understood on entering the university. In addition, thecourses address a number of the ABET (a) through (k) outcomes; the outcomes specificallyaddressed include: a. Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering b. Design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data d. Function on a multi-disciplinary team f. Understand professional and ethical responsibility g. Communicate effectively, and k. Use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice Page 13.1300.13
Page 13.1134.13Appendix A – Raw Data (continued) Page 13.1134.14Appendix B – Sample Statistical Analysis for Research Question 1 Page 13.1134.15Appendix B – Sample Statistical Analysis for Research Question 1 (continued) Page 13.1134.16
(SeeFigure 1). Although successful academic programs depend on many good characteristics,Zhang7 finds two characteristics to be notable; they are, “…(a) facilitates critical thinking and (b)recognizes a variety of intellectual styles” (517). Page 13.1155.2Figure 1. Staircase to Critical and Creative Thinking4As demonstrated in Figure 1, remembering or retrieving information, although the first steptowards higher-order skills, is not evidence of unique perspective and exploration of situationswith questions and assessments. Instead, proficient critical thinkers go beyond constructing newmeanings by mixing new material with existing ideas (Understand
boundaries between engineering and technology, it became clear that engineers were not adequately prepared in laboratory techniques. ‚ By late 1990s ABET EC2000 appeared, requiring institutions to develop mission and objectives for each program, to develop outcomes that could be periodically assessed, and to continuously improve programs’ offerings.The new EC2000, referred to engineering laboratories as a significant part of engineeringeducation in 4 places; Design of experiment (3b), Use of modern tools (3k), Facilities (newcriterion 7), and Support (new criterion 8). Outcome 3.b, in particular, states that engineeringprograms must demonstrate that their students attain: an ability to design and conductexperiments, as
b: characteristic length a: speed of sound Mach Number Ma = V / a V: speed of airplaneAn efficient wing has a large lift-to-drag ratio CL / CD. The lift force Lf of an airfoil can be alteredby changing the angle of attack α. This actually represents a change in the shape of the object, andthese shape changes can be used to alter the lift when desired. Various types of airfoils have beendeveloped over the years in response to changes in flight requirements. Typical shapes of airfoildesigns are sketched in Table 2 and the corresponding experimental lift coefficients CL
eye opening experience.” - Student A “This is the first time in my life that I have traveled overseas, let alone to Africa.” - Student B “One thing I didn’t expect is that we couldn’t find a waste basket anywhere in the hotel. All drinks are served out of bottles, which are recycled. There were no napkins, but we washed our hands before and after meals with water and a rag. Any food or items purchased were not packaged in any cardboard or plastic. There is almost no waste produced here.” - Student C “Before our meeting with the District Chief Executive (like a mayor
teaching practice, and what would count as an effective use ofinformation about learners. The review also raises questions about how these various ways oftaking learners into account map to the extent and the ways in which practicing engineeringeducators currently take learners into account, questions that we address in this paper.Research questionsThis paper addresses the following questions: a) To what extent are engineering educatorscurrently taking into account learners in their teaching? b) How do engineering educatorscharacterize their learners when they do take them into account (what information, how is theinformation organized)? and c) Where do engineering educators get their information about theirlearners? In the next section, we
thinking. Tasks which could be completed by sequential steps generated low engagement and collaborative thinking.3. Include accessible assessment criteria in each task. The criteria are accessible if the students Page 13.1102.14 can easily employ them to assess the quality of their solution as they create it. Students were observed using four different sources of assessment criteria: a. Physical reasoning to determine if an activity was physically possible or not. b. Constraints within the stated problem. c. Calculated values to compare one design to another. d. Optimization rules to compare a design to an ideal.4
