Paper ID #36791Board 334: Master’s Individual Development Plans as an Essential Tool inWorkforce DevelopmentDeborah Silver, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Deborah Silver is the Executive Director of the Professional Science Master’s Program at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. This program offers the Master of Business & Science (MBS) degree which is a combination of a science master’s with courses in business and includes many engineering disciplines. She is also a full professor in the Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rutgers. From 2008-2010 she served as Associate Dean of
Paper ID #38001Board 309: Impact of RET Summer Program Designs on Teachers’Technological-Content Knowledge and Lesson Plan Development OutcomesDr. Shenghua Zha, University of South AlabamaDr. Na Gong, University of South Alabama Dr. Na Gong is currently Warren Nicholson Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of South Alabama. She received the Ph.D. degree in Computer Science and Engineering from the State University of New York,Erin Bosarge, University of South Alabama ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Impact of RET Summer Program Designs on
implementable lesson/exercise, as well as dissemination of newlyacquired knowledge at annual teacher summit and/or online presentation. The participants alsosummarized their studies and shared their posters with other research students and teachers fromdifferent RET/REU programs. The expected outcomes of this program would be the transferringof acquired practical knowledge and skills to excite, empower, and educate students through newclass/lab activities. Funding from industry allowed additional equipment for schools and havingmore teacher participants in this program. The three-year program achieved most of the planned objectives. The program recruitedand trained a diverse cohort of participants, most teachers managed to grow their
)represent a unique yet understudied student group that comprises substantial numbers of thosehistorically underrepresented and underserved in STEM (i.e., due to race, ethnicity, gender, socialclass, ability, orientation, etc.). The individual diversity reflected by SVSMs, as well as theirtechnical interests, leadership and teamwork skills, maturity, life experience, and self-discipline,highlight SVSM as promising candidates for helping the field of engineering meet 21st centurySTEM workforce diversity goals [1,2].Project Goals and Work PlanThe overall goal of this NSF CAREER project is to advance full participation of SVSM within higherengineering education and the engineering workforce via two complementary work streams: aresearch plan and an
increase in the number of applications in the second year of theprogram with teacher referral and broader dissemination.We recruited ten faculty members in the College of Engineering to participate as facultymentors. They also recruited one of their graduate students to participate as student mentors.Two faculty mentors were replaced in the second year of the program due to their unavailability.An Industry Advisory Board (IAB) was formed for the program to provide guidance andfeedback on the program activities, especially those related to industry engagement, to ensure theteachers are well-informed of the workforce needs in the data analytics space, which can bereflected in their lesson plan development.Pre-Program ActivitiesWe designed a two-week
emphasis on the industrial control components required to maintain facility operations. Tour concludes with a discussion of the NOVA Data Center Operations program. NOVA Fab Lab Tour Tour of the digital fabrication lab and NOVA’s engineering In-person, 4 hours technology classrooms. Facilitators introduced NOVA’s degree programs formally, then conducted a group discussion of how to better reach students with opportunities. Plan of Action Participants create a plan explaining what they learned from Asynchronous, 2 hours the externship, how they will
led by experienced NSF ATE principal investigators from various technologydisciplines. Topics covered during the workshop included components of an NSF ATE proposal;results of prior support; rationale; goals, objectives, activities, and deliverables; one-pagesummaries; the review process; mock panels; timelines; management plans; budgets and budgetjustifications; evaluation plans; sustainability plans; dissemination plans; the Research.govsubmission platform; and resources such as ATE Central and Mentor-Connect. Participants weregiven assignments each night such as preparation for the mock panel reviews. Following the2022 cohort, the leadership team and mentors decided to keep the workshop virtual for theremainder of the grant period to
conductingsimulation analyses of completion rates, this aspect of Curricular Complexity is generally toounderdeveloped to be used as a theoretical framework on its own – despite some work by Waller[10], who used the concept of grade anomaly instead of course pass-rate as a proxy forinstructional complexity.Much more promising, however, is the idea of structural complexity. This construct has theresearcher examine the curriculum itself by using network analysis to measure sequencing andinterconnectedness in a plan of study. Two intrinsic measurements are associated with eachcourse in Curricular Analytics: (1) the blocking factor, which counts how many courses areinaccessible to a student upon failing a specific course, and (2) the delay factor, the
