. Roselli R, Brophy S. Effectiveness of challenge-based instruction in biomechanics. Journal of EngineeringEducation 2006;95:311-324.7. Kolikant Y-D, Linsenmeier R, Hirsch P, Gatchell D. A cognitive-apprenticeship-inspired instructionapproach for teaching scientific writing and reading. Journal of College Science Teaching 2006; 36:20-25.8. Kolikant Y-D, McKenna A, Yalvac B. The emergence of a community of practice in engineeringeducation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2007; :7-16.9. Bransford J, Brown A, Cocking R (eds). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and SchoolWashington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.10. Martin T, Petrosino AJ, Rivale S, Diller K. The development of adaptive expertise in biotransport
AC 2008-1399: EARTH DAY TEACH-IN: A MODEL FOR INDUSTRY,COMMUNITY, AND EDUCATION COLLABORATIONKen Barnard, K-State at Salina Ken Barnard has a doctorate in Aviation and Space from Oklahoma State University, and is a professional pilot with Airline Transport Rating, Certified Flight Instructor in airplanes and helicopters and Mechanic Airframe and Power Plant ratings. Ken is a professor in Aviation at Kansas State University at Salina. A former Department Head and Director of an International Pilot Center Ken became interested in climate change issues while doing atmospheric research for the Aviation Meteorology class he currently teaches. He was selected as one of the one-thousand individuals
, Vol. 20, Mar 1999, pp 131-152. 5. Elsegood, Russell, J. MacCallum, R. Hickey, and B. Jeffreys, “The Science/Technology Awareness Raising (STAR) Programme: a partenership in raising participation through peer tutoring”, Mentoring and Tutoring by Students, Sinclair Goodland, ed., Kogand Page Ltd. Stirling, VA 1998. 6. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching), Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities, 1998 (http://notes.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf). Page 13.406.10
are teaching courses in the sustainability area. We have identified universities from 15 states and the 3Page 13.115.4 District of Columbia which are teaching college level courses in the area of sustainability. The project team is checking on the web and using various databases to determine the courses listed on the university “books” as being taught in their departments, with the goal being to develop a questionnaire/survey to be sent to the department head and engineering dean to identify (a) how frequently these courses are taught, number of students who took these classes, etc., and (b) a copy of the course syllabus and information on the textbook(s) used. This
concerns,some particular to the 4+1 program. These concerns were: a. The 4+1 program is popular among the students and the faculty. It provides a relatively easy way to attract students into the graduate programs. Students choose it because it allows them to remain at Cal Poly, they are familiar with the system, the faculty, and already have housing and a social support system in place. On the down side, the 4+1 program blurs the lines between being an undergraduate and graduate student. Students and faculty are unclear when the transition is made. They are treated more as super seniors. b. Students felt that the number of undergraduate students (many 4+1 students) taking 500 level courses during their senior
) Gillespie, Thomas D., Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1992.2) http://www.epa.gov/nvfel/methods/uddscol.txt accessed on 1/17/08.3) Pourmovahed, A., Beachley, N.H., and Fronczak, F.J., “Modeling of a Hydraulic Energy Regeneration System – Part I: Analytical Treatment,” J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, March 1992, vol. 114, pp. 155 – 159.4) Wu, B., Lin, C-C., Filipi, Z., Peng, H., and Assanis, D., “Optimal Power Management for a Hydraulic Hybrid Delivery Truck,” Vehicle System Dynamics, 2004, vol. 42, nos. 1-2, pp. 23-40. Page 13.50.16
. Measurement Computing, http://www.measurementcomputing.com/ 2. B. Brey, “ The Intel Microprocessors 8086/8088, 80186/80188, 80286, 80386, 80486, Pentium, and Pentium Pro Processor Architecture, Programming, and Interfacing,” 7th edition, Prentice Hall, 2005 3. ADC0808/0809 datasheet, http://www.national.com/ds/DC/ADC0808.pdf 4. H. Broberg, EET302 laboratory manual, Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne 5. DAC0808/0809 datasheet, http://www.national.com/ds/DA/DAC0808.pdf 6. Likert, Rensis (1932), "A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes", Archives of Psychology 140: pp. 1- 55 Page
Name Game,” Success 101: A Forum for the Sharing of Ideas, Issue #1, Spring 1996, Discovery Press (www.discovery-press.com).3. Mendenhall, W. and T. Sincich, 1992. Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, 3rd ed., Dellen Publishing, San Francisco, CA ISBN 0-02-380-552-8.4. Seybert, T. A., C. D. Ghilani, and B. J. Naberezny, 2000. “Enhancing the First-Semester Experience in Surveying,” Journal of Surveying and Land Information Systems, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 183-189.5. Seybert, T. A., 2002. “Building Community and Team Skills in a First-Year Seminar,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Zone I Conference, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York
