Conference Session

Work-in-Progress Session: Emergent Methods for Engineering Education Research

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trevion S Henderson, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

approach to examining students’ epistemologies in thecontext engineering design. Studies of students’ epistemologies suggest a gap between theirprofessed epistemologies (i.e., their stated beliefs about knowledge) and their enactedepistemologies (i.e., what one might deduce about their beliefs from their behaviors). Thisresearch examines that gap in the context of design problem solving. We conducted focus groupsin which we asked students to (a) discuss their responses to a paper survey (professedepistemologies) and (b) evaluate engineering concepts, as well as the rationales behind theconcepts, in a set of engineering vignettes (enacted epistemologies). Preliminary findings suggeststudents often expressed hesitance for dominant epistemologies in

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division (CONST) Technical Session 5

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tolulope Ibilola Ogundare; Rebecca Kassa, University of Kansas; Omar Maali, City of Lawrence, Kansas; Brian Lines, University of Kansas; Jake Smithwick, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Kenneth Timothy Sullivan, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

constructionworkers.LIMITATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCHOne limitation of this study is the limited number of Specialty Field Leaders participants. Futureresearch is suggested to expand the data pool and investigate the human factors of more FieldLeaders from other specialty trades.REFERENCES[1] A. R. Chini, B. H. Brown, and E. G. Drummond, “Causes of the Construction Skilled LaborShortage and Proposed Solutions”. ASC Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference, CaliforniaPolytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo, California, USA, April 7 - 10, 1999. pp 187 – 196[2] Associated General Contractors of America (AGC), (2018). Worker Shortage SurveyAnalysis. Retrieved from: 2018_Worker_Shortage_Survey_Analysis.pdf (agc.org)[3] Associated General Contractors

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 5: Exploring and Re-Examining Ideas in Engineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Felix Kempf, King's College London; Nada Elfiki, Stanford University; Aya Mouallem, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; George Toye; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Kei Hysi; Xiao Ge, Stanford University; Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

we take a different tack, wanting to identify the nexus, or common ground, ofInnovative and Entrepreneurial self-efficacies, and Innovative and Entrepreneurial behaviors.Thinking about common ground is a useful lens with which to look at the intentional or focusedcreativity of engineers, whether they are working in new or existing enterprises. First, we showthe development of this intersectional/nexus concept (which we call Embracing New Ideas, ENI)in terms of measures of self-efficacy (ENI-SE; consisting of six items, with a Cronbach’s Alphaof .85) and behavior (ENI-B; consisting of five items, with a Cronbach’s Alpha of .80). Thenbased on Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), we model ENI-B (our dependent variable) asa function of ENI-SE

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janna Jobel, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

to feel comfortable with both their peers and their TA tobe able to recover from a setback quickly. 1. Student experiences a setback (lab does not go as planned). 2. Student looks to a) lab partner(s) or peers, and/or b) TA, and/or c) class and lab materials to decide how to respond. 3. Student's ability to move past the setback depends on whether a) others experience the same setback, b) others normalize setbacks, and c) they know where to look to help them troubleshoot. These factors impact whether they can effectively manage their frustration in the moment.Figure 1. Student Response to Setbacks in Lab Settings FlowchartConclusion To summarize, students’ ability to recover from

Conference Session

Reviewing Emergent Topics and Theory in Engineering Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yi Cao, Virginia Tech; Qin Zhu, Virginia Tech; Jennifer M. Case, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

methodological paradigm.Such an exercise can further help us develop some contextual knowledge that will prepare us toconduct qualitative research in Chinese engineering classrooms.Reference[1] B. M. Olds, B. M. Moskal, and R. L. Miller, “Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches and Future Collaborations,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 13– 25, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00826.x.[2] A. W. Astin, Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2012.[3] D.-M. Duşe and C. Duse, Engineering education in a highly globalised world. 2008.[4] S. O. Shaposhnikov and E. Yu. Yatkina

Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 9

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cole Hatfield Joslyn, Northern Arizona University; Peter Golding, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

research includes exploring a) how integrating holistic, socio-culturally responsive practices and His- panic/Latine cultural assets and values into educational success strategies influences Hispanic/Latine stu- dents’ sense of belonging in engineering and b) how Hispanics/Latines experience values conflicts in engineering and then navigate/reconcile those conflicts, as students or professionals.Dr. Peter Golding, University of Texas, El Paso Professor in the Department of Engineering and Leadership at UTEP. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Piloting a socio-culturally responsive peer-mentoring program to promote HLX+ students’ sense of belonging in engineering education: Lessons

