within the overall nationalpopulation. Faculty members and administrators play key roles in academia, from deciding whogets hired in faculty roles to teach and advise students, to deciding policies and practices thatsupport student retention and graduation. Thus, the beliefs of STEM faculty members andadministrators about who belongs in their institutions, in their disciplines, and the types ofopportunities and access they should have speak to the decision-making that shapes the exclusionthat occurs in STEM.PurposeThis study is part of a larger research project designed to investigate factors that help or hinderindividuals from minoritized racial and ethnic identities when pursuing careers in the STEMprofessoriate. The research questions that
experiences expose students toaerospace research projects and help them build a supportive community of peers and mentors,which is critical for their persistence in graduate programs and/or careers. The impact of suchprograms extends beyond skill development, as they also play a crucial role in fostering self-efficacyand sense of belonging in the aerospace engineering community. This is particularly important giventhat URM students often face additional challenges, including imposter syndrome and a lack ofrepresentation among faculty and industry professionals [1]. Furthermore, the intersectionality ofmarginalization based on ethnicity and social class compounds the challenges faced by URMstudents, making it essential to consider multiple dimensions
Paper ID #45484Navigating Pathways: Qualitative Insights into Personal and ProfessionalTrajectories of Non-Traditional Groups across Engineering-Related AcademicDisciplinesMs. Kimberly A Luthi, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide Dr. Kimberly Luthi is a Department Chair for the Applied Aerospace Sciences, and Faculty Member at Embry-Riddle Aeronautic University-Worldwide in the College of Aviation. Her research background is in workforce development education and engineering education.MICHAEL KOSLOSKI, Old Dominion UniversityBettina Mrusek, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide
Engineering (ICSE), Executive Director for Gulf Coast Environmental Equity Center (GCEEC), Director for the Solid Waste Sustainability Hub, Director for the Gulf Coast Center for Addressing Microplastics Pollution (GC-CAMP), and Director for the Sustainable Asphalt Materials Laboratory, as well as the founding faculty advisor for the Society of Sustainable Engineering. He teaches a mixture of undergraduate and graduate engineering courses. Dr. Wu is a committee member for Transportation Research Board (TRB) AJE35 and AKM 90, a member of American Society of Civil Engineer (ASCE), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and Academy of Pavement Science and Engineering (APSE), as well as an editorial member for
WFU Engineering inaugural graduating class had about 50% of engineeringstudents participate in study abroad experiences at locations like Chile, Australia, Italy,Denmark, Spain, Germany, England, etc. This is just one example of how student feedback andengineering education research informed curricular decisions and informed advisingstructures, practices, and policies.Beyond academic advising, career advising is an important aspect to Educating the WholeEngineer and Educating the Whole Student towards degree completion and professional success.When WFU Engineering launched in 2017, the WFU Office of Personal and CareerDevelopment (OPCD) was also undergoing growth and development under new leadership. Theonly OPCD staff that had experience
with a specialization in electrical engineering from Roger Williams University. Her research interests include developing professional skills for engineering students and understanding mathematics barriers that exist within engineering.Ms. Katherine Drinkwater, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Katie Drinkwater is a recent graduate of Duke University with a Bachelor’s in Mechanical Engineering. She is excited to begin working towards her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in the Fall. Her interest in Engineering Education began through a project where she helped to design a makerspace inside a shipping container. Since then, she has explored design and engineering education through
formalaccommodations fail to remove all barriers. Student interviews informed this paper’srecommendations to improve their access to education, especially when implemented together.Recommendations include both instructor- and administrative-level supports.II. METHODSA. Positionality Both authors hold engineering degrees and identify as white, disabled women. The firstauthor, whose disability affects her cognitive function, energy, and mobility, is working towardsa graduate engineering degree. This research came to fruition out of the frustration we felt afterthe first author experienced numerous barriers to accommodations and faculty support during herfirst year of graduate school. We are motivated by this experience to increase accessibility
STEM context, itis fundamental to support faculty members with multidimensional professional developmentactivities. Providing the faculty with resources and training to advance their understanding wouldimprove the doctoral program context and help racially and ethnically minoritized students tohave an affirming view of their identity within the academic context. This way, instead of gettinglost in the leaky graduate pipeline, students could develop the skills and knowledge to beindependent professionals and achieve their career pursuits. With culturally liberative mentoringpractices, Latine scholars could successfully feed the faculty pipelines to diversify the STEMfields in higher education settings. Furthermore, institutionalizing faculty
accessibility, sustainability, and the fair distribution of resources,which are often overlooked in traditional engineering programs [6], [7], [8]. This criticalengagement is important for promoting more inclusive and socially responsible engineeringpractices. Studies have shown that when students are exposed to social justice frameworks, theyare better equipped to develop solutions that address the needs of all members of society,particularly marginalized communities [5], [6]. Thus, integrating social justice into engineeringeducation enhances technical competence of students and also prepares them to be agents ofpositive social change in their professional careers.1.4 Purpose of the StudyThis study seeks to explore how gender influences engineering
