Paper ID #40567Labs that should be hands-on are, in fact, not hands-on at all - What isthis the state of our engineering laboratories today?Ahmad Farooq, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyProf. Kimberly Cook-Chennault, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Kimberly Cook-Chennault is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering De- partment at Rutgers University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Labs that should be hands-on are, in fact, not hands-on at all. What is the state of our engineering laboratories today
Paper ID #40555Wind farm acoustics course: Use of a real-world case study to addressABET student outcomesDr. Heather Lai, State University of New York at New Paltz Heather Lai is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at SUNY New Paltz, NY where she teaches courses in dynamics, system dynamics, finite element analysis and computer simulation. Her pro- fessional background and research interests include automotive vibration (Motorola Inc.), musculoskeletal biomechanics (BME, Wayne State University), room acoustics, wind farm acoustics and the dynamic be- havior of 3D printed multi-materials. Over the past 8 years
sections of the paper for them. How ethical is it for the student to use ChatGPT in this way? [Likert scale] How ethical would your peers think it is to use ChatGPT in this way? [Likert scale] How ethical is it in the present-day engineering profession to use ChatGPT in this way? [Likert scale] Would you have made the same decision as the student? Why or why not? [Open- ended question]Implementation and Plan for Future Work Face validity is a significant concern with new survey instruments. “A test is said to beface valid if it appears to be measuring what it claims to measure” (Kline, 2000, p. 18). Ineducational research, typically a couple of approaches have been utilized for
design and manufacturing. He also has a growing interest in engineering education, especially with regards to sustainability and entrepreneurial innovation in the curriculum. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Structuring Learning in a Makerspace Using a Design MethodIntroduction & BackgroundStructuring students’ makerspace experiences within the context of Taguchi’s Method, anembodiment and detail level design method meant to improve quality [1], is the great idea forteaching (GIFT) explored in this article. Engineering instructors responsible for courses rangingacross all undergraduate years find educational uses for university makerspaces [2].Makerspaces support: active learning
Eng Des 176, art. 113023 (2022).[5] S. Gourod, H. Choe, ITER Organization. “Stats on US Universities participation in ITER Internship Program”, private communication, June 2022[6] A. Dominguez, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. “Outreach and education activities at PPPL”, private communication, July 2022.[7] A. Creely, D. Brunner. “Engineering needs at Commonwealth Fusion Systems”, private communication, December 2021.[8] J. Liou. “Joint ICTP–IAEA College Launches E-learning Course on Fusion Applications, Provides Training”. IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication, https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/joint-ictp-iaea-college-launches-e-learning-course- on-fusion-applications-provides-training (retrieved
, and construction of this system and related knowledge is currently indevelopment by upperclassmen engineering students at Rowan University alongside faculty andthe Waterworks partners. This project is supported and funded by the USEPA. The four pillars ofWaterworks are WaterMobile, WaterPal, WaterTalk, and WaterCave (Figure 1). The curriculumsare developed in line with and are connected to the New Jersey Core Curriculum ContentStandards for science [9]. Figure 1: Activities for the Various WaterWorks ComponentsWaterMobile consists of multiple physical models that can be transported on a cart and broughtto classrooms in order to promote visual and hands-on learning. Included in the array are modelsof pumps and pipes
CollegeBackgroundThe learning objectives for the class are inspired by Myles Horton and bell hooks who- in theirexploration of democratic classrooms- said that as educators and learners we seek to transformconsciousness, to learn ways of knowing that enable us to know ourselves better and live in the worldmore fully [1, 2]. This paper follows on the author’s previous work [3], which argues for therepoliticization of engineering knowledge through curricular interventions for a more liberatoryengineering education. Interdisciplinary and context-rich approaches have been shown to elicit deeperlearning in general [4], and to engage marginalized students more effectively [5]. One of Horton’stheories is that learning takes place through cycles of reflection and
