sort from point A to point B, or perform some sort of surveillance. Airplanes arecharacterized by their relatively frequent takeoffs and landings. Aircraft are generallyreuseable. Missiles, with some notable exceptions, are typically used as weapons of war. Theyare usually launched in an instantaneous manner (no taxi or takeoff run) from an airplane or aground station, and explode with some degree of lethality at their terminus (instant landing).Moreover, missiles are generally not reuseable.Airplane wings generally have higher aspect ratios than missile fins, although some fightersmight be viewed as exceptions. Airplanes are usually powered by reciprocating or jet engines.With some exceptions, missiles are typically powered by either liquid
155 Page 10.417.11in the 2003/04 AY was 53.2% compared to 51.8% in 2002/03, 43.1% in 01/02 and 38.3% in2000/01. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationFigure 8. Stacked Bar Figure of MATH 155 Grades Including AY-GPA and % of Grades => C A B C D F I W 100% 90% 80
buthad trouble with traditional assessments in school. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Student BStudent B provides another example of a student with a borderline learning problem. Thisstudent was not a star in the mechanical engineering technology classes, receiving C’s in bothFluid Dynamics and Metrology. However in the Senior Project course this individual becamethe team leader and was responsible for keeping everyone on schedule, communicating with theteam, dealing with the customer, and producing the final product. This student handled all thetasks far better than expected and was a
toward becoming awelcoming facility, one that invites users in to use it. By “users”, I mean everyone who uses it:students first of all, but also teachers, administrative, staff, and other school-related visitors. Oneessential component of “a welcoming” design is visibility. A user should always be able to findhis or her way from point A to point B with relative ease. This aspect of circulation (whicharchitects refer to as wayfinding) can be enhanced through clear, easily intelligible signage that Page 10.412.7is placed just where people will need it. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
SME Certification Exam in TC2K or EC2000 Outcomes Assessment,” Proceedings of the ASME 2004 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, Biloxi, February 3-6, 2004.BiographySUSAN SCACHITTI is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering Technology at Purdue UniversityCalumet. She holds degrees in Industrial Engineering Technology from the University of Dayton and aMBA in Management from North Central College. She teaches TQM and consults in the area of continuousimprovement. Sue is past chair of the IE Division of ASEE and formerly served as division chair, programchair, newsletter editor and treasurer. She has served as a TAC/ABET commissioner since 2003 andprogram accreditation evaluator since 2001.JAMES B
Experimental Laboratory provided a major component of support for the UTCmechanical engineering program meeting ABET 2000 Criterion 3 Outcomes a through k[8] and receiving ME program accreditation on first request in 2003.The laboratorycourse was found to be our major contributor to four of the criteria outcomes: b (anability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data), c (anability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs), e (an ability toidentify, formulate, and solve engineering problems), g (an ability to communicateeffectively), and k (an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
be easily transported to classrooms.This would permit the runs to be made outside of the engineering labs.VII. ConclusionA heat transfer experiment in forced and natural convection has been designed andconstructed to illustrate the topic of dimensional analysis. The experimental apparatushas performed successfully and has provided results which clearly show the applicationand usefulness of dimensional analysis in correlating experimental data.VIII. Bibliography 1. Munson, B. R., Young, D. F., Okiishi, T. H., “Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics”, 4th Edition, Chapter 7, Wiley, 2002. 2. Fox, R. W., McDonald, A. T., Pritchard, P. J., “Introduction to Fluid Mechanics”, 6th Edition, Chapter 7, Wiley, 2004. 3
(multiple word instructions possible) • user can single step or run microcode • Registers 16-bit program counter (PC) 16-bit stack pointer (SP) 16-bit memory address register (MAR) 8-bit accumulator (A) Six 8-bit registers for general use (B, C, D, E, H, and L) One 8-bit temporary register for microprogram use only (T) 4-bit flag registers (zero, carry, sign, and parity) 9-bit microcontrol address register • 16-function, 8-bit ALU • fully animated data, control, and address paths • built-in editor so the user can modify, save, and print Microcode file Instruction decoder file User program file • Can operate in pipelined or non-pipeline mode • Pipeline
hydrogen and oxygen).The actual reaction is x x −1 H2 + [O 2 + 3.76 N 2 ] → H 2 O (liquid) + (1.88 x) N 2 + O2 (12) 2 2The minimum (stoichiometric) reactant flow rate required for current generation atstandard pressure and temperature may be determined as follows. The stoichiometricreaction of hydrogen and pure oxygen to form water can be written asH 2 → 2 H + + 2e − (a)1 O + 2 H + + 2e − → H O (b) 2 2 2which combine to :H 2 + 1 O2 → H 2O ( a + b) 2At standard temperature and pressure (STP), 1 kmol of any gas
Saddle River, NJ, 2003.2. F. G. Martin, Robotic Explorations: A Hands-on Introduction to Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River,NJ, 2001. Page 10.349.7 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for engineering Education”3. J. W. Dally and S. J. Reeves, Introduction to Engineering Design, Book 7: Projects, Skills and LEGO Challenges,College House Enterprises, Knoxville, TN, 2001.4. B. S. Heck, N. S. Clements, and A. A. Ferri, “A LEGO Experiment for Embedded Control System Design,” IEEEControl Systems
