Conference Session

Recruitment and Retention

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Tom Eppes; Peter Schuyler

., Diefes-Dux, H., Follman, D., Gaunt, J., Haghighi, K., Imbrie, P. K., Jamieson, L., Montgomery, R., Oakes, W., and Wankat, P., Development of Graduate Programs in Engineering Education, 2004 ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT. (2004).National Alliance of Business. “The Multifaceted Returns to Education,” Workforce Economic Trends, June 1998, p1.Newberry, B. and Farison, J., “A Look at the Past and Present of General Engineering and Engineering Science Programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, 92(3), 217-226 (2003).Varma, Virendra K. Varma, Fluctuations in ET student enrollments, a viewpoint, Proceedings of 2003 CIECConference, Tuscon AZ, 2003Wankat, P.C.; Felder; R.M., Smith, K. A.; Oreovicz, F.S., “The

Conference Session

New! Improved! CE Accreditation Criteria

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Stephen Ressler

of such a mechanism, BOK validation wouldrequire a substantial bureaucratic infrastructure that currently does not exist.Given this second assumption, CAP3 has proposed that civil engineers should be able to attainthe Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge by following either of two alternative paths: • Path #1: B + MABET & E – A bachelor’s degree in any discipline plus an ABET- accredited master’s degree in civil engineering, augmented with appropriate professional experience • Path #2: BABET + 30 & E – An ABET-accredited bachelor’s degree in civil engineering plus approximately 30 credit hours of relevant upper-level undergraduate and graduate- level coursework , augmented with appropriate

Conference Session

Understanding Engineering Design

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Penny Hirsch; Ann McKenna

, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience,and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.2. Hynd, Cynthia, Holschuh, Jodi, and Nist, Sherrir (2000). Learning Complex Scientific Information: MotivationTheory And its Relation to Student Perceptions, Reading &Writing Quarterly, 16: 23–57.3. Keller, John, M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design, Journal ofInstructional Development, vol. 10, no. 3.4. Hirsch, P., Anderson, J., Colgate, J.E., Lake, J., Shwom, B., and Yarnoff C. “Enriching Freshman DesignThrough Collaboration with Professional Designers.” Proceedings, American Society of Engineering Educationnational meeting, June 2002.5. Atman, Cynthia

Conference Session

Undergraduate Research & New Directions

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Max Rabiee

Light @ N#2(R_LT) O:2/1 Switch #2 @ N#3 (SW_2) I:1/4 Switch #1 @ N#1 (SW_1) I:0/0 Green Pilot Light @ N#1 (G_LT) O:0/0 Red Pilot Light @ N#1 (R_LT) O:0/1 Figure 3- The Master and Slave PLC Input/Output address assignmentsThe Control Routine:Figure 4 displays a flow chart of the program to control the data flow. Appendix A, Appendix B,and Appendix C contain the PLC ladder logic diagrams for the Master and Slave PLC stations.The input ports are first scanned by the master PLC station. If an input is activated, then adecision will be made to see which network message

Conference Session

Thermal Systems

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Pamela J. Théroux; Gary Gabriele; Brad Lister; Deborah Kaminski

the length ofthe study was 3.7 on a 5-point scale where A is 5, F is 14; standard deviation was 1.02SD;N=499. In other words, on the average, students in TFI generally received a C+ grade. Gradedistribution is shown graphically in Figure 5.Figure 5Distribution of Student Grades Overall 2.40% 8.82% Grades A B C

Conference Session

NSF Funding for Educational Scholarship

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Patrick Carriere

Programs7. Biocomplexity in the Environment (BE): Integrated Research and Education inEnvironmental Systems - promotes comprehensive, integrated investigations ofenvironmental systems using advanced scientific and engineering methods. The concept ofbiocomplexity stresses the richness of biological systems and their capacity for adaptation andself-organizing behavior. By placing biocomplexity studies in an environmental context, thiscompetition emphasizes research with the following characteristics: (a) a high degree ofinterdisciplinarity; (b) a focus on complex environmental systems that includes non-humanbiota or humans; and (c) a focus on systems with high potential for exhibiting non-linearbehavior.8. Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Xian Fan Liu