participants. Our poster will present anoverview of our: 1) conceptual model informing our data collection; 2) workshop developmentand implementation; and 3) instrument revision and piloting.Project OverviewThis project is a multi-case study with three phases in the research plan and two phases in theeducation plan. The project is guided by a conceptual model developed during Years 1 and 2 ofthe project. Phase 1 of the research plan is a single case study, which involves data collection atthe PI’s home institution, which is the current stage of the project. Part 1 of the education planrelated to developing and implementing Situational Judgment Inventories is currently underwayas well.Before we began collecting data, we reflected on the research
librarians. During the project, fellowscompleted 24 hours of design thinking instruction, practiced teaching at digital fabricationsummer camps for elementary and middle school youth, and created a lesson plan that integrateddesign thinking into their subject area. This paper investigates the extent to which teacherconfidence & ability in integration of design thinking principles into classroom instruction wereimproved by participation in the PL fellowship.Project Rationale. The notion of “making” has shown promise as an active, project-basedlearning intervention[2]. Integrating digital fabrication into classroom instruction has beenshown to improve student attitudes toward the STEM disciplines and increase career interest [3]-[5]. However
one year before COVID and the physics CCT was active forroughly six months prior to COVID. Timing relative to COVID is mentioned because themovement to online learning impacted the trajectories and schedules for teaching change efforts.Both of these CCTs started their work by designing a change plan that outlined the issues theywanted to target and then started to work towards those goals by making changes in the targetedintroductory courses. The computer science department joined the project more recently, and itsCCT is still working to design its plan for change.Teaching change efforts spearheaded by the math and physics CCTs primarily focused on thestructure of recitations. Math focused on redesigning calculus recitations to an active
new course entitled “Solar PV Planning and Installation”, (ii) summer workshopsfor K-12 students through Center for Pre-College Programs (CPCP) at NJIT, (iii) facultydevelopment workshops for the instructors of other 2- and 4-year institutions, (iv) undergraduateresearch and senior design projects, and (v) development of a dedicated public website to includeall the lecture notes, laboratory experiments, video recordings, publications, guidelines todevelop similar courses, and other instructional materials. This paper summarizes and presentsthe comments and feedback from external advisory committee (EAC), external evaluator, facultydevelopment workshop participants, K-12 workshop participants, and the students enrolled in thenew course. It
to Year 2, as well as the design and implementation of anew faculty orientation, called the Welcome Academy, specific to new engineering faculty andpractices related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Finally, drawing on the principal investigator(PI) team’s reflections as well as feedback from external evaluators, we provide our insights withthe intention of sharing useful experiences to other colleges planning to form such FLCs.IntroductionOverwhelming evidence points to the need for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices inthe profession of engineering in general, and in engineering education in particular. There arestrong arguments for embracing DEI practices, from both economics (to improve the nationaltechnical workforce
with the research mentors and graduatestudents who were working on complimentary research problems. Each teacher defined aresearch problem unique to them, for a total of 11 individual research projects within the fourmain research areas of Blast Furnace Fuel Simulation, Reheat Furnace Simulation, FiniteElement Analysis of Structures, and Safety Training. Teachers completed the research andpresented results at the end of the 6-week summer session. Each teacher also developed andpresented a lesson plan related to their research which was to be implemented in their classroomduring the 2022-23 school year.Evaluation included pre & post measurement of teacher’s self-reported ability to completeresearch tasks such as defining a research problem
curriculum and AI concepts. This research focuses onleveraging 6th and 7th-grade science curricula related to state standards to introduce machine learningconcepts by using fossil shark teeth. Researchers from engineering, education, and paleontologycollaboratively developed learning modules to upskill Title I schoolteachers to meaningfully integrate AIfundamentals within their existing curriculum. With a special emphasis on machine learning (ML), fivelesson plans were presented during a week-long teacher professional development. Teachers conceptualizedand implemented ML models that distinguish fossil shark teeth by their taxonomy and primary functionsto recognize ecological and evolutionary patterns. After introducing a lesson, each teacher