Microcontrollers“, ASEE Annual Meeting, SaltLake City, June 2004.[3] Murray, W. R., Garbini, J. L., “Embedded Computing in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum: A Course Fea-turing Structured Laboratory Exercises”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 285-290 July, 1997.[4] Moallem, M., “Design and Implementation of Computer Control Software”, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp.26-29, February 2005.[5] Arzen, K-E., Blomdell, A., Wittenmark, B., “Laboratories and Real-Time Computing”, IEEE Control SystemsMagazine, pp. 30-34, February 2005.BiographyHUGH JACK earned his bachelors degree in electrical engineering, and masters and Ph.D. degrees in mechanicalengineering at the University of Western Ontario. He is currently an associate professor at Grand
increasingdifficulties in the nation’s engineering curricula and resultant general shortcomings ofengineering graduates as determined by outcomes assessment. Although these shortcomingstake many faces, root causes are traceable to shortcomings in the core-defining characteristic ofan effective engineer: strong problem solving ability. Effective problem solving is predicatedon: (a) thorough understanding of technical background material required for the problem athand or an ability to obtain that understanding; (b) ability to integrate background material; (c)ability to sharpen a stated problem and produce a well-structured problem from an ill-structuredproblem; (d) ability to apply the background material systematically and effectively to theproblem; (e
the Continuum, J. of Materials Education, 21, 47-56, 1999.5. Will, J.D., and Johnson E.W., Scientific Visualization for Undergraduate Education, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 31386. Collura, M.A., Aliane, B., Daniels S., and Nocito-Gobel Jean, Development of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Foundation Spiral, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2630Biographical InformationGerald Sullivan:Dr. Sullivan, Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Virginia MilitaryInstitute, received his B.S.M.E. from the University of Vermont in 1985, and hisM.S.M.E. and Ph.D
/Competency_Gap.pdf, 2001.[3] Halford, B., "Pursuing New Paths", ASEE Prism, http://www.prism-magazine.org/nov03/pursuing_paths.cfm,Nov., 2003.[4] SERVICES 2000; A Conference and Dialogue on Global Policy Developments and U.S. Business, http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/sif/2kfullreport.htm, 1999.[5] Kanter, E., "Women in the Driving Seat", Asbury Park Press, http://www.app.com/ontherun/story/0,20853,948356,00.html, April 21, 2004.[6] McNulty, Z. (translated by), "Female Printer from Epson", http://www.techjapan.com/modules.php?op=mod-load&name=News&file=article&sid=170&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0, Mar., 16, 2004[7] Kelley, C., Wang, M., et.al., “High-Technology Manufacturing and U.S. Competitiveness”, Rand Science andTechnology technical
Session xxxx A Virtual Tour of Energy Conscious Architecture Mohammed E. Haque, Ph.D., P.E., Suketu Shah, Gaurav Agarwal Texas A&M University, Texas, USAAbstractAs technology rapidly changes, the importance of educating and training diverse populations ofcivil/construction engineering/science students becomes more critical. With the advances ininformation technology (IT) over the last decade, the traditional teaching format of having anindividual lecture to an audience has been supplemented, and in some cases, replaced by therapid development and implementation of new distance learning
theoptical receptor. Some of the reasons of misalignment are a) swaying of upper floors in tallbuildings, b) vibrations in the mounting structures, c) variations in the refractive index structure Page 10.416.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationof the atmosphere (beam wandering and scintillation) and d) the objects flying in the line ofsight. Active alignment by sensing the received power level and controlling automatically themechanical alignment is the best guarantee
Advocating Breadth in a World of Depth Steven H. VanderLeest Department of Engineering, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI1 AbstractA typical four-year engineering curriculum is chock-full of courses, concepts, and ideas.However, four years is simply not enough time to explore the vast landscape of engineeringknowledge thoroughly. Thus trade-offs are made selecting material within a course as well asselecting courses within a curriculum. One of these trade-offs is depth versus breadth. At theextremes, the specialist is too narrow while the generalist is too shallow. Most curricula locatethemselves between these two poles, with general engineering programs leaning
A Study of Learning Styles and Team Performance Musa K. Jouaneh1 Department of Mechanical Engineering & Applied Mechanics University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881Abstract This paper reports on a study that was performed over a 4-year long period in which theperformance of undergraduate mechanical engineering students on a team project, enrolled in asenior mechanical systems course at the University of Rhode Island, was correlated with theirlearning styles as measured by the Brain Dominance Model. To measure the learning style ofeach student, the Brain Works program
similar, butnot close enough to assume that it will always be the same. Figure 1 is a graph of Rockwell Chardness as a function of distance from the center of the weld on one of the tests. Page 10.33.3 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education 45 40 Rockwell C Hardness 35 30 B end
