a "unified community of support" that will worktogether to break down barriers and support students. Our research empirically examines the
, that was that was beyond acceptable…” • XXX “Once I was in a high-level pitch meeting (the only woman in the room), and asked if I could present early, stating I had to leave at 5:45 pm in order to pick up my son from daycare. They did not accommodate me, and I quietly left the room at 5:45. The next day I was chastised for leaving. It was bad enough my kids spent long hours with strangers, so this event triggered me to evaluate my work-life balance. I resigned a few weeks later…”As mentioned previously 17 of the 22 had children and 14 of 17 mothers discussedstruggles integrating work and family.The entire quotes are:BBB “I got a bad review my first year, (as an engineering
Massachusetts-Amherst. Dr. Downey focuses on critical qualitative inquiry with a discerning eye toward humanizing and culturally sustaining pedagogies.Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on, University of Florida Dr. Villanueva Alarc´on is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the Uni- versity of Florida. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational re- searcher, and professional development mentor for underrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for stu- dent professional development and training. In addition, she has developed methodologies around hidden
Scholarshipii. Demonstrated financial neediii. Leadership, scholastic engagement, and community engagementiv. Engagement with Penn Statev. Personal and social responsibilityvi. High achievement in high school courses 4Once selected as a finalist, students are then asked tosubmit a nomination from a mentor, counselor or teacherbased on the following prompts:i. Please describe how the nominee embodies the values of effort, integrity, ingenuity, and/or servant leadership.ii. Please describe how the nominee has contributed to fostering an inclusive and diverse community and plans to continue in these efforts at Penn State and in their future career as
sociocultural contexts, the impact of critical consciousness in engineering practice, and the development and imple- mentation of culturally responsive pedagogies in engineering education.Dr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Diana A. Chen, PhD is an Associate Professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated En- gineering at the University of San Diego. She earned her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University. In collaboration with colleagues, Dr. Chen is designing a new engineering curriculum to educate changemakers who understand that engineer- ing is an inherently socio-technical activity. Her passion is studying and encouraging culture
Paper ID #35548Creating and Sustaining Inclusive Learning Communities in EngineeringDr. Melissa M. Bilec, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Melissa Bilec is the William Kepler Whiteford Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Co-director of the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation. Her research focuses on the sustainable built environment. She is committed to exploring how the built environment can be an integral part of climate change solutions. She views the world and her research using a systems-level approach, and she is an expert in life cycle assessment. Using this view, she integrates critical built
establishing their own internal engineering goal [15],[39]. As an example, Micari & Pazos [42], in their study, discussed the importance of engagingstudents in relevant course work to students’ perception of curriculum and their success. Thiswas found again in Gasman et al’s. study [55], which also discusses the importance ofconnecting students with STEM capital, including STEM related opportunities and resources.Discovering that engineering faculty viewed their role in broadening participation as closelyconnected to how they support, encourage, and engage undergraduate students provides apotentially emerging engineering faculty perspective. Existing literature captures STEM facultyvoice in discussing their role in attracting more students into
the faculty prioritized ensuring that our students have “anability to…create a collaborative and inclusive environment” upon graduation. Our approach tointroducing DEI pedagogy was to focus on a first-year course, Grand Challenges in Engineering(GCE), and a second-year course, Engineering Mechanics: Statics (Statics). GCE is the firstfoundational design course in the program, where ABET Student Outcomes (SOs) 2-6 areintroduced. This was a natural fit for introducing DEI concepts, since they tie well with SOs 3(effective communication) and 5 (function effectively on a team). While Statics is a less obviouschoice to integrate DEI instruction, it was an opportunity to explore innovative ways toemphasize the importance of DEI in engineering in a
