, she works as a Doctoral Researcher and Adjunct Professor at Louisiana Tech University’s DECODED Lab, focusing on VR flight simulation programs. She has also worked as Executive Director leading public relations and scientific research for the SGWCD for fifteen years. Lindsay holds a Master of Science in Engineering and Technology Management, a Master of Business Administration, and a Bachelor of Science in Agricultural Business. In addition, she holds black and green belt six-sigma certifications.Dr. Kelly B. Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University Dr Kelly Crittenden is a member of Louisiana Tech University’s Integrated STEM Education Center (ISERC), and is the Harrelson Family Professor of engineering. He is also the
, Louisville, Kentucky,June 2010. DOI:10.18260/1-2--16917[7] Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. Journal Clubs As Pedagogy For Interdisciplinary Graduate EducationPaper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 2008.DOI:10.18260/1-2--3665[8] Kelkar, A. D., & Ryan, J. G. Innovative Graduate Program in Nanoengineering Paper presented at 2011ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, June 2011. DOI:10.18260/1-2—18176[9] Honey, M.; Alberts, B.; Bass, H.; Castillo, C.; Lee, O.; Strutchens, M. M.; Vermillion, L.; Rodriguez,F. STEM Education for the Future - 2020 Visioning Report; National Science Foundation, Spring 2020.[10] Council, N. R., Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and
Paper ID #42137Exploring Interdisciplinary Identity Formation in Graduate StudentsMs. Susan Wainscott, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Susan Wainscott is the Engineering Librarian for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas University Libraries. She holds a Master of Library and Information Science from San Jose State University and a Master of Science in Biological Sciences from Illinois State University.Dr. Dustin B. Thoman, San Diego State University Dr. Dustin Thoman is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education at San Diego State University. His scholarship
an ethnographic study of the interplay between ethics and imagination in engineering research. As an extension of this work, I am closely collaborating with engineers and other technologists on issues related to the future of work and technology. In addition, I am a co-PI on an NSF-funded graduate research training program on robots in the future workplace, and a co-PI on an NSF-funded research project on platform design for nonprofits. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 ConGrad: A Graduate Education Framework for Convergence Research and Experiential Learning Tess B. Meier, Ceren Yilmaz-Akkaya, Yunus Do˘gan TellielAbstractGraduate STEM programs
, with input from the other project faculty. Each workshop was team-led by the sociolinguist, anthropologist, and one of the other faculty team members, in rotation.The student participants comprising the first cohort in the program included master’s anddoctoral students from psychology (1), counseling (1), sociology (1), environmental engineering(2), industrial engineering (1), mechanical engineering (1), and sustainable energy engineering(3).TRANSDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION WORKSHOP MODELParticipants in the workshops engaged in (a) two cultural competence workshops, (b) twocommunity engagement workshops, and (c) two qualitative data analysis workshops. Wedescribe the structure and design of key elements in the workshops below. In the tradition
Senior Capstone Projects: Opportunities, and Challenges”. 2014 ASEE North Midwest Conference, 2014[5] Lynch, K., Goold, A. & Blain, J., “Students’ pedagogical preferences in the delivery of IT capstone courses”, Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 431-442, 2004 https://doi.org/10.28945/750[6] Onal, S., Nadler. J. & O'Loughlin, M., “Applying theory to real-world problems: Integrating service-learning into the industrial engineering Capstone Design course”, International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 57-80, 2017[7] Hotaling, N., Fasse, B. B., Bost, L. F., Hermann, C. D. & Forest, C. R., “A quantitative
Business Psychology from H-BRS.Dr. Neha B. Raikar, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Raikar is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County in the Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering department. She has taught both undergraduate and graduate-level courses. Dr. Raikar also has 3 years of industry experience from working at Unilever Research in the Netherlands.Mrs. Yarazeth Medina, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Multidisciplinary research interests aimed to diversify and increment access to higher education. Research interests focus on bringing the disparity of availability of information that improves programs that enforce participation in science, engineering
experiences and the graduate student role in them,more studies need to be done focusing on the unique role of the graduate student as bridgementor within a mentoring triad. A better understanding of the role of graduate students as bridgementors can lead to better preparation for undergraduate research experiences and thereforebetter outcomes for all stakeholders.References[1] B. L. Montgomery and S. C. Page, Mentoring beyond hierarchies: Multi-Mentor Systems and Models, https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/25568/Montgomery%20and%20Page%20- %20Mentoring.pdf (accessed Nov. 20, 2023).[2] Sobieraj, K. S., & Kajfez, R. L. (2020, June). Using Qualitative Techniques to Understand the Types of Undergraduate Research Mentorship. In 2020
afocus group to examine the opinions of five students regarding the relationship betweencommunity building, trust, and active learning in a graduate Structure and Diffraction course in aMaterials Science and Engineering program at Stevens Institute of Technology. Three centralcommunity building techniques were implemented throughout the course: a) the incorporation ofa mid-class snack break, b) an optional weekend museum field trip, and c) the use of game-basedstudent response systems such as Kahoot! and PollEverywhere. Active learning strategies such assmall-group problem solving, hands-on instrument demonstrations, and student presentationswere carried out in class, many of which also doubled as opportunities for students to
Paper ID #42832A Systematized Literature Review on Workforce Development Programs forEngineering Graduate StudentsMs. Isabella Victoria, University of Florida Isabella Victoria is a Ph.D student in the Engineering Education Department at the University of FloridaMs. Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, University of Florida Dr. Laura Cruz is an instructional assistant professor in the engineering education department at University of Florida.Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on, University of Florida Dr. Villanueva is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida. Her multiple roles as an
maintain objectivity in this autoethnography, I frequently self-reflected to maintaintransparency while using my identity to gather comprehensive, thick, and rich data on internationalstudents' experiences. My dual perspective as an insider and outsider to the research allows me touncover details that might otherwise remain hidden. In my data analysis, I collaborated with mylab mates, Rater A (a white female senior graduate student) and Rater B (a male Nigerian PhDstudent), who, despite some similarities, provided outsider perspectives as doctoral students in thecivil engineering program at the University of Florida. Raters A and B read through my journalentries and memos, asked follow-up questions, and provided future reflection prompts
of Transportation, US Department of Transportation (via the Mineta National Transit Research Consortium and the Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center), Federal Highway Administration, National Cooperative Highway Research Program and National Science Foundation. Dr. Gayah currently serves as an editorial advisory board member of Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, an editorial board editor of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, an associate editor for the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine (an international peer-reviewed journal), a handling editor for the Transportation Research Record and is a member of the Transportation Research Board’s Committee on
and PhD in STEM Education from the University of Texas at Austin.Dr. David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. Knight currently serves as the co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Maura Borrego, University of Texas at Austin
Paper ID #42829Development of a Climate Survey for Engineering Doctoral Students from anIntersectional Approach: First-Round Validity EvidenceDr. So Yoon Yoon, University of Cincinnati Dr. So Yoon Yoon is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Cincinnati, OH, USA. Dr. Yoon received her Ph.D. in Gifted Education, and an M.S.Ed. in Research Methods and Measurement with a specialization in Educational Psychology, both from Purdue University, IN, USA. She also holds an M.S. in Astronomy and Astrophysics and a B.S
. 2217640 through a wider initiative and acenter for transforming graduate engineering education. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCESArtiles, M. S., Knight, D. B., & Matusovich, H. M. (2023). Doctoral advisor selection processes in science, math, and engineering programs in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1-16.Boyce, A. S. (2021). Strategies for mentoring and advising evaluation graduate students of color. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 35(3), 350-362.Bryson, T., Kowalske, M., Wilkins-Yel, K., & Housh, K. (2023). The
Paper ID #43481”How You Got Me Messed Up”: A Critical Analysis of Doctoral EngineeringEducation through the Lens of Black PhD CandidatesMrs. Crystal Alicia Nattoo, Stanford University Crystal Nattoo (she/her) is a first-generation college student from South Florida. She graduated with her bachelors from the University of Miami in 2019 as an Electrical Engineering (EE) major and Graphic Design minor. She then received her EE M.S. degree at Stanford University in 2021, and is currently continuing in the EE Ph.D program. Her current research focuses on the fabrication and characterization of flexible sensors and circuits using
