University and her MFA from ArtCenter. She is also an accreditor for NASAD, The National Association of Schools of Art and Design. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 RETENTION STRATEGIES FOR EDUCATORS FROMWOMEN STEM GRADUATES OF THE 1970’S & 1980’S CoNECD Conference February 20 to 23, 2022 Kathleen Buse, Ph.D. Debra Musch Allison Goodman Abstract • Research study on the career experiences of women • All obtained STEM degrees between 1979 and 1983 • Explores expectations, achievements, challenges, and reflections on career journey • Recommendations are provided to
. Romance is Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Florida Atlantic Univer- sity (FAU) and a graduate faculty member in both the College of Engineering and Computer Science and the College of Science at FAU.Her research interests address meaningful learning in complex STEM do- mains, applying a learning sciences lens in addressing issues ranging from building elementary teachers knowledge and skill in teaching science to coordinating learning communities addressing mathematics curriculum as a persistent barrier impacting student success and retention in undergraduate STEM pro- grams. She is currently OI on a NSF DR K-12, Co-PI on a USDOE Title III Hispanic Serving Institution, internal evaluator
those at thecollege level. For the three principles: outreach and recruitment, support services, and inclusiveenvironment, the authors investigated the existing barriers and ways to address them. In theprocess, this group of researchers articulated some critical issues that prevent diverse andeconomically disadvantaged undergraduate students from seeking a graduate degree inengineering. Realizing this, a Grand Valley State University (GVSU) team comprised ofadministrators and faculty members sought to build a comprehensive program that incorporatesall of the aforementioned structures and others. This paper describes the development strategy ofsuch a program that culminated with an NSF award.Development of Program StructureIt is understood that
faculty relationships. Students also mentionedthat interaction with staff and faculty members who identify as one of them is missing in their collegeexperience.For example Barbara [in person, Civil Engineering, expected graduation 2023] explained her example ofusing campus support. I used it a lot last year. I had M H as my advisor, but he left this semester. It's just, it sucked because he was such a good advisor. He was really helpful. He helped me with my classes and he helped me with scholarships. He would just check in on me daily basically. That was really nice. Tutoring, I really hate asking for help, so I didn't necessarily use tutoring...DART (safety escort)..."This semester when I was there, I
the adequacy of the case [21]. We were full participants in everyaspect of this faculty search and held distinct roles and perspectives (Sandekian as an ex-officiomember of the college committee acting as the advisor for process equity and logistics manager,Stamo as a lead member of the student team, and Lewis as the college-wide committee chair).These varying roles allowed us to access all key decision points and conversations that would nothave typically been open to an outside investigator. We have also provided thick, rich detailsregarding the process that occurred and what process changes we implemented from ourcollege’s prior faculty hiring process.Figure 1: Search Phases and ProcessFindingsFigure 1 was developed to help the reader
about each of the fields of engineering, as well as connect with students and staff members in those departments.Throughout her high school’s 3 course STEM program, she was able to get hands‐on experience with CAD and using power tools, as well as experience developing a concept project to propose to the community.Another influential factor in her decision to pursue STEM comes from her father’s work as an electrical engineer. These influences led her to conduct this study to ensure more women have access to outreach programs and chose to pursue STEM careers. 4 Research Question and Objectives Research question: What influences more women
minorities along the engineering pathway in the united states,” Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, pp. 311–334, 2014.[14] M. T. Nettles, “Success in doctoral programs: Experiences of minority and white students,” American Journal of Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 494–522, 1990.[15] J. M. Cohoon, M. Nable, and P. Boucher, “Conflicted identities and sexism in computing graduate programs,” in 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. S1H–1, IEEE, 2011.[16] L. J. Charleston, “A qualitative investigation of african americans’ decision to pursue computing science degrees: Implications for cultivating career choice and aspiration,” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 222, 2012.[17
, cognitiveproblem-solving, decision-making and memory processes [9]. Social emotions, or emotionsrelated or directed towards other persons, have been found to directly impact how studentsengage with academic tasks [10]. This is exacerbated in traditional teacher-student situations aswell as peer-to-peer situations, which can ultimately cause these students to steer away fromacademic-centered interactions [10]. This type of disengagement could be paramount in thesocial and academic integration issues often found within Black engineering students. Emotionscan play an integral part in the experiences that Black graduate students will have navigatingengineering environments, especially amongst the racialized barriers that are faced.Racialized experiences for
