School. Eds: Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R..National Academy Press (Washington; 1999).3. Greenberg, J. E., Smith, N. T., and Newman, J. H. (2003) Instructional module in Fourier spectral analysis, basedon principles of ‘how people learn’. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 155-1654. Pandy, M. G., Petrosino, A.J., Austin, B. A., and Barr, R. E. (2004) Assessing adaptive expertise in undergraduatebiomechanics. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 1-125. Gunter H.E., Bonventre, J.V., D’Avila M.A., Sadeghpour S., Vijaykumar R. (2003), “Education Innovation inPhysiology” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Nashville, TN,June 22-25, 2003.6. Henrickson S.E., Gunter H.E., D’Avila M.A
math activities in high school; AP courses taken in math and science; (b) Role Models: having a sister or brother in engineering, math or science; having a female math or science teacher (role model for women); (c) Support of significant others for the student’s choice of engineering as a major and/or career. Hypothesis 1: Women who enter fields that have lower proportions of women will have stronger academic backgrounds, greater exposure to more role models, and stronger support from significant others for their choice of such a non-traditional major or career. (2) Self-confidence: (a) General academic skills; (b) Math-science academic skills; and (c) Engineering-related skills and subjects
. Few sites includedinformation on enrollment or the award of degrees in ‘manufacturing’. It is quite clear that thereis far from universal understanding as to the meaning of this designation in terms of content orextent. The next stage of the current study was the compilation and distribution of a comprehensivesurvey form. It was an attempt to collect information in some depth in five substantivecategories: [a] program identification; [b] program context and content; [c] research andindustry focus; [d] resources; [e] enrollment and degree production. This survey wasadministered through an SME web-based automated survey instrument. Announcements weresent via email to the 104 contacts who had responded to the earlier SME inquiry into
AC 2007-1535: LEARN AND SERVE – DESIGN PROJECTS FOR THECOMMUNITYMariappan Jawaharlal, California State Polytechnic University-Pomona Dr. Mariappan “Jawa” Jawaharlal is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at California State Polytechnic University (Cal Poly Pomona). Before joining Cal Poly Pomona, Dr. Jawaharlal founded and developed APlusStudent.com, Inc., an online supplemental education company focusing on K-12 math. He also served as a faculty at Rowan University, NJ and General Motors Institute (renamed as Kettering University), MI. Dr. Jawaharlal is recognized as an outstanding educator for his innovative and engaging teaching pedagogy.Amir Rezaei, California State Polytechnic
comparison above would also appear to dictate the deletion of criteria provisions regardinglifelong learning and contemporary issues, as well as changes to criteria provisions regarding thesocial sciences. However, all of these provisions are contained in the ABET Basic-LevelGeneral Criteria and thus cannot be readily changed by ASCE. It should also be noted thatdeletion of the requirement for experimentation from the Civil Engineering Program Criteriawould not result in the removal of experimentation from curricula, because Criterion 3(b) of theGeneral Criteria still requires “an ability to design and conduct experiments,” albeit notnecessarily in a civil engineering context.The comparison above would also appear to dictate the addition of a
Needy, Robert Ries, Laura Schaefer, Larry Shuman School of Engineering University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USAAbstractA new challenge facing engineering educators is how to train both undergraduate and graduatestudents to routinely include sustainability topics as important design criteria. Equally importantis the need for engineering students to both broaden their perspective and learn to functioncollaboratively in cross-cultural environments. The University of Pittsburgh’s School ofEngineering is addressing these issues by educating students from the BS through PhD levels aspart of a comprehensive
fabricating an actuallab station and identifying areas for efficiency. Page 12.410.7 Appendix A, Piping and Instrumentation DiagramPage 12.410.8Page 12.410.9 Appendix B, Bill of MaterialComponent Type Equipment Used Qty Reqd.Vessel 4" Schedule 40 PVC Pipe 6 feetVessel Support- 2" Galvanized Pipe 3 feet- 2" Support Flange 1- 6" Pipe Clamps 3 2" Galvanized Split Rings
collegestudents (http://www.solarnow.org.)BooksBerger, J. 1997. Charging Ahead: The Business of Renewable Energy and What it Means forAmerica. Henry Holt & Co.Berinstein, P. 2001. Alternative Energy: Facts, Statistics, and Issues. Oryx Press.Boyle, G. 2004. Renewable Energy. Oxford University Press.Boyle, G. 1996. Renewable Energy: Power for a Sustainable Future. Oxford University Press.Boyle, G., Everett, B., Ramage, J. 2003. Energy Systems and Sustainability. Oxford UniversityPress.Ewing, R. 2003. Power with Nature: Solar and Wind Energy Demystified. Pixyjack Press.Morgan, S. 2002. Alternative Energy Sources. Heinemann Library.Scheer, H. 2004. The Solar Economy. Earthscan Publications.Sorensen, B. 2004. Renewable Energy. Academic Press
