team score webpages where all the team scores are displayed andupdated in real time, and Challenge webpages where student teams can access challenge filesduring the course of a Datastorm Challenge or event.Both the team score and Challenge webpages are designed in a gamified manner to make userinteraction with them more engaging. Figure 2 shows an example of both pages where the team isrepresented by a mouse character, and their progress through the challenges is represented by themouse progressing through a maze. The faster and more successful the team is in solving theirchallenges, the faster the mouse representing their team progresses through the maze. (a) The Team Score page shows the (b) The Challenge Page provides files
expressed that crops grown by our ancestors were more compatible with ourDNA, (b) an engineering teacher found that the ingenuity of family ancestors solved real-worldproblems which engineers still face today, and (c) language arts teachers discovered a multitudeof Spanish words that are not common and felt the need to find innovative and creative ways topreserve them through education. This program allows a connection between family andeducation.The evolution of AVE Frontera over the years revealed that sharing the ancestral knowledge offamily leaders could be used to enrich curricula and teaching practices within the classroom.These contributions by family leaders complemented Shelly’s urge to bring her students’ parentsinto her classroom to
Press, 1989.[16] N. K. Khosh, A. A. A. Khalil, and H. H. S. Alhaded, “CULTURAL VALUES AND NORMS OF COMMUNICATION: A VIEW FROM THE MIDDLE EAST,” in Proceedings of ADVED 2020- 6th International Conference on Advances in Education, International Organization Center of Academic Research, Sep. 2020. doi: 10.47696/adved.202096.[17] D. K. Qattous, “The image of the teacher in Arabic poetry,” vol. 3, no. 9, 2014.[18] S. A. Karabenick and S. Moosa, “Culture and personal epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern students’ beliefs about scientific knowledge and knowing,” p. 19.[19] J. H. Steward, Theory of culture change: The methodology of multilinear evolution. University of Illinois Press, 1972.[20] B. K. Hofer, “Personal
out to professionals at the beginningof the course compared to the end of the course. A word cloud generated to visualize the mostfrequently used terms indicates that all respondents felt empowered to reach out to professionalsafter participating in the career launch course and much less nervous and intimidated. Note thatin the word cloud (Figure 9), larger words indicate they were used more frequently. A B Figure 9: Word cloud generated to visualize the most frequently used terms included in their finalreflection where they were prompted to discuss how they felt about reaching out to professionals prior to starting the career launch course (Panel A) and how they felt at the end of the
matrix.Example ResultA key outcome of this project is that network analysis metrics for bipartite student-toolinteraction networks of makerspaces do detect disruptions in university makerspaces. Shown inFigure 3 is students’ tool usage data from the two universities over three spring semesters,including during COVID-19 and recovery afterward [1-3]. The effects of COVID-19 can be seenclearly in the tool usage data on the left. What is far less clear is if the two spaces recovered at asimilar rate. The modularity and nestedness data on the right clearly show impact due to COVID-19, but also indicate that University B was able to maintain a high nestedness value andrecovered more quickly. High nestedness generally indicates a more robust network
the learning outcomes appraisal are also reflected in these reports. The PAIC meets and discusses these reports and develops its own recommendations for improvement. 3. By the end of capstone: a. All graduating students complete the graduating student survey. b. Members from the Industry Advisory Board (IAB) and other external examiners are invited to attend the oral presentations and demonstrations, called Demo Day, of all senior design projects. They evaluate the projects by completing the senior design form. c. External examiners are invited to interview graduating students, and to complete the Exit interview form. 4. At the end of capstone project, the PAIC meets to
games on effective computer programming learning in higher education,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2615–2634, Oct. 2020.[9] M. Moradi and N. F. B. Noor, “The Impact of Problem-Based Serious Games on Learning Motivation,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 8339–8349, 2022.[10] M. Gamarra, A. Dominguez, J. Velazquez, and H. Páez, “A gamification strategy in engineering education—A case study on motivation and engagement,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 472–482, Mar. 2022.[11] V. F. Martins, I. de Almeida Souza Concilio, and M. de Paiva Guimarães, “Problem based learning associated to the development of games for programming teaching,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1577–1589, Sep
