Conference Session

Frontiers in Engineering Management

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suzanna Long, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Hector Carlo, University of Puerto Rico; Jane Fraser, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Abhijit Gosavi, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Scott Grasman, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Abroad: The Role of College Students’ Goals on the Development of Cross- Cultural Skills and Global Understanding. College Student Journal, 38(3), 441 -452.12. Leask, B., (2004) Internationalisation Outcomes for All Students Using Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). Journal of Studies in International Education. 8(4) 336-351.13. Lipnack, Jessica and Stamps, Jeffrey, (2000) Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology, 2nd. Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.14. Lipnack, Jessica and Stamps, Jeffrey, (1997) Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology, New York: John Wiley and Sons.15. Lohman, J., (2008) A Rising Global Discipline, Journal of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; Jacquelyn Kelly, Arizona State University; Dale Baker, Arizona State University; Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University

engineering language, or "engineeringspeak" as a result of the multimodal module, mental model expression, and the assessment.Results indicated that the mean score following instruction (M = 12.23, SD = 2.12) wassignificantly greater than the mean score prior to instruction (M = 8.79, SD = 3.19), t(37) = 7.72,p < .01.In order to examine the relationship between conceptual gain and increase in engineering speak,as measured by the Bonding Module Assessment, a liner regression analysis was conducted.This analysis revealed a significant correlation of .726, t(35) = 6.33, p < .01. The unstandardizedcoefficient, B=.629, suggests that for every one unit increase in engineering speak, studentswould experience a .629 unit increase in conceptual

Conference Session

Engaging Students in Learning

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Dong, University of Cincinnati; Janak Dave, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

experiential learning as anexcellent one. For global experiential learning, the extra cost of travel can be a limiting factor.For the honors experiential learning students, it was the additional time required to communicatewith the nonprofit organizations.Bibliography1. David A. Kolb on Experiential Learning, http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-explrn.htm2. Honors Scholar Program Academic and Curricular Information at the University of Cincinnati, October 2006,http://www.uc.edu/honors/3. Institute for Global Studies and Affairs, http://www.uc.edu/global/Programs/mprograms.html4. University Studies Abroad Consortium, http://usac.unr.edu/5. Honors Special Topics Course Proposal, Entrepreneurship through Innovative Interdisciplinary Projects inTechnology and

Conference Session

Global Engineering Education: Intercultural Awareness and International Experience

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janak Dave, University of Cincinnati; Janet Dong, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

International

experiential learning as anexcellent one. For global experiential learning, the extra cost of travel can be a limiting factor.For the honors experiential learning students, it was the additional time required to communicatewith the nonprofit organizations.Bibliography1. David A. Kolb on Experiential Learning, http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-explrn.htm2. Honors Scholar Program Academic and Curricular Information at the University of Cincinnati, October 2006,http://www.uc.edu/honors/3. Institute for Global Studies and Affairs, http://www.uc.edu/global/Programs/mprograms.html4. University Studies Abroad Consortium, http://usac.unr.edu/5. Honors Special Topics Course Proposal, Entrepreneurship through Innovative Interdisciplinary Projects inTechnology and

Conference Session

Innovations in Civil Engineering Education I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stuart Walesh, S. G. Walesh Consulting; Javier Conde, National University of Distance Education; Jose M. de Urena, University of Castilla-La Mancha; Jose Turmo, University of Castilla-La Mancha; Raul Vizcaino, University of Castilla-La Mancha

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

coaching, talent administration), (20).Appendix B is a detailed, small portion of the curriculum provided to illustrate additional detail.Books from which reading assignments are drawn during the MLCE program are listed inAppendix C.These topics are taught by different means, depending on the subject and on the faculty. Allsessions are both theoretical and practical and are directed by engineers in practice andprofessors from academia. Methods such case studies, group dynamics, debate groups,brainstorming, and open discussion are used. In addition, leaders from various companies andpublic sector organizations share their experiences with the students, communicate their ownvision of leadership, and discuss them in an open environment

Conference Session

Construction Classroom Development

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Namhun Lee, East Carolina University; Eddy Rojas, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Construction

Technical Report #156, Stanford University. 17. Fruchter, R. (1997). “The A/E/C Virtual Atelier: Experience and Future Directions.”Proceedings of the Fourth Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, Philadelphia, pp. 395-402. 18. Getz, M., Siegfried, J. J., and Anderson, K. H. (1994). Adoption of Innovations in HigherEducation. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. 19. Gilligan, B. and Kunz, J. (2007). “VDC Use in 2007: Significant Value, Dramatic Growth,and Apparent Business Opportunity.” CIFE Technical Report #171, Stanford University. 20. Hajjar, D. and AbouRizk, S. (1999). “Simphony: An Environment for Building SpecialPurpose Construction Simulation Tools.” Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference,pp. 998-1006. 21. Halpin, D