and how they need to frame their academic problem, ask for help, evaluateoptions, and decide for their academic path project.The authors identified two important courses to intervene: UNIV 1301 Learning Frameworksand MECE 1101 Intro to Mechanical Engineering. These two courses teach a variety ofimportant topics, and both traditionally had project elements of technical innovation (MECE1101) and career path planning (UNIV 1301) that required to be formalized into proper projects.For this purpose, the Challenge Based Instruction (CBI) approach (Fuentes et al., 2008;Bransford et al., 1999; Freeman et al., 2016) was chosen to guide the steps of the parallelprojects. CBI promotes engagement when properly implemented, and this is critical
the implementation of innovative ideas in sustainable energy and bioengineering. 2.Educate students to become independent researchers with entrepreneurial thinking skills and provide themopportunities to use their newly developed as well as innate skills in the summer-end final projectpresentation and competition. 3. Develop a network of mentoring relationship among high school teachers,faculty and underrepresented minority (URM) undergraduate students that will support them in theirprofessional and graduate careers. 4. Educate teachers on sustainable energy and bioengineering and helpthem create their lesson plans for high school curriculum development on nanotechnology and engineeringthat will increase students’ interest in STEM fields.The
instructors (Fig.1) throughout the Spring 2023 semester. We asked to meet with each instructor to plan theimplementation of ABP into the instructors’ courses early in the spring semester. Additionally,we recruited an instructor to allow us to collect data in his course so we could gather informationon students’ responses to ABP. Pre-Data Post-Data Professional Implement Debrief Plan Collection Collection Development Instructors Individual Plan course of student of student Host
Puerto Rico that you would be attending with these modules, although the premise is that these units could be used in any school in Puerto Rico that could require it. [4] Before the site visit, students were lectured on how to rebuild schools, and during the visittheir professors and a graduate student explained the structural failures in the design of thebuilding. They studied the original plans and were guided to observe the correspondence betweenthe plans, the structure, and visible damages. After the tour of the school, students were asked touse the site visit experience to discuss their proposed design project and complete an exercise usingthe technique of Triple Bottom Line (TBL)’[5]. The instructions for this exercise
use all the tools acquired in their undergraduateprograms. Simultaneously, students can contribute to one of the goals of society through researchand development of emergency housing in Puerto Rico [4] The paper presents the instructionaldesign, results, and evaluation of the Design-Build course, and finally reflects about lessons learnedand relevance of this type of interdisciplinary learning scenario.2. Methods and Results. 2.1. Method / Semester Project.The design project consisted of conceptualizing a group of emergency houses. Four smallliving units with the same floor plan, interconnected by a central open space where thepersons will be able to interact and develop a sense of community. These small units areexpected to be self
electric and autonomous vehicles, advancedbatteries, power storage, microgrids and smart grids, and carbon removal initiatives will all beenabled and made more efficient through the use of IoT applications. The present version ofSmart Phone technology, 5G, is being driven by M2M applications as contrasted with previousgenerations concerned with higher data rates. Already, plans to implement 6G smart phonetechnology by the end of this decade are taking shape and being driven by notions of how MLand AI can be used to enhance the system. Emerging Wi-Fi 7 standards are also being influencedheavily by IoT communication needs. All of these trends give rise to the flourishing of cyber-physical systems that have relevance to things like the electrical
participated in the study through an online survey.The survey was based on modified instruments from previous studies, specifically tailored toexamine academic major selection, rather than career decision-making.Survey InstrumentsThe online survey was developed leveraging 6 different survey instruments: 1) Career DecisionSelf-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (CDSE-SF) [7][8], 2) Career Decision Making OutcomesExpectation (CDMOE) [9], 3) Career Exploratory Plans or Intentions (CEPI) [10], 4) CareerExploratory Survey: Environmental Exploration (CES-EE) [11], 5) Career Thoughts Inventory(CTI) [12][13].The Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (CDSE-SF) [7][8] is a comprehensive surveyinstrument, consisting of 5 questions that use a 5-point rating scale