sorted within topic in terms of difficulty (easy, moderate, and difficult). Thisthree-step method resulted in a final version consisting of five questions (load, pulleys, rotation,compressors, etc.).For the Thermodynamics course, several commonly available teaching and evaluation resourceswere scoured for conceptual questions. However, most questions required calculations such thatstudents would be unlikely to complete the questions during a pretest even if they intuitivelyunderstood the underlying concepts. Thus, we utilized a set of conceptual questions (SeeAppendix B) and compared students’ scores to the course professor’s final exam to determineconstruct validity (students doing better on professor’s final will also do better on the
AC 2007-2771: IMPACT OF NEW FACILITIES ON ENGINEERING STUDENTOUTCOMESJames Helbling, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University JAMES HELBLING, M.S.A.E. Currently an Assistant Professor of Aerospace Engineering where he teaches structural analysis, computer aided design, and aircraft detail design courses. He has 21 years of industry experience with McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing) and Northrop Grumman Corporation where he specialized in structural fatigue loading and served as manager of F-5/T-38 Engineering.David Lanning, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University DAVID B. LANNING, Ph.D. Currently an Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering at ERAU/Prescott where he teaches courses in structural
the human interaction in which one person communicates a new idea to another person. Thus, at the most elemental level of conceptualization, the diffusion process consists of (1) a new idea, (2) individual A who knows about the innovation, and (3) individual B who does not yet know about the innovation.”Online learning or distance education among individuals has been a topic of discussion for quitesome time. There have been many different thoughts and theories as to what distance educationshould consist of; how people perceive distance education; and what should be included in adistance education course. In order to understand the confusion behind the acceptance of newtechnologies and ideas, many turn to the Diffusion
: Physics II, Engineering Geology, Linear Algebra, Geomorphology, Environmental Chemistry (instead of requiring Physics II and Engineering Geology). • Drop Dynamics and GE1030, Engineering Projects • Drop Reinforced Concrete as a required class for all students and add as an elective for structures students (and possibly others) • Drop 3 credits of required technical electives • Drop 2 credits of required technical electives and GE 1030 (Engineering Projects) which is 1 credit. Option B: Two three-credit classes on infrastructure Six credits to come from: • Dropping Computer
out in partial ignorance. This ignorance stems from thefact there are uncertainties in a) models used in the design, b) material properties, c) qualitycontrol in manufacturing and d) system response to actual use.It is pointed out to students that engineers have an obligation to protect the safety of humanbeings. Hence, engineers should be aware of the experimental nature of any project, forecastingpossible side effects, and should make an effort to monitor them.Legal regulations and the existence of many regulatory agencies such as EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) are explained in this context. The case study of the Titanic disaster ispresented to demonstrate the uncertainties experienced by the designers and builder of Titanicand how
, from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/BODY_WC02612. Tormoehlen, R. L. (personal communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, August 10, 2003)13. Wessel, T., & Wessel, M. (1982). 4-H: An American idea 1900-1980, A history of 4-H. Chevy Chase, MD: National 4-H Council.14. Willis, B. (2004). Distance education at a glance. Retrieved May 13, 2004, from http://www.uidaho.edu/eo/distglan.html15. Woloshuk, J. M., Brown, G., & Wagaman, G. D. (1999). 4-H projects: Is completion important? Journal of Extension, 37 (5). Retrieved August 19, 2004, from http://www.joe.org/joe/1999october/rb5.html Page 12.585.16
performance of the freshman has been greatly improvedsince the mentor program was created. The percentage of students on first semester honors(above 3.5) has increased, the number of students on first semester probation (below 2.0) and thenumber of students with a GPA below 1.5 has been reduced, the GPA has increased by almost ahalf a point (C+ to a B-) and the number of students leaving engineering has been reduced.Regarding the transfer population, the 9.18% transfer out value consists of two parts: 1) Transferto another program within the university and 2) Students that leave the university. Part of thehomework assignments in the student’s first semester courses is for the students to also learnabout other fields in the sciences that are related
projects for classroom applications. These projects need to: a. be limited in scope, b. align and sequence with subject material being taught in the class, and c. support current AMP and CAMP projects. 3. As with CAMP and AMP, these projects should produce an environment similar to that the students will encounter during high-level capstone design activities and should include specific tasks such as “statement of work” and “deliverables”. 4. Staff from CAMP and/or AMP should co-lead the class during this teach- ing/learning process.As an example, we have developed a design analysis project for the Spring 2007 offeringof Heat Transfer. The following section briefly presents the project
. & Pollack, M.E., & Riskin, E. & Thomas, B. & Wolf, E. & Wu, A. (1990) “Becoming a ComputerScientist” Communications of the ACM 33(11) pg 47-579. Fisher, A. & Margolis, J. & Miller, F. (1997) “Undergraduate Women in Computer Science: Experience,Motivation and Culture”10. Blum, L. “Women in Computer Science: The Carnegie Mellon Experience”www.cs.cmu.edu/nlblum/PAPERS/women_in_computer_science.pdf11. Pearl, A. & Pollack, M.E., & Riskin, E. & Thomas, B. & Wolf, E. & Wu, A. (1990) “Becoming a ComputerScientist”12. Fisher, A. &Margolis, J. (June 2002) “Unlocking The Clubhouse: The Carnegie Mellon Experience” InroadsSIGCSE Bulletin, Women In Computing 34(2) pg 79-8313. Cuny, J. & Aspray, W
mathematics, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a globaleconomic, environmental and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for, and an
roughly a week and the last week will be dedicated tocreating the final management presentation. The course content pursues the following outline: a.The course begins by strategically positioning enterprise modeling as a business analysis andleaning tool. b. The course then introduces a series of modeling techniques that are used as theinternational standards for modeling. c. The course continues with the application of themodeling techniques to lean a process, create an integrated supply network, develop aknowledge management system, etc. d. The course ends with a capstone deliverable of a businessmanagement presentation by the student on how the enterprise modeling techniques can bepositioned to effectively address a real business issue.IEE 512
AC 2007-1066: COMMUNITY SERVICE PROJECTS AS INTEGRATEDUNDERGRADUATE LEARNING EXPERIENCESThomas Nicholas, University of North Carolina-Charlotte Thomas Nicholas II is currently a Faculty Associate in Civil Engineering Technology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He has received a B. S. in Civil Engineering Technology degree from Fairmont State and a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from West Virginia University. Mr. Nicholas’ scholarly activities have included funded projects in transportation and structural engineering for West Virginia Department of Transportation. Mr. Nicholas was employed as a Structural Engineer and Project Manager for the West Virginia Department of
-functions in design and creating a sense of practical empowermentin novice or even tentative engineers.Bibliography 1. National Science Foundation, “Shaping The Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology”, NSF 96-139, October 1996. 2. Pearson, G., and A.T.Young, (editors) Technically Speaking: Why all Americans Need to Know More About Technology. Washington, D.C. National Academy Press, (2002). 3. National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, National Academy Press, (2005). 4. Nocito-Gobel J., S. Daniels, M. Collura, B. Aliane, “Project-Based Introduction to Engineering – A
-InstitutionalStudy,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, 2004, pp. 313–320. [3] Felder, R.M., Brent, R., “Understanding Student Differences,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Jan., 2005, pp. 57–72. [4] Seymour, E., and Hewitt, H., Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave theSciences, Boulder, Colo.,: Westview Press, 1997. [5] Packard, B. W. l., and Nguyen, D., “Science career-related possible selves ofadolescent girls: a longitudinal study,” Journal of Career Development, Vol 29, No. 4, 2003, pp.251-263. [6] Husman, J., and Lens, W., “The role of the future in student motivation,”Educational Psychologist, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1999, pp. 113-125. [7] Lang, F. R., and Carstensen, L. L., “Time counts: Future time
. Luntz, E. Almeiada, D. Tilbury, J. Moyne and K. Hargrove, “The distributed reconfigurable factory testbed(DRFT): A collaborative cross-university manufacturing system testbed,” Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference,2006.[10] R, Bartz, S. Engell, C. Schmid, H. Roth, N. Becker and H. M. Schaedel, “Project-oriented internet-basedlearning in the field of control engineering,” Proceedings of ASEE/SEFI/TUB Annual Colloquium, 2002.[11] J. Rehg and B. Muller, “Teaching PLCs with the IEC 61131 standard languages,” Proceedings of ASEE AnnualConference, 2005.[12] D. Wang, and H. Peddle, “System approach for design and construction of PLC training laboratory,”Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, 2001.[13] K. H. Johansson, et al. (2005). “Vehicle
