Conference Session

ERM: Problem Solving and Conceptual Understanding

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Therriault, University of Florida; Elliot Douglas, University of Florida; Emily Buten; Elizabeth Bates, Michigan Technological University; Jeremy Waisome, University of Florida; Marah Berry, University of Florida

Paper ID #36636Characterization of Problem Types in Engineering TextbooksDavid J Therriault (Ph. D.) David J. Therriault is an Associate Professor of Educational Psychology in the College of Education at the University of Florida. where he has been a faculty member since 2004. From 2014–2017, he held the UF Research Foundation Professorship. From 2015-2018 he held the B. O. Smith Research Professorship. He currently holds the University of Florida Research Foundation Professorship (2019-2022). His research interests lie in the area of cognitive psychology. Consequently, the bulk of his work is experimental

Conference Session

Curricular Developments in Electrical and Computer Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alejandro H Espera Jr, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University; Nicole Pitterson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

concepts and the need for them to pinpoint these early on in their study [3],[4], [5], it is also important for instructors that they develop an awareness of their own conceptualknowledge of the content. Thus, a systematic inquiry [1] into this issue is necessary to giveinstructors, especially beginners, the mechanism to reflect and improve on their teaching strategies[6], [7].The concept inventory used in this study [8] has been originally designed to comprise two parts:a) 20-item multiple-choice questions involving electric circuits operating in transient D.C. andsteady-state A.C., and b) a follow-up structured interview, where the latter is not within the scopeof this study. More detail about this instrument is discussed in the methodology

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Behnam Shadravan

.• 2014)• Heinricher, A. C., & Quinn, P., & Vaz, R. F., & Rissmiller, K. J. (2013, June), Long-term Impacts of Project-Based Learning in Science and Engineering Paper presented in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--19888Attachment- Project Definition: Developing a town near a sea and a forestThat is not an actual project, but it is defined for getting a sense of similar projects. It is assumedto be in Florida, as shown in figure 1.Figure 1. The assumed area of this project (a) the location of the project in the Florida State, (b)the project location on google map, and (c) the project location in google satellite map viewA town is proposed to be developed. The town is close to a forest

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Computing, Technology, and AI

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Quintin Kreth, Georgia Institute of Technology; Daniel Schiff, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jeonghyun Lee, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jason Borenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology; Ellen Zegura, Georgia Institute of Technology

22 [1, 7] 5.28 0.95 4.84 1.06 *** *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05To create the study’s independent variables, we transformed administrative data provided byGeorgia Tech into categorical variables (Table 3). Major area of academic study was divided intofour non-overlapping categories: computing, engineering, non-STEM, and science. Students withmultiple majors were assigned to their primary major, as recorded by the Georgia Tech registrar.A full list of majors included in each category is available in Appendix B (Table B1). Firstgeneration student status was included as a proxy for low socio-economic status, a commonpractice in studies of higher education [59], [60]. Race/ethnicity was coded as: non

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bruce Maxim, University of Michigan - Dearborn; Thomas Limbaugh, University of Michigan - Dearborn; Jeffrey Yackley, University of Michigan - Dearborn

Paper ID #36660Socially Distant Active Learning and Student Engagement inSoftware Engineering CoursesBruce R Maxim (Professor) Bruce Maxim has worked as a software engineer, project manager, professor, author, and consultant for more than 40 years. His research interests include software engineering, user experience design, game development, AR/VR/XR, social media, artificial intelligence, and software engineering education. Bruce Maxim is professor of computer and information science and collegiate professor of engineering at the University of Michigan – Dearborn. He established the GAME Lab in the College

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division ASCE Liaison Committee - Accreditation and Curriculums - What Changes Are Occurring?