their development offive skills, where a grade of ‘F’ is 1 point, and a grade of ‘A’ is 5 points. These five skills areCommunication with audiences from different academic disciplines and the public,Understanding FEW stakeholders, Identify potential research partnerships, Interdisciplinaryteamwork, Understand potential career pathways: government, academia, industry. Then wecalculated mean student rating for each skill. Figure 1 offers a summative depiction of studentratings for how well the NRT program supported development of the five skills. All cohorts ratedthe NRT program similarly for each skill, with a grade at or near 4.0, which is a ‘B.'Figure 1: Students gave the NRT a grade for how well the NRT program supported trainees’development
, Cases in strategic marketing. Prentice Hall, 2000.[11] L. B. Barnes, C. R. Christensen, and A. J. Hansen, Teaching and the case method: Text, cases, and readings. Harvard Business Press, 1994.[12] D. Fasko Jr, “Case studies and methods in teaching and learning.” 2003.[13] M. A. Lundeberg and A. Yadav, “Assessment of case study teaching: Where do we go from here? part i and ii,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 35, no. 5 and 6, p. 8, 2006.[14] T. A. Newson and N. J. Delatte, “Case methods in civil engineering teaching,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1016–1030, 2011.[15] C. F. Herreid, Start with a story: The case study method of teaching college science. NSTA press, 2007.[16] G. M. Crosling
-baseline- demographic_pdf[3] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 36, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/nbt.4089.[4] C. G. P. Berdanier, C. Whitehair, A. Kirn, and D. Satterfield, “Analysis of social media forums to elicit narratives of graduate engineering student attrition,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 125–147, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20299.[5] E. Zerbe, G. M. Sallai, K. Shanachilubwa, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Engineering graduate students’ critical events as catalysts of attrition,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 868–888, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20481.[6] D. A. Gilbert, “The
-doctoral researcher, and (6) an African Americanpost-baccalaureate psychology student. MethodsResearch DesignThis research was drawn from a larger multiple embedded case study that sought to understandthe nature and quality of STEM doctoral mentorships. However, this work focuses on anextracted case: women STEM doctoral students. Data was drawn from a National ScienceFoundation Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (NSF AGEP) grant-fundedresearch study, which included three institutional types: (a) Historically White Insitution (HWI)-Flagship/R1, (b) Historically Black College and University (HBCU)/R2, and (c) HWI-Regional/R2. These institutions were located in the Southeastern part of
curriculum is a vital step in demonstrating that curriculum hascoherence and relevance in addressing the needs of learners, in this case articulated through therecommendations of the National Academies. Curriculum research is necessary to drivecurricular reform in engineering and prioritizing activities to reach desired outcomes [11]. Thefollowing research question drove this study: How do program components address the core recommendations for STEM doctoral programs from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine: A. Develop Scientific and Technological Literacy and Conduct Original Research? B. Develop Leadership, Communication, and Professional Competencies?MethodsThis
an Online Near-Peer Mentoring Model,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4. 2023.[7] Qua K, Pinkard O, Kundracik EC, Ramirez-Bergeron D, Berger NA. “Near Peer Mentors to Address Socio-Emotional Issues Among Underrepresented Minority High School Students in Research Intensive STEM Programs: Perceptions of Students and Mentors,” J STEM Outreach, vol. 3, no. 1. 2020.[8] Anderson, Margery K., R. Jerome Anderson, Laura S. Tenenbaum, Emily D. Kuehn, Holly K. M. Brown, Swati B. Ramadorai, and Debra L. Yourick. “The Benefits of a Near-Peer Mentoring Experience on STEM Persistence in Education and Careers: A 2004-2015 Study,” Journal of STEM Outreach, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11. 2019.[9] Crisp, G., & Cruz, I
startedlooking into the feasibility of making the graduate engineering program more accessible. Thiswould not only allow us to meet the growing demand for engineers in West Michigan, but itwould be well aligned with our program’s student-centric focus. To prepare the students for thegraduate-level engineering work, an exhaustive list of prerequisite undergraduate classes thatstudents must take has been approved. While each applicant’s curriculum is tailored, GVSU’sSchool of Engineering developed a general plan to onboard students from a variety of non-engineering undergraduate backgrounds. Applicants are granted conditional admission to thegraduate program predicated on completing the prerequisite classes with a B or better grade.These plans allow the