her parents favored women’s rights and her mother was a staunch suffragist andfriend of Susan B. Anthony. Ms. Gleason studied mechanical arts at Cornell University and atMechanics Institute, now known as the Rochester Institute of Technology. Shortly thereafter, shejoined her father at his factory - Gleason Works. Kate Gleason promoted his business, whichbecame one of the leading sellers of machine tools in the United States and Europe largely due toher efforts.“Kate Gleason's place in American history is ironic. The accomplishment she is most oftencredited with, the invention of the gear planer, was her father's. Henry Ford mistakenlyattributed the invention to her, the press picked it up and it stuck. That overshadows her reallegacy: using
provides an overarching, application-based approach to ECE education. Page 10.105.10 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Bibliography1. R.G. Baraniuk, C.S. Burrus, B. Hendricks, G. Henry, A. Hero, D. Johnson, D.L. Jones, J. Kusuma, R. Nowak, J. Odegard, L.C. Potter, and K. Ramchandran (2002). “Connexions: DSP education for a networked world,” 2002 Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. 4144-4147.2. The
Session Number ______ ASEE Paper # 2005-0659 A Simple Digital Logic Project for Freshman Engineering David R. Doucette, Gunter W. Georgi, and Lorcan M. Folan Polytechnic UniversityAbstractLike many other schools, Polytechnic University has developed robotics projects usingcommercial products such as Robolab for its Freshman Engineering course. These projects havebeen well-received by many students1. However, some Freshman students have commented thatthey wanted something more related to Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering.To meet this demand, we have developed a project for digital logic design that
Culture Shock: Acclimating as a New Faculty Member Adrienne R. Minerick1, Jason M. Keith2 1 Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical Engineering Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS 39672 / 2 Department of Chemical Engineering Michigan Technological University Houghton, MI 49931AbstractNobody said that the first year of teaching engineering and mentoring graduate studentsat a college or university was going to be easy. With the
Sections Section 3 Section 4 Section 4 Section 3 Section 4 Section 3 s Dr. B’ Section 5 Section 7 Section 7 Section 5 Section 7 Section 5 Sections Section 6 Section 8 Section 8 Section 6 Section 8 Section 6Testing MeasuresPre-tests and post-tests were developed for each lab and given to all students. Using a matched-pairs design, the change in grade (post-test – pre-test) will be recorded for each student and theoverall section average were calculated to determine if a significant improvement wasexperienced by students in the sensor group versus the non-sensor group. Data collected duringthis semester is still being processed
measure engineering students’ progress towards achieving more than one or two – muchless all 15 – of the identified foundational student learning outcomes. Table 1. 15 Foundational Technical and Non-Technical Student Outcomes Engineering graduates must have: ABET Criteria 3a-k a) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs d) An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f) An understanding of professional and ethical
longer exist) included the lengthof truss members (lower cord), distance between panel points, length of the vertical and diagonalmembers, traverse distance between the parallel trusses, and the roadway width. Memberproperties including size and shape as well as cross-sectional area were also found to determinedead loads.III. Introducing Symbolic Problem Solving to the ClassroomThe following equilibrium problem was presented in class as shown in Figure 1. Points A and Care pinned, and there is a hinge at point B. Page 10.252.3 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
PatternsThe table below gives a random sampling of student grades for the short 250-word essays.Unfortunately, only three short essays were completed during the semester because additionaltime was given for the term paper and mid-term exam. Name Paper 1 Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 2 Paper 3 Paper 3 (random sampling) Draft Revised Draft Revised Draft Revised Student "A" C B A- A- B+ A Student "B" B B+ B A- B A Student "C" C- D+ C- C B- B Student "D" C no rev. A A B
Move and Shake: A Hands-on Activity Connecting Engineering to the Everyday World for Secondary Students Laura A. Koehl, Suzanne W. Soled and Nicholas B. Harth, Colleges of Education and Engineering, University of CincinnatiAbstract One of the main goals of Project STEP (Science and Technology EnhancementProgram) is to design, develop, and implement hands-on activities and technology-driveninquiry-based projects, which relate to the students’ community issues, as vehicles toauthentically teach science, mathematics, engineering and technology skills. The Moversand Shakers Lesson Plan was a three-part activity that helped students connectengineering principles to the design of buildings that
. Positive b. Negative c. Zero where s is either x, y, or z.Figure 2. The 2D version of Question 1 is shown on the left. The rendered version is shown on the right. Therendered version was displayed in stereo in a much larger format and in color. In the second experiment, a 3D rigid body was shown with two forces acting on it (Fig.3). Again a multiple-choice quiz was given. For both forces acting on the rigid body thefollowing questions were asked: For the force, is the s-component of the force a. Positive b. Negative c. Zero For the point on which this force acts, is the s-location of the point a
Session 2625 First-Year Hands-On Design on a Dime – Almost! J.C. Malzahn Kampe, Richard M. Goff, Jeffrey B. Connor Department of Engineering Education (0218) Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia 24061Abstract The implementation of in-class, hands-on activities in first-year engineering classroomscan easily become a costly endeavor. This is especially true when the number of freshmanstudents in the incoming class exceeds 1200. Additionally, difficulties in delivery logistics suchas class time