Paper ID #34970Creating a Diverse Next Generation of Technically- and Community-MindedSTEM Professionals (Experience)Dr. Denise M. Driscoll, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Denise M. Driscoll, Purdue University Dr. Driscoll is an experimental social psychologist with ex- pertise in stereotyping and prejudice, attitude and persuasion, diversity and inclusion, and managerial and intercultural business communication. Her experiences as an academic, diversity consultant, and admin- istrator over the last 30 years have helped her integrate broadening participation and inclusion practices across research
for the circuit’s laboratory (from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering) islive online.The Circuits Lab learning outcomes are described below. 1- Learn how to use the oscilloscope, function generator, power supply, and multimeter. 2- Improve the technical writing and computer-aided circuit analysis and design. 3- Study electrical networks such as pure resistive networks, RC (resistor and capacitor combination), RL (resistor and inductor combination), RLC (Resistor, inductor, and capacitor combination), Operational amplifier networks and their behavior. 4- Create a troubleshooting procedure to improve the circuit implementation time.One of the most critical challenges in this laboratory is getting the
to learn from each other in courses taught byengineering faculty with technical topics.Table 1 shows the correlation of the General Education Outcomes to the ABET StudentOutcomes. The mapping provided a way to explain to engineering students that the seminarswere groundwork for future engineering work. At the same time, it offered an explanation tonon-engineers that these skills could be transferred between different disciplines, regardless ofseminar topic. ABET Outcome 5 (Teamwork) has no apparent analog to the General EducationOutcomes and is included for completeness. In many of the Freshman Seminars, students dowork together in teams, but this dynamic is not assessed explicitly. Table 1: General Education and ABET
Pedagogy,vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–106.[4] Coffman-Wolph, S., & Gray, K. (2020, June), Work in Progress: Student-generated Materialfor Artificial Intelligence Course Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual ConferenceContent Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2—35685[5] Miller, H. (2007). Designing effective writing assignments. Teaching with writing.University of Minnesota Center for Writing. Retrieved Mar. 8, 2021, fromhttp://writing.umn.edu/tww/assignments/designing.html[6] Coffman-Wolph, S., “Online/Hybrid/Flipped EM Learning in a Programming 1 Course andBeyond (2021 KNC Session).” Engineering Unleashed,https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/2403.
Cybersecurity.2.0 BackgroundThe two-fold goal of the NSF Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) S-STEM fundedAttracting and Cultivating Cybersecurity Experts and Scholars through Scholarships (ACCESS)program is: (1) to increase cybersecurity-related STEM degree completion of low-income, high-achieving undergraduate students with demonstrated financial need (including women andminorities) and (2) to generate knowledge about academic success, retention, persistence,graduation, and career pathways of these students to improve the education of futureCybersecurity-related STEM workers. Specifically, ACCESS aims to contribute towardsaddressing the tremendous governmental and industry need for highly skilled cybersecurityexperts by addressing the following
that lead to reducing the quantityand diversity of possible solutions, the results of the study can support engineering instructors toprovide scaffolding as they provide lessons on concept generation for their students.IntroductionWith the increasing complexity of problems in the world, engineers must develop innovativesolutions to pressing problems, as described by the National Academy of Engineering [1]. Toequip students with important design skills, design education has adopted project-based coursesthat require students to tackle open-ended problems [2]. However, despite the changes in thecurriculum, studies have indicated the challenges of teaching students how to innovate [3], [4].Engineers engage in concept generation in design, which
(withdraws). To improve academic success, traditional SI programs provide voluntary, non-remedialweekly group sessions led by previously successful students known as SI Leaders, who aretrained to design and facilitate collaborative activities that combine application of difficultcontent and transferable study effectiveness skills, with opportunities for practice that requiresactive engagement of student attendees. The SI model was built upon theories including themediation of learning by social constructivism and interdependence [1, 2] so while developmentof content knowledge and study skills are intentional in sessions, there are often incidentalbenefits, such as developing interpersonal skills, teamwork and a sense of community andbelonging
