thechallenges that are present during graduate training are common among graduate students. Thesesimilarities are more evident among graduate students that share certain backgrounds, and inparticular among members of minority groups. While much research has been devoted to theexperiences of gender and ethnic minorities [1]–[3], the experiences of English as SecondLanguage (ESL) students in graduate school has been poorly explored. The challenges of ESLstudents often interplay with those of gender and ethnic minorities because their identities areintersectional with such characteristics. Therefore, being an ESL student represents a dimensionthat would be valuable to explore in the context of graduate education.Supporting the development of graduate
Paper ID #27554Fostering Belonging through an Undergraduate Summer Internship: A Com-munity of Practice Model for Engineering Research EducationMs. Nicole Bowers, Arizona State UniversityDr. Michelle Jordan , Arizona State University Michelle Jordan is as associate professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State Uni- versity. She also serves as the Education Director for the QESST Engineering Research Center. Michelle’s program of research focuses on social interactions in collaborative learning contexts. She is particularly interested in how students navigate communication challenges as they negotiate
theright message (messages about engineering) in front of middle and high school students.” Theframework for our Engineering Ambassador program was to establish criteria for theundergraduate to serve students in middle and high schools near Manhattan College.The Ambassador program was uniquely designed to engage engineers in education and educatorsin engineering. The combination of content and methods requires the collaboration that modelsfor students that learning is no longer competitive, but rather cooperative. A strong contentbackground for a teacher is a must. But, so is the need to provide pre-adolescents and adolescentswith the autonomy that characterizes growth and development typical of these age groups. Whilethere may be limitations on
Paper ID #24997Exploring Faculty Perceptions of Students Characteristics at Hispanic Serv-ing InstitutionsDr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso An Assistant Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is helping develop a new Engineering Leadership Program to enable students to bridge the gap between traditional engineer- ing education and what they will really experience in industry. With a background in both engineering education and design thinking, her research focuses on how Latinx students develop an identity as an engineer, methods for enhancing student motivation, and
, predominantly rural state could attend.Since I instructed several courses in the program, I taught the same students several times indifferent courses. For a period of about 2 and 1/2 years, I saw Cooper frequently—whether hewas attending class or studying in the classroom building before class.As the researcher, I credit my own previous experiences—as a service academy graduate, a U.S.Army veteran, and a returning veteran graduate student in mechanical engineering— for thedesire to exploring SVSM experience in engineering education, not just qualitatively, but alsorelationally. Using the relational, transactional methodology of NI, I came alongside Cooperwithin the context of a two-year, undergraduate engineering transfer program, to examine
teams that exist inworkplaces within the United States and abroad. As such, the purpose of this paper is to describethe process of creating and subsequent plans for implementation of an interdisciplinary capstonecourse at a large research-intensive institution in the Southeast US. The challenges associatedwith developing a course that meets the need of each disciplinary capstone experience and spansthe boundary of different approaches to pedagogy, knowledge structure and learning will beexplored as well.Background and ObjectivesOne of the most common complaints among recruiters of engineering graduates is a failure ofuniversities to properly prepare their students to collaborate within a diverse workplaceenvironment [1], [2]. Students typically
University of Alabama. She has experi- ence working with many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to
. He teaches undergraduate design, thermo- dynamics, and engineering experimentation and is the faculty adviser to both the Formula SAE Team (Cooper Motorsports) and Pi Tau Sigma Honor Society.Mr. Estuardo Rodas, Cooper Union Estuardo Rodas is Adjunct Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Cooper Union for the Advance- ment of Science & Art where he is also Project Coordinator of the Mechanical Engineering Lab. He is adviser for Cooper’s Formula SAE team and a Lead Instructor for the summer STEM program for high school students. Among his other projects, Prof. Rodas designed the Ike Heller Center for Integrated Manufacturing and Robotics at Brooklyn Tech, collaborated in construction and design of the
-academic-programs [7] M. L. Springer and M. T. Schuver, “Dwindling graduate student enrollments in distance- based programs: A researched-based exploration with underlying findings and premise,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018. [8] P. Bawa, “Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—a literature review,” SAGE Open, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2016. [9] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? a review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, Jul. 2004.[10] D. Johnson, R. Johnson, and K. Smith, Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Class- room. Interaction Book Company, 1991.
