. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She enjoys serving as a ”communication coach” to students throughout the curriculum, and she’s especially excited to work with first year and senior students, as well as engineering project teams, as they navigate the more open-ended communication decisions involved in describing the products of open-ended design scenarios.Mark Mills, UM, Center for Academic Innovation Mark Mills is a Data Scientist with the Center for Academic Innovation at the University of Michigan. He is responsible for leading analysis across the Center in support of its mission to leverage data for shaping
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Critical Technology Integration in Pursuit of a Liberatory Engineering Education Holly Plank Department of Teaching, Learning, and Leading University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA holly.plank@pitt.eduAbstractWhen designing an engineering curriculum for K-12 or higher education students, it is importantfor us to continuously ask two questions. When does technology integration enhance or hinderour
3 Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering EducationThe course curriculum relies heavily on previously existing materials from the CaliforniaCommunity Colleges Accessibility Center1 and Pennsylvania State University’s guide,Accessibility and Usability at Penn State,2 as well as feedback from stakeholders across campus.The target audience for the course is faculty at Mines creating OER, however it is open to theentire campus and to educators across the state to participate. The course is now also publishedas an OER in Canvas Commons, enabling adoption beyond Mines. 25ACE provides extensive information on accessibility issues found in STEM materials andaddresses the specific challenges such materials pose for accessibility
Paper ID #35839Using a pilot course to evaluate curriculum redesign for a first yearengineering program.Dr. Janie M Moore, Texas A&M University Dr. Janie McClurkin Moore is an Assistant Professor in the Biological and Agricultural Engineering De- partment at Texas A&M University in College Station. A native of Columbus, Ohio, she attended North Carolina A&T State University where she received a B.S. in Bio Environmental Engineering in 2006. She then began pursuing her graduate education at Purdue University in the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary
, that was that was beyond acceptable…” • XXX “Once I was in a high-level pitch meeting (the only woman in the room), and asked if I could present early, stating I had to leave at 5:45 pm in order to pick up my son from daycare. They did not accommodate me, and I quietly left the room at 5:45. The next day I was chastised for leaving. It was bad enough my kids spent long hours with strangers, so this event triggered me to evaluate my work-life balance. I resigned a few weeks later…”As mentioned previously 17 of the 22 had children and 14 of 17 mothers discussedstruggles integrating work and family.The entire quotes are:BBB “I got a bad review my first year, (as an engineering
, in 2005 and 2011, respectively. In 2013, he served as an Adjunct Professor with the American University of Kuwait and the Gulf University of Science and Technology. He is currently a lecturer at with Purdue University. His research has been concerned with power and energy systems, electromechanical energy conversion devices, modeling and simulation and engineering education.Mr. Srinivas Mohan Dustker, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Srinivas Dustker is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include community engaged learning, integration of service-learning in engineering curriculum, faculty development, curriculum development, education policy and
Paper ID #36097Design of a Low-Cost PID Level Control Experiment to Teach ChemicalEngineering Concepts in an Introductory Engineering LaboratoryAlexia Leonard, The Ohio State University Alexia Leonard is a PhD candidate in the Engineering Education program at The Ohio State University. She is currently working as a Lead Graduate Teaching Associate for the First Year Engineering program within the Department of Engineering Education and as a Graduate Research Associate for the Beliefs in Engineering Research Group (BERG) led by Dr. Emily Dringenberg.Dr. Andrew Maxson, The Ohio State University Andrew Maxson is an assistant
their primary goal is to obtainthat first job after graduation. We have observed that our students here at Prairie View A&MUniversity (PVAMU), are as technically prepared from the engineering curriculum as any studentfrom any other University. Most capstones instructors have the same opinion that final projects forengineering majors should stress professional skills as well as design education through a variety ofteaching paradigms1,2,3,4,5,6. It has been observed that using the theory in the engineering curriculumhas produced graduates with far less experience in the practice of engineering and design than thoseof year’s past7. Also, the ability to function as a member of a team is measured by several instructorsto be an important skill of
