. Nuske, G. Azad, C. Benjamin Wolk, B.B. Maddox, ... andR. S. Beidas, R. S., “Community–academic partnerships in implementation research,” J.Community Psychol., vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 941-952, 2018.[3] K.G. Provan, M.A. Veazie, L. K. Staten, and N. I. Teufel‐Shone, “The use of networkanalysis to strengthen community partnerships,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 603-613,2005.[4] T. L. Fletcher, J. P. Jefferson, B. N. Boyd, and K.J. Cross, “Missed opportunity for diversityin engineering: Black women and undergraduate engineering degree attainment,” J. Coll. Stud.Ret., doi:10.1177/1521025120986918, 2021.[5] J. Burrelli and A. Rapoport, “Role of HBCUs as Baccalaureate-origin Institution of BlackS&E doctorate recipients,” Infobrief. National
in Education Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-7.[17] Jamali, M.A.J., Bahrami, B., Heidari, A., Allahverdizadeh, P. & Norouzi, F., 2020, “IoT Architecture”, Towards the Internet of Things, pp. 9-31.[18] Lynn, T., Endo, P.T., Ribeiro, A.M.N., Barbosa, G.B. & Rosati, P., 2020, “The internet of things: definitions, key concepts, and reference architectures”, The Cloud-to-Thing Continuum, p.1.[19] Krčo, S., Pokrić, B. & Carrez, F., 2014, “Designing IoT architecture (s): A European perspective”, 2014 IEEE world forum on internet of things (WF-IoT), pp. 79-84.[20] Hakiri, A., Berthou, P., Gokhale, A. & Abdellatif, S., “Publish/subscribe-enabled software defined networking for efficient and scalable IoT
., Washington DC, USA: The National Academies Press, 2002.[5] M. Stains et al., “Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6383, pp. 1468-1470, Mar., 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aap8892.[6] S. E. Brownell and K. D. Tanner, “Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and... tensions with professional identity?,” CBE: Life Sciences Education, vol. 11, pp. 339–346, 2012, doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163.[7] S. E. Shadle, A. Marker, and B. Earl, “Faculty drivers and barriers: Laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1-13, April, 2017, doi
. Reppen, Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use, Cambridge University Press, 1998.[4] B. Furman and W. Robinson, "Improving Engineering Report Writing with Calibrated Peer Review," in The 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, 2003.[5] D. Biber, Variation Across Speech and Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.[6] A. Nini, Multidimensional Analysis Tagger v1.3, 2015.[7] D. Biber, "A typology of English texts," Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3-43, 1989.[8] M. A. K. Halliday, "The Grammatical Construction of Scientific Knowledge: The Framing of the English Clause," in Incommensurability and Translation: Kuhnian Perspectives on Scientific Communication and Theory Change
2001 and 2010. Review of Educational Research. 84 (4):609–639.[32] Abraham, N., & Telang, N. K. (2019, June). Effectiveness of the Supplemental InstructionProgram in First-Year Engineering Courses-A Longitudinal Report (2015-2018). In 2019 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition.[33] The Independent Samples t-test (Student Test). (2020, August 17). Retrieved April 16, 2021,from https://stats.libretexts.org/@go/page/4023[34] Riegle-Crumb, C., Kyte, S. B., & Morton, K. (2018). Gender and racial/ethnic differences ineducational outcomes: Examining patterns, explanations, and new directions for research.Handbook of the sociology of education in the 21st century, 131-152.Riegle-Crumb, C., Kyte, S.B., & Morton, K. (2018). Gender and
. “Inservice Teachers' Perceptions of a Professional Development Plan Basedon SAMR Model: A Case Study,” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET,vol. 18 ED-3, pp. 46-53, 2019.[3] A. Kolb and D. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning anddevelopment. Cleveland, OH. Experience Based Learning Systems Press, 2014.[4] J. Lave, and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1991.[5] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 93 ED-3, pp. 223-231, 2004.[6] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, “Chapter 4: Fundamentals of qualitative dataanalysis” in Qualitative Data Analysis, Ed
-33.7. Conger, D., M.C. Long, and R. McGhee Jr. Advanced Placement and Initial College Enrollment: Evidence from an Experiment. in Proceedings of the Association for Education, Finance, and Policy 2020 Conference. 2020.8. Dodd, B.G., et al., An Investigation of the Validity of AP® Grades of 3 and a Comparison of AP and Non-AP Student Groups. Research Report No. 2002-9. College Board, 2002.9. Morgan, R. and B. Maneckshana, AP students in college: An investigation of their course-taking patterns and college majors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 2000.10. Mattern, K.D., J.P. Marini, and E.J. Shaw, Are AP® Students More Likely to Graduate from College on Time? Research Report 2013-5. College Board
. Chesler, “Gender-informed mentoring strategies for women engineeringscholars: On establishing a caring community”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 1,pp. 49-62, 2002.[15] M. Franchetti, “An analysis of retention programs for female students in engineering at theUniversity of Toledo”, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, vol 2., no.1, pp.21-27, 2012, doi: 10.5703/1288284314652.[16] P.R. Hernandez, B. Bloodhart, R.T. Barnes, A.S. Adams, S.M. Clinton, I. Pollack, et al.,“Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoringprogram for female undergraduate students”, PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 11, November 2017, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187531[17] T. Dennehy and N. Dasgupta
on a Conventional Bike, ASEE Conference Proceeding 20187. Cristian Stransky, Damien Dumayas, Tianyi Dai, Paponvich Chattrapronvichian, Hari Kumarakuru, and Bala Maheswaran, Innovative Energy Elevator: A Physics and Engineering Wonder!, ASEE Conference Proceeding 20188. R. Harris and B. Maheswaran, A partnership of non-traditional access into engineering via nuprime and the ujima scholars program, ASEE Conference Proceeding, AC 2010-1907.9. R. Reisberg, A. Funai and B. Maheswaran, Supplemental freshman physics/chemistry programs to support women in engineering, ASEE Conference Proceeding, AC 2009 -1851.10. R. Harris and B. Maheswaran, Summer Bridge: a step into the engineering gap, ASEE Conference
Research Society.Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press.creative/design/papers/32AtmanDTRS6.pdfCrewe, E. (1997). The silent traditions of developing cooks. Discourses of Development. Anthropological Perspectives. Oxford and New York: Berg.D'Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data Feminism. MIT Press.Daitch., P. B. (1970). Engineering and Social Values, Engineering Education. 61(2) 125–26.Dorst, K. (2004). On the problem of design problems-problem solving and design expertise. Journal of design research, 4(2), 185-196.Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of
the structure of the Survey Of Attitudes toward Statistics (Sats-36) by Swedish students,” Stat. Educ. Res. J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 83–93, 2019.[18] T. R. Rhoads and N. F. Hubele, “Student attitudes toward statistics before and after a computer-integrated introductory statistics course,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 182–187, 2000, doi: 10.1109/13.848071.[19] P. B. Elmore, E. L. Lewis, and M. L. G. Bay, “Statistics Achievement: A Function of Attitudes and Related Experiences,” in Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1993.[20] K. S. Shultz and H. Koshino, “Evidence of reliability and validity for wise’s attitude toward statistics scale,” Psychol. Rep., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 27–31
/.[Accessed October 5, 2020].[3] B. Means and J. Neisler, “Suddenly online: A national survey of undergraduates during theCOVID-19 pandemic,” Langer Research Associates, 2020. Available:https://digitalpromise.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ELE_CoBrand_DP_FINAL_3.pdf.[Accessed March 7, 2021].[4] A. Kurtz, “The US economy lost 140,000 jobs in December. All of them were held bywomen,” CNN.com, January 9, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/08/economy/women-job-losses-pandemic/index.html. [AccessedFebruary 2, 2021].[5] D. Boesch and S. Phadke. “When women lose all the jobs: Essential actions for a gender-equitable recover,” Center for American Progress, February 1, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/women
in hand. In Problems of Education in the 21st Century, page 54. . [4] A.C. Burrows. Partnerships: A systemic study of two professional developments with university faculty and k-12 teachers of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 65(1):28–38, . [5] A.C. Burrows, M. DiPompeo, A. Myers, R. Hickox, M. Borowczak, D. French, and A. Schwortz. Authentic science experiences: Pre-collegiate science teachers’ successes and challenges during professional development. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 70:59–73, . [6] A. Burrows, M. Lockwood, M. Borowczak, E. Janak, and B. Barber. Integrated stem: Focus on informal education and community collaboration through
. [Accessed Jun. 16, 2020].[5] C. Hodges, S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust, and A. Bond, "The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teachingand Online Learning". Mar. 2020. [Online]. Available: EDUCAUSE Review, https://er.educause.edu. [AccessedJun. 5, 2020].[6] A.D. Dumford and A. L. Miller, "Online Learning in Higher Education: Exploring Advantages andDisadvantages for Engagement." Journal of Computing in Higher Education : Research & Integration ofInstructional Technology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 452–465. Apr. 2018. [Online]. Available: WorldCat Discovery,https://boisestate.on.worldcat.org. [Accessed Jun. 15, 2020].[7] D. Lederman. "What Do We Know About This Spring's Remote Learning?" Inside Higher Ed. Jun. 2020.[Online]. Available: Inside Higher Ed
their robots (b) One student programming her robots Figure 1: Demonstration of the robotics activities in Fayette County in early 2020.Since March 2020, the VEX simulator over vr.vex.com has been the main platform for theparticipating middle school students to program robots virtually. At each participating middleschool, one teacher serves as the coordinator of the COVERAGE project, and he/she has a realVEX IQ robot. When a middle school student verifies her codes over the vr.vex.com platform,she could ask the teacher to test her codes using the real robot. In Fall 2020 and Spring 2021,online instructions were offered every week via Microsoft Teams, intending to guide theparticipating middle school students to program
the project teams was 3.94 in year one and 3.84 in year two.To better understand how the student perceptions of team comfort and creativity changedbetween the two years, the Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient was calculated.The calculation was based on a correlation matrix for the question about creativity. Thecorrelation coefficient represents how closely correlated one variable is to another on a scalefrom 1 to -1. The results are shown in Figure 3. The creativity was more strongly correlatedwith the team and comfort level in the 2017 experiment, after the instructor led discussion. (a) First implementation (2016) of third- (b) Second implementation (2017) of year intervention
Paper ID #33359Examining In-Person and Asynchronous Information-Seeking BehaviorInstruction Among First-Year Engineering StudentsDr. George James Lamont, University of Waterloo George Lamont is a member of the Department of English Language and Literature at the University of Waterloo. George is one of many instructors who teach first-year communications courses to engineers and sciences, in addition to courses in writing and rhetoric.Ms. Stephanie Mutch, University of Waterloo Stephanie Mutch works in Information Services and Resources at the University of Waterloo Library. Stephanie holds an MA in Criminology and
Taxonomy to Support Data Visualization Capacity Skills,” In E- Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 1039- 1053, Nov. 2019.3) B. Fry, Visualizing data: Exploring and explaining data with the processing environment. " O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2008.4) M. Hu, S. Cleland, and S. Burt, “Build up a Constructivist Learning Environment for Teaching First-year Students Data Flow Diagrams,” In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE, 2019.5) D. Jonassen, “Designing constructivist learning environments”, Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, vol. 2
Paper ID #32371Engineering Students’ Experiences of Socially-mediated Exclusion andInclusion: Role of Actors and DiscoursesMs. Minha R. Ha, York University Minha is a PhD Candidate in Mechanical Engineering, whose qualitative research focuses on the socio- technical knowledge integration in engineering design practice. As an interdisciplinary researcher with formal training in Molecular Biology and Education Research, she integrates grounded theory and Critical Discourse Analysis methods in order to study the transdisciplinary aspects of responsible design. Inquiry learning and knowledge co-creation are at the heart of
: Programs,best practices, and recommendations.”, Journal of Engineering Education, 100.1 (2011): 89-122.[8]. S. Rojstaczer, and C. Healy, “Grading in American colleges and universities”, TeachersCollege Record 4 (2010): 1-6.[9]. J. Schinske, and K. Tanner, “Teaching more by grading less (or differently)”, CBE - LifeSciences Education 13.2 (2014): 159-166.[10]. B. N. Geisinger, and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition fromengineering majors”, International Journal of Engineering Education, 29.4 (2013): 914.[11]. T. Kotzé and P. D. Plessis, “Students as ‘co‐producers’ of education: a proposed model ofstudent socialisation and participation at tertiary institutions,” Quality Assurance in Education,vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 186–201
thinking and systems thinking. 3. Cybersecurity topics from each of the following areas: a) Data Security: protection of data at rest, during processing, and in transit. b) Software Security: development and use of software that reliably preserves the security properties of the protected information and systems. c) Component Security: the security aspects of the design, procurement, testing, analysis, and main- tenance of components integrated into larger systems. d) Connection Security: security of the connections between components, both physical and logical. e) System Security: security aspects of systems that use software and are composed of components and connections. f) Human Security: the study of
Paper ID #34313Work in Progress: Using Cost-effective Educational Robotics Kits inEngineering EducationMs. Caroline Grace Sawatzki, Saginaw Valley State University Caroline Sawatzki is a senior in the Electrical & Computer Engineering program at Saginaw Valley State University (SVSU), and has adopted a double minor in Mathematics and Japanese. Caroline expresses her love for helping her peers succeed academically through her employment at the SVSU Writing Center, where she assists students in the development of their professional and research writing skills. During her undergraduate education, Caroline has visited
twofold: a) to communicate the process of building an effectiveassessment program for ABET accreditation from the ground up; and b) to share best practiceswith others who offer degree programs in Engineering Technology or similar degrees.IntroductionHigher education institutions value accreditation and strive to acquire the accreditation status notonly to offer quality education and services to students but also to build confidence among thepublic in the value of the program the institutions have to offer. Accrediting bodies highlight theneed for program assessment, evaluation and continuous improvement as a quality assuranceprocess to help maintain the rigor and relevance of the program to the professions it serves.Accreditation status
Computational Thinking course for non-majors. An initialquantitative evaluation of the visualizations raised questions about their long-term effectivenessand ease of use. This study represents a qualitative study done to gain deeper insight into theexperiences of students. The results of this study demonstrated students were engaging withcourse materials in unexpected ways but frequently referred back to the visualizations.Additionally, students had an approach to understanding the visualizations that was both helpfuland problematic. These findings help to inform visualization and curriculum designers aboutstudent attitudes and strategies in using course materials.1 IntroductionDue to the abstract nature of Computer Science it is not uncommon for
Paper ID #32960Shrinking the Construction SiteDr. Nicholas Tymvios, Bucknell University Nicholas Tymvios received a B.S. and M.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Purdue University in 1999, and 2002 respectively. After working for four years in Cyprus in the construction industry, he was ac- cepted into the Ph.D. program at Oregon State University, where he graduated in 2013 with a degree in Civil Engineering with emphasis in Construction Engineering and Management. His area of concentra- tion is construction safety, and in particular Prevention through Design. Upon graduation, he worked for four years as an Assistant
peer leaders to promotein-class discussion, engage students in problem solving, and provide pre-class worksheets and weeklyquizzes to scaffold learning.Summary and ConclusionsFaculty interviews, surveys, and progress reports in conjunction with student course surveys indicateimportant changes in instructional practices including: (a) Increased use of peer-to-peer learning; (b)Reorganization of large science lectures into smaller, more student-centered sections that favor pre-classworksheets, weekly quizzes, and group problem solving; (c) Decrease in faculty-led lectures toaccommodate student led problem solving and reporting out of their solutions in class. In this context, peerleaders have been a notable strategy found successful during the
Intervention that Increases Underserved College Students' Success," AAC&U Peer Review, vol. Winter/Spring 2016, pp. 31-36, 2016.[11] V. Sathy and K. A. Hogan, "Want to Reach All of Your Students? Here’s How to Make Your Teaching More Inclusive," The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2019.[12] S. Freeman et al., "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, 2014.[13] C. Hoessler, "Identifying and Leveraging Forces that Hinder and Support Change in Teaching and Learning," in International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Atlanta, GA, Oct 9-12, 2019 2019.[14] B. L
issues in aviation. Routledge, 2018.[34] B. Gagliardo, “Against the Wind: A Study on Aviation as a Female Career Choice,” Ed.D. disseration, Dept. of Org. Leadership, Brandman University, Irvine, CA, 2020.[35] R. K. Lutte, and C. Huang, “Aviation outreach,” in Engaging the Next Generation of Aviation Professionals, S. K. Kearns, T. J. Mavin, S. Hodge, Eds. Routledge, 2019.[36] S.A. Hewlett, M. Marshall, and L. Sherbin, “How Diversity Can Drive Innovation” in Harvard Business Review, vol. 91, no. 12, p. 30, 2013.[37] R.I. Lerman, “Why Firms Do and Don’t Offer Apprenticeships” in Vocational Education and Training in Times of Economic Crisis, M. Pilz, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2017, pp.305-320.[38] U.S
4. create and quantify a design. Module Topics Sample Learning Goals & Activities Week 3: Design • Understand how to relate mechanism to function. Challenge Part B: • Understand how different mechanisms can accomplish the same Ideation, Biological function (practice SFM thinking). Analogies, and Low- • Identify Biological Analogies/Create Design* Fidelity Prototypes o Effectively search the biological literature using functions (and synonyms/antonyms) and environments to find multiple examples. o Express biological systems using SFM language that
, 2010.[12] E. Godfrey, A. Johri, and B. Olds, "Understanding disciplinary cultures: The first step to cultural change," Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, pp. 437- 455, 2014.[13] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, "Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students," Engineering Studies, vol. 3, pp. 1-24, 2011.[14] M. Tremblay, T. Wils, and C. Proulx, "Determinants of career path preferences among Canadian engineers," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 19, pp. 1-23, 2002.[15] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, "Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis," Journal of