AC 2008-510: ASSESSING THE OUTCOMES OF TWO SUMMER CAMPS AT NKUSeyed Allameh, Northern Kentucky University Seyed Allameh is a full graduate faculty of Northern Kentucky University. Prior to joining NKU, Dr. Allameh conducted research at Princeton University for 5 years in the areas of MEMS, nanotechnology and advanced materials. He has served as a guest editor/editorial board of journals including Journals of Materials Science. Dr. Allameh holds a PhD from The Ohio State University. He has published over 70 scientific papers/book chapters.Thomas Brackman, Northern Kentucky University Thomas B. Brackman is the Physical Science and Pre-Engineering Recruiting Director at CINSAM, Northern
andare currently preparing a proposal for a minor in entrepreneurship.As part of the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) Program sponsored by theKern Family Foundation, UDM is developing a number of entrepreneurship case studies whichare being integrated into existing engineering fundamental courses. These case studies areintended to illustrate how entrepreneurs have capitalized on their knowledge of specificengineering topics. The aim is to provide routine exposures to successful engineeringentrepreneurs and principles of entrepreneurship throughout the curriculum. The ideal, long-termvision is that each engineering course would have one or more corresponding case studies. Thispaper will summarize the three cases which have been
Graduates,” Journal of Cooperative Education, 27(3), 1992, pp. 16-26.[6] Parks, D. K., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Cash, S. H., “Development of a Measure for Predicting Learning Advancement Through Cooperative Education: Reliability and Validity of the PLACE Scale,” Journal of Cooperative Education, 36(1), 2001, pp. 23-31.[7] Weston W. & Rogers, B., “A Survey of Recent Engineering Graduates: The Relationship of Cooperative Education to Job Factors,” Journal of Cooperative Education, 23(3), 1987, pp. 33-39.[8] Eames, C., “Researching in Cooperative Education: How a Practitioner Met the Challenge!” in Linn, Miller & Adams (Eds.), Handbook for Research in Cooperative Education and Internships, Mahwah, NJ
) you can find and write down each one’s nutritional data from the USRDA label and cost. What is the energy cost ($/100kcal)? What is the energy density (kcal/kg)? b. Now find the most nutritious item you can find in each category in the store and write down their nutritional values and costs. What are their energy costs ($/100kcal) and energy densities (kcal/kg)? 2. Plan a day’s menu for yourself using each of three alternative budgets: a. $5 (maximum individual daily allotment for a food stamp recipient) b. $10 (low budget/student)Maximize nutrition regardless of costModule 7: Carbon FootprintFrom a physics point of view, the creation of electrical
in the Research University. (1988). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook, New York: State University of New York at Stony Brook for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 14. Winston, R. B., Ender, S. C., & Miller, T. K. (Eds.), “Developmental approaches to academic advising,” New Directions for Student Services, No. 17. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982 Page 13.402.9 8
: Many students answered the three questions, “In what ways was the workforcepresentation instruction useful?” 2) “Is there anything else you would suggest changing?” and3) “Any additional comments?” The answers represented four themes: professionalism,awareness of good communication skills, comments about skills, and appreciation. Some of theanswers are included below. 1) Professionalism---for example, students said a. “It [the instruction] helped to gather a sense of professionalism.” b. “I like this program! I think it will definitely help students with senior design, other campus presentations, and presentations in industry.” 2) Awareness of good communication skills--- a. “Good tips
, “Integrating formal methods tools into undergraduate computer science curriculum”, Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2006.17. J. Spivey. The Z notation - A Reference Manual (Second Edition). Prentice Hall, 1992.18. J. B. Wordsworth, Software Development with Z, Addison-Wesley, 1992.BiographiesMARK J. SEBERN is a Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at the MilwaukeeSchool of Engineering (MSOE), and was the founding program director for MSOE's undergraduate softwareengineering program. He has served as an ABET program evaluator for software engineering, computer engineering,and computer science.HENRY L. WELCH is a Professor of computer and software engineering in the
devations of the other two workshops at a significancelevel of 5%. Whereas, Figure 4 shows that there is not enough evidence to reject the nullhypothesis of equal standard deviations between workshops 1 and 2. Since the end-of-semestermeasure of students’ satisfaction turned out to have a non-normal distribution which is alsocharacterized by unequal variances – and by checking the distributions, provided in Appendix B,the distributions did not seem to look similar – there was no reliable statistical test available tocompare the two distributions central tendencies. Table 4: Tests of normality, equal variances and equal central tendency measures Normality Equal Variances Equal