students, would have negative repercussions for the individual’sperformance as well as the duration in which the students will be able to whether thatenvironment. This theory will help us to examine the level of compatibility as described byBlack graduate students and the academic environments they are successfully navigating. As the goal is to explore how institutions might better create spaces where Black studentsfeel their values and beliefs are espoused, person environment fit theory is used here tounderscore the need to utilize real experiences of those who have previously navigated thesehostile spaces to inform how these spaces can be climate controlled moving forward. In extantliterature, there has been documentation of coping
that the personal support from the successcoach was “simple, but it was powerful” [FGP41 Ad, Male].Other than the advisor, students talked about faculty being a close point of contact for manystudents. This matter is especially true for students who started during the pandemic; forthem, the faculty was the only representative from the university. However, FGPs mentionedfaculty only relate to students narrowly on their courses. FGP31 Ig, a transfer student whostarted school during spring 2020, shared an experience when she heard her uncle died duringa class. At that moment, she did not feel the faculty were approachable enough for her toshare the news; she also did not find any resources about how to deal with the unpleasantsituation. During
further study.Keywords: Undergraduate, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, EngineeringIntroductionIn an effort to address this issue of persistence for undergraduate students majoring inengineering and taking general chemistry, typically one of the pre-requisite courses taken duringthe first two-years on campus, we have developed a career-forward laboratory curriculum that isdesigned to support persistence. A career-forward curriculum targets the long-term goal ofpersistence—the personal capacity of students to continue towards an academic goal—byframing experiences with the content, context and specific skills of working in the target careerfield. Created as an extension of an earlier reform of the recitation component of chemistrycourses [1], this
;T State University where she received a B.S. in Bio Environmental Engineering in 2006. She then began pursuing her graduate education at Purdue University in the Agricultural and Bi- ological Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary research areas include 1) social competence in engineering education and 2) innovate instructional strategies for Biological and Agricultural Engineering students. She is also a Member of the Engineering Education Faculty, Insti- tute for Engineering Education and Innovation, Food Science Graduate Faculty, and Multidisciplinary Engineering Graduate Faculty groups at Texas A&M University. American c
societal impact of engineering infrastructure.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University. London is a mixed methods researcher with interests in research impact, cyberlearning, and instructional change in STEM Education. Prior to being a faculty member, London worked at the National Science Foundation, GE Healthcare, and Anheuser-Busch. She earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. American c Society for Engineering
• Initiated by a Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering faculty member as part of her Higher Education Research Services (HERS) Institute experience • Supported through funding from the Chancellor's Commission for Women, Tickle College of Engineering, College of Arts and Sciences, and private donations • Hosts social and development programming • Build community among women in STEM fields • Prepare students for success through their graduate studies and into their careers • WiSTAR3 mentoring program works with STEM professionals from UTK, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Y-12 National Security Complex, and area companies to provide professional and career development
began working as Co-PI on another NSF-funded study to reduce barriers in the hiring of underrepresented racial minority faculty in data science and data engineering fields.Dr. Tammy Michelle McCoy, Georgia Institute of Technology Tammy M. McCoy is the TA Development and Future Faculty Specialist for the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In this capacity, she works closely with graduate students and postdoctoral scholars interested in pursuing careers in college teaching through teaching assistant (TA) training and support, academic career development programs, and training and certification in college teaching. Specifically, she teaches courses and facilitates workshops to
a PhD in mathematics, I participated in one of the first Preparing the Professoriate programs in the nation. The goal of the program was to prepare graduate students more deliberately to “hit the ground running” as new faculty members. For me, it worked. I started a tenure-track position at an undergraduate-only institution with a solid awareness of the cultural values, norms, and expectations for mathematics faculty members at that time. Additional formal mentoring in mathematics education allowed me to quickly learn and model the norms and values of education faculty members as well. I was promoted to associate professor and tenured with ease, racking up awards and recognitions along the way. My experience with explicit, formal