stop on graduation as professional and practitionersuse these publications to continue learning and refreshing their knowledge. The instructor providesfeedback for each to each student on the technical contents of their review as well as grammar,spelling and clear transmission of ideas.At the end of the course the students were asked to respond to an anonymous survey about thisactivity. The survey focused on questioning the students on the technical concepts that they learnedfrom the article reviews as well as how they felt about writing the reviews. The main findings canbe summarized as follows: a) Students didn’t like having to write the critical reviews. b) Students acknowledged the value of the critical reviews as a tool that gave them
. Page 13.852.8References 1. Faculty Handbook, 2007-2008, [University] , [Location], 2007.Appendix Page 13.852.9 GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYINVENTION DISCLOSURECover Sheet for Inventors An invention disclosure should be made when some new and useful idea has been conceived ordeveloped at GVSU, or when a GVSU employee or student has obtained unusual, unexpected, or unobviousresearch results that can be utilized by someone to enhance economic development in west Michigan. This Invention Disclosure Form (“IDF”) will enable evaluation of your idea to determine (a) itspatentability and (b) its potential for commercial value. An
convective heat loss to theenvironment shown in equation (12). •T / k air ? hexp *Tw / T¢ + (12) •y y ?0An approximate temperature gradient, •T/•y, at the wall can be calculated from the measuredtemperature profile.Figure 4 Laminar, free convection boundary layer conditions on an isothermal vertical surface.(a) Velocity profiles. (b) Temperature profiles[9, 10]. Page 13.835.8Figure 5 Velocity and temperature profiles in a natural convection boundary layer. *Diagram reproduced with permission from
:“You were all creative when you were kids. Every time you sat down and were handed a crayon,you drew something interesting. It’s time to get that creativity back.”A third set of problems was designed to show tradeoffs in design solutions and that problems aresolved for a reason; they aren’t solved in a vacuum. For example, they were given thisassignment: a.) Why do public restrooms have hand drying devices? That is, what is the purpose of hand drying devices in a restroom? (It is not sufficient to answer “to dry hands”)? b.) Give an example of a purely (or mostly) electrical solution to the hand drying problem and an example of a purely (or mostly) mechanical solution. c.) For each solution, list the direct costs of that
M l /C uf si ts B i vi M in A n ca En al n .( l /M .( E g tri & ci
AC 2008-873: ANALYSIS OF K-12 ENGINEERING EDUCATION CURRICULA INTHE UNITED STATES—A PRELIMINARY REPORTKenneth Welty, University of Wisconsin, Stout Kenneth Welty is a Professor in the School of Education at the University of Wisconsin-Stout. He teaches a variety of undergraduate and graduate course in curriculum development, instructional methodology, and student assessment. He received his Bachelor's and Master's degrees from Illinois State University and earned his Doctor of Philosophy degree from the University of Illinois at Champaign/Urbana. Prior to joining the faculty at UW-Stout, he was a Visiting Professor in the College of Education at the University of Illinois, a Research Associate at
through their offering cycle (two-yearcycle). The following sample testimonial from one of the classes is typical of the positiveresponse we have been getting from the students. We are currently compiling all suchevaluations to generate an annual improvement action plan.Students TestimonialsIn this section, we present a sample student testimonial that shows the type of hands-onknowledge that became available to the students through NDLP. Statistics for COSC-4313/5313, Computer Networking Course offered every fall semesterNo. Of Students 19Students overall A B C DGrade in the 8
accomplish. It can be introduced tostudents earlier and used as a tool throughout the design curriculum.As technology continues to move forward, the tools given to engineering students must alsochange to adapt to the engineering environment outside of academics. The expectation forstudents to be proficient in sophisticated design and graphics technologies requires that machinevision and computerized animation software be embraced as key elements in undergraduateengineering design curriculum.Bibliography1. DARPA OR of the Future Workshop in executive Summary 2003. P 1-22. Rosen, J. & Hannaford, B. (2006, October). Doc at a Distance. IEEE Spectrum, 43(10), [34-39
