. Minichiello and A. Iqbal, "Perceived Factors Contributing to the SubjectiveWellbeing of Undergraduate Engineering Students: An Exploratory Study," International Journal ofEnvironmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, (23), 2022. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316284.[3] D. Kim and B. K. Jesiek, "Work-in-Progress: Emotion and Intuition in Engineering Students’ EthicalDecision Making and Implications for Engineering Ethics Education," 2019. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33666.[4] N. N. Kellam et al, "Uncovering the role of emotion in engineering education within an integratedcurricular experience," in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[5] L. F. Barrett, "The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoceptionand categorization
and hand-off of written reports. While there was no required coursetextbook, two texts were recommended as supplementary material, including Jeter et al. [26] forlearning objectives A and B and Tufte [27] for objective C (see Table 1).The overarching course learning objectives were mapped to specific communications skills(Table 1) that were introduced and reinforced with three steps. First, in the weekly workshops,students were introduced to a communications skill, e.g., creating a table, and specific guidelinesfor content and formatting associated with that skill (Figure 1). Then students critiqued aninstructor-provided example of technical communications according to these guidelines, first inclass as small group activity and then as part
, projects), and instructors assigned to eachsection. Sections No. of Homework In-class activities Team Instructor students (HW) (ICA) Project Bloom’s 100 Modified Problems at five Not A Taxonomy- problems at Bloom’s Assigned based Learning five Bloom’s Taxonomy levels (BTL) Taxonomy levels Project-based 100 Textbook Problems at two Assigned B Learning problems at Bloom’s (PBL) two Bloom’s Taxonomy levels
project #1, we will be writing separate functions for each number from zero to nine.This way when we want to display a number all we have to do in call the function for thatnumber. You will find good documentation on functions at:https://www.arduino.cc/en/Reference/FunctionDeclaration. G F Com A B A GND F B G 220 Com E C D H F A B E D C H G E D Com C H Figure 1: The
section. Note that each of the bonuscategories had multiple questions. A greater percentage of students from each section receivedfull/partial credit on questions at the Understand level than the Evaluate level likely becauseEvaluate is a higher cognitive level. (A) (B)Figure 2: Student performance on Quiz 2. (A) Total quiz scores (with and without bonus), out of14 points. (B) The percentage of students who received partial or full credits on the quiz problemsat different cognitive levels. Error bars represent the standard deviations.The grades for students from the two class sections on questions from Chapter 2: Fluid Statics onMidterm 1 were compared using a Mann-Whitney
rubric were also provided to the students. Throughout the project, the followingcourse learning outcomes were assessed. • Develop the governing equation for a mechanical system. • Derive the state space representation of a mechanical system. • Predict the response of a system using software. • Describe the effect of inertia, stiffness, damping elements on a mechanical system response. (a) (b) (c) (d)Fig. 2 Diagrams of sdof torsional systems with (a) top disk clamped and masses attached to the bottom disk (b) top disk clamped and no mass on the bottom disk (c) bottom disk clamped and masses attached
. (a) (b) Figure 2: Icons representing (a) Entrepreneurial Mindset (b) Technical SkillsetResults and Assessments:The projects were designed to be open-ended and poorly defined explicitly to encourage studentsto engage in mindset and skillset development. These projects lent themselves particularly todeveloping the skillsets of • Simplifying complicated, real-world systems into ideal mathematical model representations. • Justifying idealization and simplifying assumption choices. • Choosing appropriate dimensions, directions of motion, and relative coordinates for these systems. • Conducting appropriate analysis for the modeled systems. • Numerically modeling
History, Biological Sciences, Science Education, andBusiness Economics.Points-Based Grading SchemeIn 2020 and 2021, course grades were determined using a points-based grading scheme. Eachassignment was scored out of a certain number of points, and the course grade was calculatedbased on the given points and the weight of each group of assignments, as shown in Table 2.Letter grades were then calculated using the following cumulative percentages: A+ ≥ 96.5%, A≥ 93.5%, A- ≥ 90%, B+ ≥ 86.5%, B ≥ 83.5%, B- ≥ 80%, C+ ≥ 76.5%, C ≥ 73.5%, C- ≥ 70%,D+ ≥ 66.5%, D ≥ 63.5%, D- ≥ 60%, F < 60%.Assignments included weekly homework, homework quizzes, and concept quizzes, attendance inweekly discussion sessions, submission of study sheets that were allowed to
