of Teacher Education, 64(5), 426-438.Gurvitch, R. (2005). Congratulations!: A guide for new graduate students. Journal of PhysicalEducation, Recreation & Dance, 76(3), 48-52.Hardré, P. L. (2005). Instruction design as a professional development tool-of-choice for graduateteaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 30(3), 163-175.Hullinger, M., & Hogan, R. L. (2014). Student anxiety: Effects of a new graduate studentorientation program. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, & Research, 4(2), 27-34.Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. L., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters tostudent success: A review of the literature, Volume 8. Washington, DC: National PostsecondaryEducation
Takeaways Drawing the 5 Seed a) You don’t have to be good at drawing to do this; Shapes b) You can draw anything with the 5 seed shapes Understanding a) We can create new meaning when we draw relationships Relational Drawing b) Relational drawing requires visual metaphors. Page Forms, a) Page forms begin to structure visual metaphors and relationships Containers, and b) Two key tools in articulating or discovering relationships are Connectors containers (what belongs together?) and connectors (how are these ideas related?) Drawing Other a) Page forms can help us understand other authors’ arguments and People’s
reasoning and mathematical computation, among others. In fact, most RPGgames utilize some or all these scientific habits, making serious games an excellent medium foracademic knowledge transfer, especially.MethodsThe studies chosen for the preliminary literature survey were filtered according to the followingcharacteristics: (a) papers published between the years 2010 to 2020 (b) board games and real-world games were also included (c) search queries in Scopus were run for ‘Serious Games’ and‘Engineering’ in ‘Article Title’ (d) due to the limited number of entries found and relevant papersafter refining the selection criteria, a further search query of ‘Virtual Learning Environment’ and‘Engineering’ in ‘Article Title’ was also executed (e) To filter
scientific research. Finally, this activity encouragesstudents to practice making explicit connections between mathematical concepts, real-worldengineering problems, and policy.“Graph Theory and Gratitude”In the second activity, designed for the closing weeks of a course, students are invited to writenotes of appreciation, anonymous or otherwise, for peers who have elevated their learningexperience during the semester (additional details in Appendix B). These notes are collected anddistributed to their intended recipients; based on the flow of notes, the instructor constructs ananonymized directed graph (Figure 2).This activity reinforces numerouslearning objectives. At a basic level,by presenting yet another context inwhich a data set is
student experiencewith regard to retention in the first two years of study will not only lead to lower attrition ratesand a rise in general student satisfaction, but also encapsulate specific course features that otherprograms may utilize in their own retention models.References[1] K. Eagan, S. Hurtado, T. Figueroa, & B. Hughes. “Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four-year institutions” Paper Prepared for the Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2- and 4- Year STEM Degrees 2014 (May), 1–27.[2] M. Gibbons. “Engineering by the Numbers.” American Society for Engineering Education, 2010. Available at https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college- profiles
learningenhances undergraduate students’ global sociotechnical competency, especially as it relates totheir ability to define and solve problems with people from diverse disciplinary backgrounds andlife experiences. Situated learning refers to how students learn under different a) configurationsof social relations (e.g., graduate/undergraduate; expert/non-expert; US/non-US students, etc.);b) pedagogical strategies for engineering problem definition and solution (e.g., remote vs.in-person; in-class vs. in-field); and c) different geographical contexts (e.g., in the US vs. inColombia) affect faculty and student learning. Global sociotechnical competency refers to havingthe knowledge, skills, and attitudes to define and solve engineering problems as socio
responses to these failures. Participants have been selected from those that havereceived funding through the national VentureWell E-Team program. This program awardsthree levels of funding and provides mentorship, training, and networking for the teams. Thestudy uses the framework developed by Henry, Shorter, Charkoudian, Heemstra, and Corwin(2019) in which they associate pre-failure dispositions related to fixed and growth mindset(Dweck, 2000, 2006) and mastery vs. performance disposition (Pintrich, 2000 a, b). Our workwill utilize this framework to guide the research, but more importantly will provide a uniquecontext for analysis, specifically within engineering entrepreneurship, which will add to the bodyof work and expand the understanding of