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchel Jonathan Colebank, University of California, Irvine; Naomi Chesler

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

/white Spring 2022 3/8 4/7 6/5 Fall 2022 4/5 6/3 5/4Example reading, coding sessions,and homeworkHere is an example of how lecture-style and coding sessions werecombined to understand the importanceof blood vessel radii in determiningvascular resistance and blood flow.Lecture: Students read chapters basedon vascular resistance and Poiseuille’slaw. Class discussions focused on (a)how resistance, viscosity, and radiuschange in disease and (b) how Figure 1: Class homework to simulate steady, meanPoiseuille is used clinically. Coding: blood flow. Baseline

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division 2 - Engagement in Practice Lightning Round: Equitable Engagement and Transformative Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hyunjung Ji, The University of Alabama; Sally Grace Shettled, The University of Alabama; Mark Allen Mueller, The University of Alabama; Colby Nicole Putman, The University of Alabama; Amelia Salazar, Sam Houston State University; Laurel Jane Holmes MPH, Energy Alabama; Hyun Jin Kim, The University of Alabama

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division (COMMENG)

not shown in the table.Mentor students’ majors included chemical, Table 1. Mentor Student Demographicenvironmental, and mechanical engineering, and Black Hispanic Whitefinance. College freshman to senior students Female 1 1 5participated in our program as mentors. Male 1 0 2Our high school mentee student sample is drawn from two majority-minority high schools fromTuscaloosa County (School A) and Hale County (School B, located in Black Belt) districtsrespectively, approximately 60 and 25 students from each school for the program participation.While

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly M Golecki, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign; Elizabeth Ann McNeela, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign; Thomas Tran, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

both the pre- and post- survey. The last two questionsof the survey asked gender identity and age. Gender identity options included (a) man, (b) woman, (c)non-binary, (d) prefer not to answer, and a write in option. Students participating identified as 50% menand 50% women. Average age of the student respondents was 16.8 ± 1.5 years.Definitions of a soft robot In the free response section of the survey, participants were asked “What is asoft robot?”. Overall, students had reasonable ideas about what soft robots were and their uniquefeatures compared to traditional robots. Table 1 shows a summary of pre- and post- survey responses forthis question. While in the post survey, no one answered “I don’t know”, it is important to note that 4

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Technical Session 5: Work-in-Progress Part 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carlos Landaverde-Alvarado, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

Paper ID #37538Work In Progress: A Teamwork Training Model to Promote the Developmentof Teaming Skills in Chemical Engineering Students.Dr. Carlos Landaverde-Alvarado, University of Texas, Austin Carlos Landaverde-Alvarado is an Assistant Professor of Instruction in the McKetta Department of Chem- ical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. He received his B. S. in Chemical Engineering from Universidad Centroamericana ”Jose Simeon Ca˜nas” (UCA) in El Salvador, and obtained his M. Eng. and Ph.D. degrees in Chemical Engineering at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). He then pursued

Conference Session

Student Teams and Teamwork

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State University; Fatemeh Khalkhal; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University; Ana Karen Biviano; Yiyi Wang, San Francisco State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

,” Group Organ. Manag., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 165–210, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1059601118776750.[7] F. R. C. de Wit, L. L. Greer, and K. A. Jehn, “The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta- analysis.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 360–390, 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0024844.[8] D. A. Harrison and K. Klein, “What’s the Difference? Diversity Constructs as Separation, Variety, or Disparity in Organizations,” Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1199–1228, 2007.[9] J. Field and N. Morgan-Klein, “Studenthood and identification: higher education as a liminal transitional space,” presented at the 40th Annual SCUTREA Conference, Jul. 2010. Accessed: May 27, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/handle/1893/3221[10] B

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, University of Florida; Jenny Patricia Quintana-Cifuentes, University of Louisiana at Monroe; Akash Kumar

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

present preliminary results on students’ preferred debugging strategies andcompare them with their learning gains during a programming course. We focus on answeringthe following questions: a) “Is there a difference between students’ preference for debuggingstrategies and their course achievements?”; b) “Is there a relationship between softwaredebugging tools and the conceptual understanding of debugging strategies?”This study was conducted during Fall of 2022 in a 16-week programming fundamentals II courseat a large public southwestern university. This semester, 328 students enrolled from variousengineering and computer science majors. The data was gathered from a debugging assignment,which is an open-ended questionnaire. The open-ended

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Technical Session 7: Innovative Pedagogy

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Austin N. Johns, The State University of New York, Buffalo; Robert P. Hesketh, Rowan University; Matthew D. Stuber, University of Connecticut; Ashlee N. Ford Versypt, The State University of New York, Buffalo