student (Figure 1 (a)), as well as supply the modelsolution (Figure 1 (b)). Below the model solution is where the instructor develops variousassessments with corresponding comments to provide intermediate feedback should a studentfail an assessment (Figure 1(c)). (a) (b) (c) Figure 1: Instructor view of a MATLAB Grader Problem showing the problem statement (a), model solution (b), and assessments (c). The second part is the instructor view of the student-facing page which is where thestudents type out their code (Figure 2). On this page, the instructor can prescribe certain thingswhich the students cannot change. For instance, if the problem
. Heimann, "Understanding the Challenger disaster: Organizational structure and the design of reliable systems," American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 421-435, 1993.[22] J. C. Jung and E. Sharon, "The Volkswagen emissions scandal and its aftermath," Global Business and Organizational Excellence, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 6-15, 5 2019.[23] S. M. Lord, B. Przestrzelki and E. Reddy, "Teaching social responsibility: Conflict minerals module for a circuits class," World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2018.[24] J. Khubchandani, S. Sharma, J. H. Price, M. J. Wiblishauser, M. Sharma and F. J. Webb, "COVID- 19 Vaccination Hesitancy in the United States: A Rapid National
. Zhang, A. Gong, Y. Fan, J. Yan, X. Li, “Nuclear power plants with artificialintelligence in industry 4.0 era: top-level design and current applications – a systemic review.”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 194315-194332, 2020.[2] A. Thakur, D. Sarkar, V. Bharti, and U. Kannan, “Development of in-core fuel managementtool for AHWR using artificial neural networks,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 150, p.107869,2021.[3] D. Price, M. Radaideh, and B. Kochunas, “Multiobjective optimization of nuclearmicroreactor reactivity control system operation with swarm and evolutionary algorithms.”Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 393, p. 111776, 2022.[4] D. Lee, P.H. Seong, and J. Kim, “Autonomous operation algorithm for safety systems ofnuclear power plants by
Paper ID #42530Designing and Evaluating Virtual Reality Applications for a Machine DesignCourseDr. Andrea Gregg, Penn State University Dr. Gregg’s career sits at the unique intersection of instructional design, faculty development, educational technology leadership, curriculum planning, and educational research and evaluation. She is an established higher education professional with over twenty years’ experience in online, distance education. As the manager of an instructional design (ID) team responsible for the design, development, and support of nearly 150 courses, she worked with a diverse portfolio including STEM
Course at a South African University: Snapshot on Sectional Drawing,” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 4, Mar. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1220a.[5] R. K. Kaushal, S. N. Panda, and N. Kumar, “Proposing Effective Framework for Animation Based Learning Environment for Engineering Students,” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, vol. 33, no. 3, p. 48, Jan. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i3/144816.[6] M. B. McGrath and J. R. Brown, “Visual learning for science and engineering,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 56–63, Sep. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.117.[7] M
(formerly facultyoffices), and one in a main common area. (b) Portable Data Acquisition System (a) Main Experiment Station Figure 1: HEAD Acoustics Lab Facilities for Sound Pressure Measurement ExerciseAs there are three experiment setup areas in the HEAD acoustics Lab, each section of MECH-431is divided into three groups of students. The typical class size for MECH-431 is 18 students persection, so each experiment area has about six students. Most of the data acquisition equipmentand software required for MECH-431 in the HEAD acoustics Lab is already in place and ownedby KU. The only remaining equipment to be added was a desktop computer for each of the threeexperiment setups. The
Paper ID #42616Impact of Digital Twins in Engineering Education: Enhancing Learning Motivationand Accessibility - A Review Study with a Proposed New SolutionKalon Ma Bienz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoDevon Bountry, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoChang Rui Liu, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoBehnam Ghalamchi ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Title Impact of Digital Twins in Engineering Education: Enhancing LearningMotivation and Accessibility - A Review Study with a Proposed New Solution Kalon Ma Bienz, Devon Bountry, Chang