Conference Session

Gender and Minority Issues in K-12 Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Edginton Bigelow, University of Dayton; Gail Wheatley, Edheads; David Tomasko, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Directions for Child and Adolescent Development.110: 3-6.15. Steinke, J. 1997. A Portrait of a Women as a Scientist: Breaking Down Barriers Created by Gender-Role Stereotypes. Public Understanding of Science. 6: 409-428. Page 15.610.1516. Tiedemann, J. 2002. Teachers’ Gender Stereotypes as Determinants of Teacher Perceptions in Elementary School Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 50: 49-62.17. Valian, V. 1999. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge: MIT Press.18. Clewell, B. and K. Darke. 2000. Summary Report on the Impact Study of the National Science Foundation’s Program for Women and Girls

Conference Session

IE and the Classroom

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lesley Strawderman, Mississippi State University; Laura Ruff, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

career efficacy, as predicted in the fifthhypothesis. Students who had higher satisfaction scores with the course had significantly higherefficacy scores (F = 8.66, p < 0.001). Additionally, satisfaction and career efficacy scores were Page 15.697.6significantly correlated (r = 0.335, p < 0.001). The grade a student received in the introductorycourse also had a significant impact on career efficacy (F = 2.74, p = 0.030). Students whoreceived an “A” in the course had significantly higher efficacy scores than those who received a“B.”Table 5. Impact of Student Satisfaction on Average Career Efficacy Variable Sample

Conference Session

Enhancing Environmental Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

until you know what theproblem is.” In other words, primarily, instructors should select a few prominent assessmenttasks in their courses (Dick & Carey, 1996, 2001). It is also important to observe that all courseassignments need not necessarily be identified as assessment tasks. It may be adequate if aninstructor can designate one or two tasks from each of the chosen courses (Brookhart, 1999).Authentic Assessment Fallon, Hammons, Brown and Wann (Fallon, 1997) define authentic assessment tasks arethose that (a) are meaningful to both students and the teacher, (b) are individual to each student’s experience in order to demonstrate his or her achievement, (c) require students to locate and analyze information as well as to

Conference Session

Technological Literacy - Courses, Educational and Accreditation Standards

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Blake, Austin Peay State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological Literacy Constituent Committee

, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context Page 15.1193.6 and (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues.24For engineering technology degrees, the relevant TAC of ABET accreditation criteria itemsinclude: b. an ability to … adapt to emerging applications of … technology i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities and j. a respect for

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kingsley Reeves, University of South Florida; Susana Lai-Yuen, University of South Florida

Engineering Education, August 6-10, 2001, pp. 7B6-12 – 7B6-17.8. Steiner, M. W., Gabriele, G. A., Swersey, B., Messler, Jr., R. W., and Foley, W., “Multidisciplinary Project- Based Learning at Rensselaer: Team advisement, assessment and change,” Proceedings of the NCIIA 5th National Conference, March 6-9, 2001.9. Lai-Yuen, S. K., and Reeves, K. R., “Active Learning Experiences on Medical Devices for Manufacturing and New Product Development,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009. Page 15.1234.7

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vincent Pizziconi, Arizona State University; Susan Haag, Arizona State University; Tirupalavanam Ganesh, Arizona State University; Lynn Cozort, Arkansas State University; Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; B.L. Ramakrishna, Arizona State University; Deirdre Meldrum, Arizona State University; Brian Lunt, Arizona State University; Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University; Albert Valdez, Arizona State University; Victoria Yarbrough, Arizona State University

addressing real world needs in their localcommunities.This one-year pilot project consisted of four key phases that were implemented in nearly equalquarters, i.e., (a) the creation of a vibrant partnership to assess, motivate and inform teachers andcounselors about engineering and its societal connections, workforce barriers, and curricularrelevance, (b) the development of a viable education pathway to successfully engage 8th gradestudents in the full spectra of STEM-based learning that captivate their interest throughintegrated activities that span across science, mathematics, language arts and social studies, (c)the implementation of semester-long science and engineering fair projects chosen by studentswho were mentored by ASU engineering

Conference Session

Computational Tools and Simulation II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edwin Garcia, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

example applications to expose students to advantagesand disadvantages of a) phase field, sharp, and level set microstructural evolution methods and b)numerical techniques such as finite differences, finite elements, and finite volumes.To attain the goals of the course, two computational tools, OOF and FiPy, have beenincorporated into the class. OOF (Reid et al., 2009) 3 is a tool designed to calculate the spatial Page 15.584.2distribution of physical fields and the macroscopic properties from images of real or simulatedmicrostructures (see Figure 1). The code provides an intuitive Graphical User Interface to enablethe user to perform Finite

Conference Session

Historical Perspectives for Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Maines, Cornell University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

component of the rise andspread of democratic institutions that aspire to provide Field Marshal Slessor’s “first socialservice.”13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 Due process for the development of consensus codes is itself definedby an ANSI (American National Standards Institute) consensus standard, as follows: Due process means that any person (organization, company, government agency, individual, etc.) with a direct and material interest has a right to participate by: a) expressing a position and its basis, b) having that position considered, and c) having the right to appeal. Due process allows for equity and fair play.21 Safety engineering as the instrumental arm of injury epidemiology, including the codedevelopment

Conference Session

High School Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Abdelrahman, Tennessee Technological University; Cynthia Rice-York, Tennessee Tech University; Dalton York, Tennessee Tech University; Cynthia Stowers, Clark Range High School; Robert Sircy, Tennessee Tech University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

to: a) advancing the state of the artin conventional manufacturing processes such as metalcasting; b) new trends in manufacturingsuch as rapid prototyping, c) emerging technologies such as nanomaterials and manufacturing offuel cells and special coating materials, and d) enabling technologies serving manufacturingprocesses in general such as intelligent optimization. Manufacturing is a field where boundariesbetween disciplines disappear opening opportunities for multidisciplinary research. The researchprojects and faculty mentors participating in the program represent 5 different disciplines in thecollege of engineering. This offers the teachers a multi-perspective view of how underlyingmathematical and scientific concepts are integrated in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dmitriy Garmatyuk, Miami University

reflection on these observations, we came to a conclusion that a good way toaddress the question above would be to gain experience in (and test-run) Project-Based Learning(PBL). It appears that engineering has inherent appeal due to its strong “hands-on” component –we have not met a student of engineering yet who wouldn’t be fascinated by the applied natureof the subject, which translates into “building something” or “seeing something work.” PBL isalso advantageous from the perspective of structuring the coursework to maximize its impact onthe students’ ability to a). Find a desirable job, and b). Succeed in it – and it’s no secret thatpresent-day industry operates in terms of projects. Thus, it has been decided that our teachingproject will focus

Conference Session

Capstone Design Pedagogy I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daria Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Gary Pawlas, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

bookend curriculum. Page 15.586.12AcknowledgementsThis project was completed with the support of the University of Colorado at BoulderIndustry/University Cooperative Project Center (I/UCPC).Bibliography1. Brown, B. F., Sr. and Brown, B.“Problem-Based Education (PROBE): Learning for a Lifetime of Change.” ASEE Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1997.2. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Ozgur, E., Fry, D., Leifer, L., “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.”Journal of Engineering Education, Vol, No 94, January 2005, pp. 103.3. Savage, R., Chen, K., Vanasupa, L.,“Integrating Project-based Learning Throughout the Undergraduate

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanical Engineering I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ivana Milanovic, University of Hartford; Tom Eppes, University of Hartford

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

trigger curricular change. Table I showsa subset of courses from the ME curriculum to illustrate some of the embedded assessments.Each PO is typically assessed in 3-4 courses with no course spanning more than 3 Criterion 3(a-k). Page 15.1271.4 Table I Subset of courses used for PO assessment ME Program Required Program Outcomes [Criterion 3(a-k)] Course/Course Title a b c d e f g h i j kES 101 Engineering Freshmen Dialogue

Conference Session

Retention Strategies in Action Part II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan Dimitriu, San Antonio College; Jerry O'Connor, San Antonio College

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

data (b) ≠ the ability to function in teams (d) ≠ understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (f) ≠ the ability to communicate effectively (g) ≠ a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (i) ≠ a knowledge of contemporary issues (j) ≠ the ability to use some of the basic techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice (k).If these outcomes are clearly articulated and effectively assessed by the TYC program, this willhelp the program articulate smoothly with the engineering program(s) at the four-yearinstitutions. Community college programs are advised to work with their four-year partner(s) todevelop an assessment and evaluation process that

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sharon Johnson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Venkat Allada, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Susan Pariseau, Merrimack College

changes.Bibliography1. Krathwohl, D. R., “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview”, Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218, 20022. Nakamura, M.S., S. Sakakibara, R. Schroeder, “Adoption of Just-in-Time Manufacturing Methods at US- and Japanese-Owned Plants”, Transactions on Engineering Management, 45, 230-240, 1998.3. Moskal, B. M., “Scoring Rubrics: What, When and How?”, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3), 2000a.4. Moskal, B. M., “Scoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability”, Practical Assessment, Research & Page 15.766.5 Evaluation, 7(10), 2000b.5. National Research Council (NRC), How People

Conference Session

Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jean Jiang, Purdue University, North Central; Li Tan, Purdue University, North Central

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

structure isillustrated as follows: 1. Establish the necessary differential equation(s) based on its free-body diagram(s) and the fundamental laws, such as Newton’s law, D’Alembert’s law, Hook’s Law, etc. 2. Take the Laplace transform to the differential equation(s) including possible initial conditions, 3. Solve the obtained Laplace transform equation(s) algebraically 4. Evaluate the inverse transform(s) to obtain the system solution(s) in the time-domain.The following example demonstrates the application of the procedure:The translational system shown in Figure 3 has the parameter values M=1 kg, B= 4 Ns/m, andK= 3 N/m. The applied force is f a (t ) ? 9u (t ) N. The mass has no initial velocity, but it isreleased from a position

Conference Session

Enhancing Recruitment and Retention in Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith Walters; Keisha Walters

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

course-specific evaluation (Appendix B), a similar four-level scoring rubric was usedwith 1=disagree, 2=somewhat disagree, 3=somewhat agree, and 4=agree. The mean responsewas a 3.85 over all questions indicating that the students felt the course had been a positiveexperience. The highest scores were given to questions 1, 3, 5, and 7 and indicated that hands-onactivities and ‘human factors’, including communication between the instructors and the studentsand lecture style, had a significant impact on the students’ evaluation of the course. From theirresponses, the students felt that the visual and active learning tools (e.g., visual images,experiments, CFD simulations, scavenger hunt, ‘fluids in the news’) used in the course hadsignificantly

Conference Session

Web-based Learning in ECE

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dale Buechler, University of Wisconsin, Platteville

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Traditional Electrical Engineering Courses for Non-Traditional Students,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June, 20083. M. Plett, D. Peter, S. Parsons, and B. Gjerding, "The Virtual Synchronous Classroom: Real Time Off-Campus Classroom Participation with Adobe Connect," Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June, 2008.4. J. Crofton, J. Rogers, C. Pugh, K. Evans, "The Use of Elluminate Distance-Learning Software in Engineering Education," Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June, 2008.5. H. Salehfar, J. Watson, and A. Johnson, "Internet Based Class Presentations to Enhance Distance Engineering Degree," Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual

Conference Session

Curricular Developments in Energy Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ilya Grinberg, Buffalo State College; Mohammed Safiuddin, State University of New York, Buffalo; Chilukuri Mohan, Syracuse University; Steve Macho, Buffalo State College

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

). Fig.3. Typical LevelAddressing the challengesIn September 2009, Department of Energy issued a call for proposal DE-FOA-0000152Recovery Act – Workforce Training for the Electric Power Sector seeking applications that willsupport and greatly expand job creation and career advancement opportunities within the utilityindustry and the electric power system equipment manufacturing sector. Two types ofapplications were specified:Topic A. Developing and Enhancing Workforce Training Programs for the Electric Power Sectorwith subtopic Strategic Training and Education in Power Systems (STEPS) and Topic B. SmartGrid Workforce Training. The objective of STEPS is to support educators at universities andcolleges (including community colleges) in developing

Conference Session

Rethinking Traditional Pedagogical Strategies

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Frankie Santos Laanan, Iowa State University; Dimitra Jackson, Iowa State University; Soko Starobin, Iowa State University; Mary Darrow, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

AC 2010-1019: EDUCATING FUTURE ENGINEERS: ROLE OF COMMUNITYCOLLEGESFrankie Santos Laanan, Iowa State University Frankie Santos Laanan is associate professor and director of the Office of Community College Research and Policy at Iowa State University. His research focuses on the role of community colleges in serving as a pathway for women and minorities in STEM.Dimitra Jackson, Iowa State University Dimitra Jackson is a doctoral student and research associate in the Office of Community College Research and Policy at Iowa State University. Her research interests focuses on underrepresented students in STEM fields.Soko Starobin, Iowa State University Soko Starobin is assistant professor