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Norb Delatte, Oklahoma State University; Camilla Saviz, University of the Pacific; Audra Morse, Michigan Technological University; Brock Barry, United States Military Academy

-secondary educational and professional experiences that: (a) Supports the attainment of student outcomes of Criterion 3 of the general criteria for baccalaureate level engineering programs, and (b) Includes at least one year of math and basic science (basic science includes thebiological, chemical, and physical sciences), as well as at least one-and-one-half years ofengineering topics and a major design experience that meets the requirements of Criterion 5 ofthe general criteria for baccalaureate level engineering programs.If the student has graduated from an EAC of ABET accredited baccalaureate program, thepresumption is that items (a) and (b) above have been satisfied.” [3]Unlike the baccalaureate level criteria, it is not

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - The New Normal: Enduring Technology Improvements in the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyson Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert Rabb, The Citadel; Ronald Welch, The Citadel

,” Paper presented at ASEE 2021 Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Waco, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/36367[9] Lowman, J. (1995). Mastering the techniques of teaching (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[10] D. A. Saftner, C. B. Farnsworth, and J. Retherford, “Lowman's model goes back to the movies,” Paper presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.[11] J. B. Buckley, B. S. Robinson, T. Tretter, A. Hammond, A. Thompson, J. E. Lewis, “WIP: Impacts of COVID-19 on Diverse Engineering Students’ Sense of Belonging,” Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/38089.Appendix AAll: Now that you

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division Technical Session 3: Technology

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul McMonigle, Pennsylvania State University

, B. Penuel, J. Rhodes, K. Salen, J. Schor, J. Sefton-Green, and S.C. Watkings, "Summary and introduction," in Connected Learning: An Agenda forResearch and Design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. 2013.[9] A. Garcia, J. Bence, L. Pahomov, and N. Kremer, "Academically oriented teaching," inTeaching in the Connected Learning Classroom, A. Garcia, ed., Digital Media and LearningResearch Hub, 2014.[10] M. Sharples and R. Pea, "Mobile learning," in The Cambridge Handbook of the LearningSciences, 2nd ed., R.K. Sawyer, ed., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 501-521.[11] J.D. Slotta and H. Najafi, "Supporting collaborative knowledge construction with web 2.0technologies," in Emerging Technologies for the Classroom

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Integration of Engineering and/or Technical Rigor with Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Justice (DEIJ)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manish Roy, University of Connecticut; Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut; Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut

students.Specifically, the standards related to a strengths-based approach encouraged instructors toenhance student motivation and engagement [16], [17] by providing a variety of modes foractivities and assessments and provide students with the opportunity to make choices and applytheir strengths within the context of these learning activities and assessments. The standardsrelated to building a culture of inclusion encouraged instructors to a) include a personalizedinclusion statement in the course syllabus that goes beyond the required accessibility statementrelated to access and accommodations, b) to participate in development activities related toneurodiversity, and c) to adopt inclusive teaching practices that are appropriate for their course.The teaching

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - NAE Grand Challenges, Graduate Students, Sustainability, and Makerspaces

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna Engelke, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

Paper ID #38033Work-In-Progress: Make It Count - Supporting MakerspaceCourse Outcomes With Blended LearningAnna Engelke Anna Engelke is the Education Program Manager for the BeAM network of makerspaces at the University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill. Her work focuses on developing makerspace learning environments, including maker course integration, instructional design for tool trainings, and mentor programs for makerspace staff. She is a current doctoral student in the Learning Design + Technology program at NC State University. Her research interests include communities of practice, professional development for

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Shannon Gilmartin, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Paper ID #38250The effects of gender and URM status on the engineeringprofessional identity of upper-year engineering studentsSara A. Atwood (Dean of the School of Engineering, Mathematics, andComputer Science, and Associate Professor of Phy) Dean of the School of Engineering, Math, and Computer Science and Associate Professor of Engineering at Elizabethtown College in central Pennsylvania. Dr. Atwood has been at Elizabethtown since 2010 after obtaining a PhD in Mechanical Engineering at the University of California at Berkeley, and an BA and MS in Engineering at Dartmouth College. She is passionate about integrating

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 3 - Humanitarian Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Awatef Ergai, Kennesaw State University; Shane Peterson; Ginny Zhan, Kennesaw State University; Sabine Smith

/mentalhealth/stress-coping/parental-resources/young-adulthood/index.html [Accessed: January 27, 2022][2] L. Bland, “Impact of cross cultural study experiences on cultural sensitivitydevelopment,” in 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/16409[3] K. Davis and D. B. Knight, “Impact of a global engineering course on student culturalintelligence and cross-cultural communication,” Journal of International Engineering Education,vol. 1, pp. 1-38, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jiee/vol1/iss1/4[4] G. L. Downey, J. C. Lucena, B. M. Moskal, R. Parkhurst, T. Bigley, C. Hays, B. K. Jesiek, L.Kelly, J. Miller, S. Ruff, J. L. Lehr, and A. Nichols‐Belo, “The globally competent

Conference Session

LEAD Tech Session #2: Assessing and Evaluating Engineering Leadership Development.

