. According to their website "The mission of The National GEMConsortium is to enhance the value of the nation’s human capital by increasing theparticipation of underrepresented groups (African Americans, American Indians, andHispanic Americans) at the master’s and doctoral levels in engineering and science."The writing coordinator provided ongoing individual graduate school applicationsresearch coaching and support, and one on one writing conferences, providingfeedback and support on personal statements. Volunteer graduate student mentors 19 Program Design 2021: Changes and Adaptations at the Outset ▪ Program ran March through September
Paper ID #35581Improving engineering-student retention via the UC Davis LEADR programProf. Ralph C. Aldredge III, University of California, Davis Dr. Ralph Aldredge is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the College of Engineering, where he provides leadership and oversight for undergraduate enrollment management, orientation and yield efforts, transfer student admissions, academic advising and intervention, retention programs, the Student Start-up Center, ABET degree-program accreditation, assessment training for faculty, and strategic efforts to improve the academic experience. Prior to this administrative
daughters.• In the second example, this was another dual engineering career couple. They were transferred multiple times including internationally. After working 11 years full time and having three children, she decided to take the “mommy track’ (her words), left engineering and became an adjunct math professor. After several more years and obtaining additional degrees in statistics, started her own business.• Third example, she developed broad technical experience to include designing chemical plants, to pilot plant engineer, to safety, health & environment (SHE), to product development before transitioning to technical manager roles. This broad experience allowed her to develop into operations management and eventually managed a
of software design through the implementation and debugging of student-written programs; (4) introduction to engineering majors, career exploration, engineering practice within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, ethical, health and safety, and sustainability. Physics: This is the second course in the first-year engineering experience and has Intro as a pre-requisite. Many of the experiments involve rely on Python code to interact with sensors and actuators. Therefore, a solid foundation in the skills from Intro is necessary.From the population of position-of-stress participants, a stratified sampling technique was usedto choose interview candidates in three categories of decreasing
. Dr. Furterer is an author or co-author of several academic journal articles, conference proceedings and 4 reference textbooks on Lean Six Sigma, Design for Six Sigma and Lean Systems, Lean Six Sigma Case Studies in the Healthcare Enterprise. She is a co-editor for the ASQ Certified Quality Improvement Asso- ciate Handbook (2020), and the ASQ Certified Manager of Quality / Organizational Excellence Handbook (2020).Ms. Elizabeth Hart, University of Dayton Beth Hart is a Principal Lecturer for the University of Dayton School of Engineering Dean’s Office. She received her B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Dayton, both in Chemical Engineering. She currently teaches engineering design and oversees the Women
Paper ID #35646Program: A focused, 5-year effort to increase the number of AfricanAmerican, Hispanic/Latino(a), Native American (AHLN) 7th-grade studentswho are academically prepared to take algebraMs. Virginia Lynn Booth-Womack, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Virginia received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering and a B.A. in Psychology while at Purdue Univer- sity. She is currently the Director of Minority Engineering Programs in the College of Engineering. She assumed the position in 2004 after 18 years of manufacturing experience. Her last assignment was Lean Manufacturing Manager for the for the 3.7L and 4.7L
transitioned from in-personprogramming to online instruction in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers selectedthe qualitative approach of virtual ethnography to detail the experiences of four practitioners asthey planned and implemented virtual educational programming. Each of the four practitionerswork as staff members in the University of Cincinnati College of Engineering and AppliedScience. The University of Cincinnati is a historically white tier 1 research institution in theMidwest. The reflections of the practitioners were documented as they transitioned programsintended for face-to-face engagement to virtual programming for faculty, staff, middle school,high school, and college students. Programming was designed for populations that
alsoshed light onto the troubles and triumphs that international and immigrant teachingprofessionals in the higher education landscape may face. It is hoped that the presentation is useful for administrators as they think about supportingatypical cases to strengthen their infrastructure, since afterall, innovation happens most amongthose pushing boundaries whilst facing challenges.pg. 18References:[1] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, andmixed methods approaches. Sage publications.[2] Matusovich, H. M., Murzi, H., Gray, D., Chambers, B., & James, M. (2020, January). AnAutoethnography: Outcomes from Faculty Engagement in Course Development in a Large First-Year Engineering Program. ASEE
Paper ID #35597#BlackLivesMatter: A content analysis of top engineering institutions’responses to social-political activismTaylor Lightner, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Taylor Lightner is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she serves as a graduate research assistant. In addition, she is a student in the Disaster Resilience and Risk Management Program. Taylor received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson Uni- versity. Her research interests include broadening participation, interdisciplinary interactions, community engagement, and the
project Spring Seminar Content▪Goal setting and review of fall lessons learned to start▪Semester long group project on Engineering Grand Challenges or UN Sustainable Development Goals▪Teams of 3-4 students▪Teamwork module and teamwork/communication project agreement form▪Short intro or mini check in presentation mid semester▪Final presentation can be poster, video or presentation Social Aspects▪Weekly social programming with Peer Coaches▪Field trips, game nights, crafts, study groups▪Office hours and light tutoring▪Group study, support and networkingBEST PRACTICES Best Practices▪Rely on your Housing/Res Life professionals to manage their stuff▪Canvas/LMS can be your friend▪A
Munich. He holds a Ph.D. in English (University of Wisconsin) and is a certified Project Management Professional.Dr. Kim Lester, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Lester serves as the Director of Pre-College Programs at Virginia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity focusing on outreach and recruiting underserved students into STEM fields. She also worked as a global engagement specialist in the Office of Global Engineering Engagement and Research at Virginia Tech, providing assistance with the development, implementation and administrative support of international initiatives at the College of Engineering. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Animal Science and a Doctor of
multiscale characterization of complex tissues, fundamental studies on biophysical control of induced pluripotent stem cells, biomaterial development for complex tissue regeneration, and inten- tionally building inclusion into research design and execution. This connects to his broader vision to make engineering spaces more diverse, more equitable, and more inclusive. He has held administrative positions in programs to broaden the participation of historically excluded students in engineering. Dr. Dickerson’s work in expanding participation in engineering has yielded significant programmatic inter- ventions, institutional change activities, and national strategic initiatives. He also serves as the Director of Engineering
to the engineeringeducation community. Based on our experience, high school students are far more capable of managing thedevelopment of powerful Engineering/STEM messaging and materials than is generallyaccepted. By getting out of their way, we have empowered them to design their own programsand ideas without relying on the ‘adults in the room’, - and the SiS program is much stronger forthat. We do not presume that we know better than our students, how to teach love of engineeringand STEM. The young educators reflected on some of the important attributes contributing to thesuccess of their initiatives: Endless creativity, close connectivity and relevance with youngchildren, a similar experience base, a culture of volunteerism, mutually
programs as exemplary; those programs were announced on the NAE website. 1A virtual workshop was held in May, 2021. In addition to presentations from the exemplary programs, theworkshop covered topics of the higher education admissions system, admissions for transfer and 3+2programs, research on admissions, and the benefits and consequences of using artificial intelligence anddata science tools in recruiting, admissions, and retention. Breakout sessions covered questions about thesystem of state, institutional, and engineering school policies and how they interact to affect admissions;future research needs, and considerations about how new technologies fit into the system. The workshopagenda is designed to encourage new collaborations and
STEM outreach project at Daniel Hale Elementary School which provides civil engineering lesson plans, afterschool programs, family work- shops and field trips. Prof. Villatoro is the Project Director for the Peer Advisement program sponsored by Perkins and designed to increase retention of females across the School of Technology and Design. American c Society for Engineering Education, 202212PPA is a grant funded program at New York City College of Technology (City Tech)committed to increasing enrollment and retention of female and nontraditionalstudents in engineering technology programs. PPA provides a successful model formentoring, recruiting and retaining a diverse
Dean of Academic and Student Affairs in the Tickle College o Engineering at University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She has over 15 years of academic experience in various leadership positions. Prior to joining academia, she was an Electronics Engineer at U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi MD where she managed Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Programs for the develop- ment of hybrid numerical electromagnetic tools. Dr. Kilic has over five years of industry experience at COMSAT Laboratories as a Senior Engineer and Program Manager with specialization in satellite com- munications, link modeling and analysis, and modeling, design and test of phased arrays and reflector antennas for satellite communications
culture of engineering.Action-Oriented Education and Organizing as Beyond ReformsBowen et al. [34] formed the Undergraduate Engineering Collaborative Growth Series (UECGS),seeking to “design a program for marginalized engineering students that reduced barriers to theexpression of their whole selves, including the value of their identities within the engineeringeducational space” [p. 1]. This was done through four two-hour workshops in addition to a seriesof one-on-one feedback and coaching sessions to provide participants reflective space to discussthe series itself and how it connected to other components of participants’ lives. The firstworkshop consisted of focus groups on naming barriers within and relating to engineering thatthey perceive
classrooms which are focused on student team dynamics are well documented [3], [9][10], [11]. However, it is critical to provide guidance on the value and importance of leveragingthe benefits of diverse teams [12]. When the benefits of diverse teams are not pointedlyaddressed, the effectiveness of a diverse team can be diminished. One prime example of this isinequitable distribution of work and tasks due to gender bias [9], [10], [12],Similar to [12], this work focuses on the integration of activities designed to help students see thevalue and importance of diverse perspectives in engineering design. The engineering program atthe investigator’s institution was launched in Fall 2018. The program was built with ABETaccreditation standards in mind and
this role, she served as Director of the Program in Technical Communication since 2012. She has taught classes in technical communications to undergraduate and graduate students at the College of Engineering since 1997. She has also co-authored the book A Practical Guide to Technical Reports and Presentations for Scientists, Engineers and Students. Prior to her teaching career, Dr. Khan worked as an engineering and project manager to design man- ufacturing systems in the information technology field, to manufacture and test engine blocks for the automotive industry, and to research coatings for high-speed and high-temperature machining applica- tions. Dr. Khan has a Bachelors of Science degree in Mechanical
Paper ID #35636Online and Global Education in Engineering: Building a Strategic Casefor Placed-based LearningDr. Natasha B. Watts, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University As Director of Cardinal Education and the Associate Director of Online Learning in the College of En- gineering at Virginia Tech, Natasha provides college-level leadership for the design, development, im- plementation, and evaluation of distance learning initiatives. Watts is the main point of contact for the Cardinal Education Program (formerly Commonwealth Graduate Engineering CGEP). Before coming to Virginia Tech, Natasha worked as an
inhabiting those spaces? 2. How can communities centered around visible identity, such as women in engineering student organizations, also make space for intersectional invisible identities, such as asexuality?While current efforts in designing DEI programming have made significant strides, researchersand practitioners alike must address these questions in designing truly inclusive andwell-executed DEI spaces. Kayla’s experience illustrates that DEI spaces, while welcome, maynot necessarily be desired by the target population. In other words, DEI spaces must beaccessible to all, but not all marginalized people will want to access DEI spaces for theiridentities. With limited resources and funding, practitioners will have to make difficult
Paper ID #35619For Us, By Us: Recommendations for Institutional Efforts to Enhance theBlack Student Experience in EngineeringKatreena Thomas, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Katreena Thomas is a graduate student at Arizona State University in the Engineering Education Systems and Design Doctoral program. She is a member of the Shifting Perceptions, Attitudes, and Cultures in Engineering (SPACE) Lab group and her research interests include broadening participation in engineer- ing, engineering leadership, and experiential learning experiences in engineering. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from
Paper ID #35617PhD’ing While Black: Unpacking the Emotions of Navigating Engineering asa Black Student and the Implications for Mental HealthMr. Michael Lorenzo Greene, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Michael Greene is a PhD student in the Engineering Educations Systems and Design program at Arizona Sate University, Polytechnic Campus.Dr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Brooke Coley, PhD is an Assistant Professor in Engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Dr. Coley is Principal Investigator of the Shifting
. CLICK5. A Cultural Transformation with the appointment of a Director of Faculty Engagement who would advance several initiatives that would EMPOWER our engineers to advance DEI in the College. One approach was the establishment of the Empowering Engineers for Positive Chance also known as the EMPOWER Certificate Program and another was the establishment and management of the Faculty Engagement Fund.Our intent today is to share how we used the Faculty Engagement Fund to transformthe culture in the college and advance DEI at the departmental level. 4The establishment of the Faculty Engagement Fund would provide opportunities forfaculty in the college
consideration to alternativeperspectives.Human-Centered design was described as vital for ethics and considering the value of designs inrelation to engineering [26, 65]. Contextualizing problems was important for thinking about thebroader impact of designs on others and for finding more inclusive solutions [65, 66]. Oneparticularly creative approach to developing such skills, and thinking about the needs of others,was curricula established around “alien-centered design” [67]. Students were tasked withthinking about “a new, inter-galactic student exchange program planned with students from theplanet Xenos” in two courses. As part of the process, students in one of the courses applied moretraditional design methodogolgies to learn more about their
Paper ID #35536Broadening Participation through Information: A Synthesis of Resourcesfor Research and Practice in Computing and Computer ScienceMiss Anu Tuladhar, Medtronic Anu graduated in 2021 with her B.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan. Within engineering education, she is working on understanding the effects of a mentorship program on the con- nectedness and resiliency of students, and how student-run organizations evolve to meet student needs. Currently, she is employed as an R&D Sensors Engineer I at Medtronic, and continues to work for in- creasing representation and diversity within
research labs, throughservice experiences with K-12 students, through individual mentoring which nearly all participantsspoke of with great pride as making a difference for the few women persisting through an engineeringundergraduate major, and through advising their local chapter of the Society of Women Engineers.Faculty also reported encouraging students to attend office hours, form peer study groups, andparticipate in conferences and seminars—which is generally seen as good advising practices. 13 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE • The findings reveal the importance of creating engineering faculty development programming designed to
Paper ID #35572Navigating the academy in the absence of graduate disabilityaccommodation policiesD. C. Beardmore, University of Colorado Boulder Mx. Beardmore is currently a PhD student at the University of Colorado, Boulder. They study inclusive engineering education and construction engineering risk management. Their full bio and current and historical positionality statements can be found on their website at dcbeardmore.com American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Navigating the academy in the absence of graduate disability
forthis gap include hiring criteria that may reduce—implicitly or explicitly—the likelihood thatcertain outstanding new academics are offered positions as STEM faculty. The National ScienceFoundation-funded ADVANCE program has led to the broad dissemination of evidence-basedpolicies and practices designed to expand the representation of women in engineering andscience for more than two decades and has shown success for growing the percentage of whitewomen on STEM faculty. More recently, ADVANCE has expanded its explicit focus to ensurethe inclusion of women-identifying individuals from all historically marginalized andunderrepresented groups.The goal of this case study is to document our experiences as members of this faculty searchcommittee and
by aspects of research once in graduate school. For instance, a few par-ticipants discussed being surprised by the importance of writing and presenting the results of astudy, and the relative lack of focus on programming. As Patricia explained, “it’s not the systemyou build that is the big part of the research, but it’s after when you get the results back.” Phoeberealized that time management during the PhD was more challenging than she had anticipated. Sheexpected coursework to play a minimal role in the degree program, but found instead that it wasdifficult to balance both research and coursework. For many students who felt that they knew whatneeded to be done coming in, learning how to complete those tasks still felt challenging