Paper ID #34925Engineering Graduate Education: An Overwhelming Journey ofFirst-Generation ImmigrantsDr. Hoda Ehsan, Georgia Institute of Technology Hoda is a postdoctoral fellow at Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics & Computing at Georgia Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in mechanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests
[13], [14].The millennials (Gen Y), span the years 1981 through 1996. They follow the veterans, babyboomers, and Gen Xers. Gen Z is discussed as the most recent generational cohort on whomthere is sufficient early information. Veterans (Traditionalist) 1922-1945; 52 million people; born before and during WW II Baby Boomers 1946-1964; 78.8 million people; after WW II Reared during a period of optimism, opportunity, and progress. Began turning 65 on January 1, 2011; aging to 65 years old at 10,000/day, through December 31, 2029. Generation X (Gen X) 1965-1980; 44 million people Came of age in the shadow of the boomers Children of veterans, older boomers, or younger siblings of younger
Paper ID #33082An After-action Review: Creating a Matrix Organizational Design Modelfor Online Education at a Tier-1 Research UniversityDr. Mitchell L. Springer, Purdue University at West Lafayette Dr. Mitchell L. Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Dr. Springer currently serves as an Executive Director for Purdue University’s Polytechnic Institute lo- cated in West Lafayette, Indiana. He has over thirty-five years of theoretical and defense industry-based practical experience from four disciplines: software engineering, systems engineering, program manage- ment and human resources. Dr. Springer possesses a significant
2019 semester to3.774 in the Spring 2020 semester.Data were collected by survey pre- and post-semester to measure improvements inIntrapreneurial Competencies. The “Intrapreneurial Competencies Measurement Scale” (ICMS)by Vargas-Halabi et al. [12] was used to measure and evaluate the development ofintrapreneurial competencies, which include: (1) Opportunity promoter, (2) Proactivity, (3)Flexibility, (4) Drive, and (5) Risk-taking. Each of the categories of the ICMS is divided into 3-9sub-categories to assess skill and mindset in the five general categories. In answering thequestions on the ICMS test, students evaluated their proficiency in each of the areas. Growth wasevident for almost all the categories and sub-categories across each of the
Paper ID #33181On the Development of a Next-Generation Sensor/Actuator Module forAutomation LabsMr. Bradley Lane Kicklighter, University of Southern Indiana Brad holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (1989) and an MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University (2001). His past work experience includes eleven years at Delphi (formerly Delco Electronics) as an Advanced Project Engineer, eleven years at Whirlpool Corporation as a Lead Engineer/Solution Architect, and three years at Ivy Tech Community College as an Instructor/Program Chair of Pre-Engineering. Since 2015
addition to making numerous other conference presentations. Straub’s research spans the gauntlet between technology, commercialization and technology policy. In particular, his research has recently focused on cybersecurity topics including intrusion detection and forensics, robotic command and control, aerospace command and 3D printing quality assurance. Straub is a member of Sigma Xi, the AAAS, the AIAA and several other technical societies, he has also served as a track or session chair for numerous conferences. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Pandemic Response: Hybrid-Flexible Course Delivery for General Education Computer
to the stay-at-home home orders and directivesissued by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to limit the spread of COVID-19. The U.S. education sector was also impacted and institutions across the globe had totransition to distance learning education and university students returned home to finish up theirspring 2020 coursework. Unfamiliar learning environments caused uncertainties in students andaffected academic performance, internships, and general expectations of the future [1]. Thelearning consistency of students was affected with the physical closing of schools as students didnot learn what they needed to learn, and possibly even lost previously gained knowledge [2],[3]. Institutions faced great challenges as
Paper ID #33809Internet of Things Education Project (IoTEP)Prof. Gary J. Mullett, Springfield Technical Community College Gary J. Mullett, a Professor of Electronics Technology and Department Chair, presently teaches in the Applied Engineering Technology Group at Springfield Technical Community College (STCC) located in Springfield, MA. A long time faculty member and consultant to local business and industry, Mullett has provided leadership and initiated numerous curriculum reforms as either the Chair or Co-Department Chair of the four technology degree programs that constituted the former Electronics Group. Since the