AC 2007-83: THE ROLE OF EDUCATION IN THE PROGRESSION FROMTECHNOLOGIST TO GENERAL MANAGERLarry Bland, John Brown University Page 12.1460.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Role of Education in the Progression from Technologist to General Manager: A Qualitative StudyAbstractA qualitative research study addressing looking at educational interventions in the careerdevelopment of engineers moving from technologist to general manager. For this study“education” is defined on a four-part continuum of formal, non-formal, informal, andincidental/experiential. Formal and non-formal education is an intentional and systematicenterprise while
additional information. At this stage of the project, this role was fairly easy since we’re really moving forward on our design. Everyone came to the meetings with a pretty clear idea of what we needed to do and the motivation to work on it making my job fairly easy. The only blotch on my record was failing to call when I was quite sick and couldn’t come to the meeting. Our attendance policy states that we need to notify the group, and I just forgot. I would grade myself a B- on my role as not quite a solid “good,” but more like a “not half bad.” Person 2: This portion of the semester I had the role of leader. I feel I did a good job for the most part. I am comfortable taking
, P.A.; King, E.A.; Letourneau- Wagner, J.; and Shapiro, K. (1998). A Problem Based Learning, Case Study Approach to Pharmaceutics: Faculty and Student Perspectives, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Vol. 62(4): 398-401. 2. Carlson, L. and Sullivan, J. (1999). Hands-on Engineering: Learning by Doing in the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program. Int. J. Engng. Ed. Vol. 15(1): 20-31. 3. Eyerer, P.; Hefer, B.; and Krause, D. (2000). The Reformation of Technical Education through Project- Orientated Education (TheoPrax®), Global J. of Engng. Educ., Vol.4, No.3. 4. Dong, Z.Y. (2005). Improving Learning in Undergraduate Control Engineering Courses using Context- based Learning Models Int. J
Energy Program3 provides some of the most lucrative rebatesfor renewable energy system installations in the nation, and this clinic experience allowedengineering students to directly participate in a growing renewable energy market while learningmore about the electrical design of PV systems. In order to assure that their PV systems wouldbe economically feasible and well designed, the City of Ocean City (OC) and the OC Board ofEducation hired Integrated Systems (a consulting engineering group) to determine appropriatedesigns and plans for each of the twenty buildings they were considering. The feasibility studydetermined that ten buildings were good candidates for the PV systems. The consultingcompany (acting as an industry affiliate to the
. Todd, R. and Magelby, S. “Creating Successful Capstone Programs by Considering the Needs of Stakeholders” Journal of Engineering Education, 19934. Kirschman, J. and Greenstein, J. “The use of groupware for collaboration in distributed student engineering design teams,” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct 20025. Latcha, M. and Oakley, B. “Toying with a capstone design course,” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct 20016. Hargreaves, D.J., "Addressing Transition to Tertiary Education in Engineering," European Journal of Engineering Education, 1998, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 79-89.7. Hansen, J. and Andersen, A., “Engineers of Tomorrow and Beyond: Knowledge, Insight and Skills Needed to Work Across Borders”, Proceedings of
1006 848 1208 1858 219 5139 % of Sample 19.6% 16.5% 23.5% 36.2% 4.3% 100.0% Total Count 1262 1346 1723 2416 219 6966 % of Sample 18.1% 19.3% 24.7% 34.7% 3.1% 100.0%GenderGender differences were insignificant (p=.612), with both populations being split roughly 50- Page 12.640.450%.Free and Reduced LunchThe Control sample has a significantly higher proportion of students receiving free or reducedlunch (Goodman & Kruskal Tau-b p=.000). 69.1% of the Control sample reporting receives freeor
professors from different cultures and academic traditions.Up until the end of year 2006, there used to be three main International Activities at KetteringUniversity: a) Study Abroad for Kettering University students, b) Study at Kettering Universityfor Foreign Exchange students and c) Matriculating foreign students at Kettering University.The first of these activities used to occur in the Academic Services Office on the Academic sideof Kettering University. This office deals strictly with the preparation and organization of studyabroad programs. At Kettering University foreign students used to be handled out of a separateoffice called the Office of International and Governmental Affairs. This office is responsible forthe preparation and