Conference Session

Professional Graduate Education and Industry

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roger Olson, Rolls-Royce Corporation

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

required for Engineering Levels [1-3]; b) Part II addresses theOrganizational Leadership Skills and Actions required for Engineering Levels [4-6], and; c) Part IIIaddresses the Strategic Leadership Skills and Actions required for Engineering Levels [7-9]. The overallanalysis sets the foundation for building a coherent professional graduate curriculum and dynamiceducational process reflective of how experienced engineering professionals learn, grow, and create newtechnology in industry. This paper addresses Part II: the Organizational Leadership Function, Skills andActions that engineers must learn and develop from Group Leader, Functional Area Manager, SystemsEngineer through Technical Program Manager Levels [4-6

Conference Session

Teaching Statics

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Masoud Rais-Rohani, Mississippi State University; Andrew Walters, Mississippi State University; Anthony Vizzini, Western Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Page 15.456.3our redesign effort along with results of the pilot and full implementation phases of Staticsredesign at Mississippi State University. We also discuss the results of a survey to highlight theviews of students on the redesign initiative and our implementation of the emporium approach,in particular.Performance TrendsOn average, four sections of Statics are offered in the spring, two in the summer, and seven inthe fall semester with multiple instructors in each term. Over a four-year period from Fall 2001to Spring 2005, 1024 students took Statics at Mississippi State University and received a lettergrade (A, B, C, D, F, or W). Table 1 shows the numbers of students under success and failurecolumns for each semester. The number of

Conference Session

Information and Network Security

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alireza Kavianpour, DeVry University; Ricardo Monterrosa, DeVry University; Rammy Badran, DeVry University

Tagged Divisions

Information Systems

Axiom HC-KP 16 key (4x4) keypad and HC-LCD 80 character (4x20) LCD module.CML12S-DP256 SpecificationsUpward code compatible with 68HC114K Bytes EEPROM512K Byte Flash EEPROM14K Byte SRAM2 Enhanced SCI Ports3 SPI Port (Synchronous Serial)5 CAN 2.0 A or B InterfaceTwo 8 Channel 10 Bit Analog ConvertersBackground Debug PortEnhanced 16 bit Timer w/ 8 channels 16 Bit Pulse Accumulator8 PWM ChannelsTwo 8 bit Key Wake-up portsPLL Clock Oscillator SupportRTC and COP featuresUp to 91 I/O4Mhz reference oscillator for up to 24MHz operation.External Memory: 256K Bytes (128K x 16) SRAMCOM1 Port – HC12 SCI0 w/ RS232 and DB9S connectorCOM2 Port – HC12 SCI1 w/ RS232 and 3 pin headerINDICATORS – Power and RESET.BUS-PORT – 40 Pin Socket HeaderMCU I/O PORT - 60

Conference Session

Teaching Technological Literacy - College Courses and Minors

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelli Huser, Iowa State University; Thomas Kelly, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University; Seth Ballou, Iowa State University; Joseph Crispin, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological Literacy Constituent Committee

AC 2010-1138: VENUES TO INTRODUCE AND TEACH IMPACT OFENGINEERING IN HISTORY, SOCIETY, AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENTKelli Huser, Iowa State UniversityMani Mina, Iowa State UniversityThomas Kelly, Iowa State UniversitySeth Ballou, Iowa State UniversityJoseph Crispin, Iowa State University Page 15.1350.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A technological literacy approach to introduce and teach the impact of engineering throughout the human historyAbstractThis paper provides a possible approach to introduce and teach impact of engineering to non-engineering students with a focus on the technology and engineering aspects. One effective wayto enhance

Conference Session

Engineering Design: Implementation and Evaluation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cameron Denson, Utah State University; Matt Lammi, Utah State University; Kyungsuk Park, Utah State University; Elizabeth Dansie, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, J.W. and G.M. Zhang, A Freshman Engineering Design Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 1993. 82(2): p. 83-91.12. Natishan, M.E., L.C. Schmidt, and P. Mead, Student Focus Group Results on Student Team Performance Issues. Journal of Engineering Education, 2000. 89(3): p. 269-272.13. Eide, A., R. Jenison, L. Northup, and S. Mickelson, Engineering Fundamentals and Problem Solving. Fifth ed, ed. B. Stenquist. 2008, Boston: McGraw-Hill.14. Creswell, J.W., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches 2nd. Ed. 2007, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Page 15.869.2115. Lincoln, Y.S. and E.G. Guba