welcomed; (ii) engage students from different backgroundsto learn about each other and come together to solve computational problems; (iii) to strengthenthe communication between students early on in their computing experience and student who arerelatively new to the field of computing. This paper will discuss the design of inclusively themedHackathons, the logistics involved during planning, the execution, the challenges faced, and theimpact it created to broaden the participation of underrepresented, underserved, andunderprepared community college students in computing related activities.IntroductionHackathons have grown in popularity as a venue for computer enthusiasts and aspiring inventorsto network and realize their ideas. Hackathons are
pilotstudy indicates our curriculum’s potential to introduce students to engineering and its related careerpaths. The pilot also provided insight to the method of surveying used and justified for us the use of aretrospective survey in a full scale planned study. This program may serve as a pathway to engage adiversity of students in robotics and engineering leveraging new materials and applications.IntroductionGender disparities persist across engineering disciplines. This is especially true in traditional disciplinessuch as mechanical engineering (MechE) and electrical engineering (EE) [1]. Nationwide, ~15% and~14% of undergraduate MechE and EE degrees are awarded to women, respectively [2]. Alternatively,bioengineering and biomedical engineering
Paper ID #38029Board 316: Improving Two-Year Students’ Spatiotemporal Computing Skillsthrough START InternshipDr. Jia Lu, Valdosta State University Dr. Jia Lu is a Professor of Geography and Urban Planning at Valdosta State University. She teaches courses in Urban Community Planning, Environmental Science, and GIS Applications in Planning. Her research interests include population and employment analyses, urban modeling, spatial analyses, and GIS applications in planning and transportation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Improving 2-year students’ spatiotemporal computing
the UPRM. A total of92 students participated in the program, of which 61 have been directly impacted by scholarshipsand interventions (scholars) plus 31 participants who, although not receiving scholarships, havebenefited from the interventions. Both groups received services in the form of faculty and peermentoring, career planning, and curricular, co-curricular, and community-building activities.This initial group included 89 undergraduates from nine different academic programs and twograds from two different master's level programs. The average household family income amongscholars was $14,512/year; and $44,216/year among participants. The gender balance included43% females and 57% males. The group was composed of four cohorts that
engineering departments to advertise tothe potential students who may be interested and has experience related to the topic of interest.Undergraduate students can register for a particular project in the form of research credits, but idlimited to a maximum of 3 credits per semester so that the effort is commensurate with the timeand effort expended. Based on individual departmental regulations, these credits may be used astechnical elective credits, capstone design credits, or research credits that count toward theirdegree plans. For high-performing honors students that are above a certain cutoff GPA, thesecredits are also eligible to be used as part of an honors section. Such flexibility allows for thisAggiE-Challenge program to conveniently
used in different fields. Hence, without proper documentationand management of such projects, achieving overall objectives can be underpinned.To aid the successful management of complex or multi-departmental projects in fields outsidethe university, various social management frameworks and program management tools havebeen developed, employed, and reported. Aside from promoting teamwork andcommunication, smoothing decision-making and problem-solving, and enabling transparencyand accountability, PM management processes and tools are strongly related to projectsuccess [2],[3]. These tools are designed to support the successful execution of projects byproviding a range of features and functionalities that help plan, organize, and control
the course LMS, meet with the instructor to discuss the approach to the course, student discuss the approach to the course, student challenges and issues and plan for observed lessons. challenges and issues and plan for observed lessons. Section B: Flipped Classroom Observation Section B: Classroom Observation Tool Tool This tool includes observation items in areas This tool includes observation items in eight major areas: Lesson Organization, Content related to instructor-student interactions and Knowledge & Relevance
activities.Because of their lessons learned through the AREP process, Melissa and Isabella aremaking plans for putting students in more control of club recruitment and activities.Based on their observation that the participation of girls increased when the femalestudents brought in their friends, Melissa and Isabella hope to increase the number offemale students in the STEM Club in year 2 by encouraging the females to spread theword within their social circles to try out the club. This places the students in a positionof leadership with influence on the club’s success. Additionally, Melissa and Isabellafound that many students in the STEM Club were interested in pursuing engineeringcareers but unsure which engineering field. This uncertainty lends itself