* *Penn State University, ESMAbstract This is a work in progress study of implementing novel educational content deliverymethods in 2nd year engineering mechanics courses. Today’s students have access to a plethoraof digital information and are quickly adapting to new technologies. Addressing the continuingchallenges in maintaining students’ motivation and success requires new approaches to teachingintroductory topics in engineering courses. In typical engineering class, traditional teachingapproaches, such as chalkboard talks and PowerPoint presentations are often utilized, this oftenpresents the issue of unidirectional communication and passive learning. While students haveaccess to many online education resources such as YouTube and
-Credential Development, Evaluation, and StandardizationAbstract:Penn State is the flagship and land-grant university for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania andtherefore has an active outreach program serving Pennsylvania industry and citizens that hasexpanded in scope nationally and internationally over the years. Penn State is now evaluatinghow micro-credentials can be used to strengthen educational experiences and provide upskillingfor its students and working professionals. The School of Engineering Design and Innovation(SEDI) in the College of Engineering (COE) is responsible for leading professional developmentinstruction for engineers and others working in technical fields. As has become evident,particularly over the last
electrical en- gineering. His research focuses on microgrids and energy harvesting, and aligns with his passion for renewable energy and sustainable solutions. In 2022, Devin graduated summa cum laude with a B.S.E.E. from Bucknell, where he developed a strong foundation in electrical engineering. He demonstrates his dedication to his field through his involvement in curriculum development, academic and research-related activities, and presenting his findings at national and global conferences and workshops. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Photovoltaic Design Projects as an Innovation in Fundamentals of Electric
: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and- engineering/home.htm [Accessed February 1, 2023].[16] E. Ginzberg, S.W. Ginzberg, S. Axelrod, and J.L. Herma. “Occupational choice: An approach to a general theory”, New York: Columbia University Press, 1951.[17] L. V. Potts, A. Schmidt and R. Hale, “The great outdoors: Assisting student career choice in geomatics”, Surveying and Land Information Science, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 71-81, 2010.[18] G. Nugent, B. Barker, G. Welch, N. Grandgenett, C. Wu and C. Nelson, “A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1067-1088, 2015.[19] A. S. Kazi and A. Akhlaq, “Factors Affecting Students' Career Choice
safety topics. Within our curriculum, we havenoticed a gap in safety thinking when going on site tours, as well as, a general safe mindset culture. It seemsthat students tend to not review pre-selected safety briefs, safety warnings, or even boiler plate safetystatements on syllabi. Over the last four years several faculty members adopted a more upfront and proactive teachingmoment to address these concerns by emphasizing the importance of safety, in every class and meeting,through a Safety Moment. To date, we have implemented safety moments in five different classes withinArchitectural Engineering (AE), from our second-year introductory courses, to a third-year construction course,a fourth-year discipline specific design course, and a
benefits of college student project teams and competitions. Teaching Interests: David Schneider has dedicated much of his career towards the improvement of engi- neering education. In addition to mentoring typically over 200 students every semester on many of the projects listed above, David has taught courses such as Model-Based Systems Engineering, Engineering Project Leadership, and Creativity in Engineering. Through the Cornell Cup, David has also developed in conjunction with the Cornell team’s students, a series of systems engineering professional design guides that target identified nationwide curriculum gaps. Utilizing this work in particular, students have earned such recognitions as being the 1st American
CooperativeEducation and Internships.[23] Dehing, Fons, Wim Jochems and Liesbeth Baartman, 2012, “Development of an Engineering Identityin the Engineering Curriculum in Dutch Higher Education: An Exploratory Study from the Teaching Staffperspective,” European Journal of Engineering Education, 38 (1), pp. 1-10.[24] Pfund C, Maidl Pribbenow C, Branchaw J, Miller Laufer S, Handelsman J., Professional skills: themerits of training mentors, Science. 2006; 311:473–4.[25] Bieschke K., Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations: implications fordeveloping scientifically minded psychologists, J Career Assess. 2006; 14:77–91.[26] Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior(Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New