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

solving systems of nonlinear equations are the numerical techniques used in the worked examples and case study. The template is designed to be used as an interactive textbook. Template 2: M3_PipeNetwork.mlx & J3_PipeNetwork.ipynb The case study in this MATLAB Live Script and Jupyter Notebook is adapted from Problem 8.11 from [45]. The case study models the behavior of water flowing through a pipe system. The template is designed to be used as in-class activity or case study for part “a” and as a homework problem for part “b” and part “c”. The case study involves solving a system of nonlinear equations using a built-in nonlinear equation solver.• Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs): Initial Value

Conference Session

Effective Teaching and Learning, and Post-Pandemic Classrooms

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olga Mironenko, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Juan Alvarez, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

negative impact of the quizzes onthe final grades, with an average reduction of merely 1.1 points out of 100, with a standarddeviation of 2.27.Figure 1 (b) shows a distribution of difference (grade with quizzes minus grade without quizzes)in final grade comparison among individual students. The figure clearly demonstrates that aslightly negative impact was a result of a combination of some students experiencing lower scoreswith quizzes factored in while others achieved higher scores. Specifically, approximately 62% ofstudents experienced a decrease in their grades, with an average decline of 2.34 points out of 100.Conversely, the remaining 38% of students saw an improvement in their grades, with an averageincrease of 0.91 points out of 100.Figure

Conference Session

Two-Year College Potpourri

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hye Rin Lee, University of Delaware; Kevin Francisco Ramirez, University of California, Irvine; Nathanael Quinn Forde, University of California, Irvine; Zhong Cao, University of California, Irvine; Anna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine; Kameryn Denaro

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

prompts; (b) provideguidelines for effectively coding these prompts to understand how students aredifferentially engaging with the intervention; and (c) evaluate the extent to which thequality of writing prompt completion is associated with changes in motivational beliefs in aYouTube role model intervention for community college engineering students. Resultsprovide guidelines for effectively developing and coding writing prompts that target a widerange of motivational beliefs. Further, findings show that there were no statisticallysignificant associations between the quality of writing prompts and any of the post-motivational beliefs. Implications for developing more effective interventions by analyzingstudents’ writing prompt responses are

Conference Session

Reviewing Methods for Educational Research

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alfa Satya Putra, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Jason Morphew, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Li Tan, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

). Research characteristics and patterns in engineering education: Content analysis 2000-2009. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8(4), 462-470.Chou, P. N., & Chen, W. F. (2014). Global resources in engineering education: A content analysis of worldwide engineering education journals. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(3), 701–710.Counsell, A., & Harlow, L. L. (2017). Reporting Practices and Use of Quantitative Methods in Canadian Journal Articles in Psychology. Canadian psychology, 58(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000074Godwin, A., Benedict, B., Rohde, J., Thielmeyer, A., Perkins, H., Major, J., Clements, H., & Chen, Z. (2021). New epistemological

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah D Budinoff, The University of Arizona; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jannatul Bushra; Ann Shivers-McNair

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

ScienceFoundation.References[1] A. Godwin, “The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Sep. 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-development-of-a-measure-of-engineering-identity[2] B. E. Hughes, W. J. Schell, B. Tallman, R. Beigel, E. Annand, and M. Kwapisz, “Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on Retention,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/do-i-think-i-m-an-engineer-understanding-the-impact-of-engineering-i dentity-on-retention[3] M. M. Camacho and S. M. Lord, The Borderlands of

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 7: Making

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville; Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville; Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville; James E. Lewis, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

. Resultant implications,limitations, and revelations of these findings conclude this paper.1. The Formal Makerspace Course1.1 Course OverviewDuring the first-year at the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville(UofL), all engineering students are required to take a course titled Engineering Methods, Tools,and Practice II (ENGR 111) [1-7]. The ultimate goal of ENGR 111 is to instruct students inapplication and integration of institutionally-identified fundamental engineering skills that areintroduced and practiced in the prerequisite Engineering Methods, Tools, and Practice I (ENGR110) course. Other notable general features of ENGR 111 include a formal (15,000 ft2) makerspacesetting that exclusively employs active learning

Conference Session

Ocean and Marine Division (OMED) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan M. Kathir, P.E., George Mason University; Mehdi Amiri