Newark Public Schools. Her latest endeavors have introduced an increase in the number and quality of STEM-related opportunities with the Orange Public Schools as the Director of Mathematics and Science; expanding opportunities to underrep- resented populations of students to participate in STEM-focused offerings such as Robotics, engineering courses, and high-impact summer camps. In an effort to further ready students for college success through new models for learning, Dr. Powell, in collaboration with district leads, post-secondary partners, and industry experts founded by the STEM Innovation Academy of the Oranges. The Academy is a fully integrated STEM education model that uses engineering design, mathematical
Paper ID #35548Creating and Sustaining Inclusive Learning Communities in EngineeringDr. Melissa M. Bilec, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Melissa Bilec is the William Kepler Whiteford Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Co-director of the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation. Her research focuses on the sustainable built environment. She is committed to exploring how the built environment can be an integral part of climate change solutions. She views the world and her research using a systems-level approach, and she is an expert in life cycle assessment. Using this view, she integrates critical built
EM’s integration into the engineering curriculum are that itreinforces technical concepts (especially in design-related topics), helps promote greaterinclusion within the profession, and develops a mindset oriented towards problem-solving,empathy, creativity, and valuing the expertise of others. 10 The KEEN Framework’s“mindset+skillset” approach presents EM as a competency geared towards graduates creatingvalue for their organizations and communities in successful and rewarding engineering careers. 9To succinctly put it, EM is CBE.KEEN’s approach also benefits the development of computing professionals. Researchinvestigating the EM of engineering and computer science students did not report any differencesbetween these two groups.11 The
material and conduct assessments through online tools andplatforms, ensuring academic integrity and preventing academic cheating while doing so. It isvirtually impossible to use the course delivery and assessment methods previously used in face-to-face classroom setting without modifications for use in an online setting. The activitiespreviously used in a face-to-face classroom setting have to be replaced with similar activitieswhich are conducive to be used in an online setting.The course delivery methods and instructional activities part aside, assessments methods must bemodified as well for use in an online setting. While one of the reasons being that some of theassessment methods cannot be effectively used in an online setting, the other
the faculty prioritized ensuring that our students have “anability to…create a collaborative and inclusive environment” upon graduation. Our approach tointroducing DEI pedagogy was to focus on a first-year course, Grand Challenges in Engineering(GCE), and a second-year course, Engineering Mechanics: Statics (Statics). GCE is the firstfoundational design course in the program, where ABET Student Outcomes (SOs) 2-6 areintroduced. This was a natural fit for introducing DEI concepts, since they tie well with SOs 3(effective communication) and 5 (function effectively on a team). While Statics is a less obviouschoice to integrate DEI instruction, it was an opportunity to explore innovative ways toemphasize the importance of DEI in engineering in a
other engineering education institutions: at heart, the project aims to helpstudents better understand, and hence be better prepared for, their post-graduation futures. Lackof student preparation in all dimensions needed to succeed in the engineering environment–a“misalignment” between engineering education and practice has long been noted, and manyengineering graduates still endure a challenging transition to the workforce [1], [2]. To addressthis need, engineering educators have incorporated project-based learning in the curriculum [3],[4], [5], including capstones [6] and design projects [7]. [7] proposes more broadly that“curriculum developers and instructors should employ an integrative approach where studentscan connect their use of
University in Engineering Education. Her re- search interests include K-12 STEM integration, curriculum development, and improving diversity and inclusion in engineering.Dr. Natalie L Shaheen, Illinois State University Dr. Natalie L. Shaheen is an assistant professor of low vision and blindness at Illinois State University. Dr. Shaheen’s research and teaching focus on equity and access for disabled students in technology-mediated K-12 learning environments.Dr. Wade H Goodridge, Utah State University Wade Goodridge is a tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. He holds dual B.S. degrees in Industrial Technology Education and also in Civil and Environmental