machine. Topics includebasic I/O, interrupts, timers, communication methods and protocols, driver circuitry, actuator(stepper motors, dc motors, solenoids, servos) control, user interface, and reactive state-machinedevelopment. We specifically discuss how the lessons and labs build upon themselves over the (a) Side View (b) Playfield Figure 1: Course Pinball Machinesemester to culminate in a complete, functional machine. A custom designed pinball machine,shown in Figure 1, and custom node based embedded system architecture, shown in Figure 3,were developed specifically for this course. The course pinball machine includes both traditionalpinball mechanisms
can be evaluated in terms of t effectiveness ascompared to the other capstone courses to inform changes can be made to the Global Capstone.Citations(1 )Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., & Babco, E. L. (2005). Diversifying the Engineering Workforce. Journal ofEngineering Education, 94(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00830.x(2) De Graaff, E., & Ravesteijn, W. (2001). Training complete engineers: Global enterprise andengineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 419–427.https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790110068701(3) Jesiek, Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global Engineering Competency inContext: Situations and Behaviors. 16.(4) Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., &
Paper ID #32262Women In EngineeringDr. Raymond Edward Floyd, Northwest College Raymond E. Floyd (M’63 – SM’85 – LSM’03) He has a BSEE from Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL – 1970, an MSEE from Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL – 1977, and a PhD in Engineering Management from California Coast University, Santa Ana, CA - 2009. He spent 26 years with IBM, retiring as a Senior Engineer in 1992. He is currently a Visiting Lecturer at Northwest College in Powell, WY. He has published over 200 papers on a variety of topics. He most recently co-authored a text, Perspectives on Engineering (2011), an
and Engineering: Special Report NSF 19-304," Alexandria, VA, 2019.[3] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter and T. J. Weston, "Why We Are Still Talking About Leaving," in Talking About Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education, Springer, 2019, pp. 1-54.[4] Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA, "Degrees of Success: Bachelor’s Degree Completion Rates Among Initial STEM Majors," HERI Report Brief, 2010.[5] Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline, Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011.[6] M. J. Graham, J
Canvas platform. The course intervention modules arecurrently implemented in a section of Calculus I. Based on the mid-term process, more than halfof the students (56%) felt they were properly prepared for the course and (20%) felt that they couldearn an A or B. More students also felt confident that they could conduct an engineering designproject (36%). Many of the students (68%) indicated they liked traditional assignments likelectures, quizzes, and homework embedded in the course. Only a small number of students (8%)indicated the intervention was helpful towards learning calculus. This indicates that many studentsprefer the traditional way of learning calculus and feel confident that they are prepared to engagein these activities.Benefits of
Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14-31, 2019.[2] R. E. Mayer, Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman, 1992.[3] G. Duffy, S. Sorby, and B. Bowe, "An investigation of the role of spatial ability in representing and solving word problems among engineering students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 424-442, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20349.[4] A. D. Baddeley and G. J. Hitch, "Working Memory," in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 8, G. h. Bower Ed. New York: Academies Press, 1974, pp. 48-79.[5] A. Baddeley, "Fractionating the Central Executive," in Principles of Frontal Lobe Function, D. T. Stuss and R
, “Conceptual and Procedural Approaches to Mathematics in the Engineering Curriculum: Student Conceptions and Performance,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 138–162, 2012.[3] R. A. Streveler, T. A. Litzinger, R. L. Miller, and P. S. Steif, “Learning Conceptual Knowledge in the Engineering Sciences: Overview and Future Research Directions,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 279–294, 2008.[4] T. J. Moore, R. L. Miller, R. A. Lesh, M. S. Stohlmann, and Y. R. Kim, “Modeling in Engineering: The Role of Representational Fluency in Students' Conceptual Understanding,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 141–178, 2013.[5] B. P. Self, J. M. Widmann, and G. C. Adam, “Increasing
(Salem, Mass.), vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 877–907, 2011, doi: 10.1002/sce.20441.[3] S. Y. Yoon, M. Dyehouse, A. M. Lucietto, H. A. Diefes-Dux, and B. M. Capobianco, "The Effects of Integrated Science, Technology, and Engineering Education on Elementary Students' Knowledge and Identity Development: Effects of Integrated STEM Education on Students," School science and mathematics, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 380–391, 2014, doi: 10.1111/ssm.12090.[4] O. Pierrakos, T. K. Beam, J. Constantz, A. Johri, and R. Anderson, "On the development of a professional identity: Engineering persisters vs engineering switchers," in 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2009, pp. 1–6.[5] B. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, "Why They Leave
