experiences of graduate students in a blended interviewing experienceAbstractSocialization in graduate school is critical to personal and professional success, and encompassesboth the development as a researcher and as a member of the field. This paper discusses theexperiences of 28 graduate students through their participation in an engineering educationresearch project. The blended experience included online training workshops, qualitativeresearch tasks, and culminated in a final meeting at the 2014 ASEE annual conference inIndianapolis. The graduate student participants reflected on their participation in an onlinesurvey, which was coded for individual descriptions of their experiences.The results are presented as four
Publications. 6. McCord, R., Hixson, C., Ingram, E. L., & McNair, L. D. (2014). Graduate student and faculty member: An exploration of career and personal decisions. Paper presented at the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. Page 26.1569.10
enroll some participants with involvement in women inengineering initiatives). Public, departmental websites were used to randomly generate names. Page 26.626.2Yet, within the parameters of random sampling, purposeful steps were taken to recruit a fullrange of engineering disciplines, career levels, and an approximately even number of men andwomen.The interviews covered a wide range of topics that have been identified in prior scholarship ascontributing to either the gendering of engineering and/or women’s underrepresentation inengineering. The overarching aim of the interviews was to better understand what and howengineering faculty members
Female MaleMethodologyThis paper reports on part of a larger study conducted through the institution’s provost office toassess the impact that work-life policies have on faculty careers. An assistant provost served asprincipal investigator with graduate students as co-investigators. The principal investigator hadaccess to university records that identified faculty members who had used the tenure clockextension and modified duties policies between 2006 and 2013. The study was designed as amixed methods study, drawing from survey data and faculty interviews. However, the surveydata presented limited results so this paper focuses on analysis of the qualitative data.SurveyA total of 168 faculty members who had been identified through
personal journeys as engineers. That [The older SHPE student’s] motivation translated into their school as well, into them being engineering students, and to their professional development, and you could tell every single one of these people here, these guys are going to accomplish their education, accomplish their career. –Manolo I quickly started to see the benefits of SHPE...most importantly hearing what other Latino engineers were like, and how they got there, hearing their story. –AnthonyNurturing an engineering familia Within SHPE students found more than friendship and collegiality, they found a familia(family) of engineers. The students discussed the strong ties that connected them to their peers
curriculum developmentand instructional support. As part of this group, nine undergraduate students were hired to helpin the development of five CBI courses. The students were directly supervised by a graduatestudent under the direction of an engineering faculty member. The courses included ComputerAided Design, Water Science, Systems Thinking, Nanotechnology, and Computer Science.The students had access to previously developed curriculum and TexPREP instructors who hadtaught similar content in prior years. Their objective was to develop and support an effectiveCBI challenge for each course that was engaging for students and addressed the majority ofcourse content. Developed materials supporting the CBI challenge included detailed courseoutlines and
to be, his passion has always been more on the teachingside. One of Jon’s job prospects that was very interesting to him was in Philadelphia. Thoughthis job was not directly related to his field of study, it was an opportunity to use his skill set in adifferent area. When he contacted a graduate student colleague of both Jon and Chris about lifein Philadelphia, that connection proved to be invaluable. He noted his department had a jobposting for a teaching faculty member. This was Chris’s dream job. In the end, Chris left histenure track position for a non-tenure track teaching faculty position and Jon left his researchcareer for a career in software, which has been an underlying passion of his. Patience andflexibility ultimately led to
Paper ID #11724The Impact of Personal Interactions on the Experience of African-AmericanMales on Multiracial Student TeamsMs. Kelly J Cross, Virginia Tech Ms. Cross earned her Bachelor’s of Science in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University in 2007. She earned her Master’s of Science in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Cincin- nati in 2011. Ms. Cross is currently completing her studies in the Engineering Education PhD program at Virginia Tech and involved with multiple educational research projects with faculty and graduate students. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion
pertaining to impediments to academiccommercialization and career advancement for women faculty in engineering and science. Thepurpose is to not only raise awareness of the likely origins of these issues, but to recommendways that staff, faculty, departments, and universities can create a more equitable careertrajectory for women faculty in engineering and science. Immediate and long term shifts inindividual and institutional bias, policy, leadership, and training have the potential to make asignificant difference in engineering innovation for social and environmental change.Introduction“Innovation is not gender-blind, but rather inherently gender-biased, because of an implicit,socially constructed assumption that women are less innovative than men
engineering lab, under the guidanceof an assigned mentor (usually a graduate student) and supervision of a faculty member. In thelab setting, students work on an authentic research project. Participants also attend a weeklyscientific communications class, weekly seminars, and social events. At the culmination of theexperience, students present a research talk to the research community and participate in a postersession at the university-wide Undergraduate Research Symposium. Students receive a $5,000stipend for participation in the program. Each lab that hosts a summer student receives $500 forsupplies and each student’s primary mentor receives $500 to support their travel to a conference.The YSP is funded by the National Science Foundation
