the course topics.” (LeDoux and Waller, 2016) In this approach, students workin small groups (typically dyads) to analyze problems and develop solutions through interactionwith their peers. The interaction with instructors is intended to provide positive reinforcementand “just in time” intervention using the principles of being a reflective teacher outlined byBrookfield (1995). In the PSS, the interactions meet the criteria defined by Chi et al and providefor increased formative assessment opportunities within the learning environment from peers andinstructors “in the moment.” Furthermore, LeDoux and Waller (2016) measured the impact ofthis approach on student learning with summative assessments and conclude that “no matterwhat level of
. Surprisingly, over half of the studies we reviewed used more qualitativemethods such as direct observation, analysis of reflective writings, presentations, and notebooks,document analysis of programs and curriculum, interviews, and recordings. Quantitative datafrom rubrics, surveys, and pre and post tests were also analyzed. The variety of research methodsused to explore project management skills are important to consider as we evaluate and assessthe GAPS program. Studies using quantitative designs were able to demonstrate differencesbefore and after project management initiatives were implemented. These studies provided arelatively concise and clear evaluation of the effectiveness of project management skills. The preponderance of qualitative
advantageous. Further, the pairing ofROS2 and Webots is not limited to these configurations, packages, and communicationprotocols. There are many arrangements in connecting ROS and Webots for education notdetailed in this report.The specific connections constructed in this research were found to have various obstacles whosesolutions are described in the following and reflected in Table II. Firstly, Webots runs mostreliably with an NVIDIA or AMD OpenGL graphics adaptor. Neither Oracle nor VMware freeversions, which were the virtual machine platforms utilized during this project, support Webots’sgraphics preference. This was found to have minimal effect on the performance of the simplesimulations if the rendering options were adjusted. For heavier
guide students and their mentors [16]-[20]. We mentioned that not only would the poster help them in their careers, but it would help us seek funding to continue the program. Interestingly, several of the students were genuinely excited about our desire to continue the program going forward, and they wanted to know how they could help. This was equally exciting for us to see. ● Reflections: In the final session, students talked about their projects and experiences. Most of the session was spent having various informal conversations. We also announced that each student would receive an additional $600, which was the remainder of the NSF funds.Mentor – Student InteractionAll of the faculty mentors were serving as
character test7 Communication8 Case study 19 Critical path and lean concept10 Evaluating and terminating the project11 Guest lectures: invited speakers12 Reflective writingAssignments, due dates (Friday 5:00 pm) and Assessments Due Percentage Assignment Points (pts) (Week) (%) 3, 8, 10, Homework 10 10 14 Midterm 7 25
their departments or colleges. This research addresses the need for a scale to measure microaggressions in the uniqueengineering to provide data to better understand the breadth of microaggressions experienced bystudents. The development and validation of the EGRMS will impact engineering students andacademic leaders as it enables the collection and analysis of microaggressions across manyengineering departments and colleges.AcknowledgementsThis material is based in part on work supported by a National Science Foundation No., 1828172and 1828559. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation