Multimedia Software: The Impact of Interactivity on Learning. Page 11.605.15 Stanford, CA: Stanford University.16 Di Vesta, F. & Smith, D. (1979). The Pausing Principle: Increasing the Efficiency of Memory for Ongoing Events. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Vol. 4, 288-296.17 Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Alexandria VA: Merrill.18 Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement vs. Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, Vol. 66, 64-74.19 Redish, E., Saul, J. & Steinberg, R. (1997). On the
2006-1933: RE-ENGAGING ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN HANDS-ONEDUCATIONDon Millard, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteJason Coutermarsh, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteKenneth Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Page 11.1062.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Re-Engaging Engineering Students in Hands-On EducationAbstractThis paper presents the technologies and implementation activities that are underdevelopment to re-engage students in “hands-on”, in and out of class exploration,experimentation and design to aid students’ understanding of the “big ideas” in electricalengineering. It describes (while the presentation will demonstrate) the Mobile Laboratoryhardware
2006-2580: ENGAGING ECE STUDENTS IN THE PRACTICE OF ENGINEERINGBruce Ferguson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bruce A. Ferguson received the B.S., M.S., and the Ph. D. degree in electrical engineering from Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana in 1987, 1988, and 1992 respectively. He is currently an associate professor in the ECE department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in Terre Haute, IN. His technical interests include communication systems and fiber optic systems, including his specialty of analog fiber optic links. He has previously worked with space and ground communication systems and photonics at TRW Space and Electronics (now NGST), and taught at The
industry to access universityresources—personnel and facilities. Engagement is the title typically used to describe thisrelationship between industry and academia. The engagement process at Western Carolina hasbeen successful in coupling graduate students with industry projects, and now it is being used toprovide undergraduate students with that same exposure. One of the benefits of thisundergraduate involvement is that there is now a conduit in place to generate additional interestin the graduate program, as well as a means for student and faculty to interact in an industrialproject setting. The next step in this progression is to couple graduate students withundergraduate students, as they embark on challenging projects that will benefit
Associate Editor of the "Journal of Curriculum and Supervision" (the scholarly journal of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development). Her research interests are in curriculum studies. Page 11.544.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Engaging Undergraduate Students in Machine Learning Research: Progress, Experiences and Achievements of Project EMD-MLR AbstractProject EMD-MLR is a National Science Foundation funded, on-going effort that aims atengaging undergraduate engineering and computer science students into research on MachineLearning
10graduate students), 32 teachers, 7 university faculty members, and the Fellow facultyadvisors, a technology web designer, a Grant Coordinator, an Evaluation Fellow andan Oversight Committee. The grant is currently in its fourth year, with 8 graduateFellows, and similar staffing, and has approved funding for continuation of anadditional five years. This paper discusses the impact of Project STEP on theFellows, teachers, and students in its first three-and-a-half years.The teachers and Fellows have worked in teams to design, develop, and implementhands-on activities and technology-driven inquiry-based projects, which relate to thestudents' community issues, as vehicles to authentically teach STEM skills. Activitieshave been incorporated into lessons
Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Measuring Engineering Classroom Community: Learning and Connectedness of StudentsAbstractThe Collaborative Learner-constructed Engineering-concept Articulation and Representation(CLEAR) model was used to explore how the introduction of visually represented materials andthe use of blended instruction (i.e., online class sessions, group concept visualization projects,threaded discussions, etc.) impact the sense of community students experience with their peers inthe classroom in comparison to a more traditionally taught class. Results reveal thatimplementation of some of these concepts can result in better retention in a sophomore levelchemical engineering course, with
theapplication of mathematics. At California State University we have experienced, recently, anegative shift of mathematical interest and therefore a lack of progress in theunderstanding of basic concepts that require a strong mathematical background. Thisproblem stems from the lack of mathematical skills and studying habits. One way to solvethis problem is to engage our students into the application of mathematics with simple, yet,powerful problems. An assessment of such engagement occurs every week with a quiz thatspans the material covered during the previous week and tests some of the mathematicaland engineering skills. This paper attempts to show the results of such assessment and theoutcome of a class in which such approach was tasted. During this
2006-878: RECRUITING STUDENTS WITH A NEW IMAGE OFMANUFACTURINGGilah Pomeranz, Sinclair Community CollegeMonica Pfarr, Sinclair Community CollegeSean Falkowski, University of Dayton Page 11.1069.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006Recruiting Students with a New Image of ManufacturingWhether it is in spite of or because of an apparently improving American economy, theUS is facing a national shortage of highly skilled employees for today’s advanced, highlytechnological manufacturing industry. The already existing shortage is growing rapidly,and both government agencies and industry are consistent in this single message: Findand educate new workers and upgrade the skills of
as a function of project alternative (week 6). In thelast two thirds of the semester, they work as teams on the project. They choose and refine thebest individual assignments of the group members for inclusion in the group report. They alsoqualify or quantify the baseline and impacted social, economic, and environmental attributes as afunction of project alternative, identify data and modeling tools required to evaluate the impact,and discuss the effectiveness of mitigation.Course Assessment ToolsShort term assessments are used to evaluate whether individual course objectives were met, andwhether the primary goals of the new course were met: engage all CE students regardless of theirspecialization, and create an interdisciplinary forum to
areperceived as being more relevant and having a more immediate impact upon their academicperformance than stand-alone courses or tutorial programs outside the COE. One goal ofCxC is to facilitate more on-site tutoring from other programs so that their assistance willalso be perceived as more relevant to engineering students.An Early Assessment of Results:With only one semester of implementation, assessment of program results is limited toobservations, including feedback from faculty and students. Quite often, the facultymembers’ responses are an acknowledgement of the value of integrating communication intothe engineering curriculum, but they are then tempered by the limits on classroom time inany designated course and the perceived additional
interest is in professional development for K-8 teachers in engineering education. Erin works at Tufts Center for Engineering Educational Outreach (CEEO), managing their industry outreach program. Page 11.718.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Impacts of Industry Employee Volunteering in K-12 ClassroomsAbstractEngineering education has the potential to improve K-12 students’ problem-solving and criticalthinking skills while motivating them to learn science and math. However, for teachers toeffectively implement hands-on engineering activities in the classroom, they may need additionaladult
2006-1629: USING DIVERSITY STATEMENTS TO PROMOTE ENGAGEMENTWITH DIVERSITY AND TEACHINGJennifer Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an assistant professor in the Department of Technical Communication at the University of Washington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests include engineering education, learner-centered design, user-centered design, and audience analysis. Dr. Turns is currently working on multiple NSF grants dealing with engineering education including an NSF Career award exploring the impact of portfolio construction on engineering students’ professional identity. Email: jturns
community, and to introduce them to keymentors among their more senior student colleagues.It is this expectation of their management team that they actively engage with their newcommunity that gives them the authority to rapidly acquire all levels of knowledge about theiracademic and town communities. It provides the method by which a student with a specificproblem has immediate access to multiple levels of knowledge pools, and the authority to tap Page 11.367.5into them without developing personal relationships with people in those knowledge pools.Impact of Cohort Methodology on minority studentsMinority students considering graduate schools in
interdisciplinary engineering courseas a team training exercise. Communication patterns of the student teams are selected that modeleffective and ineffective behaviors. Positive and negative excerpts from actual studentinteractions are discussed as instructional vehicles for student training on teamwork skills and forguiding student understanding of simulation game dynamics.1.0 Introduction The ability to successfully work in teams is a crucial ingredient for success in theworkplace1. Researchers also report that team success in an academic setting is determined moreby the group’s ability to identify and overcome communication problems, than to handletechnical ones 2. Unfortunately, while universities know their students must understand