engineering technology program must demonstrate that graduates have:A. Technical Skills and Knowledge. a. an appropriate mastery of the • Strong analytical skills1. the understanding of electric circuits, circuit knowledge, techniques, skills, analysis techniques, and analog circuit design. and modern tools of their2. the understanding of computer programming, disciplines. digital circuit design, microcomputers, b. an ability to apply current operating systems, and local area networks. knowledge and adapt to3. the understanding of industrial electronic emerging
various ASK systems we have developed, as well as aglossary, search functions, and contextual help. In the following sections we specificallydiscuss system navigation, the ASK system, and the embedded narratives. Page 13.1181.8 Figure 1.b Components of learning enmvironmentNavigational SchemeThe navigational scheme we have implemented is two-tiered. Learners use a macronavigational structure to navigate to specific cases by first selecting a course, then acourse learning module, and then a scenario (case). Once the learner has selected a case,he or she navigates within the case by using the navigational controls within the ASKsystem and
: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy. Washington D.C: The National Academies Press.[6] National Science Board. (2006). America’s Pressing Challenge – Building A Stronger Foundation. A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.[7] Rogers, G. E. (2007). The Perceptions of Indiana High School Principals Related to Project Lead the Way. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 44(1), p. 49-65.[8] Hanson, D., Burton D., Guam G. (2007). Six Concepts to Help You Align With NCLB. The technology teacher. September 2007, p. 17-20.[9] Olds, B. M, Moskal, B. M., Miller, R. J. (2005). Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches and Future Collaborations. Journal
AC 2008-2241: LARGE-SCALE PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM DESIGN: LEARNINGSUSTAINABILITY THROUGH ENGINEERING CLINICSPeter Mark Jansson, Rowan UniversityUlrich Schwabe, Rowan University Ulrich Schwabe is a graduate student at Rowan UniveristyAndrew Hak, Rowan University Andrew Hak is a senior in electrical and computer engineering at Rowan University Page 13.837.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Large-Scale Photovoltaic System Design: Learning Sustainability through Engineering ClinicsI. AbstractWorking on cutting edge technology projects with industry is a key component of RowanUniversity’s engineering
of Critical IndicatorsThe execution of the students in our institution could be summarized using several criticalindicators in a single graph. Bar graphs for a subgroup of five critical indicators are shownFigures 4 and 5. These CI are: First Year Retention Rate, Graduation Rate, GPA in all Mathcourses taken, GPA in all the Spanish courses taken, and GPA in all the English courses taken.These indicators, for the school under consideration, are presented against the median for allschools to establish a comparison between the schools. In Figure 4, an actual school, labeledSchool A, showed above median behavior for all indicators. Figure 5 presents a case, School B,for which certain indicators are well below the median for all schools. By
. Benefit Estimation - Capital A - Operating Savings A - Operating Expense - Other Savings 4. Economic Analysis - Establish Economic Criteria (MARR, FoM, Tax Rate, etc.) - Use After Tax Analysis (ATA) Model - Calculate Life Cycle Costs (EUAC) 5. Evaluate Intangibles / Non Economic - Environmental, Aesthetic, Legal, etc. - Set Goals / Criteria 6. Decision Analysis A. Conduct Economic Analysis B. Conduct Sensitivity Analysis
irradiation on its roof and walls. Thesimulation is performed for a home in the southwest portion of the United States, specifically,Phoenix. The simulation is performed twice: a) with half of the roof shaded with PV modulesmounted on a rack, and b) with no PV modules. Even though the specific device used here toprovide the shading is PV arrays, any other means would produce similar results. The dynamicthermal model of the house is implemented in TK-Solver. The simulation goes through everyhour to determine the required cooling and heating load. It takes into consideration direct anddiffuse solar irradiance. It uses the Sol-Air temperature approach to determine wall and rooftemperatures. This approach modifies the outside skin temperature depending