-limit threshold values. These glitches are categorized as major glitches, and are further categorized into: • Significant major glitches Value drops/rises suddenly then rises/drops to ≤ 25% of the sudden change. • Quite significant major glitches Value drops/rises suddenly then rises/drops to ≤ 50% of the sudden change. • Insignificant major glitches Value drops/rises suddenly then rises/drops to ≤ 75% of the sudden change. • Minor glitches Value drops/rises suddenly then rises/drops to ≤ 95% of the sudden change. a) No glitch b) Significant major glitch c) Quite significant major glitch

Conference Session

Service Learning Projects

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

William Moeller; Margaret Pinnell; Bernard Amadei; Jay Shah; R. Scott Summers; Angela Bielefeldt; Robyn Sandekian

Boulder (CU). As part of the program, an EDC option in theEnvironmental Engineering (EVEN) B.S. degree is being proposed. Given the success of theEngineers Without Borders (EWB) outreach and service program, it is expected that studentinterest in the EDC option will be significant. At a workshop on “Integrating Appropriate-Sustainable Technology and Service-Learning in Engineering Education” held at CU onSeptember 27-29, 2004, participants were surveyed on existing courses and programs at theiruniversities that are relevant to EDC. A description of the proposed curriculum, option coursesand technical electives for the proposed EDC emphasis in EVEN are provided. Relevant socialscience and humanistic electives are recommended. The information will

Conference Session

EM Skills and Real World Concepts

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert Powell

” Table 2. Survey QuestionsQualitative Assessment 1. What is your major? 2. What is the name of your capstone project? 3. Did your project span 1 or 2 semesters? 4. Which of the following describes your project? (Circle one or more) a. Curriculum-based industrial design project b. Cross functional design team that may include non-engineering team members c. National competitions (SAE challenges, DOE challenges, etc.) d. Decision Analysis e. Optimization f. Project Management g. Process Modeling & Analysis h. Modeling & Simulation i. Statistical Analysis and Stochastic Processes j. Operations Management k. Other: 5. Who

Conference Session

Assessing Where We Stand

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert Pangborn; Renata Engel

the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education (b) Learn, through a limited set of individual interviews, what kinds of experiences – experiments, discussions, writing assignments, projects, etc. – students remember in conjunction with the courses they took, and how they see these as related to achieving the goals of general education and their majors; (c) Collect and review the syllabi for the “popular” courses to survey the course goals and in- and out-of-class activities, and query instructors on how they perceive these as mapping to the general education objectives and goals for

Conference Session

Laboratories

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Kevin Schmaltz; Christopher Byrne; Joel Lenoir; Robert Choate

appreciation for the professional outcomes expected. The disconnect between studentand faculty expectations has resulted in the modifications discussed in the Lessons Learned andConclusions section.Assessment specific to design of experiments is incorporated into ME Program Outcome 3:Mechanical Engineering graduates can measure physical quantities and can plan, conduct,analyze and evaluate experiments. This program outcome supports ABET Outcome (b) directly,as well as ABET (a) and (c) to a lesser extent. The Program Outcomes are measured usingseveral methods and are reviewed on an annual basis. The primary means of assessment is MEfaculty evaluations of selected student work in several of the courses listed in Table 1.The assessment rubric shown in

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Frontiers

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Rick Olson

answersuntil they find the correct responses. Q1: Why does compound interest grow more quickly than simple interest? a) Compound interest is based on beginning-of-period calculations. b) More banks offer compounded interest, so they need to provide higher rates to attract customers. >> c) Unpaid interest accrues additional interest when compounding. Q2: When ranking projects to determine an organization's MARR, which measure is most appropriate? a) Shortest Payback Period b) Greatest Present Worth >> c) Greatest Internal Rate of Return d) Benefit/Cost ration or Present Worth Index Figure 1 Representative WebCT quiz questions used in Engr 50On the