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bruce DeRuntz, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Harvey Henson, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Tom Withee

, faculty, and community leaders independently “Agree” or “StronglyAgree” that the LDP met program objectives and provided value to the program participants.Coaches and students also noted that organizations within SIUC continue to reach out to LDP toorganize and conduct events on campus. The LDP continued to demonstrate significantleadership through organizing or participation in multiple events: a) the Annual LDP Food Driveraised over $5,000; b) raised over $3,000 for a family in need (Axel’s 5K); c) registered 126Donors at Red Cross Blood Drive; d) contributed 60 hours of trail building at Touch of NatureOutdoor Education Center; e) sent two teams to the Collegiate Leadership Competition (CLC)Impact Challenge; and f) raised over $25,000 for SIUC

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Crilly, United States Coast Guard Academy; Richard Hartnett, United States Coast Guard Academy

waveform.References1. M. T. Taher, A. S. Khan. Comparison of simulation-based and hands-on teaching methodologies onstudents’ learning in an engineering technology program, QScience Proceedings (Engineering LeadersConference 2014) 2015:58 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.582. M. T. Taher, A. S. Khan, “Effectiveness of Simulation versus Hands-on Labs: A Case Study forTeaching an Electronics Course, 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, June 2015.3. J. E. Corter, J. V. Nickerson, S. K. Esche, C. Chassapis, “Remote Versus Hands-On Labs: AComparative Study,” 34th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA, 20-23October 2004.4. D. May, B. Morkos, A. Jackson, N. J. Hunsu, A. Ingalls & F. Beyette (2022): Rapid

Conference Session

How Communities and Systems Influence Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emma Stine, University of Colorado Boulder; Amy Javernick-Will, University of Colorado Boulder; Tiera Tanksley, University of Colorado Boulder

Paper ID #38055Passing Along Experiential and Learned Understandings ofInequality: Marginalized Communities are Shapers ofHumanitarian EngineersEmma Sophie Stine Emma Stine is pursuing a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado, Boulder, where she is researching student experiences before, during, and after attending a graduate program in humanitarian engineering, focusing on how these experiences influence career goals and outcome expectations. She is interested in how these goals align with social justice movements, including if and how students and practitioners are addressing global inequality and

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Ethics Education Assessment

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kingsley Reeves, University of South Florida; Michelle Hughes Miller, University of South Florida; Grisselle Centeno, Florida Polytechnic University; Elaine Englehardt, Utah Valley University; Michael Pritchard; Susan LeFrancois, Florida Polytechnic University; Ideliz Roman, University of South Florida

] Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.701[11] Wang, Q., Song, Q., & Kim Koh, J. B. (2017). Culture, Memory, and Narrative Self- Making. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 37(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236617733827[12] Raelin, J. A., Bailey, M. B., Hamann, J., Pendleton, L. K., Reisberg, R., & Whitman, D. L. (2014). The gendered effect of cooperative education, contextual support, and self‐ efficacy on undergraduate retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 599- 624.[13] Ralph, E., Walker

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; Joseph Brobst, Old Dominion University; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Andrew Klein, Western Washington University; Sura Alqudah, Western Washington University

. Davishahl, A. Klein. “S-STEM Becoming Engaged EngineeringScholars: Insights from Year 1.” Proceedings of the 125th Annual American Society of EngineeringEducation Conference and Exposition. June 2020Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O'Neill, T. B., & Brecklin, J. B. C. (2013). Crafting a future inscience: Tracing middle school girls' identity work over time and space. American Educational ResearchJournal, 50, 37–75. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212458142Carlone, H.B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women ofcolor: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187-1218.https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237C. A. P. Cass, Z. Hazari, J. Cribbs, P. M. Sadler

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samantha Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Susan Sajadi, Arizona State University; Talia Makarov, Clemson University

Number of Participants Hiring Promotion Code Company: A1 B C D Total A B C D Total Agile learning 0 1 1 3 5 1 0 1 0 2 Comfort with ambiguity 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 0 4 Comfort with change 2 0 0 1 3 2 0 2 1 5 Creative problem solving 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 3 Interpersonal flexibility 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 Task flexibility 2 1