curriculum basedon its potential to be supportive of learning for all students. PBL is an educational designapproach which guides learners to “conduct research, integrate theory and practice and applyknowledge and skills to develop a viable solution to a defined problem” [29]. PBL has beenshown to increase long term knowledge retention, the motivation of learners and their ability tosolve authentic problems [30]. More specifically, PBL has been shown to be effective in helpingthe persistence of underrepresented students in STEM. For example, in a case study of at-riskfemale students in a physics classroom, the use of a PBL curriculum was shown to have positiveeffects on both student collaboration and self-efficacy [31]. An additional exploratory
included if empathy development was amajor component examined or considered in the research. Many that integrated empathy did notdirectly explore its growth or development, it was more of a component considered or as part ofthe curriculum rather than the goal of the research. For example, McDonald and Pan (2020)presented feedback from graduate students on ethical considerations for artificial intelligence[49]. While this work elicited insight into prompting consideration of bias and fairness, fosteringempathy was more of an indirect outcome than the phenomena of focus. Alternatively studiesconducted in other countries were excluded since the interpretation and assessment of empathymay vary by culture depending on the societal norms and preferences
request anonymous feedback on the course at the end of each quarter to provide an alternate forum for their voice to be heard.c) In addition to teamwork and communication, we also embed diversity content in the curriculum. A highlight of the year is when we invite guest speakers to talk about their experiences as women in the engineering workplace. Hearing about how women have been and continue to be treated as engineers is an eye-opening discussion for the students. We also include practical applications for the students. For example, we discuss what they should do if they see someone disrespecting someone from an underrepresented group in the workplace. Another major theme in the course is ethics, where we study ethical dilemmas
groups, andparticipate in conferences and seminars—which is generally seen as good advising practices. 13 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE • The findings reveal the importance of creating engineering faculty development programming designed to improve their conceptualization of STEM identity, as well as the classroom practices used to promote the STEM identity of women undergraduates • Engineering programs must consider how to integrate the BSSI model postulated by Collins (2018) in their curriculum as it proved to be a useful tool for organizing and communicating ideas about STEM identity
systematic application of inclusive teaching standards(called I-Standards) in our curriculum. The I- Standards were inspired by the approach andformat of Quality Matters, the certification system for online courses, which is adopted at theuniversity for all online classes and is supported by the university teaching center [6]. Theywere developed by a team of faculty by integrating principles of Universal Design forLearning [7], evidenced-based inclusive teaching practices and a comprehensive suite ofstudent support structures anchored by the strength-based approach. The I-standards are usedas a guide to organize the activities of the I-team, a team of instructors who attend a series ofworkshops and work together to redesign their courses.Research
(STEM) education is an effective catalyst toengage students in science & engineering careers. STEM continues to support the long-term goalof preparing students for life-long careers that promise a competitive edge in the job market.However, STEM program development is often challenging. Wu-Rorrer [1] argues that “STEMremains vaguely defined, and the strategies to successfully integrate it into the currenteducational system remain elusive”, inferring that a school’s STEM program is amorphous.Furthermore, STEM programs need more work than before with recent pressure to promoteinclusivity [2] and a solid career path [3] in a stable environment [4]. To better solve thisdilemma, there remains an aspect of STEM programs that is overlooked – the
improve their conceptualization of STEM identity, as well as the classroom practices used to promote the STEM identity of women undergraduates • Engineering programs must consider how to integrate the BSSI model postulated by Collins (2018) in their curriculum as it proved to be a useful tool for organizing and communicating ideas about STEM identity, its intersection with gender and racial/ethnic identity, and asset‐based thinkingThe findings reveal the importance of creating engineering faculty development programmingdesigned to improve their conceptualization of STEM identity, as well as the classroom practicesused to promote the STEM identity of women students—this study indicated there is
forsuccess. The overall experience focused on process and included opportunities forrehearsals, feedback, and ongoing enhancements. The projects required a final presentationto be delivered in a virtual conference at the completion of the program.The undergraduate mentors were an integral component of the curriculum design. Theyworked daily with the high school lab assistants and developed working relationships thatsupported student success through tutoring of physics course content, ongoing guidance onprojects and designing additional activities to further develop skills and areas of knowledge.STEM LeadershipThe Bringing STEM to Life: Work Integrated Learning program also works to address issuesaround STEM leadership by constructing work embedded