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research and Assessment III

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Wanda Dann; Stephen Cooper; Ashlyn Hutchinson; Barbara Moskal

and faulty instruments damage the validity of a study’sfinal results. These problems can be rectified during the formative phase by carefully selectingand/or creating assessment instruments and conducting a pilot investigation before summativedata is collected. This paper illustrates the formative phase of assessment and how theinformation collected during the formative phase was used to improve the design of a study thatinvestigated an innovative approach to teaching introductory computer science. This work wassupported in part by NSF-03020542.I. IntroductionIn most reported engineering education studies, the emphasis of the discussion concerningassessment is based on summative data. Summative data, after all, allows the researcher toexamine

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Sherif Michael; Ron Pieper

An Exact Analysis for Freeze-out and Exhaustion in Single Impurity Semiconductors Ron J. Pieper, Sherif Michael Department of Electrical Engineering/ Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Texas, Tyler/ Naval Postgraduate School Tyler, TX 75799/ Monterey, CA 93943IntroductionIn this paper, a complete analytical description for an exact expression for temperaturedependence of the majority carrier in a single-impurity, equilibrium semiconductor is proposed.Analysis establishes that the problem is solvable exactly by identifying the only physicallypossible root to a

Conference Session

Trends in Energy Conversion/Conservation

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Wendy L. Mahan; Martin J. Gutowski; Brian H. Victor; Mark Deluca; Sarma Pisupati

the energy consumption. These answers are entered on the nextscreen in the Flash simulation. When the submit button is clicked all the answers enteredare recorded back in the data base. Page 10.717.6 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2005, American Society for Engineering Education” Figure 1.Screenshots of Home Energy Consumption Activity Flash Simulation a) shows the whole house and appliances b) shows the nameplate information.At the time of grading, when an instructor or a Teaching Assistant logs into the system, a

Conference Session

International Engineering Education I

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Margaret Pinnell; Carl Eger

Sustainable Development in Appropriate Technology: Technology as if People Matter Robert C. Wicklein, Ed. D. University of Georgia, USA 7 Hazelton, B, Bull, C. Appropriate Technology: Tools, Choices and Implications, November 1988.Biographical Information: Carl (Bill) Eger is a graduate student and assistant director for the ETHOS program at theUniversity of Dayton. Additionally, he works with the Industrial Assessment Center at UDwhere he conducts energy audits for various industries. His areas of interest includesustainability, appropriate technology and service-learning. Margaret Pinnell is the faculty director for ETHOS and assistant professor for theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Dayton

Conference Session

ET Curriculum & Design Issues

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Rafael Obregon; Kevin Hall

marketingsites. Journal of Advertising, 30, 65-77.Cronin, M. J. (1997). Intranets reach the factory floor. Fortune, 136, 208.Dwyer, F, M. (1972). A guide for improving visualized instruction. States College, Pennsylvania: Learning Services.Firebaugh, M. W. (1993). Computer Graphics: Tools for Visualization. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Publishers.Fraser, A. B. (1999). Colleges should tap the pedagogical potential of the World-Wide Web. Chronicle of highereducation, 48, B8.Guastello, E. F., Beasley, T. M., & Sinatra, R. C. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science contentcomprehension of low-achieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 356.Hallett, P. (2001). Web-Based visualization. DM Review Magazine. Retrieved October 29

Conference Session

Undergraduate Retention Activities

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Rose Marra; Cherith Moore; Mieke Schuurman; Barbara Bogue

(WECE) project”, Goodman Research Group Inc., Cambridge, MA. Available online at www.grginc.com.2. Marra, R.M. and Bogue, B. (2001). “Developing Exportable Assessment Instruments and Models for Women In Engineering Programs”, NSF Award # HRD-0120642. National Science Foundation Program for Gender Equity in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (Program Announcement NSF 01-6).3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.4. Blaisdell, Stephanie (2000). Social cognitive theory predictors of entry into engineering majors for high school students. Arizona State University. Unpublished dissertation.5. Mannix, M. (2001). Getting it right