Performance: Comparing Paper-Based and Computer- Adaptive Versions of the Graduate Record Examinations (Gre©) General Test,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 249–273, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.2190/680W- 66CR-QRP7-CL1F.[20] J. A. Heissel, E. K. Adam, J. L. Doleac, D. N. Figlio, and J. Meer, “Testing, Stress, and Performance: How Students Respond Physiologically to High-Stakes Testing,” Education Finance and Policy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 183–208, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1162/edfp_a_00306.[21] L. Moneta-Koehler, A. M. Brown, K. A. Petrie, B. J. Evans, and R. Chalkley, “The Limitations of the GRE in Predicting Success in Biomedical Graduate School,” PLOS ONE, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e0166742, Jan. 2017
personalexperiences. It's also important for us to note that while our team offers diverse points of view ongender, culture, and other aspects of society, our understanding is shaped by our backgrounds aswhite individuals in the United States.Project OverviewThis IRB-approved, NSF-funded research project included ten focus groups of students who self-identified as neurodivergent and were pursuing advanced degrees in STEM disciplines at an R1university in the Northeastern United States. Recruitment took place via an email listserv for allgraduate students and an email from the university’s disability services office. The focus groupparticipants a) self-identified as neurodiverse and b) indicated that they were completing agraduate degree in a STEM field
Mechanical Engineering, from IIT Delhi for undergraduate studies and Cornell University for graduate work. He worked for nearly 15 years as a materials scientist at the DuPont company and moved in 2004 to Lehigh University. His research interests are in interfacial mechanical properties.Volkmar Dierolf, Lehigh University Volkmar Dierolf is a Professor of Physics a Distinguished University Professor of Physics and Materials Science & Engineering at Lehigh University, where he has been a faculty member since 2000. He received his Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Utah in 1992 and a Habilitation in Experimental Physics from University of Paderborn, Germany in 2000. Dr. Dierolf’s research focuses on the study of
satisfied with the material resources of their schoolinfrastructure, this infrastructure falls short in fostering their professional identity andcareer development. References [1] PATRICK A D,PRYBUTOK A N,BORREGO M.Predicting persistencein engineering through an engineering identity scale[J].International journal ofengineering education,2018,34 (2(A)),351-363. [2] Geisinger B N , Raman D R .Why They Leave: Understanding StudentAttrition from Engineering Majors[J].The international journal of engineeringeducation, 2013, 29(4):914-925. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.784. [3] ZHANG Guodong. A study on the model of coherent doctoral training[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2016:120-123. [4] Zhang Li. Analysis of
generation of engineers who thrive in their careers.References[1] National Association of Colleges and Employers, 'Career Readiness Defined,' [Online]. Available: https://www.naceweb.org/career-readiness/competencies/career-readiness- defined. [Accessed: 01-Feb-2024].[2] T. S. Ritchie, D. L. Rossiter, H. B. Opris, I. E. Akpan, S. Oliphant, and M. McCartney, “How do STEM graduate students perceive science communication? Understanding science communication perceptions of future scientists,” PLOS ONE, vol. 17, no. 10, p. e0274840, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274840.[3] B. Holmes, T. Waterbury, E. Baltrinic, and A. Davis, “Angst About Academic Writing: Graduate Students At The Brink,” CIER, vol
issupported by the National Science Foundation Innovations in Graduate Education Program undergrant 1954946.References[1] A. B. Badiru, C. F. Rusnock, and V. V. Valencia, Project Management for Research: A Guide for Gradaute Students. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.[2] D. K. Sherman, L. Ortosky, S. Leong, C. Kello, and M. Hegarty, “The Changing Landscape of Doctoral Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: PhD Students, Faculty Advisors, and Preferences for Varied Career Options,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, p. 711615, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711615.[3] D. Denecke, K. Feaster, and K. Stone, Professional Development: Shaping Effective Programs for STEM Graduate Students. Washington, DC
Paper ID #41103Understanding Ecosystems of Interdisciplinary Graduate Education throughan Ecological Systems ApproachMargaret Webb, Virginia Tech Margaret (Maggie) Webb is a master’s and Ph.D. student in sustainable land development (civil engineering) and engineering education, respectively, at Virginia Tech. She graduated with her mechanical engineering degree from Rice University and worked for ExxonMobil as a subsea engineer and as a high school STEM teacher in a Houston charter school before starting grad school. Her research interests include interdisciplinary higher education, focusing on organizational systems