in the course. The data from the HECI is then presented.The overall results for each instrument and its content areas are identified and discussed in lightof the course content and pedagogy. Comments from the Senior Survey are then presentedfollowed by a discussion of the results along with the limitations and implications of this study. Question 29: A flat sheet of aluminum foil and a thicker aluminum baking sheet are placed in an oven at 400°F for a long period of time. While holding these objects from the oven, which feels hotter to the touch? a. Both objects feel equally hot because they are at the same temperature b. The baking sheet feels hotter because it is hotter c
would comprise each program goal. Starting in 2022, the curriculum committeewas finally able to move the project off the back burner and work with more focus and purposeto build out the student proficiencies, which are the fine-grained skills that make up studentlearning objectives. At present, the curriculum committee has developed and documented the program goals, studentlearning objectives, and student proficiencies (see Appendix A). These have been mapped to theABET required student learning outcomes (see Appendix B).The set of drafted program goals, student learning objectives, and corresponding studentproficiencies were shared with the larger faculty body in the department in November 2023. Thecommittee facilitated discussion with the
. These frameworks helped us identify where newly discoveredand unlisted interventions lie with the existing frameworks.III. MethodWe followed Cochrane's (1995) guidelines for a systematic review, striving to discern, evaluate,and combine relevant empirical evidence that meets specific eligibility criteria established toaddress a defined research question. Using this, the literature was collected based on a setcriterion, compiled into a database, summarized, and discussed. As one of the goals, theliterature collected was summarized and sorted by an established coding scheme primarilyfocusing on intervention category and subcategory. Appendices A and B summarize our findingsincluding a brief description of the intervention, outcomes, and
carelessness can serve as a foundation for future research into the adaptationof homework problems for enhanced learning outcomes.References:[1] W. C. Newstetter and M. D. Svinicki, “Learning Theories for Engineering Education Practice,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 29–46. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.005.[2] M. Waldrop, “Why we are teaching science wrong, and how to make it right,” Nature, vol. 523, pp. 272–4, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1038/523272a.[3] E. Michor and M. Koretsky, “Students’ Approaches to Studying through a Situative Lens,” vol. 1, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.21061/see.3.[4] D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B
].To address this tension at our university, we are engaging undergraduate engineering studentsacross multiple phases of soft robotics curriculum development. Students are developing softrobotics learning modules as co-designers, which is what is presented in this paper. In the future,they will get to pilot their activities with other students. Once modules are fully developed andpiloted, they will be implemented in courses across our mechanical engineering (ME) curriculumand shared publicly. Overall, our full project will explore the potential for student-generated softrobotics modules to impact the learning and interest in soft robotics of both (a) the studentsdesigning the modules and (b) the students participating in the modules once they
) ̅̅̅̅) 𝐼𝑚(𝑉 𝜑 𝑇 = 𝑡𝑎𝑛−1 ( 𝑅𝑒(𝑉̅̅̅̅𝑇) ) = 0.83° (5) 𝑇Step 4: Calculate the influence coefficient. 𝑉 9.26 𝝁𝒎 𝛾̅ = 𝑚𝑟 𝑇 at (𝜑 𝑇 − 𝜑 𝑇𝑊 ) = 1 ∠ (−0.83° − 0°) = 9.26 𝑔𝑟 ∠ (−0.83°) (6) 𝑇𝑊 (a) (b)Figure 5 V-meter window, a) response to unbalance plus trail weight , b) response to proposed solutionStep 5 and 6: Determine the Correction weight magnitude and angle: 𝑉𝑜 𝑉𝑜
to the students, but later some admit that theyunderestimated it or they could have added in more complexity. Students often underestimate thetime and effort to get from sketches to creating a final 3-D printed part. While the project shouldoffer a challenge, instructors should have realistic expectations of the students’ experiences.Often, supplemental information is needed to complete the project, but may not be known at thestart. This can easily be provided to the students as needed. Brainstorming ideas with theteaching assistants (TAs) can predict many potential downfalls or concerns when selecting theproject. Some concerns include: a) Is the design space for the project large enough to ensure creativity and uniqueness? b) Is
groups. Does this differ by demographics?Measurable Outcomes Objectives Method TargetA. Graduation. A minimum of 18 scholarship Track CAM scholars who 18 graduates;recipients will graduate with a bachelor’s degree graduate in ME or CIVE (50%).in engineering or computer science by the end of vs. comparison group, track 13 still enrolled inyear five. (13 will still be enrolled) years to graduation. STEM (36%).B. Retention and matriculation. Retention and Track ME/CIVE 31 scholars willmatriculation rates of scholarship recipients will persistence and persist or graduateshow an increase from the departmental