Conference Session

K-8 Engineering & Access

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Malinda Zarske; Rene Reitsma; Martha Cyr; Nancy Shaw; Michael Mooney; Jacquelyn Sullivan; Paul Klenk

lessons oractivities with broader, national sets of standards. For instance, if a lesson is indexed toMassachusetts standard 1.1, TeachEngineering’s search engine finds it when someone searchesfor curricula related to AAAS Benchmark 3.B.1 or McREL 4.4, because of the high correlationbetween that Massachusetts standard and those two national standards. The correlation is acomparison of each grade level standard to the national standards for the same grade level foreach state, scored on an ordinal four-point scale.The standards correlation in TeachEngineering indexes the Mid-Continent Regional Laboratory(McREL), the AAAS Benchmarks for Science Literacy, the National Science EducationStandards (NSES), the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics

Conference Session

Improving Statics Instruction

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Zhifeng Kou; Sudhir Mehta

to help them prepare for the final examination.The Survey of Student Engagement (SSE) is designed to measure the student engagement at theclass level and consists of 14 questions adapted from the National Survey of StudentEngagement (NSSE) (see Appendix B).13 The NSSE is an ongoing research campaign in theUnited States used to assess the extent to which colleges focus on higher levels of learning andpersonal development. The survey examines the environment of college students, but is alsointended to foster a particular way of thinking and talking about collegiate quality.14 In thedevelopment of the SSE, key questions were selected based on their measurability of studentengagement at the classroom level with relation to the level of

Conference Session

Assessment & Quality; Accreditation in Engineering Education

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Tom Thomas; Mohammad Alam

engineering programs,”presented at the Engineering Foundation Conference on Engineering Education for Global Practice in The21st Century, Barga, Italy, April 9-14, 2000.3. Response to ABET Draft Report, University of South Alabama University of South Alabama College ofEngineering, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL February 2000.4. Engineering Criteria 2000 Program Self Study, University of South Alabama College of Engineering,University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL June 1999.5. G. Peterson, “A bold new change agent,” in How do you measure success, ASEE Professional Books, 1998.6. P. Daniels, D. Holger, B. Laurenson, Presentation: EAC Orientation for Institutional Representatives and TeamChairs, Baltimore, MD, July 2004.http://www.abet.org

Conference Session

Accreditation

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Roger Painter

thatwill affect their environment and/or health; (b) the public's contribution can influence theregulatory agency's decision; (c) the concerns of all participants involved will beconsidered in the decision-making process; and (d) the decision-makers seek out andfacilitate the involvement of those potentially affected.Parsing the “legal ease” of this definition reveals that community residents can influenceregulatory decisions that will affect their environment or health by being meaningfullyinvolved. This language only succeeds in codifying the concept that a segment of thepopulation (the uninvolved in this case) could be negatively impacted even if a trulyobjective risk assessment indicated they where at a higher risk. Center et al, (1996

Conference Session

Inservice Teacher Engineering Education

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Kathleen Crowe; Kris Wood; Richard Crawford; Daniel Jensen

. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 19(No. 6): p. 874-884.6. Kresta, S.M., Hands-on Demonstrations: An Alternative to Full Scale Lab Experiments. Journal of Engineering Education, 1998: p. 7-9.7. Self, B., J.J. Wood, and D. Hansen. Teaching Undergraduate Kinetics Using Lego® Mindstorms Race Car Competition. in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2004. Salt Lake City, UT.8. Wood, J.J., et al., Enhancing Machine Design by Creating a Basic Hands-On Environment with Mechanical Breadboards. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 2001.9. Wood, J.J. and K.L. Wood. The Tinkerer's Pendulum for Machine System's Education: Creating a Basic Hands-On Environment with Mechanical

Conference Session

Crossing the Discipline Divide!