studies from Old Dominion University in 2015. Isaac’s consultancy, HEDGE Co., focuses on working with formal and informal educators to grow the numbers of females pursuing engineering or technology careers. Additionally, she is a conferred Fellow of the Society of Women Engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Does How Pre-College Engineering and Technology Role Models See Themselves Relate to Girls' Engagement in the Fields? [Research to Practice]IntroductionSince the Equal Pay Act in 1963, female participation in engineering has increased only eightpoints, from less than 5 to 13% [1], while, in the fields of medicine, female participation
today, about14% of the first year engineering cohort is enrolled in Pre-Calculus or year-long Calculus I their firstsemester [2].Eight credit hours of math is a lot to ask of first semester students, especially those among theleast mathematically prepared in the college.During the course approval process, it was decided to make Engineering Math a 3000-levelcourse (a designation usually reserved for third year courses) so that it could count as a technicalelective in several engineering degree programs. If it had been approved as a 1000-level course,most students would not have had free space in their degree plan to count the four-credit coursetowards graduation. For all these reasons, it was important to explain the course to students andmake
commitment and motivation [7], [9]. faculty. - Faculty members serve as inspiration and as partner of discussion improving the aspiration of the students [3], [7], [10]. - Learning requires cooperation between student and faculty. Enhanced student-faculty contact promotes the cooperation [11]. 2. Promote student collaboration and - After graduation students will enter jobs where team-work-skills are often a requirement or at least appreciated [12]. responsibility for own learning. - Collaboration promotes
., The Citadel Robert Rabb is an associate professor and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at The Citadel. He previously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student Veteran Leadership Skills in an Engineering Technical Writing CourseTechnical proficiency is a
explanation for this is that, on average, faculty spend the most time with53 students, compared with staff, administrators, and advisors. For most courses offered in higher education,54 this time is at least three hours per week; for research mentoring, the faculty contact time can increase55 dramatically [12]. Classroom interactions between students and faculty have a significant potential to56 influence students’ graduation path [13]. Yet, concerning the instruction by faculty, engineering students57 reported that the quality of instruction in engineering was lower than in their non-engineering courses58 [14], [15]. A 2017 study by Gandhi-Lee et al. found that most faculty are unaware of actions that59 positively influence STEM
international students. The analyses for answeringour two research questions were conducted independently in this exploratory study.Study ParticipantsStudy participants were students from a first-year engineering course in the spring semester andmost students were in their first year of study (more than 91%). This data consist 1477 studentsworked on 409 teams. Among the participants 370 were females,1102 were males, and 5students selected other or not prefer to answer. 1166 students were US-citizen and 311 wereinternational. Also, 899 students were White, 338 Asian, 33 Black, 129 Hispanic, 1 NativeAmerican, and 48 “Other.” There were 29 students who declined to answer. We are focused atteam-level effects rather than individual-level experiences, so we
teaching approachesand students’ experiences. Lattuca and her colleagues’ [12] research on the culture and values ofengineering disciplines demonstrated that disciplinary contexts shape faculty members’ attitudesand behaviors. Recent research explores the idea of the culture of engineering education and theneed to understand this culture before we can effect systemic change [13, 14]. For example,Godfrey [15] showed that different engineering disciplines exhibited different cultures, or“cultures within cultures,” affecting the participation of women.Our project explores the different disciplinary cultures of EE, CpE, and ME as these fieldsprovide a sharply contrasting picture of engineering matriculation, persistence, and attrition forBlack
chapters. She is a former board member of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching and past president of the Association for Science Teacher Education.Dr. Elizabeth Ring-Whalen, St. Catherine University Elizabeth A. Ring-Whalen is an Assistant Professor of Education at St. Catherine University in St. Paul, MN. She holds a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction - STEM Education from the University of Min- nesota. Her research focuses on STEM education and what this looks like in PreK-12 classrooms and explores teachers’ beliefs of integrated STEM as well as how these beliefs influence teachers’ practices and student achievement in the classroom. Alongside this research, she has worked to explore the atti