surrounding buildingsaffect the signal shape, phases, and amplitudes. He/she can choose between one or two pulse signals,vary signal frequency, pulse duration and delay between pulses. The simulations B and D help thestudent understand the Huggens-Fresnel principle, and the impact of various parameters on thestructure of Fresnel’s zones, as well as what sources of secondary waves should be taken into account Page 11.801.7during the calculations.A virtual experiment can provide an opportunity to separate the particular impacts of each ofseveral parameters that affect the outcomes of measurements. Using simulations the student isable to isolate and
2006-1496: THE LASER CULT: HANDS-ON LABORATORY IN PHOTONICSAlan Cheville, Oklahoma State University Alan Cheville is an associate professor of electrical engineering at Oklahoma State University. Starting out along the traditional tenure path as a researcher in THz ultrafast opto-electronic devices, his interests are shifting to the larger problem of engineering education. Dr. Cheville is currently engaged in several curriculum reform efforts based on making engineering more relevant to students and emphasizing student development to an equal degree as content. Page 11.1308.1© American Society for
for Fall 2005. One of the significant changes was a partnershipwith an interdisciplinary bioengineering research facility on campus, Bindley Bioscience Page 11.716.3Center within Discovery Park at Purdue University. This partnership provided thestudents with hands-on experience on bioengineering research instrumentation andexposed them to a research environment as opposed to a traditional teaching lab. Inaddition, the partnership increased the impact of the research by engaging undergraduatestudents. A grant obtained from Purdue University and Li-Cor Biosciences from theGenomics Education Matching Fund program, provided a DNA sequencing instrument
questions • Learners evaluate their explanations in light of alternative explanations, particularly reflecting scientific understanding • Learners communicate and justify their proposed explanations. Research also suggests that the quality of the teaching workforce is the single mostimportant factor in predicting student achievement.15 Robert Marzano has conducted anextensive review of the research studies involving factors that impact student achievement andconducted meta-analyses of those studies to determine the effect size of the factors on studentachievement16. He describes three types of factors that impact student achievement: school-level factors, student-level factors and teacher-level factors. What factors can SWEPT/RETs
fundamental to the quality of any curriculum. Current empirically-based education theory is essential to effective instruction and thus to the improvement of curricular quality. 4. A rational sequence. Educational activities should be carefully ordered in a developmental sequence to form a coherent curriculum based on the stated, intended outcomes of both the curriculum and its constituent courses.With these principles in mind, we describe the process by which a curricular framework for theMcBride Public Affairs minor for engineering students has been developed. As shown in Table1, this framework is the outcome of more than a year of activities involving all relevantconstituencies within the McBride community, including current
Table 5: The Influence of Usage Context on Product Attributes Usage Context Product Attribute Distance Community Teaching Research PreferencesUsage Factor Learning College College University Impacted Media, amount of interaction duringClass Size ~20 10-20 10-20 30-50+ the activity between the students and the
spirit, create a sense of community and cooperation, andpositively impact the way that students see their career opportunities. Living and learning withother aspiring and practicing student entrepreneurs, enjoying ready access to mentoring andcoaching from experienced advisors and instructors, and gaining the skills to actually startcompanies combine to foster a rich entrepreneurial experience.Affiliate ClassroomAnik Singal is the founder and president of Affiliate Classroom, Inc., a leader in the affiliatetraining industry specializing in training entrepreneurs on increasing their online revenuesthrough affiliate marketing. The Company is focusing on bringing together reputable internetmerchants and webmasters who can successfully promote their
education and a culture of entrepreneurship within engineeringeducation and university involvement in technology commercialization both lead to moreopportunities for doctoral students in engineering to be entrepreneurial during their studies. Thispaper explores the experience of two doctoral engineering students who co-founded a companybased, in part, on their research. The case for entrepreneurship within engineering education andthe trends in university technology commercialization have been developed in the literature andprovide the perspective for examining the experiences of these two students. University assets,community connections, an NCIIA E-team grant, courses and competitions were all connected insupport of entrepreneurship education and