modules were assigned throughout the semester, all aimed at achievingthe learning objectives of the course, while providing an inclusive and supportive learningenvironment. The projects allowed student teams to work remotely, both in synchronous classbreakout sessions, in Friday studio support, and in asynchronous formats. The first two projectswere designed to get the students comfortable working in teams and playing with the engineeringdesign steps. The final three projects were more intense, with specific deliverables and gradingrubrics. 1. Design a ping pong ball launcher using household materials: a. Purpose: To introduce students to the engineering design process in a low-stakes and fun environment. b
% 38% 40% 30% 20% Section 1 Section 2 Section 3Figure 1. (a) Students’ self-efficacy results of the top skill selected by students and (b)percentage of students not selected written and oral communication in their top three skills.MethodologyThis study used the rubric scores of lab reports as the direct assessment and a questionnairesurvey at the end of the semester as an indirect assessment to evaluate the effectiveness of theone-page letter report on the improvement of students’ technical writing and ABET studentoutcome 6. Table 1 shows
used basic mechanical elements as well as complexprinciples of pneumatics for their automata. Some of the very early automata were developed bya mathematician Hero of Alexandria. Other well-known automata developed over the historyinclude the Al-Jazari automatons of 12th and 13th century (example -automatic wine dispenser, asoap and towel dispenser, orchestra operated by force of water [24]), the digesting duck ofVaucanson in 17th century, the great Turkish chess player in 18th century, Pierre Jaques-Drozautomaton in 18th century and many more [23]. Figure 1 shows some example automata from thepast. (a) (b) Figure 1 Sketches of example automaton from the past (a) Hero's wash basin automata
MRME A detectable MRME for Woman+ students with Woman+ instructors occurred for sevenof the items on the survey, including one describing instructional practices, three for thehelpfulness of instructional practices, two for the perceived equity of instruction, and STEMmajor (Table 2). That is, the gender MRME was found to significantly contribute to the model ofresponse outcomes for these seven items. B SE Wald z OR [95%CI] Instructional practices PIPS_ShareIdeas 0.15 0.07 2.16* 1.16 [1.01, 1.33] Helpfulness of instructional practices Helpful_Feedback 0.19 0.09
students are participating and completing theassignments, they do well in the course. For the Fall 2020 semester, 26 students were enrolled inthe course; of those 26 students, one student received a B for their overall course grade, onestudent received a B+, and one student requested and received a grade deferral (they were unableto complete the course requirements for personal reasons). The remaining 23 grades were A’s(92% of the course enrollment).The course instructors are hesitant to conclude that the high grades for the fall 2020 semester aredue solely to the new flexible course format. Students have indicated that the high grades mayalso be contributed, at least in part, to boredom. Many activities have been cancelled due to thepandemic, and
learning and field trip experiences through engineering design Danielle B. Harlow1, Ron K. Skinner1,2, Alexandria Muller11 Department of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-94902 MOXI, The Wolf Museum of Exploration + Innovation, Santa Barbara, CA, 93101AbstractInteractive science centers are in a unique position to provide opportunities for engineeringeducation through K-12 field trip programs. However, field trip programs are often disconnectedfrom students’ classroom learning, and many K-12 teachers lack the engineering educationbackground to make that connection. Engineering Explorations is a 3-year project funded by theNational Science Foundation (NSF) program Research in the
/japp.12103.[17] B. Engelland, Force for Good: The Catholic guide to business integrity. Manchester, NH: Sophia Institute Press, 2017.[18] J. Trevelyan, “Understandings of value in engineering practice,” in Proceedings of the 42nd Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2012, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2012.6462258.[19] J. Trevelyan, The Making of an Expert Engineer. CRC Press, 2014.[20] M. Mulder, Competence-based vocational and professional education. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2016.[21] J. Koehler et al., “What can we learn from character education? A literature review of four prominent virtues in engineering education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2020-June, 2020, doi
ofCivil Engineering Education, vol. 146, no. 4, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000021[10] B. A. Burt, D. D. Carpenter, M. A. Holsapple, C. J. Finelli, R. M. Bielby, J. A. Sutkus, andT. S. Harding, “Out-of-classroom experiences: Bridging the disconnect between the classroom,the engineering workforce, and ethical development,” International Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 714-725, 2013.[11] M. C. Loui, “Ethics and the development of professional identities of engineering students,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005.[12] G. Rulifson, and A. R. Bielefeldt, “Influence of internships on engineering students’attitudes about socially responsible engineering,” Proceedings of the 2018