Tagged Divisions

Ocean and Marine Division (OMED)

size and weight of the tester suited for an SEM chamber. We alsoinvestigated different methods for rearranging the components of the tester so that the minimumoverall size be achieved. The micro-fatigue tester can be broken down into four main 2subsystems: The mechanical system, the electronics system, the SEM port interface, and thedigital control system interface. Collectively, these subsystems use the input provided by the userin tandem with the output from the sensors, which measure the stress and strain applied to thesample, in order to continuously adjust the required motor output. Figure 1 shows a) final designCAD model, b) various

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wujie Zhang, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Lauren M Beverung, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Rebecca McKeown; Tammy J. Rice-Bailey

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

Vries, "Biomimicry design thinking education: a base-line exercise in preconceptions of biological analogies," International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 797-814, 2021/09/01 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10798-020-09574-1.[6] https://biomimicry.org/what-is-biomimicry/[7] T. B. Kashdan et al., "The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people," Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 73, pp. 130-149, 2018/04/01/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.011. AppendicesAppendix I. Summary of project activities and related timelines. Activity

Conference Session

Work-in-Progress Session: Exploring Learning and Development in Engineering Courses

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Radheshyam Tewari, Michigan Technological University; Aneet Dharmavaram Narendranath, Michigan Technological University; Jaclyn Johnson, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

this, we quantify thecomplexity of the example problem as 26. We could choose to use other network centralitymeasures and an investigation into their suitability will be conducted in the future. Thehorizontal shear equation computation node is the most “central” to the computation, with adegree centrality of 5. Figure 3a-d: (a) Digraph of the correct solution. Steps to the two-part correct solution start at the "reaction forces" node. Solid circles show target nodes for achieving the two-part solution to the problem. (b) Student 1’s solution with solid and dotted circles showing parts of the solution achieved and unachieved, respectively. (c-d) Student 2’s and 3’s solutions, respectively, with dotted circles showing both

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yuwei Deng, King's College London; Wei Liu, King's College London

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

thinking: Part I,” Design and Culture, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 285-306, Nov. 2011.[5] L. Carlgren, I. Rauth, and M. Elmquist, “Framing design thinking: The concept in idea andenactment,” Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 38-57, Mar. 2016.[6] R. Razzouk and V. Shute, “What is design thinking and why is it important?,” Review ofEducational Research, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 330-348, Sep. 2012.[7] L. Bosman, “From doing to thinking: Developing the entrepreneurial mindset throughscaffold assignments and self-regulated learning reflection,” Open Education Studies, vol. 1, no.1, pp. 106-121, Jul. 2019.[8] J.H.L. Koh, C.S. Chai, B. Wong, and H.Y. Hong, “Design thinking and education,” SpringerSingapore, pp. 1-15, 2015.[9] A. Scheer, C

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashish Aggarwal, University of Florida; Griffin Pitts, University of Florida; Sage Bachus, University of Florida; Sarah Rajkumari Jayasekaran, University of Florida; Saira Anwar, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

253 600Students were asked to self-report their GPA. GPA was based on a scale of 4, with an “A” being a4.00, a “B” being a 3.00, a “C” being a 2.00, a “D” being a 1.00, and an “S” being a 0.00. Someclasses also used a “+” or “–” system. A “+” adds 0.33 to the base grade, while a “-” subtracts0.33. For example, a “B+” would quantitatively be a 3.33 (3.00 + 0.33), while a “B-” would be a2.77 (3.00 - 0.33).Data was gathered on students’ expected majors. Out of a total of 600 students, 311 (51.8%) weremechanical and/or aerospace engineering students, 114 (19.0%) were civil and/or environmentalengineering students, 102 (17.0%) were biomedical engineering students and 73 (12.2%) studentshad other majors. This data can be seen in Figure 2

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Technical Session 1: Diversity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Breigh Nonte Roszelle, University of Denver; Jason Andrew Roney, University of Denver

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

attributes: (a) the necessary technical knowledge, skills, and abilities to work intheir chosen field, (b) an appreciation for how all kinds of diversity strengthen engineering andcomputer science as disciplines, (c) knowledge of how to act in inclusive ways and createinclusive environments within their fields, and (d) consideration of diverse populations who areimpacted by their professional practice [4]. The thermodynamics activity focused on helpingdevelop attributes a, b, and d.Both the quick and long student reflection pieces showed that students understood the overalleffect group composition can have on the design process, helping reiterate attribute (b). In thequick reflection, 73% of students indicated that group composition mattered when

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - WIPS 3: Identity & Belonging