. Meiry “Bang-Bang Aspects of Manual Control in High Order Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 336-342, July 1965. 6. Y. Chen and J. Naughton," An Undergraduate Laboratory Platform for Control System Design, Simulation, and Implementation," IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 12-20, June. 2000. 7. R. Molengraft, ML Steinbuch, and B. Karker, "Integrating Experimentation into Control Courses, "IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 40-44, Feb. 2005. 8. K. Arzen, A. Blomdell, and B. Wittenmark, "Laboratories and Real-Time Computing," IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 30-34, Feb. 2005. 9. D. Varsakelis and W. Levine," An
considerationsCourse Grading: Grades will be based on the following:Assignments 30%Class Tests/Quizzes/Exams 20%Final Examination 10%Project(s) 40%Grades: A (90+ to 100%), B (80+ to 90%), C (70+ to 80%), D (60+ to 70%), F (0 to 60%)resources14-17 have been extensively used.Use of guest speakers to fill the knowledge gap of the instructor has proven to be effective.Typical list of guest speakers include faculty from Industrial Engineering, Economics, PoliticalScience, environmental managers from local industries, and representative of nonprofitenvironmental organizations. Presentation by a
teams on activitiesrelated to the teaching topic. This approach enables the instructor to listen and monitorstudents as they work through the material.6 Price observed that concepts breezedthrough in 10 minutes in a traditional lecture, were actually taking students an entire classsession just to get a feel for. This powerful teaching technique requires certain premisesof teaching and learning to be put into place.7Fortunately, by applying three fundamental principles, instructors can create theseconditions in the vast majority of learning groups. These principles, referred to as“KEYS” in his essay, are: a) promoting individual and group accountability; b) usingassignments that link and mutually reinforce individual work, group work, and total
Gerpen, J., Shanks, B., Pruszko, R., Clements, D., & Knothe, G. ( 2004, July). Biodiesel productiontechnology. (NREL/SR Publication No. 510-36244). National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Boulder CO. p. 56(4) Local B100 Website, http://www.localb100.com, accessed Dec 29,2007(5) Journey to Forever website, http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_vehicle.html, accessed Dec 29, 2007(6) Van Gerpen, J., Shanks, B., Pruszko, R., Clements, D., & Knothe, G. ( 2004, July).Biodiesel productiontechnology. (NREL/SR Publication No. 510-36244). National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Boulder CO. p. 1(7) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Publications(8) Canakci, M. & Van Gerpen, J. (2003). A pilot plant to produce biodiesel from high free fatty
intelligence,” 1950 Mind, Vol. 59, pp. 433-460.3. Cope, David, THe computers and musical style. Madison, WI : A-R Editions, 1991.4. Hart, David B. John Paul II and the Ethics of the Body. The New Atlantis (Summer 2005):65-82.5. Floridi, Luciano and J. W. Flanders. “On the Morality of Artificial Agents.” Minds andMachine 14 (2004): 349-379.6. Kaling, Mindy. The Office "Ben Franklin", Episode Number 42. [perf.] Randall Einhorn.February 1, 2007.7. Kant, Immanuel. Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing,1993.8. May, William. Pope John Paul II and Bioethic: Bodily Life and Integral to the Human Person.Undated Manuscript available at www.catholicsocialscientists.org.9. Norvig, S. Russell and P, Artificial intelligence: A
. He has been distinguished by awards that include Favorite Professor in the College of Engineering Award from the Student Teacher Education Association, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1987; National Science Foundation Research Initiation Award, July 1989; B. Ray Thompsan Professorship Award, University of Tennessee, 1998. He was recently honored as an ASME Fellow Page 13.819.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 It Takes Two To Teach Capstone DesignIntroduction:The Capstone Design course at The University of South Florids is a wonderful example of
did not use in any way. Based on these general trends in thefeedback and discussions, actions will be taken to establish a more coherent flow in the lessonand tie together the simulation and synthesis. One way to do this is to implement the applicationcomponent of the lesson, which will require teachers to draw on the information they gleanedfrom experimentation with the quantum dots and the simulation. In this application component,the teachers will create a presentation for a fictional “company” that wants to use quantum dots,explaining a) how they function and b) why they would be useful for this particular application. Page