to:CLICK1. Develop and direct bold large-scale initiatives that engage College of Engineering(CoE) (~300) faculty, (~240) staff, and (~6,000) students, and build literacy around,diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts CLICK2. Establish new programs based on promising practices that complement existingprograms CLICK3. Develop, design, implement, and evaluate professional, career, and skillsdevelopment trainings, workshops, and other activities that increase interactionsamong students, staff, and faculty to improve climate – one example is thedevelopment of an equity minded syllabi for faculty CLICK4. Support faculty in the integration of DEI principles in their teaching, research, andservice
, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Srinivas Dustker is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include community engaged learning, integration of service-learning in undergraduate engineering cur- riculum, faculty development, curriculum development, education policy and technology integration in engineering education. He received his Bachelor of Engineering in Industrial Engineering and Manage- ment from B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India and his Master of Science in Industrial and Operations Engineering from University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States. American c Society for
in Middle- and High-School Science and Mathematics Classrooms,” Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 2009.[11] H. Kimmel, R. Rockland, L. S. Hirsch, J. Carpinelli and L. Burr-Alexander, “Medibotics: An Engineering Program for Integration into Secondary School Science Curriculum,” Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Engineering Education, Belfast, Ireland, August, 2011.[12] R. H Rockland, L. Burr-Alexander, H. S. Kimmel, J. D. Carpinelli, L. S Hirsch, and T. M. Tylutki, “Integration of Medicine and Robotics – an online teacher professional development program for STEM education,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2013.[13] R. H. Kay, and L. Knaack
inclusion into engineeringcourses. Specifically, the third author works to integrate content concerning folks withdisabilities and teaches an upper-division course on design for disability. In dynamics, the thirdauthor incorporates modified versions of this content and helps emphasize the ways in whichengineering solutions can contribute to equity and access. In addition, the fourth author hasexperience with issues of engineering and social justice and teaches an upper division class onengineering design theory and social justice. Similarly, the fourth author works to incorporatesociotechnical topics into all their courses, including engineering statics. We note ourpositionality because the topics we teach likely influenced student responses to the
and Engineering endorse cultural ableism? • As we transition back into an in-person space, what are your thoughts, comments, or concerns for fall quarter 2021?One recurring theme throughout these Town halls was ableism. Many faculty, staff, and students hadobserved that the transition to a virtual teaching modality had highlighted for them a number of issuesof accessibility that were either improved or worsened in a virtual classroom setting. Ableism in STEMwas discussed in depth, specifically ways in which community attitudes and norms perpetuate ableismand what elements of curriculum and university infrastructure could be challenged to make STEM spacesmore inclusive. Many faculty were providing more thorough material online for their
oxidative stress in in vitro models of Parkinson’s disease. During her prior graduate and postdoctoral work in neurodegeneration, April mentored several undergraduate, graduate, and clinical researchers and developed new methods for imaging and tracking mitochondria from living zebrafish neurons. In her work for the EERC and Pitt-CIRTL, April Dukes collaborates on educational research projects and facilitates professional development (PD) on instructional and mentoring best practices for current and future STEM faculty. As an adjunct instructor in the Department of Neuroscience at the Univer- sity of Pittsburgh since 2009 and an instructor for CIRTL Network and Pitt-CIRTL local programming since 2016, April is
ES220 student wrote: “[r]igid body systems are the basis for structuralengineering.” It was determined that this student did not answer the question, therefore theirresponse was placed in the “no effect” group; if the course had affected their view, they wouldhave answered the question. Responses were characterized as “positive” if they identified factorsthat are integral to the relationship between engineering and social justice or discussed thisrelationship in a positive manner, for example: “[i]t has opened [m]y eyes to the ethicalstandards needed in engineering.” The student clearly indicated that the course impacted howthey saw the need for ethics in engineering, which is an important component to the relationshipbetween engineering and