intro to engineering to engage morestudents in the program. Bunker Hill Community College is establishing a newdegree program for Engineering Science. As part of this, they are designing anew introduction to engineering course that is hands on and engaging.Quinsigamond Community College has an established engineering program, buthas begun re-evaluating their program structure and embarking on a majorinitiative to open a state of the art technology center serving central Page 11.1002.3Massachusetts. 2 Developing programs at the high school level that will lead students to
. Page 11.1404.2 As with any other academic program, program evaluation is an essential component forprogram success and continuation. Commonly used evaluation measures: retention, grades, andengagement where used, however, the impacts of this LLC were more complex than thesequantitative tests could measure. Combining both quantitative and qualitative measures providedopportunities for not only triangulating the results but also providing supporting evidence andpossible explanations for the retention, grades, and engagement results. The qualitative datacollected also provides additional insight into whether the program was received by the studentsas it was intended.Limitations Students in the Teniwe LLC self-selected into the program
completed and doublecheck for ergonomics. Figure 4: Welding and Ergonomics TestingMetricsOf the 216 women currently enrolled in Mechanical and/or Aerospace Engineering,roughly 18 are participating in one of the two groups; 16 in the all-women group, figure2, and two in the co-ed group, not shown. Last year only one female engineering studentparticipated in the motorsports projects. Approximately 8.3% of the total number ofwomen engineering student are engaged in the projects and almost 90% of participantschose to work in the all-women group. An increase from 0.5% to 8.3% female Page 11.50.5engagement is a very significant result in just
student mindset, were addressed in a flexible AAS programsupplemented with graphical programming, e-portfolio student mentoring, internet assistedinstruction and look-ahead capability for upper division courses. The teaching of graphicalprogramming is conducted in LabVIEW, and data analysis is performed using Excel. The goalof e-portfolio student mentoring is to have an early focus on student mindsets. Internet assistedinstruction is used for developing self-learning skills. The use of Schaum’s engineering andtechnology series enables look-ahead capabilities for upper division courses in a cost effectiveway. Costs effectiveness is important as most students in our community college work to pay fortheir college expenses. The laboratory exercises
students electricity concepts in science classes.Design-based learning is intended to engage students in ways that enhance their abilities to solvereal-life problems and to reflect on their learning processes. This style of active learning is anextension of project-based learning, which is argued to enable students to relate problems toscience concepts.10, 15 Design-based learning differs from project based learning in that, inaddition to constructing and building, students engage in a design and planning process thatfollows engineering design.Typically, as was the case in the subject school district, electricity (and science in general) istaught using a guided/scripted inquiry approach to learning. Students are given materials andprocedural
his interest in international affairs and engagement throughout his career. He was keen to explore the additional opportunities, perspectives and experiences which Purdue University could offer him and DIT students.• Explore opportunity for joint research or other scholarly collaboration Our first exchange was an asynchronous in nature. One of the benefits of this model was that we got a joint opportunity to fully explore the research interests and background of our exchange partner. For instance, at Purdue University, Mr. McHale was given the opportunity to engage with current members of the faculty engaged in post-graduate research. He also had an opportunity to review some important undergraduate project work which is undertaken in
impacting engineering education in a scholarly way. Theprimary goal is to cultivate a diverse community of engineering education Scholars who canthink and work across engineering and education disciplines with the ultimate aim of improvingthe engineering student experience. A secondary goal is to formulate principles and models foradvancing this scholarship community. Both goals address a mission of building capacity(people and models) to advance engineering education.Transforming ISEE goals to objectives encompasses two ways of considering impact: impact onparticipating Scholars and impact of Scholars on engineering education. Impact “on”participating Scholars is defined by the following meta-level learning objectives: contribute toengineering