earlierresearch [2], concluding, “Practicing engineers ‘in the field’ apparently feel more strongly aboutthe desirability of such integration than do most engineering faculty or engineering school deans.”They strongly argue to strengthen the nationwide effort to improve engineering ethics education[3]. The Educating the Engineer of 2020 report also provides similar arguments to improve ethicseducation in engineering [4]. Research also shows that work experience is positively related toethical decision-making [5, 6] and whereby more experienced students had better ethical decisionmaking skills [6, 7]. Graduate students and professionals are trained by their universities andorganizations to reinforce their ethical reasoning. Also a code of ethics within an
, and family members may also influence a student’s major selection. Researchers haveidentified factors, such as career prospects, personal interests, parental influence, effects ofclimate and culture, to be important. Although a few models of major choice exist, relativelylittle attention has been given to examining engineering disciplinary choice (e.g. Mechanical,Environmental, Civil, Chemical, or Industrial). Our research aims to fill this gap from a uniqueperspective—since music genre preference can represent diversity in the broad dimension ofexperiences, we explore whether there is an association between music genre preference andengineering discipline choice.Music penetrates all aspects of modern society, including academic settings
Mexican graduate students in United States’universities are twofold: first, the language barrier with students not meeting TOEFL and GRErequirements and second, the lack of contact with faculty members at host universities. The pilotprogram consisted of 50 students selected by CANIETI and the two states, Yucatan and Page 19.19.2Zacatecas. Those students were enrolled in intensive English classes in the morning, a GREworkshop twice a week in the afternoon, and engaged in research under the supervision of afaculty member in the afternoon. This pilot program went beyond traditional marketing effortsby allowing faculty members and students the
’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts.Dr. Charles E. Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching mechanics concepts for over 10 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). While he teaches freshman to graduate- level courses across the civil engineering curriculum, his focus is on engineering mechanics. He im- plements classroom demonstrations at every opportunity as part of a complete instructional strategy that seeks to overcome issues of student conceptual understanding.Dr. Luciana R Barroso, Texas A&M University Luciana R. Barroso
counselors andteachers, by college faculty advisors and career center personnel, or could be made available tostudents in high school or college computing classes. (To order or download an easy-to-useresource for this purpose, see www.ncwit.org/resources/computing-get-most-out-your-college-degree.) But to gauge whether computing occupations are a good fit for their interests andambitions, students also need to be exposed to the nature and diversity of computingoccupations. In the following, we discuss other research-supported recommendations forinvolving girls and women, and more diverse students in general, in computing.Computing is often inaccurately stereotyped as a “geeky” or masculine endeavor. Classroompractices, both at the K-12 and college
, focus Page 26.872.10 groups and surveys—are effective in identifying and defining graduate students, as well as their specific needs and preferred resources. Innovation through Technology: University websites are often an information-rich portal for students, employers, faculty/staff, parents and alumni. Most sites offer targeted pages for each of these groups. Websites also offer a medium for delivering career services— indeed, web based resources are increasingly used as an alternative to physical locations. Career Courses and Workshops: Semester courses offer students the option to earn credit while
Paper ID #13330Exploring the Interest and Intention of Entrepreneurship in Engineering AlumniMiss Janna Rodriguez, Stanford University Janna Rodriguez is a third year PhD student in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Her re- search focus on exploring how engineering students, both undergraduates and graduates, can be prepared to become entrepreneurs and innovators in the corporate sector.Dr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a research scientist in the Designing Education Lab in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of ePortfolio Initiatives in the Office of the
Page 26.1323.11 potential to both create and make visible a wide range of connections—what I might call integration in time and integration in the person (phrases I arrived at after talking with Lauren). Regarding the former, I described to Lauren my hope that the reflection activity we discussed helped the learners inquestion—graduate students interested in engineering education—relate their experiences in an onlineworkshop to prior experiences and knowledge about engineering education, as well as to anticipatedexperiences in their academic careers. Ideally, learners would gain more from the online workshopexperiences by understanding them in this larger temporal context. What I am calling integration in the person is another
Education, 2015 Recruitment Efficacy of a Summer Undergraduate Research Program: Impact on Graduate School Intent and SelectionIntroductionSuccessful recruitment of an inclusive student body is essential to enriching the quality ofgraduate programs1, 2. Therefore, universities implement multiple activities to recruit diversestudents for post-baccalaureate studies to their institutions. Some of the recruitment activitiesinclude offering informational meetings, campus tours, career fairs, summer research programs,and assistantships3 to prospective students.Poock3, who surveyed members of the National Association of Graduate AdmissionsProfessionals (NAGAP), found that NAGAP members “perceived only one of the twenty fiverecruitment
as a frameworkfor promoting professional development and community building for graduate students.Building on the themes of the book, this program sought to promote reflection amongparticipants about the choices and actions that women can take to position themselves forsuccess—and encouraged exploration of students’ personal vision of success. Results of pre-and post-tests, along with observational data gathered by the facilitators, indicated that studentswere concerned largely by two topics: concerns about how to balance their career ambition andtheir goals for a fulfilling personal life (whatever that may be), and how to have positive andbeneficial relationship with mentors or advisors. Students also shared their challenges andfrustration