for and importance of such connections to academicsuccess.Morrow and Ackerman found that 65% of students who leave their university depart for non-academic reasons and that academic progress and achievement are closely related to a sense ofbelonging [10]. Research has shown that one predictor of persistence in college is feeling asense of mattering and belonging [1], [37]. Commuter students are particularly at risk of notpersisting [1]. Mattering is defined as “the feeling one has when he/she feels that he/she isnoticed, cared about, needed, and valued by another person” [12] and the sense of belonging as“the perception of peer and faculty support, classroom comfort, and isolation [3], [11], [38]-[40].The challenge is how one goes about
in the context ofcomputer programming was both related to and distinct from this notion of the functions of aproduct.)At some point, someone signed “so, it’s what the thing tells you about itself?” and there was anelectric moment in the room. “Yes, that! It’s what the thing tells you about — how you can useit, what it’s for…” And so, with several grammatical and production tweaks, our signedprototypes for affordance theory was born.The signs for “affordance” and “to afford” reveal (or rather, afford) exploring aspects ofaffordance theory that may be less obvious in English. For instance, when these signs wereshown to a hearing non-signer who uses affordance theory in their research, they began to usethe signs as tools with which to think
their bachelor’s degreesin Engineering Physics; are either research assistants or research assistant professors of Physics;are members of the Physics Education Research group; and are engaged in a broad range ofeducational research, mostly at “the intersection of ethnic studies, critical pedagogies, and STEMteaching and learning” (author’s biographical sketch) with a focus on engineering design andequitable change in STEM programs.The diversity of the authors’ expertise and interests was reflected in the qualities that theselection committee for LEES best paper focused in in explaining its choice of this paper. “Theexamination of student engagement with ethics and ethical reasoning builds on past work on themismatch between engineering-science
Paper ID #27100How Analogies Fit in a Framework for Supporting the Entrepreneurial Mind-set in an Electric Circuits CourseDr. Heath Joseph LeBlanc, Ohio Northern University Heath J. LeBlanc is an Associate Professor in the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Sci- ence Department at Ohio Northern University. He received his MS and PhD degrees in Electrical Engi- neering from Vanderbilt University in 2010 and 2012, respectively, and graduated summa cum laude with his BS in Electrical Engineering from Louisiana State University in 2007. His research interests include cooperative control of networked multi-agent
. 15874].The U.S. DOE is also inspiring university students to engage in sustainable building designthrough a program called Race to Zero, which is an annual competition focused on the design ofZEB buildings (housing or elementary school). The Race to Zero student design competition isopened to graduate and undergraduate students from any interested program of differentinstitutions worldwide [9].Competitions can be an effective tool for student engagement and collaboration, but it canpresent some drawbacks or challenges for students, such as worsened academic performance,disappointment and stress [10]. It is important to emphasize that even defeat can benefitcompetition participants, because they will learn from real-world experiences, dealing
filters provide relatively less similarity ingeneral. Among all five feature selection methods examined, GainRatio is determined as the bestapproach for our case study, because it identifies words relevant to the subject that highlycorrelate to a particular level (class) of Propensity for Exploration even if they are sparselyrepresented in the dataset. These words can be viewed as the diamonds in the rough thatdistinguish the question. We note that like most data mining based studies, the case study resultsare determined on the underlying dataset and the algorithms investigated. Our proposedapproach, however, can be applied to other curiosity exercise datasets as well, and provide therelevant experts a better insight into the student data.The
is to retain and graduate at least 95% of these scholars.To enhance the success of these scholars, a zero-credit six-week orientation course wasdeveloped in Fall 2017 focusing on four dimensions of student wellness: academic, financial,social, and personal. This paper describes the development of this course, its content, and themodifications that were made to the course for Fall 2018.The paper will also address the research conducted in order to generate knowledge about theprogram elements that will be essential for the success of vertical transfer programs at otheruniversities. Two research instruments are described: an online survey and a focus groupinterview that were developed, and administered to the transfer scholars in their first
, Salt LakeCity, Utah. Jun. 2018.[3] Yoritomo, J. Y., Turnipseed, N., Cooper, S. L., Elliott, C. M., Gallagher, J. R., Popovics, J.S., Prior, P., and Zilles, J. L. “Examining engineering writing instruction at a large researchuniversity through the lens of writing studies,” in Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, Utah. Jun. 2018.[4] Hanson, A. J., Lindahl, P., Strasser, S. D., Takemura, A. F., Englund, D. R., and Goldstein, J.“Technical communication instruction for graduate students: The Communication Lab vs. acourse,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, Ohio. Jun. 2017.[5] R. Day Babcock and T. Thonus, “A sample research question: What is a successful tutorial?”in Researching the Writing
students. Given that the literaturesurrounding gamification in different fields has mixed results, and that the research completed byGaffney & Dunphy (2015) suggested that the use of gamification enhanced women’s socialbenefits, further research needs to be completed in order to verify or confirm this phenomenon inrelation to women. The critical need for women representation in computer science and the growthof the computer science field behooves us to research gamification and its effect on womencomputer science students. Specifically, which of the aforementioned factors apply to women.These factors and additionally, the impacts of specific game elements, need to be explored furtherin order to determine whether the pursuit of gamification in
Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. She received a B.S. in Chemistry from Utah State University and an M.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Utah. Her current research is focused on the development and improvement of electro- chemical sensors for disease diagnosis by breath. Her interest in support for diversity and special interest groups inspired her collaboration on this project.Mr. Michael Scott Sheppard Jr., Arizona State University Michael Scott Sheppard is a graduate research associate pursuing a Master of Science degree in Engineer- ing and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State University. He received a Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Science
graduation) is double among transfer studentscompared to students who entered as freshman. Consequently, transfer studentsdisproportionately lack the family knowledge resource necessary to form realisticexpectations. Researchers have shown that students successfully navigate through transfershock when they are more transfer ready. Transfer readiness is impacted by counseling,advice from students and faculty, and an understanding of the academic requirements of thenew institution [11]. Another prominent factor impacting students’ success in four year completion aftertransfer is integration into the social aspects of the new institution. This social integrationincludes participation in clubs, organizations, and events of different cultures
opportunities and challenges that they may encounter as they progress intotheir junior and senior years? These include paid project/research opportunities, career fairs, internships,graduate school and a rapidly changing job market. Our focus, at Arizona State University’s (ASU’s) FultonSchools of Engineering, has been on a longstanding ENG scholarship-projects-mentoring program at ourfour year ENG institution – a program serving mostly upper-division transfer students (generally about70%), some upper-division non-transfers (~25%) and scholars continuing as graduate students (~5%) thathave progressed through the program. Despite this, the ideas presented are useful for all ENG students. Wewant students to become aware, take control, and pursue
, students, and educators)to make a collective success for recruiting. In multiple studies on recruitment in engineeringfields, there are several best practices that surfaced 11,12,13. Class visitations, distribution of flyers,cooperation with faculty and advisors from pipeline programs, local promotional news feeds,websites, hands-on workshops, and email distributions are among the best practices.In the Project Based Learning Program for Nuclear Workforce Development at WCU, weincorporated these best practices as well as our expertise in project-based learning to recruitstudents into the Bachelor of Science in Engineering, Mechanical and Electrical Powerconcentrations.III. Program DescriptionThe Project Based Learning Program for Nuclear