curriculum basedon its potential to be supportive of learning for all students. PBL is an educational designapproach which guides learners to “conduct research, integrate theory and practice and applyknowledge and skills to develop a viable solution to a defined problem” [29]. PBL has beenshown to increase long term knowledge retention, the motivation of learners and their ability tosolve authentic problems [30]. More specifically, PBL has been shown to be effective in helpingthe persistence of underrepresented students in STEM. For example, in a case study of at-riskfemale students in a physics classroom, the use of a PBL curriculum was shown to have positiveeffects on both student collaboration and self-efficacy [31]. An additional exploratory
included if empathy development was amajor component examined or considered in the research. Many that integrated empathy did notdirectly explore its growth or development, it was more of a component considered or as part ofthe curriculum rather than the goal of the research. For example, McDonald and Pan (2020)presented feedback from graduate students on ethical considerations for artificial intelligence[49]. While this work elicited insight into prompting consideration of bias and fairness, fosteringempathy was more of an indirect outcome than the phenomena of focus. Alternatively studiesconducted in other countries were excluded since the interpretation and assessment of empathymay vary by culture depending on the societal norms and preferences
Science. Focusing on making sure curriculum and pedagogy are tight. And integrating informal pedagogy into that as well for example experiential learning and Co-op experience. But at the end of my first year my ideal position turned into the president of a university. It was like, “Go, broke, or go home.” When it comes to the initial purpose and the drive. I still have that, because I remember when we started the program they asked for a little bio, for them to post on Twitter. They were like, “Oh, just tell us about yourself, and why you decided to pursue a PhD program with us.” And I wrote that I want people to have that “Ah-ha!” moment. So, the drive and the purpose of me wanting to stay in
Paper ID #40679The Pink Paradox: Tensions in How STEM Toys are Marketed Toward GirlsDr. Theresa Green, Purdue University Dr. Theresa Green is a postdoctoral researcher at Purdue University with a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation. Her research interests include K-12 STEM integration, curriculum development, and improving diversity and inclusion in engineering.Mr. Artre Reginald Turner, Purdue University at West Lafayette Artre Turner is a dedicated graduate student deeply invested in advancing the field of engineering edu- cation. With a methodical and inquisitive approach to his studies, he’s pioneering research that
groups, andparticipate in conferences and seminars—which is generally seen as good advising practices. 13 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE • The findings reveal the importance of creating engineering faculty development programming designed to improve their conceptualization of STEM identity, as well as the classroom practices used to promote the STEM identity of women undergraduates • Engineering programs must consider how to integrate the BSSI model postulated by Collins (2018) in their curriculum as it proved to be a useful tool for organizing and communicating ideas about STEM identity
outreach effort,and GOAL has been utilized as an aspect of the course curriculum in e4usaclassrooms. Teachers from all of these groups have participated in theco-development and design of new versions of the GOAL kits. Other area publicschools are expressing interest in the GOAL program and we are beginning to explorethe expansion of our partnerships to these new school systems.Campus Partners: The GOAL program originally launched from Women in Engineering(WIE) and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, and all aspects of the programstill run through these two main entities, including design, production, finances,partner relations, distribution, and events.Undergraduate education integration has been spearheaded by the newly
during her interview as Founding Chair.Vision for the CurriculumAlthough an internal task force had drafted an engineering curriculum spring 2016 to get the newdepartment approved in the College, the Founding Chair was allowed to start the curriculumdesign process from scratch to ensure ABET compliance and alignment with shared visioning.As a point of reference, Figure 9 shows the originally proposed WFU BS Engineeringcurriculum, which showcases what most would describe as a traditional engineering curricularmodel. Eventually, as will be visible in upcoming sections of this paper, the WFU Engineeringwould reflect a model that is more interdisciplinary, integrated, and holistic. Proposed WFU BS
improve their conceptualization of STEM identity, as well as the classroom practices used to promote the STEM identity of women undergraduates • Engineering programs must consider how to integrate the BSSI model postulated by Collins (2018) in their curriculum as it proved to be a useful tool for organizing and communicating ideas about STEM identity, its intersection with gender and racial/ethnic identity, and asset‐based thinkingThe findings reveal the importance of creating engineering faculty development programmingdesigned to improve their conceptualization of STEM identity, as well as the classroom practicesused to promote the STEM identity of women students—this study indicated there is