systematic methods and tools for innovative design with a particular focus on concept generation and design-by-analogy. Her research seeks to understand designers’ cognitive processes with the goal of creating better tools and approaches to enhance engineering design. She has authored over 150 technical publications including over forty journal papers, and ten book chapters. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Impact of Makerspaces on Student Idea Generation, Self‐Efficacy and More: Results of a Five‐year Longitudinal Study Introduction Makerspaces are community learning spaces for students and faculty to solve engineering
their availability to prepare, including non-computing related jobs, caring for a familymember, or ongoing health issues. While we do consider the support mechanisms students mayleverage to overcome obstacles, in general, these results emphasize the larger issues in existinghiring structures, and demonstrate the importance of not treating students as a monolith. Thefindings from this work are intended to inform educators about how to better prepare students tosucceed on technical interviews, and to encourage industry to reform the process to make it moreequitable.1 IntroductionBetween 2019 and 2029, demand for workers in computing occupations are expected to surge28.8% [1]. For specific positions the projected rate is even higher, with 35.0
Paper ID #33004Preparing the Next Generation Advanced Manufacturing Workforce UsingCollaborative Robots and Experiential Learning (Work in Progress)Mr. Kenechukwu Churchill Mbanisi, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kenechukwu C. Mbanisi received the B.Eng. degree in electrical and electronic engineering from Covenant University, Nigeria, in 2013, and the M.S. degree in robotics engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), MA, USA in 2018. He is currently working towards the Ph.D. degree in robotics engi- neering from WPI, USA. His research interests include shared autonomy, haptic feedback, human motion modeling
Paper ID #32764Faculty Perceptions of STEM Student and Faculty Experiences During theCOVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study (WIP).Mr. Mehdi Lamssali, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University Experienced research assistant with a Master of Science - MS focused on Civil Engineering from North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University and working towards a Ph.D. in Applied Science and Technology.Ms. Olivia Kay Nicholas, RAPID My name is Olivia Nicholas. I am a sophomore in the Built Environment department majoring in Ge- omatics at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. I am
experience for problemsolving for a new first-semester general engineering course in an engineering transfer program ata community college in the eastern United States. We first consider the benefits of using casestudies for learning. We then provide an overview of the watershed monitoring system used tocollect the data and some of the previous educational settings its data has been used in.Subsequently, we summarize the particular event used in this crayfish case study and thedevelopment of some of the data analysis products that will be provided to students. Finally, wediscuss the planned implementation of this case study into the first-year general engineeringcourse and its assessment and future steps to continue this research.1
strongertechnical communication skills. In the early 2000s, engineering professional societies reportedunderdeveloped writing and presentation skills in entry-level job candidates while, at the sametime, stressing the time spent in a typical engineer’s day on communication tasks [1, 2]. At thesame time, ABET adopted new criteria for evaluating and accrediting engineering programs [3].The criteria focused on developing “soft skills” including teamwork, ethics, and effectivecommunication, among others. The importance of soft skills has only grown in the interveningyears. Among ABET’s student outcomes as listed in 2019-2020 is “an ability to apply written,oral, and graphical communication in broadly-defined technical and non-technical environments;and an
favor of describing engineeringwork in terms of technical matters, allowing the continuation of the belief that an engineer's jobis to focus on just technical aspects of the problem and actively exclude the social contexts ofthese [2]. These dualisms are so embedded in the practices and teachings of engineering thatthe separation of social and technical aspects engineers face every day seems natural. Thereductionist nature of engineering problem solving is an asset praised in the classroom, ratherthan questioned.Engineers both generate and perpetuate the separation of “hard” and “soft” skills, prioritizing the“hard” skills above all else. One of the attributes to this divide (which we will refer to as amindset) is the persistence of seeing
& Security, 2020. 2020(8): p. 6-12.7. Marquardson, J. and A. Elnoshokaty, Skills, Certifications, or Degrees: What Companies Demand for Entry-Level Cybersecurity Jobs. Information Systems Education Journal, 2020. 18(1): p. 22-28.8. Wang, P. and R. Sbeit. A Comprehensive Mentoring Model for Cybersecurity Education. in 17th International Conference on Information Technology–New Generations (ITNG 2020). 2020. Springer.9. Omar, M.K., et al., Job satisfaction and motivation to teach: Predicting intrinsic and extrinsic factors towards retaining career-switchers in the teaching profession. International Journal of Education, 2018. 3(16): p. 59-76.10. Quinton, S. States Want More Career and Technical