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Aiman Kuzmar

Opportunities for Students Attending Small Universities and Colleges, Eye on Psi Chi, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 38-39, Spring 2000.10. Website for the Summer Undergraduate Research Program at the Chemistry Department at the Occidental College, , March 200511. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2004-2005 Cycle, Baltimore, Maryland, ABET Inc., 2004.BiographyAIMAN S. KUZMAR is an assistant professor of engineering at Penn State Fayette, the Eberly Campus. He holds aPh. D. degree from Duke University. He has a Master’s degree from Rice University. His B. S. is from theUniversity of Petroleum and Minerals in Saudi Arabia. All of His degrees are in civil engineering. His industrialexperience

Conference Session

New Trends in Graduate Education

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert Stiegler; Ernest McDuffie; Robert Kavetsky; Eugene Brown

Session 3155 PATHWAYS TO REVITALIZATION OF THE NAVY RESEARCH ENTERPRISE-- TWO PROMISING EXAMPLES Eugene F. Brown1, Robert A. Kavetsky2, Ernest L. McDuffie3, and Robert L. Stiegler4 1 Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech/ 2Director, S

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching Techniques

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert Martinazzi

problem prior 4.19to class?Overall, how would you rate the “T.H.I.N.K.” concept used during the “1st” homework problem 5.77assigned for the upcoming uncovered material in the syllabus?Finally, Appendix “B” contains representative student comments about the “T.H.I.N.K.”concept. Overall the comments are favorable and encouraging. No negative comments per sewere generated by the students which in itself is a positive statement on the concept.ConclusionsThis concept has been experimented with over the last several years with enough positivefeedback received from the students and other faculty to warrant it being submitted for ASEE’s

Conference Session

New Approaches & Techniques in Engineering II

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Jared Odom; Saeed Foroudastan

. Whether it is from overuse, neglect, or lack of sufficient resourcedevelopment and management, demands for potable water continue to grow. Water is a crucialfactor in the Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, and it’s also extensively addressed in Israel’streaty with Jordan. Political problems throughout the Middle East, Europe, Africa, Asia, andeven North and South America hinge upon this resource, and in the coming decades it isconceivable that wars might be fought over water in much the same way they were fought overoil during the 20th century.Many countries are currently pursuing a range of desalination procedures in order to cope withthis shortage. Such procedures may utilize evaporative processes that require inputs of heat to aidin

Conference Session

IE Enrollment/Curriculum Development

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Erick Jones

the STEM curriculum: for exampleengineering in comparison to other non-STEM majors such as liberal arts or business.Engineering student attrition due to poor attitudes, perceived coursework difficulty, anddepartmental polices that effect this behavior are clearly concerns for engineering institutions. Lovitts (2001) suggests that more standardized quantitative measures for departmentalenvironments need to be created, and more appropriate quantitative measurements need to beapplied to studying STEM student attrition. There is a need to conduct objective longitudinalstudies that prevent attrition as opposed to the subjective retrospective studies done in the past.This study demonstrates a methodology that will begin to fulfill this need. The

Conference Session

Ethics Classes: Creative or Inefficient

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Christy Moore; Stephanie Bird; Steven Nichols

). Although the need for technical competence or scientific knowledge isfundamental, there is more to being a engineer. An engineer uses tools of analysis andcreativity to apply scientific knowledge to social needs. Figure 1 presents a graphicalrepresentation of these domains: scientific knowledge, analysis, creativity, and societalneed. The intersection is the realm of engineering practice. Not all specific engineeringactivities require analysis (area “C”); nor do all specific engineering activities involvecreativity (area “A”), but the authors argue that all engineering activities inherently havesocietal impact (area “B”). Proper preparation for the practice of engineering requiresnot only an understanding of technical strengths but also an

Conference Session

Integrating H&SS in Engineering III

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Valerie Grash; Andrew Rose

) andrising real estate costs in central business districts. Next, the pros and cons of wrought ironconstruction were considered against the structural, aesthetic and economic use of cast iron,followed by a detailed examination of the rather conservative historicism in form andornamentation found in New York school skyscrapers such as Richard Morris Hunt’s TribuneBuilding (1873-75; enlarged 1903-05) and George B. Post’s World Building (1889-90).9One of the major issues explored in this lecture was the role of aesthetics and corporate Page 10.812.6competition among high-rise buildings, and, following recent work by such scholars as Carol