visits to the participatingschools have been completed by the project evaluator. We present our evaluation plan below andreport on the some of the findings in the next section.A two-pronged evaluation design is employed to assess the success of the project in meeting itsgoals and objectives, focusing respectively on: a) formative evaluation of training andimplementation processes during the first year, with the goal of making refinements andadjustments to procedures in subsequent years of the project; and b) summative evaluation of theimpact of the project on: i) the University’s higher education program and in the development ofteaching Fellows; ii) K-12 institutions served in enhancing student performance; and iii) thelong-term professional
having dimensions Fx, Fy, and Fz.Task B: Group the in and out flows from the same coordinate directions as pairs. Do somedividing by delta quantities and take limits as these go to zero (or to the continuum limit).Discover your PDE.After the students have been working an appropriate amount of time, the instructor convenes theclass as a whole. The instructor then works through the exercise by interacting with the class,the final result being the continuity equation in Cartesian coordinates.Comments: This exercise engages students and allows them to take ownership of the continuityequation. This exercise has been found to be much more effective than an instructor-centeredderivation. After completing this exercise, it is a simple matter to present
AC 2008-1241: HILLMAN ENTREPRENEURS PROGRAM - CHALLENGES,IMPACT ON A DIVERSE POPULATION, AND EARLY OUTCOMESKaren Thornton, University of Maryland Karen Thornton has more than twenty years experience working as an educator and mentor in two industries, first music performance where she was an artist entrepreneur, and now by supporting young entrepreneurs. She was the program director the University of Maryland’s (UM) award-winning Hinman Campus Entrepreneurship Opportunities (CEOs) Program from its launch in fall of 2000 until December 2006. Karen is currently directing the new Hillman Entrepreneurs Program that is a partnership between UM and Prince George’s Community College and she spends
(s) that will becovered in that day’s readings and lesson, by adding lesson objectives the students gain insightabove and beyond the topic to be covered. As a primary example, consider one of the lessons inthe Biomaterials course that focuses on corrosion. Instead of telling the students that today’slesson will cover concepts simply related to corrosion, and that they should study the assignedreading prior to the lesson, the following lesson objectives are also listed: a. Explain the thermodynamic reason for corrosion and develop the Nernst Equation. b. Analyze Evans plots and polarization curves to better understand corrosion rates. c. Discuss the various types of corrosion, and understand the differences between them.Hopefully it is
, October 2007, pp. 283-294.16. Davis, B. G., Tools for Teaching, Jossey-Bass Publishers, p.100, 1993.17. Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., and Allen, D.E., “Chapter 1: Why Problem-based learning? A Case Study of Institutional Change in Undergraduate Education,” The Power of Problem-Based Learning, A Practical “How to” for Teaching Undergraduate Courses in Any Disciplinary, edited by Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., and Allen, D.E., Stylus Publishing, LLC, Sterling, Virginia, 2001, pp. 3-12.18. Daems, W., Smedt, B.D., Vanassche, P., Gielen, G., Sansen, W., and Man, H.D., “PeopleMover: An Example of Interdisciplinary Project-Based Education in Electrical Engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 46, No. 1, February 2003, pp. 157-167.19. Presley
AC 2008-2041: DEVELOPING A WRITING IN THE DISCIPLINES PROGRAM INAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY COLLEGELaura Wilson, University of CIncinnati Laura Wilson, University of Cincinnati Laura Wilson is a Field Service Instructor at the University of Cincinnati’s College of Applied Science (CAS). Her main focus is Humanities, specifically English Composition and Technical Writing. She began co-teaching the Senior Design sequence in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Department in Fall 2006. She holds a Masters of Arts from Bowling Green State University in Scientific and Technical Communication.Teresa Cook, University of Cincinnati Teresa Cook, University of Cincinnati Teresa Cook is a
, Technology, and Computer Science atIPFW adopts the Citrix server for at least one year and run the surveys again for betterevaluation. Page 13.694.14Bibliography1. B. L. Hawkins, J. A. Rudy, and J. W. Madsen. EDUCAUSE 2002 Core Data Service Monograph. EDUCAUSE, 2003.2. Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau. High-speed services for internet access: Status as of December 31, 2003. Technical report, Federal Communications Commission, June 2004.3. Michael H. Goldwasser and David Lestscher. “Providing Students Universal Access to a Centralized, Graphical Computing Environment.” ITiCSE’05, June 27–29