themselves and from people who are like the students that they reach. Types of resources most asked for in live conference sessions include: translation services, pronunciation guides, and listings of agencies/resources that address basic life needs of students, e.g. housing, transportation, food. Types of HSI-relevant resources that were most frequently viewed from the repository are culturally responsive practices that are either research based and/or include examples from other HSI practitioners with NSF grants and proposal development aids.3. Community BuildingCommunity building in year 3 of the project was conducted entirely virtually. This contrasts withyears 1 and 2, where conferences were the primary mechanism for engaging with the
and was categorized as FGCS or Non-FGCS. After removing individuals who did not consent and those under the age of 18, data from19,191 students and 437 instructors remained. Data for instructors and students were matchedusing R software version 4.0.3 (R core team, 2019), resulting in 17,912 survey responses fromstudents, as seen in Table 1.Table 1 Count of survey responses broken down by the gender, race, sexuality, and First-Generation CollegeStudent status of the student and instructor. Matched Social Student Instructor survey Grouping Size for MRM Marker responses
-context, through coursework at a collaboratinginstitution and hands-on case studies within rapidly sedentarizing rural Tanzania. Students earn atotal of 6 credit hours, half of which are derived from completion of course modules onappropriate technology and human centred design and the other half on local cultures, historyand language. This project is designed in such a way as to attract and retain engineering studentswho are under-represented, particularly first-generation college students, minority students, andfemales.BackgroundCurrent global challenges are rooted in local, specific societies, of course. Ensuring that anengineering solution is not only technically sound but also culturally appropriate requires a moreproactive orientation in
. They were attempting to open the black box described in the National Academy ofEngineering’s Pathways (2018) study [1], which spoke of the different ways in which studentsexperienced engineering education, and used their experiences as a stepping stone to a variety ofcareers, including many outside of engineering.Undergraduate engineering education has almost always attempted to provide a professionaldegree, or at least the foundations of a professional degree, in just four years. This, along withthe US commitment to providing a strong general education component at the undergraduatelevel, has made it difficult to unpack how students navigate challenging curricula and providesan important context for changes in engineering education. This
and inclusionin STEM. The 14 instructors (see table 1) who participated represent a range of institutional roles(e.g., adjunct instructors, professors, and a department chair) and personal identities (e.g.,women, people of color, multilingual, first-generation college graduates). Efforts such as this PLC occupy a unique and underexplored research area supporting STEMfaculty to develop critical awareness to address inclusion and inequity. The field of STEM isparticularly unique regarding efforts to support diversity and inclusion because of the historicalmarginalization of women and people of color in particular (National Science Foundation, 2019;2020). In large part, the historical underrepresentation and marginalization of individuals is
an academic appointment in the Engineering Science and Education Department (ESED) at Clemson University. Prior to this Dr. Karen was at Oklahoma State University where she was a professor for 24 years in Chemical Engineering. She received her B.S. in chemical engineering from University of Michigan in 1985 and her M.S. in 1988 and Ph.D. in 1991 in chemical engineering both from Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Karen’s educational research emphasis includes faculty development and mentoring, graduate student development, critical thinking and communication skills, enhancing mathematical student success in Calculus (including Impact of COVID-19), and promoting women in STEM. Her technical research focuses on
the U.S. “will need a steady supplyof well-trained engineers, scientists, and other technical workers, as well as a technologically andscientifically literate general public, to succeed and prosper in the twenty-first century.” [1]Further, there is agreement that solving the most critical problems facing society requires aSTEM workforce that mirrors its diversity. The publication of Broadening Participation inAmerica’s Science and Engineering Workforce and subsequent Broadening Participation inAmerica’s STEM Workforce and Pathways to Broadening Participation in Response to theCEOSE 2011-2012 Recommendation places great emphasis on innovating pathways to includewomen, minorities, and disabled persons in commensurate numbers and shifting