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anindya Roy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Aaron Kessler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Response group A Response group B p-value Adequacy of the privacy “Yes”, “I don’t have an “No” 0.013 laws (Q3) opinion” Potential discrimination “Yes” “No”, “May be” 0.224 (Q4) Familiarity with the Very or somewhat famil- Not familiar 0.662 term third-party. . . (Q7) iar Recency of topical read- “. . . last week”, “. . . last “. . . 6 months”, “. . . not 0.061 ing (Q8) month” interested”Those who responded that the laws are inadequate have a higher level of discomfort than the othergroup with a p-value of 0.013 (determined from one-sided t-test), and an associated

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shinae Jang, University of Connecticut; Pablo Aguero-Barrantes, University of Connecticut; Richard Christenson, University of Connecticut

establish an XR infrastructure to facilitate the adoption procedure for our courses.3 AR/VR LABORATORYThe AR/VR laboratory was established in a 300 square foot classroom in building of UConn’smain campus. Figure 1 shows the setup of this laboratory and its equipment. The followinghardware is available for faculty and students: • One (1) Alienware desktop (tagged as A in Figure 1) (www.dell.com/) • Two (2) Alienware laptops • One (1) Wireless HTC Vive system (www.vive.com/) (Figure 1 shows the antenna (C) and the base station (D)) • One (1) wired HTC Vive system • One (1) 60 inch TV connected to the desktop (B in Figure 1)The software installed in the computers is: • SteamVR (store.steampowered.com/steamvr) • Unity (unity.com

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi Curtis, Campbell University; Jacqueline Gartner, Campbell University; Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Bernard Van Wie, Washington State University; Carah Watson

and outlet streams. Figure 1. a) Hydraulic loss (left) and b) Venturi (right) set up Figure 2. Double pipe set up1.3 Module Dissemination and Implementation MaterialsA country-wide dissemination effort of these units has been ongoing for the past few years.Professors with different students, teaching styles, and geographic locations receive the unitsfor implementation in their undergraduate classroom. Units are sent out every year to selectfaculty, who attend a summer workshop aimed at training faculty to use best practices forimplementation. In this workshop, faculty become aware of all the materials available toassist in implementation and are given sessions on best classroom practices using

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Karoline Jarr

, "The relationship between scholarly teaching and SoTL: Models, distinctions, and clarifications," 2011.[11] N. van Hattum-Janssen, B. Williams, and J. N. de Oliveira, "Engineering education research in Portugal, an emerging field," International journal of engineering education, vol. 31, pp. 674-684, 2015.[12] L. Malmi, T. Adawi, R. Curmi, E. De Graaff, G. Duffy, C. Kautz, P. Kinnunen, and B. Williams, "How authors did it–a methodological analysis of recent engineering education research papers in the European Journal of Engineering Education," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 43, pp. 171-189, 2018.[13] M. Borrego and J. Bernhard, "The emergence of engineering education research as an

Conference Session

We Love our MOMs (Mechanics of Materials)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarira Motaref, University of Connecticut

. Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) results showed that more than70% of students found real-life pictures helpful in their learning and said that: “Real life examples showcased how theory applies in the world around us, making concepts more understandable” [2].Instructor built simple foam models to show design details and potential loadings and stresses.More than 80% of students reflected in SET data that these foam models very helpful in theirlearning. Figure 1 shows sample of real-life examples and foam models used in Mechanics ofMaterials course. (a) (b)Figure 1. a) Foam model displaying shearing stress in punching, b) Deflection in a cantileverbeam in a baby toyThe

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga; Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University

. 331001, 2022, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000060.[7] United States Interagency Council on Homelessness, “Opening Doors: Federal and Strategic Plan to End Homelessness,” 2015.[8] I. Hager, A. Golonka, and R. Putanowicz, “3D Printing of Buildings and Building Components as the Future of Sustainable Construction?,” in International Conference on Ecology and new Building materials and products, 2016, vol. 151, pp. 292–299, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.357.[9] C. Schelly, G. Anzalone, B. Wijnen, and J. M. Pearce, “Open-source 3-D printing technologies for education: Bringing additive manufacturing to the classroom,” J. Vis. Lang. Comput., vol. 28, pp. 226–237, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2015.01.004