Fall ‘07 — Senior 14 3 4 3 0.83 1.11For the sophomore-level course, a decrease of knowledge scores is observed only rarely and anaverage increase of 1.02 score points for students’ knowledge was obtained. For the senior-levelcourse, knowledge gain was limited to only a few topics, but significant in those areas.Particularly strong average incremental gains were obtained in the primary objectives of thelaboratory exercises: speed is proportional to voltage (+1.44), torque is proportional to current(+1.61), and a dynamometer measures output mechanical power (+1.17), however the greatestincremental gain in knowledge concerned the optoswitch (+1.69).B. Assessment of Student Confidence in Applying
AC 2008-539: THE LOSS OF THE SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA: PORTAGINGTHE LEADERSHIP LESSONS WITH A CRITICAL THINKING MODELRobert Niewoehner, U.S. Naval Academy CAPT Rob Niewoehner, USN, PhD is Director of Aeronautics at the US Naval Academy. Prior to joining the Naval Academy faculty, he served as a fleet F-14 pilot, and then as an experimental test pilot, including Chief Test Pilot for the F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet, throughout its development.Craig Steidle, US Naval Academy Rear Admiral Craig Steidle, USN (ret) holds the Rogers Chair of Aeronautics at the U.S. Naval Academy. In uniform, RADM Steidle served as a combat A-6 pilot, test pilot, F/A-18 Program Manager, F-35 Program Manager, and
, computational fluid dynamics, professional ethics, and piano technology.Donald Richter, Eastern Washington University DONALD C. RICHTER obtained his B. Sc. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from The Ohio State University, M.S. and Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. He holds a Professional Engineer certification and worked as an Engineer and Engineering Manger in industry for 20 years before teaching. His interests include project management, robotics /automation and air pollution dispersion modeling. Page 13.1326.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008
AC 2008-831: MANUFACTURING A WORKFORCEStan Komacek, California University of Pennsylvania Stan Komacek earned a BS from California University of Pennsylvania, MEd from Miami University, and EdD from West Virginia University. He served as the Project Director for the PA State System of Higher Education in PA’s Nanofabrication Manufacturing Technology Partnership and for the PA Governor’s Institute for Technology Education. A Professor of Technology Education and Chair of the Department of Applied Engineering and Technology at California University of PA, Dr. Komacek is currently PI and Project Director for the NSF ATE Advanced Manufacturing in PA Project.Carol Adukaitis, PA State System of
AC 2008-1015: A CORRELATION DETECTOR SIMULATIONJames Reising, University of Evansville JAMES A. REISING is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Evansville, Evansville, Indiana, where he has taught since 1980. Prior to that time he was employed by Eagle-Picher Industries at the Miami Research Laboratories and the Electro-Optic Materials Department. He is a senior member of IEEE.Mark Randall, University of Evansville Mark E. Randall is a Staff Engineer for the University of Evansville College of Engineering and Computer Science. He is presently working on a Master of Science Degree in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of Evansville. Mark has two
. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(9), 842-843.3. Margolis, J. & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.4. Sadker M. & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness. NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.5. Isaacs, B. (2001). Mystery of the missing women engineers: A solution. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 127(2), 85-91.6. Forest, J. & Kinser, K. (2002). Higher education in the United States: An encyclopedia. Retrieved October, 24, 2006, from http://www.higher-ed.org/heus/topics.htm7. Asociación Nacional de Facultades y Escuelas de Ingeniería. (2003, October). XXX Conferencia nacional de ingeniería. La
mathematics for 3 years. She has worked on diverse projects about learning, including research about discourse, reading, statistics, algebra, and now Statics. Her primary research focus remains improving the quality of mathematics teaching. She can be contacted at kjh262@psu.edu.Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University Christine B. Masters is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics at The Pennsylvania State University. She earned a PhD from Penn State in 1992. In addition to raising four children with her husband of 20 years, she has been teaching introductory mechanics courses for more than 10 years, training the department graduate teaching assistants for