identities and roles of mentors for rising minority doctoral students inengineering. The findings revealed that various individuals, including family members, informalundergraduate mentors, and peers, played significant roles in supporting the decision ofminoritized students to enroll in doctoral programs. These mentors provided different forms ofsupport, ranging from emotional encouragement to practical guidance, thereby influencing thestudents' academic and career trajectories. The study highlighted the importance of recognizingand leveraging the diverse mentorship networks available to minoritized students to promotetheir success in doctoral programs [8].Curriculum BuildingAccording to Should You Go to Graduate School? by Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
students would beblock scheduled typically by an administrative assistant based on test scores and placement tests,and then the faculty advisor would meet with the student once a semester for the rest of thestudent’s academic career to advisee the student on the next semesters courses. This is a fairlystandard model that is used at many different institutions and is one that allows for one on onepersonal interactions with the student and minimizes the workload on the faculty advisor.However, in order to address the issues of mechanical engineering student retention, recruitment,and the initial math placement of these students the new active and structured advising modelwas created as seen in Fig. 1. The structured advising model integrates
Paper ID #49469Inclusion of Sustainability into a First-Year Engineering Technology CourseDr. Punya A Basnayaka, Cuyahoga Community College, School of Advanced Manufacturing, Engineeringand Computer Science Punya Basnayaka (she/her/hers) is an Associate professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at the Cuyahoga Community College, OH, where she teaches Mechanical Engineering Technology courses and Pre-Engineering courses. She has been involved with ABET accreditation process in preparing the self study report and course evaluation,. Additionally she is a member of the inaugural faculty learning community (FLC) for
-funded Women of Color in Engineering Collaborative, whose mission is to work cooperatively with other organizations to provide resources to create a supportive, encouraging, and inclusive environment in the engineering workplace. Her SWE research centers on equity issues in STEM education and the workplace, with studies on gender bias, the development of an engineering identity, and the community college transfer pathway. Prior to joining SWE, she worked in higher education policy research and on programs focused on faculty productivity and student success. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, MBA and M.S. in Information Management from Arizona State University, and Ph.D
future. Her research focuses on underrepresented minority youth’s access to and persistence in STEM pathways. She holds a B.A. in Anthropology and Community Health and an M.S. in Occupational Therapy from Tufts University.Rachel E Durham Rachel E. Durham (PhD, Sociology & Demography, Pennsylvania State University) is an Associate Professor in the School of Education at Notre Dame of Maryland University, and a Senior Fellow with the Baltimore Education Research Consortium (BERC). With a background in sociology of education, education policy, and demography, her research focuses on graduates’ transition to adulthood, career and college readiness, community schools, and research-practice partnerships.Prof
keyareas of focus. From 2021 to present, the author has hosted six summer programs from grades 6-12. Overall, through these programs, 190 students and 9 teachers have participated in summerSTEM programming on the WVU Tech campus. While WVU Tech is a teaching focusinstitution, research and service still contribute to the decision promotion and tenure of faculty.For smaller institutions where teaching duties may be high or dedicated research facilities maynot be available, it may be beneficial for a faculty to expand their scholarship to educationalopportunities. Funding security is an important effort for making sure these camps can run withfaculty and staff on 9-month contracts. Additionally, WVU Tech is in the southern part of WestVirginia where
-related mentorship opportunities for Black,Hispanic, and Indigenous K-12, undergraduate, and graduate-level students in the state ofIllinois.One of the premier programs of the IDEA Institute is the GIANT Program, which is a seed grantprogram that provides an opportunity for Institute members to research DEI issues they arepassionate about in a way that is otherwise not possible. The GIANT program is modeled afterthe Strategic Instructional Innovations Program (SIIP) for faculty-led teaching initiatives [7] butis modified to focus on DEI topics and allows students, postdocs, and staff to propose and leadprojects. Central to the GIANT program is: (i) proposing evidence-based strategies fostering DEIin STEM, (ii) conducting research and collecting
undergraduate degree and this modeling would be showcased bythe diverse career pathways of the faculty body. After all, students came to Wake ForestUniversity to combine a traditional liberal arts education with the innovation of an engineeringdegree. Students wanted to use their engineering degree for both engineering and non-engineering pathways and diverse professional pathways. Students wanted a technicalengineering degree but had unique interests to combine general knowledge, engineeringdisciplinary knowledge, and professional knowledge. Faculty with both traditional academicjourneys and faculty with industry experience would need to be recruited and to be united arounda common vision, mission, and values of the new department. As will be visible
areas are more likely to enroll in any postsecondary education talk about three main findings or implications from these studies.compared to rural students. Additionally, rural students might also often be low-income and first-generation students, which comes with an additional layer ofbarriers to entry for postsecondary education such as not having access toresources or knowledge from their closest peers or family members about howto apply to college in the first place. Related specifically to engineering, ruralstudents often do not have an understanding of what it means to pursueengineering or what engineering careers might look like, though many ruralstudents have a desire to attain better futures for themselves and