impact their future educational and career plans substantially [19, 20]. Thus, educatorsmust increase the frequency of opportunities and depth of experiences for elementary agestudents to develop their engineering identities.MethodsThe research questions for this study were the following: 1) What are the impacts of teaching the engineering design process online via zoom conference on development of children’s ability to use engineering discourse? a. Are students able to master the steps of the engineering design process? b. How do students learn to receive and implement feedback from their peers and the teacher over zoom? How is teamwork affected as compared to in-person experiences? 2) If and
inner workings of our program, itwould offer some insights on starting and sustaining a teaching and leadership developmentprogram for engineering graduate students. A list of topics from the Spring 2021 semesteris shown in Appendix B. Interested educators are welcome to contact the course instructors(Blake Johnson, Yuting Chen, and Mattox Beckman) for more details. References [1] E. Aqua and A. W. Winston, “Engineering leadership through tradition and innova- tion,” in Proceedings of ELECTRO ’94, Boston, Massachusetts, 1994, pp. 953–963. [2] J. C. Bean and A. G. Ulsoy, “Creating a complete environment for excellence in manufacturing education,” in International Conference on Education in Manufacturing
ourpositionalities may have shaped the form and content of our interviews, both in the topics wechose to focus on and the way the participants responded to us as interviewers. Please refer toour positionality statements at the end of the paper if you would like more information on theperspectives we are operating from as researcher. All students were assigned a pseudonym topreserve anonymity. Details about demographics and social identities of the interviewrespondents are included in Appendix B. Interviews were coded in NVivo using a pre-determined coding scheme organized around Yosso’s CCW framework. After preliminarydeductive analyses were completed, we re-visited the data with an inductive approach thatallowed for exploration of emergent themes regarding
Conference Content Access, Virtual Online, June 2020. doi:10.18260/1-2--34678[12] S. Condoor and M. McQuilling, “Incorporating An Entrepreneurial Mindset In Freshman Engineering Students” in 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas, June 2009. doi:10.18260/1-2--5566[13] M.L. Loughry, M.W. Ohland, & D.D. Moore, “Development of a Theory-Based Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 505-524, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406292085[14] E.A. Stephan, D.R. Bowman, W.J. Park, B. L. Sill, and M.W. Ohland, Thinking Like an Engineer: An Active Learning Approach, 4th edition, New York, NY: Pearson, 2018.[15] J. Weaver and N. Rayess, “Developing
the reports. For example, this was a statement in oneof the discussions of hardness testing of metals: “The original hypothesis stated that if theAluminum 2024-T351 specimens were harder than the Steel C 1010 specimens, then the moreforce would be needed to indent the aluminum specimens.” The issue with this statement is thatin the Rockwell Hardness B scale test performed in the lab, the magnitude of the force isconsistent for all the specimens, and the hardness is correlated with the level of indentation.3.2.Technical ContentThe themes in the Technical Content domain are those that are concerned with correctapplication of the technical standards and theory. Students’ writing revealed the two themes of“Accurate and precise explanation of
inclusive leadership development.ReferencesAvolio, B. J., & Vogelgesang, G. R. (2021). Beginnings matter in genuine leadership development. In Early Development and leadership: Building the next generation of leaders (pp. 179–204). New York, NY: Routledge.Bell, M. (2006). Managing diversity in organizations. Mason, OH: Thomsen South-Western.Bendick, M. (2008). Measure inclusion, not diversity! In SHRM Diversity Conference. Atlanta, GA: Society for Human Resource Management.Bright, D. S., Cortes, A. H., Hartmann, E., Parboteeah, K. P., Pierce, J. L., Reece, M., & Gardner, D. G. (2019). Principles of management. OpenStax.Carmeli, A., Reiter-palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in
both social and educational Use undergraduate students as leaders / organizers to foster engagement with near peersReferences[1] A. Evanoski-Cole, K. Catton, and B. Vermeulen, “Confidence of Undecided First-YearEngineering Students in Choosing Their Major and Implications for Retention,” 2017 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, June 2017.[2] R. A. Hensel, J. Dygert, and M. L. Morris, “Understanding Student Retention inEngineering,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 2020.[3] A. Osta, J. Kadlowec, A. Papernik, and A. Ferreira Dias-Liebold,“ Work in Progress:Studying the Factors Affecting Women Recruitment and Retention in Engineering,” 2020 ASEEVirtual Annual Conference, June 2020.[4] S. Chopra, G. R. Bertoline, and C. M. Laux