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - Innovative Teaching Strategies II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ariful Bhuiyan; Jana Willis; Roberto Dugnani; Felipe Trujillo-Wheeler, University of Houston - Clear Lake

Kaczala, , Eccles, 2005). Stage 1 associates the codes discovered in stage 0with the four subjective task value (STV) categories outlined by Eccles: (a) accomplishment, (b)intrinsic, (c) utility, and (d) relative cost. The definition of Attainment is how an individual'sview of a task reflects their sense of self. Intrinsic value, also known as interest value, is theenjoyment individuals have while performing a task. Utility value is described as a student'sview of the future involvement of a particular task, and relative cost is the cost associated withengaging in a particular task, as measured by time, effort, or psychological aspects. Table 1: Coding scheme at stage-0 TotalCategory Code

Conference Session

Design Experiences in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Weihang Zhu, University of Houston; Zheng Fan; Francisco Robles Hernandez, University of Houston, College of Technology (MERGED MEMBERSHIP WITH COE); Medhat El Nahas; Burak Basaran, University of Houston; Kamran Alba, University of Houston

(b) Toy car design kits for teaching Figure 1. Mr. K’s summer project and his teaching kits at high school Figure 2. Mr. N’s presentation on analyzing video game dynamics with computation in physics The group also participated in industrial field trips to local companies including ARCSpecialties, MasterFlo, Re:3D, and Forged Components. According to feedback, these field tripswere the favorite part for some teachers, although the weather was quite hot in Texas duringthese trips. ARC Specialties at Houston is one of the largest robot integrators in North America.Master Flo manufactures pumps for oil and gas industries (Figure 3(a)). Re:3D at Houston is asmall business that specializes in gigantic 3D printers. Forged

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato; L. James, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University; Dan Ewert

core of aparadigm that is intended to begin a scholarly dialogue to define Education 4.0 with Education5.0 hurtling towards us just around the corner.References1. National Academy of Engineering. Grand Challenges for Engineering: Imperatives, Prospects, and Priorities: Summary of a Forum. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016.2. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Industry_4.0.png, last accessed February 5, 20223. M. B. Katz, "Class, bureaucracy, and schools: The illusion of educational change in America." 1971.4. L. Cuban, Managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools, the. Suny Press, 1988.5. R. B. Reich, The resurgent liberal: And other unfashionable

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Castillo, University of California, Irvine; Brianna McIntyre, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

feel a lot better about going into the field of engineering.Briggs was able to reach the learning objectives put into place by the internship program as wellas gain insight into the norms and customs of an industry-based engineering environment.Similar to Briggs, Joy experienced a positive experience while in her internship position. Shewas able to work at a small company, which ultimately benefited her acclimation into the fieldand informed her of the design process. The engineers were very kind, and I learned a lot from them. And I’m more confident in my ability to go through the engineering process of, “We have a need. How do we solve that need,” and how to get from Step A to B to C and finally putting it on the

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Al Mestiraihi, Utah State University; Kurt Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education

Paper ID #36863Work-in-Progress: Skill Requirements for Electrical andComputer Engineers (ECE) Graduates in the United States:Industrial companies' perspectivesMohammad Al Mestiraihi Mohammad Al Mestiraihi is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. Mohammad was born and raised in Jordan, his home country. Before joining USU, Mohammad was a student at Oklahoma State University where he received a Master of Science degree from the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. Mohammad also received another Master’s degree in Computer Engineering from Jordan University of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines; Jenifer Blacklock, University of Colorado Boulder; Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State University; Jon Leydens, Colorado School of Mines; Barbara Moskal, Colorado School of Mines; Janet Tsai, University of Colorado Boulder; Natalie Plata, Colorado School of Mines

also noteworthy that our original proposal, from which these RQs are quoted,used the term “sociotechnical inquiry” rather than sociotechnical thinking.For RQ2, in addition to asking focus group participants specifically about values, attitudes, andskills in alignment with the wording of our original question, we explored new ways of lookingat the rich data we collected by adding two additional sub-questions: RQ2.a. To what degree do the data we have collected show evidence of the definitions of sociotechnical thinking adapted from Downey’s Knowledge Strengths and Limitations and our Sociotechnical Continuum? RQ2.b. To what degree do the data from the Interview Assignment provide evidence of students demonstrating