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy Frank, U.S. Air Force Academy; Daphne DePorres, U.S. Air Force Academy; Joel Sloan, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

ed., vol. 2. pp. 241-263, 2011.[6] E. L. Thile and G. E. Matt, “The ethnic mentor undergraduate program: A brief description and preliminary findings, ” Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 23rd ed., vol. 2., pp. 116-126, 1995.[7] T. D. Ennis, J. B. Milford, J. F. Sullivan, B. A. Myers, and D. Knight, “GoldShirt transitional program: first-year results and lessons learned on creating engineering capacity and expanding diversity” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 22.754.1-22.754.15, 2011.[8] M. Mattjik and M. Sanders, “Work in progress: a study on motivation in teams using self determination theory,” ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, pp. 1-9, 2020.[9] L. Tsui, “Effective

Conference Session

Work-in-Progress Session: Understanding Issues Faced by Graduate Students and Faculty

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Constanza Miranda, Johns Hopkins University; Rachel McClam, Johns Hopkins University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

definition highlights the depth and complexity of successful mentoring. After a close review of theliterature, we opted for sticking to [31]’s identification of 4 latent variables that were validated by [32] in 2009 forthe College Student Mentoring Scale. The variables underlying the mentor-protégé relationship at the collegiatelevel involve (a) Psychological and Emotional support, (b) Degree and Career Support, (c) Academic SubjectKnowledge Support, and (d) the Existence of a Role Model. While more testing is needed to validate theseconstructs in a variety of settings, it provides an important starting point for a contextually sensitive mentoringstudy. A definition with this level of theoretical specificity can be helpful for assessing program

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (ELOS) Technical Session 2: Manurfacturing, Simulation, Safety, and Technical Writing

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Audrey Erin Concepcion; Ryan Hekker; Ean H. Ng, Oregon State University; Chukwudiebube Atagbuzia; Thomas L Doyle, Oregon State University; Jenette K Paul, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

. Griffith and H. Frank, "Surveying the Safety Culture of Academic Laboratories," Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 18-26, 2020.[8] Y. Yang, G. Reniers, G. Chen and F. Goerlandt, "A bibliometric review of laboratory safety in universities," Safety Science, vol. 120, pp. 14-24, 2019.[9] K. A. McGarry, K. R. Hurley, K. A. Volp, I. M. Hill, B. A. Merritt, K. L. Peterson, P. A. Rudd, N. C. Erickson, L. A. Seiler, P. Gupta, F. S. Bates and W. B. Tolman, "Student Involvement in Improving the Culture of Safety in Academic Laboratories," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 90, pp. 1414-1417, 2013.[10] I. O. Staehle, T. S. Chung, A. Stopin, G. S. Vadehra, S. I. Hsieh, J. H. Gibson and M. A

Conference Session

Student Experiences and Development – Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Liu, University of Toronto; Greg Evans P.Eng., University of Toronto; Yunze Wei, University of Toronto; Milad Moghaddas, University of Toronto; Kashish Mistry, University of Toronto, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering; Tamara Kecman, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

effectiveness is used as one of the measures to evaluateinstruction quality [2]. In addition, learning effectiveness measures can also include an efficiencymeasure (i.e., time on task) [4, 10], which became an additional concept we explored in ourstudy.Influencing Factors of Learning Effectiveness in Online SettingsLiterature shows that learning effectiveness has been studied in three contexts: (a) when newteaching methods were introduced [6]; (b) when online or blended teaching was employed [7];and (c) when comparing different learning modes [4, 5]. The first two contexts suggest that usingalternative course delivery modes can provoke thinking and prompt studies on learningeffectiveness in different instructional settings. The instructional changes

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 13: Attitudes & Prespectives of Teachers

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tyler S. Love, University of Maryland Eastern Shore; Andrew John Hughes, California State University, San Bernardino

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

teachers’ intentions tointegrate physical computing concepts in their future classes? Design and Implementation of the Professional DevelopmentRecruitment and selection of participantsThe PD was advertised to public school district STEM curriculum coordinators acrossPennsylvania through email, a STEM outreach center website from the state’s land-grantuniversity, and posts on state STEM education association social media pages. To participate,educators had to attend as a team from their school district, requiring two teachers: (a) anelementary educator teaching in grade four or five and (b) a middle school educator teaching in aSTEM-related area. These parameters were intentionally created because the workshop content,materials, and

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria Perez-Piza, University of Texas at El Paso

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

Data Analysis Phase Step one: Propose (a) Remove prior to 2022. (a) Develop an electronic the first keywords. (b)Remove high school and college online Excel sheet. Step two: State studies. (b) Demographic criteria. (c)Remove preservice and teachers’ Information from Step three: Explore education. participants. and establish new (d) Inclusion criteria identify journals (c)Research type. specific keywords and their publishing