to:CLICK1. Develop and direct bold large-scale initiatives that engage College of Engineering(CoE) (~300) faculty, (~240) staff, and (~6,000) students, and build literacy around,diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts CLICK2. Establish new programs based on promising practices that complement existingprograms CLICK3. Develop, design, implement, and evaluate professional, career, and skillsdevelopment trainings, workshops, and other activities that increase interactionsamong students, staff, and faculty to improve climate – one example is thedevelopment of an equity minded syllabi for faculty CLICK4. Support faculty in the integration of DEI principles in their teaching, research, andservice
of how cultural norms affect engineering design and the adoption of engineeringinnovations. Specifically, participants will: Increase their self-knowledge of interculturalcompetence, and explore and adopt strategies for developing their own interculturaleffectiveness; Explore and evaluate engineering innovations within a framework of communitywellbeing and sustainable development; Integrate cultural knowledge, ideas and concepts intoSTEM curriculum and pedagogy. Therefore this paper will focus on the research question:“Does participation in the NSF RET Global STEM program positively impact participants'intercultural competence?"In an effort to address this research question, a convergent parallel mixed method evaluationdesign (Creswell &
Paper ID #40775Creating Pathways to Engineering through Sponsored Summer CampsDr. Racheida S Lewis, University of Georgia Racheida S. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Georgia in the Engineering Ed- ucation Transformations Institute (EETI) and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Lewis believes in creating a diverse engineering field and strives to do so through connecting with teaching, and mentoring future engineers. She has devoted her life to this mission through her leadership and lifetime membership in the National Society of Black Engineers. Ultimately, Dr. Lewis
inclusion into engineeringcourses. Specifically, the third author works to integrate content concerning folks withdisabilities and teaches an upper-division course on design for disability. In dynamics, the thirdauthor incorporates modified versions of this content and helps emphasize the ways in whichengineering solutions can contribute to equity and access. In addition, the fourth author hasexperience with issues of engineering and social justice and teaches an upper division class onengineering design theory and social justice. Similarly, the fourth author works to incorporatesociotechnical topics into all their courses, including engineering statics. We note ourpositionality because the topics we teach likely influenced student responses to the
process which emphasizes on open-ended problem solving to createinnovative solutions to challenges in any subjects impacting society.Nowadays, the Faculty of Engineering at the Université de Sherbrooke (UdeS), Canada, aims tointegrate EDI concepts into its undergraduate program curricula. This objective aligns with theintention of the Canadian engineering accreditation board (CEAB) to integrate EDI throughaccreditation requirements for engineering programs in Canada.CEAB, an instance related to Engineers Canada, regulates engineering education in Canada andis responsible for accrediting undergraduate engineering programs. Program accreditation isrequired to issue permits for professional regulatory bodies in each province of Canada. In theUnited
and Engineering endorse cultural ableism? • As we transition back into an in-person space, what are your thoughts, comments, or concerns for fall quarter 2021?One recurring theme throughout these Town halls was ableism. Many faculty, staff, and students hadobserved that the transition to a virtual teaching modality had highlighted for them a number of issuesof accessibility that were either improved or worsened in a virtual classroom setting. Ableism in STEMwas discussed in depth, specifically ways in which community attitudes and norms perpetuate ableismand what elements of curriculum and university infrastructure could be challenged to make STEM spacesmore inclusive. Many faculty were providing more thorough material online for their
Paper ID #40715Beyond Math Readiness: Understanding Why Some Women Pursue Engi-neeringOlivia Ryan, Virginia Tech Engineering Education Olivia Ryan is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and a Master’s student in Engineering Mechanics at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. in engineering with a specialization in electrical engineering from Roger Williams University. Her research interests include understanding curriculum barriers in engineering related to mathematics.Dr. Susan Sajadi, Virginia Tech Susan Sajadi is an assistant professor at Virginia Tech in the department of engineering education. She has a BSE and MS