method to reach awide number of students, as well as to see how people exchange and build on each other’sideas through conversational exchanges in a group setting. Focus groups are useful foracquiring insight or gathering baseline information about a topic of interest from a group’sperspective, allowing multiple opinions and perspectives to be heard and debated rather thanindividual meaning-making [41].4.1 Institutional ContextThis exploratory investigation was conducted at the researchers’ university, a public R1Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI), with over 50,000 undergraduate students. During thespring 2020 semester, the university moved to remote settings and was preparing to return toin-person instruction for a fall 2021 semester at the
Education. Her research focuses on the interactions between student mo- tivation and their learning experiences. Her projects focus on student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, development of problem solving skills, self-regulated learn- ing, and epistemic beliefs. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022Lived Experiences of African American Engineering Students at a PWI Through the Lens of Navigational CapitalIntroduction There are significant disparities
departments to participate. This context forced college-wideinspection of our campus’ cultural norms through a nuanced lens—a necessary step towardsshifting toward a more inclusive culture.In recent years there has been a growing consensus on specific hiring and retention practices thatimprove the recruiting experiences and likelihood of hiring a more inclusive and diverse facultybody than has previously been the case in engineering [14, 15]. White women and BIPOC-identifying people of all genders have supposedly benefitted from long-standing, federal anti-discrimination laws [16] yet have gained little ground in representation on research-universityfaculty even as the student bodies at those same institutions have diversified [9, 17]. Reasons
. 2Asians and Whites are overrepresented among STEM professionals compared with their share ofemployment across all occupations. Whites represent 67% of STEM professionals. These statisticstranslate into increased earning potential for overrepresented groups and further exacerbates thesocioeconomic racial divide that exists between racial groups and occupations (Pew Research Center,2021).Math is a foundational subject that is required for students to earn degrees in STEM fields (Ibrahim &Johnson, 2019; Lane et al., 2020). Yet, educators are challenged with engaging all students to be successfulin math (Stansell, Tyler-Wood, & Austin, 2016). Student tracking in K-12 schools begins as early as firstgrade and depending on the ‘track’ that they
for Multicultural Education 11(2), 149- 159.32 32 References Fifolt, M., Engler, J., & Abbott, G. (2014). Bridging STEM Professions for McNair Scholars through Faculty Mentoring and Academic Preparation. American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers. Griffin, K. A. (2019). Institutional barriers, strategies, and benefits to increasing the representation of Women and Men of Color in the Professoriate: Looking beyond the pipeline. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: Volume 35, 1-73. Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Tran, M. C., New man, C. B., Chang, M
Paper ID #35606Retaining a diverse group of undergraduate students in EngineeringTechnology MajorsProf. Melanie Villatoro, New York City College of Technology Melanie Villatoro, Chair of the Department of Construction Management and Civil Engineering Technol- ogy at NYC College of Technology, is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of New York. Prof. Villatoro is passionate about student retention and performance, as well as STEM Outreach in K-12. She has served as Project Director for the National Transportation Summer Institute sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration multiple years. Prof. Villatoro leads a
willingness to share their experiences. Additionally, we would like to thank thecase study participant for taking extra time to member-check our paper. We would also like tothank the anonymous reviewers for their feedback. Finally, we would like to acknowledgeCypress Lefebre for providing additional insights into this topic through her valuablediscussions. References[1] J. A. Yang, M. K. Sherard, C. Julien and M. Borrego, "LGBTQ+ in ECE: Culture and (Non)Visibility," in IEEE Trans. Edu., March 2021, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/TE.2021.3057542.[2] J. A. Yang, M. K. Sherard, C. Julien and M. Borrego, “Resistance and Community-Building in LGBTQ+ Engineering Students,” J. Women and Minorities in
, and to help them approachinteractions, tasks, and product design while considering the perspectives and needs of others,educators should think about how to embed empathy into the curriculum. Employing appropriatelearning activities can be beneficial for developing empathy in students. Prior research on K-12students has shown that infusing empathy into STEM lessons can advance interest in pursuing acareer in STEM, and it can also foster a sense of belonging [4, 5].While such practices may be efficacious in higher education as well, more understanding isneeded. It is important to foster empathy in undergraduate/graduate students and faculty to worktowards more inclusive mindsets and environments. Previously Hess and Fila [6] demonstratedthat
users interact with Black lives matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(11), 1814–1830. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1334931Khazan, Olga. (2020, June 2nd). “Why People Loot” The Atlantic.Kim, Catherine. (2020, May 31st). “Images of police using violence against peaceful protesters are going viral” Vox.Kimmons, R., Veletsianos, G., & Woodward, S. (2017). institutional uses of Twitter in U.S. higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 42(2), 97-111.Linvill, D. L., McGee, S. E., & Hicks, L. K. (2012). Colleges’ and universities’ use of Twitter: A content analysis. Public Relations Review, 38, 636–638.Lockard, D. T., Baker, D. J., & Blissett, R. S. (2019). Student and administrative
program at the University in the Fall of 2019. The goal of the program is to help Women in Science and Engineering make connections and grow to form a successful and supportive network of women. The relationships and supportive network formed through the mentoring program will help students throughout their college experience and beyond. The program pairs first year students with an upperclassman student who will be their mentor throughout the year. The program also has events throughout the semester to allow all program participants to network with one another. The second year of the mentoring program kicked off in Fall 2020 during the COVID‐19 pandemic. The program was designed to implement one‐on‐one peer mentoring within the WISE program
Paper ID #35595Auto-ethnographic Reflections : Lessons from Leading a STEM Initiativefor Girls in School While We Ourselves Were in SchoolKayli Heather Battel, Tufts University Kayli Battel is currently a sophomore at Tufts University, majoring in Human Factors Engineering and minoring in Education and Art. One of SiS’s three original founders, she organized, led, marketed, and fundraised the program from 2018-2020, and continues to mentor SiS to this day. As a leader then President of Saguaro’s FRC Robotics team, Kayli led numerous STEM outreach events at local middle and elementary schools, and beyond. The success of
makesit even more challenging to hold a discussion about those issues and how they are evolving overtime. However, that same participant also added that the group successfully navigated through allsuch confusions and were able to have healthy conversations.The second theme revealed form this analysis was “Expansion” of the participants’ mindset andunderstanding of social justice issues. The knowledge gained through this participation experiencehas expanded the thinking of the attendees beyond their own spheres of knowledge. One of theparticipants shared: “We’re all knowledgeable in our own ways within our own kind of subgroups.I think we all have some ignorance about other groups”. It was also mentioned that the diversenature of the book club
Discussion section are AsianAmerican, as our sample population was biased towards this group. Racial and ethnic groups canhave unique processes for racial identity development [25]. The process of Asian Americanidentity development is quite different than that for other racial/ethnic groups. Asian Americanstypically go through five stages: ethnic awareness, white identification (either active or passive),awakening to social political consciousness, redirection to an Asian American consciousness,and incorporation [26]. We will focus on two stages. White identification begins with racialharassment (e.g., mockery) and leads to Asian Americans trying to fit into white society (passivewhite identification) or claiming a white identity (active white
and Statistical Sciences and to the Department of Education and Human Development. Her research centers issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM through the lens of identity development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Lived Experiences and Literature Reviews: Leveraging Experiential Knowledge in STEM Education Doctoral Studies Abstract Writing a doctoral dissertation is a daunting task under the best of circumstances.Students must organize and synthesize their research and academic knowledge to make acompelling case for why their research matters and why their results are
culture of engineering.Action-Oriented Education and Organizing as Beyond ReformsBowen et al. [34] formed the Undergraduate Engineering Collaborative Growth Series (UECGS),seeking to “design a program for marginalized engineering students that reduced barriers to theexpression of their whole selves, including the value of their identities within the engineeringeducational space” [p. 1]. This was done through four two-hour workshops in addition to a seriesof one-on-one feedback and coaching sessions to provide participants reflective space to discussthe series itself and how it connected to other components of participants’ lives. The firstworkshop consisted of focus groups on naming barriers within and relating to engineering thatthey perceive
design,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--29965.[38] H. Barrows, “Is it Truly Possible to Have Such a Thing as dPBL?,” Distance Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 119–122, May 2002, doi: 10.1080/01587910220124026.[39] National Academy of Engineering [NAE], “Grand Challenges - 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering,” 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org. [Accessed: 04-Jul-2020][40] T. Moore, H. Diefes-Dux, and P. K. Imbrie, “Developing First-Year Students’ Perceptions of the Engineering Profession through Realistic, Client-Driven Problems,” in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference, 2005
, she is leading the charge with the following mission:CLICKTo transform the lives of our students by preparing them to become successful leaders and innovators for positive change.CLICKTo expand knowledge and create transformative technology through original research to tackle the world’s biggest challenges.CLICKTo work toward a transformed society, in which all members can thrive, through service to government, industry and the engineering professions.At the core of our mission are values that drive us to educate inclusive leaders and create knowledge equitably in service of a diverse society. 3Under the leadership of former Associate Dean Kara
educators have sought to increase student motivation and success is through theuse of Utility Value Interventions (UVIs) (Hecht et al., 2020; Hulleman, Kosovich, Barron, &Daniel, 2017). UVIs typically take the form of short writing assignments that prompt students tothink about course content and the relationship that content might have to their own lives orgoals. UVIs have been used in STEM education as well as other disciplines to increasemotivation and a growing body of research has demonstrated positive student outcomes. Forexample, Hulleman et al. (2017) used UVIs in an introductory psychology course anddemonstrated their positive impact on interest, expectancy for success, and subsequentperformance. Relatedly, Kosovich, Hulleman, Phelps
diversity in Engineering beforebeing guided through an exercise to identify inclusive practices they could establish to promotediversity.In 2019, The DEI instructor did not teach this course but instead guest-lectured in the twosections that were offered. The course instructor for each of those sections was asked to assignthe Wolf article as a reading exercise for homework. The next day, the DEI instructor gave ashort lesson on the need for diversity in engineering. Students were guided through an exercise tofirst identify engineering projects that would benefit from a diverse perspective, then to identifythe unique perspectives they bring to the table, and finally to identify inclusive practices theycould start now that would promote diversity
research labs, throughservice experiences with K-12 students, through individual mentoring which nearly all participantsspoke of with great pride as making a difference for the few women persisting through an engineeringundergraduate major, and through advising their local chapter of the Society of Women Engineers.Faculty also reported encouraging students to attend office hours, form peer study groups, andparticipate in conferences and seminars—which is generally seen as good advising practices. 13 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE • The findings reveal the importance of creating engineering faculty development programming designed to
]. Alternatively, the conceptualization ofdisability-as-oppression fits within the social model of disability [9]. The social model ofdisability presents disability as a consequence of a systemically excluding and oppressiveenvironment [3], [6], [7]. It acknowledges that we, as a society, have manufactured and enforcedsystemic barriers, derogatory attitudes, and social exclusion for individuals who are differentfrom those in power [7]. Additionally, some scholars view disability through a neoliberal-ableism critical lens. This model acknowledges both the realities of impairment and implicatessociety in the enforced disablement of “non-desirable others” [9]. It celebrates disability as anidentity that disrupts norms and subverts ableist values of society
representation to the leaky pipeline andthat with time representation would improve. 13Despite faculty struggling to connect with the concept of STEM identity, many citated ways in whichthey promoted student STEM identity outside the classroom, be it in their research labs, throughservice experiences with K-12 students, through individual mentoring which nearly all participantsspoke of with great pride as making a difference for the few women persisting through an engineeringundergraduate major, and through advising their local chapter of the Society of Women Engineers.Faculty also reported encouraging students to attend office hours, form peer study
the final groupof ambassadors. These five ambassadors worked through spring quarter of academic year 2019-20. Fourof them continued through the academic year 2020-21 (one decided to leave the group due to othercommitments). Because three out of the four ambassadors were graduating in spring of 2021, we had to select oursecond cohort of DEI Student Ambassadors at the end of the academic year. The process was very similarto how we selected the first cohort with one difference: current student ambassadors were involved ininterviews of the candidates alongside faculty/staff members of the DEI Committee. As a result, weselected 8 students to be ambassadors during the academic year 2021-22. One of these students is acontinuing ambassador from
Administration in Quantitative Analysis and her Doctorate of Philosophy in Biomedical Engineering/Engineering Education. In her role as Assistant Dean, Dr. Gaskins has revamped the summer bridge program to increase student support and retention as well as developed and strengthened partnerships in with local area school districts to aid in the high school to college path- way. In 2009, she founded The Gaskins Foundation, a non-profit organization, whose mission is to educate and empower the African American community. Her foundation recently launched the Cincinnati STEM- ulates year round K-12 program, which is a free of charge program that will introduce more students to Math and Science. She was named the 2017 K12 Champion
Paper ID #35582Retention Strategies for Educators from Women STEM Graduates of the1970’s & 1980’sDr. Kathleen Buse, Advancing Women in the Workforce Kathleen Buse is a business leader whose work focuses on helping organizations be more successful through the development of engaged and inclusive work cultures. As President and Founder of Advancing Women in the Workforce, she helps employers recruit, retain, and advance women. Kathleen’s experience includes 25 years in industry, beginning as an engineer and advancing to executive leadership. She spent ten years in academia where she became an award-winning researcher and
share how we use existing best practices to create andsustain innovative retention programs for undergraduate women, assist ourgraduate students in becoming well-rounded engineers through networkingprograms, and support our women faculty through continued professionaldevelopment. This process engages university constituents as well as K-12administrators, teachers, counselors and students, alumni and Board of Advisorsby utilizing tools, resources, and best practices for student success. 3 Background: Why focus on women? Undergraduate Students Graduate Students T/TT Faculty (Enrolled) (Enrolled