vessel walls, more closelyrepresenting physiologically-relevant conditions.Figure 1. Representations of venous valve model. a) Diagram of venous valve model as used for numerical simulations and silicone model experiments. b) Valve leaflet crescent-tipped shape The numerical and experimental models will be used in tandem to explore the effect of venousvalve morphology on flow conditions conducive to disease. While numerical simulations arevaluable in simulating a wide range of parameter sets and in obtaining data that can be difficultto accurately measure using experiments (such as shear stress), the silicone model can be used asfurther validation of the numerical model and can also readily be used to study fluid stasis andresidence time
free-response survey questions: (a) “What advice wouldyou give to someone who is just learning how to operate a mill?”; (b) “What are the positiveaspects of this mill training exercise?”; and (c) “How could we improve this exercise for futureyears?” (a) Take your time and use the machine slowly, mistakes might happen but it’s a learning process. (a) I now feel more confident in my ability to make complex parts on the mill. (b) I learned how to use a mill for the first time and now I am confident about using them in the future. (b) I feel a lot more comfortable doing manufacturing on the mill, which is huge as I had no experience prior. (c) This exercise could be improved by increasing the availability of mini-mill TAs for the weeks just after
, emerging trends, and successful strategies,” in Design education today, Springer, 2019, pp. 115–148.[11] A. S. Hanna and K. T. Sullivan, “Bridging the gap between academics and practice: A capstone design experience,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 59–62, 2005, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052- 3928(2005)131:1(59).[12] B. E. Barry, V. P. Drnevich, A. Irfanoglu, and D. Bullock, “Summary of developments in the civil engineering capstone course at Purdue University,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 95–98, 2012, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000084.[13] M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall
: 10.1080/87567550209595875[8] R. Cullen and M. Harris, “Assessing learner-centredness through course syllabi,” Assessmentand Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 115-125, 2009. doi:10.1080/026029308019566018[9] M. Eslami, K. Denaro, K., B. Sato, J. Sumarsono, P. Collins, and M. Dennin, “How syllabirelate to outcomes in higher education: a study of syllabi learner-centeredness and grade inequityin STEM”, UCI Education Research Initiative, Working Paper #22-10, 2022. Accessed February2, 2024. [Online] Available: https://cpb-usw2.wpmucdn.com/wp.ovptl.uci.edu/dist/6/18/files/2021/08/CODAS_WP_Eslami-et-al_Syllabi-Paper.pdf.[10] Texas State University, “Public access to course information,” Accessed on March 4, 2024.[Online] Available
organized and chaired numerous sessions, fora, symposia, and tracks for several ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) and APS (American Physical Society) conferences and served as the Chair of the ASME Micro/Nano Fluid Dynamics Technical Committee. Moreover, he served as an Associate Editor for the ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering; currently, he is an Editor for Electrophoresis. Prof. Dutta is an elected Fellow of ASME, and he is a recipient of the prestigious Fulbright Professorship sponsored by the US Department of State.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State
%). As theimpact of the disruption subsided, courses using the Quizzes feature declined, but not back to the2019 use-level. (a) (b) Figure 1. Percentage of courses that used Grading LMS features, (a) Mid-Spring, (b) SpringTo better understand the use of the Quizzes and Gradebook Entries features, box-and-whiskerplots were created. Figure 2 shows the distribution in the number of quizzes the coursesadministered. It is very evident that the average number of Quizzes (shown using the lineconnecting the bars) administered via the LMS for each course peaked in Spring 2020 andSpring 2021 though the median number of Quizzes (shown as the line
, including a combination filter and regulator, a shutoff valve, anda manifold, while the back is used for mounting power supplies for control and data acquisition.The control panel is currently sparsely utilized, allowing for future expansion and customization. (a) (b) Figure 4: Control panel (a) front and (b) back. Air prep and manifolding are mounted to the front of the control panel for easy access while 5V and 24V power supplies are mounted to the back. The remaining pegboard provides additional mounting space for future builds. The final component of the pneumatic cart is the sandbox. The sandbox consists of adrawer