9PERFORMANCE REVIEW #2: PEER (360) AND SELF-ASSESSMENTContext: Students have engaged in a team-based project through nearly half of its duration, after having set performance goals weeks ago. This provides an opportunity for obtaining both peer and self- assessment data with regard to important knowledge, skills, and abilities being used in the project.Assignment: For each of three areas – Project development, Teamwork development, and Personal development: (a) Rate each team member (including yourself) on his or her personal demonstrations of the knowledge, skill, or ability listed. Insert team member names at the top of each column and fill all unshaded rows of those columns
during their graduate program. The findings ofthis work suggested several common themes within the experiences of returners and provided auseful starting point for a more broad-scale investigation. These themes were clustered based ondifferent aspects of returners’ identity, including their identity as scholars, as individual students,as members of the student community, and as whole people. Themes also emerged that describedthe transition in identity that took place as returners made and executed the decision to return toschool2. Further analysis showed that Expectancy Value Theory (EVT) was a suitable frameworkfor interpretation of the data4. This interpretation yielded several interesting findings. First, it wasfound that the returners had a
person to coordinate a system like healthcare in the US? In thefaculty context, how do faculty members, students, administrators, government funders, andothers come together through documentation and in person to coordinate, for example, tenurepractices? I was interested in extending this to engineering student life – how did ruling relationsinfluence the structure of undergraduate education? And did it influence engineering differentlythan the other “letters” of STEM? So I built this theory into my CAREER grant proposal, titledLearning from Small Numbers (LfSN). I grounded my argument in both engineering educationresearch and women’s studies literature, and argued that: 1. the choice of much existing engineering education research on gender
provides a strong educational experience via theorycombined with practice in a class/lab atmosphere. Dedicated faculty and staff are directlyinvolved in classes and labs, and each degree program culminates with a senior design or"Capstone" project, which is required for graduation. Capstone projects emphasize projectmanagement, technical deliverables, and multidisciplinary effort in team-oriented, long-termprojects. As a result of the heavy emphasis on practical, applied, and experiential learning,students who graduate from ISOE are well prepared for careers in all aspects of engineering. Theschool has more than 800 engineering students. In addition to modern classrooms and computerlabs, ISOE has fully equipped labs including a class 1000
., postsecondary education, private industry,government), and roles (e.g., undergraduate and graduate students, faculty members,academic administrators, program officers, chief executives). These individuals were either Page 26.746.6personal contacts (individuals whom we had met prior to or through Epicenter activities) orsuggested to us by other invitees. This process resembled chain-referral data collectionmethods in social science research.5Design-wise, once our attendee list came into shape, we structured our agenda such that allattendees were placed on a single, unitary track of sessions, as opposed to having parallelsession tracks that attendees would
STEAM-inspired interdisciplinary studio course. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Atlanta, GA.6. McCord, R., Hixson, C., Ingram, E. L., & McNair, L. D. (2014). Graduate student and faculty member: An exploration of career and personal decisions. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Indianapolis, IN.7. Delamont, S. (2007). Arguments against auto-ethnography. In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference (Vol. 5, p. 8).8. Holt, N. L. (2008). Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 18-28.9. Ellis, C., Adams, T
. There is an explicit goal to increase the number of students graduating, transferring or earning a workforce credential by more than 90,0009. The accomplishment of such goals will result in greater applicant pools and students interested in transferring to the university, which will ultimately need to be accommodated at the university level. According to a 2005-‐06 VCCS report, 38% of students who graduated from VCCS in a STEM field continued in a STEM field at a 4-‐year institution. Additionally, of students earning an associate’s degree from VCCS and transferring to a 4-‐year institution, 75% completed a bachelor’s degree9. Although
Paper ID #11535A Series of Singular Testimonies: A New Way to Explore Unearned Advan-tages and Unearned DisadvantagesDr. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin is an assistant professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests focus on social factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of underrepresented students in engineering. Dr. Martin is a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.” She held an American Association for the
Foundation (NSF)ADVANCE grant, which works to align University policies and practices to promote inclusionand increase the recruitment and retention of women faculty in science.6 The primaryfacilitator’s background was in higher education and she was experienced at designing andevaluating co-curricular programs. The primary facilitator took the lead role in developing thecurriculum; facilitating the discussions; and designing, deploying and evaluating the assessmentinstruments.The secondary facilitator was an academic staff member with an earned PhD in Engineering andresearch experience in engineering education and graduate student development. The secondaryfacilitator was responsible for developing the initial grant proposal, including the
visiting or tenure track positions.IntroductionInternational faculty join US institutions to teach in engineering programs among otherprograms. The positions they pursue could be permanent as in tenure-track positions ortemporary as the case in visiting positions or other forms of employment. An internationalfaculty member pursuing a career in academia is usually faced with a decision regarding the kindof position he/she plans to take. Those who love research activities will pursue a career ininstitutions that also value research activities more that teaching. Others who love teaching anddesire to keep it their main focus are likely to pursue a career at teaching institutions that valueteaching excellence and without great emphasis on research