their learning: An action research,” Ph.D. dissertation, ProQuest Dissertationsand Theses database, 2016.[5] A. Robinowitz, “From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system,” AppliedMeasurement in Education, vol. 13(2), pp. 181–208, 2010.[6] N. Alahmadi, M. Alrahaili and D. Alshraideh, “The impact of the formative assessment inspeaking test on Saudi students’ performance,” Arab World English Journal, vol. 10(1), pp. 259–270, 2019.[7] D. D. Dixson and F. C. Worrell, “Formative and summative assessment in the classroom,”Theory into practice, vol. 55(2), pp. 153–159, 2016.[8] P. Black, C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam, Assessment for learning: Puttingit into practice. Open University Press, 2004.[9] K. Buyukkarci and S
complementthe development of critical consciousness, “where students (a) gain sociopolitical understanding,or engage in critical reflection, to (b) change the world, or take critical action” [8].An analytical review of CC literature by Jemal [9] observes divergence in the interpretation of“critical action,” with some scholars viewing the capacity, or the intention, to take action, assufficient, and also divergence in whether and how critical consciousness may be experienced bythe privileged as well as the oppressed. Jemal proposes the notion of “transformative potential”to clarify the construct of critical consciousness on both counts.Engineering identity and critical consciousnessWhile the engaged presence of diverse perspectives in engineering
- aamt/docview/2667263062/se-2.[5] P. H. Collins, Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2000, pp. 69–96.[6] A. Walker, In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens. Betascript Publishing, 1983.[7] G. Anzaldúa, Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books, 1987.[8] S. B. Coutin, Legalizing Moves: Salvadoran Immigrants’ Struggle for U.S. Residency. Ann Arbor: University Of Michigan Press, 2003.[9] B. A. Burt, K. L. Williams, and W. A. Smith, “Into the storm: Ecological and sociological impediments to Black males’ persistence in engineering graduate programs,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 965
,” Bls.gov, Jul. 13, 2018. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/management/construction-managers.htm[6] J. O. Choi, P. P. Shrestha, J. Lim, and B. K. Shrestha, “An Investigation of Construction Workforce Inequalities and Biases in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Industry,” Construction Research Congress 2018, Mar. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481301.007.[7] J. M. Burgoon, A. Roebuck, and J. W. Elliott, “Evidence of Opportunity Gaps in Construction Education: A Longitudinal Analysis of Student Success,” International Journal of Construction Education and Research, pp. 1–15, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2023.2186980.[8] E. Escamilla, M. Ostadalimakhmalbaf, and F. Pariafsai
.” Accessed: Mar. 26, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3610978.3640574[7] S. Dutta, T. Banerjee, N. D. Roy, and B. Chowdhury, “Development of a BCI-Based Application Using EEG to Assess Attentional Control,” in Proceedings of the Global AI Congress 2019, J. K. Mandal and S. Mukhopadhyay, Eds., in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 659–670. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2188- 1_52.[8] E. H. Houssein, A. Hammad, and A. A. Ali, “Human emotion recognition from EEG-based brain–computer interface using machine learning: a comprehensive review,” Neural Comput & Applic, vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 12527–12557, Aug. 2022, doi
Affecting PhD Student Success. International journal of exercise science, 12(1), 34–45.[5] Cass, C., Kirn, A., Tsugawa, M. A., Perkins, H., Chestnut, J. N., Briggs, D. E., & Miller, B. (2017, June), Board # 18 : Improving Performance and Retention of Engineering Graduate Students through Motivation and Identity Formation Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--27798[6] Perkins, H., Tsugawa-Nieves, M., Bahnson, M., Satterfield, D., Parker, M., Kirn, A., & Cass, C. (2019). Motivation Profiles of engineering doctoral students and implications for persistence. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109
Polytechnic Institute and State University Jennifer Case is Head and Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds an honorary position at the University of Cape Town. Her research on the student experience of learning, focusing mainly on science and engineerinDr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and
Paper ID #42973Understanding Federal STEM Education InitiativesDr. Jessica Centers, The MITRE Corporation Jessica Centers is a communications engineer at the MITRE Corporation. She joined MITRE in 2023 after completing her Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering with a focus on signal and information processing at Duke University. Upon beginning her role at MITRE, she also completed her Master of Arts in Technology Ethics and Science Policy. Prior to graduate school, she received her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Milwaukee School of Engineering in 2018. She currently splits her time between STEM workforce and
. Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University Catherine Cohan, Ph.D. has been a research psychologist for over 20 years. Her areas of expertise include engineering education, retention of underrepresented students, measurement, and assessment. She is currently an Assistant Research Professor and coorDawn Pfeifer Pfeifer Reitz, The Pennsylvania State UniversitySonia Delaquito, Pennsylvania State UniversityJanelle B Larson, Pennsylvania State UniversityDr. Rungun Nathan, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Rungun Nathan, a professor and program chair for the mechanical engineering department, joined the faculty at Penn State Berks in 2007 as an assistant professor and was promoted in 2012 to associate professor and
at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology, learning sciences, and instructiJacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Campbell University Jacqueline Gartner is an Associate Professor and Founding Faculty at Campbell University in the School of Engineering, which offers a broad BS in engineering with concentrations in chemical, mechanical and electrical engineering.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education.MD SHARIFUL ISLAM
Associate Dean and Director of Engineering at the R. B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. He and his coauthors were awarded the Wickenden award (Journal of Engineering Education, 2014) and Best Paper award, Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE, 2014). He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award (2013) for designing the B.S. degree in Engineering Education. He is a co-PI on the ”Engineering for Us All” (e4usa) project to develop a high school engineering course ”for all”. He is active in engineering within K-12, (Technology Student Association Board of Directors) and has written multiple texts in Engineering, Mathematics and Digital Electronics. He earned a PhD in
professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAINDr. Yilin Feng, California State University, Los Angeles Yilin Feng is an assistant professor at California State University, Los Angeles. She received her Ph.D. degree from Purdue University. Her research interest is in airport simulation, operation, and management.Dr. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal State LA. His specialization is in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering. Since becoming part of the
Paper ID #42752Board 202: Assessing the Design of an AR-based Physics ExploratoriumMs. Elizabeth Flynn, San Diego State University Elizabeth Flynn is a PhD student in the joint Math and Science Education Doctoral program at San Diego State University/University of California San Diego. She is interested in studying teaching and learning in undergraduate math and science as well as supporting participation and success of women in STEM.Molly Horner, San Diego State UniversityAdrian Larios, San Diego State UniversityRyan Thomas RiosIndia Elizabeth Wishart, San Diego State UniversityJanet Bowers, San Diego State UniversityDr. Dustin B
organized and chaired numerous sessions, fora, symposia, and tracks for several ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) and APS (American Physical Society) conferences and served as the Chair of the ASME Micro/Nano Fluid Dynamics Technical Committee. Moreover, he served as an Associate Editor for the ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering; currently, he is an Editor for Electrophoresis. Prof. Dutta is an elected Fellow of ASME, and he is a recipient of the prestigious Fulbright Professorship sponsored by the US Department of State.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State
and PhD in STEM Education from the University of Texas at Austin.Dr. David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. Knight currently serves as the co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Maura Borrego, University of Texas at Austin
entrepreneurship.Dr. Deborah Anne Trytten, University of Oklahoma Dr. Deborah A. Trytten is a Professor of Computer Science and Womens’ and Gender Studies at the University of Oklahoma. Her main research focus is diversity in engineering education and introductory software engineering education.Dr. Russell D. Meier, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Russ Meier teaches computer architecture at Milwaukee School of Engineering. His funded research explores how first year students develop computational thinking. He received the Iowa State University Teaching Excellence Award, the Iowa State University Warren B. Boast Award for Undergraduate Teaching Excellence, and the MSOE Oscar Werwath Distinguished Teacher Award. He belongs
. Theme Module Description Category Interaction Nickname Type Aircraft Module A Explore a Jet Plane Learning Individual Week Module B Fly a Jet Plane Experience Individual Module C Explore Mars with a Remote- Learning Individual Spacecraft Controlled Vehicle Week Module D Explore Mars with an Au- Experience Individual tonomous Vehicle Astronaut Module E Human-Machine Interactions Both
content support.Program Assessment and SustainabilityThe program will be monitored from two perspectives: (1) changes in the attitudes andproficiency of students regarding the software of choice, and (2) perceptions of faculty and TAson class implementation. The student-focused assessment will be based on student use of CTAoffice hours and on survey responses. These surveys will be conducted at the start of thesemester (Survey A) and late in the semester when students start team-based assignments(Survey B) – this timing was selected to monitor whether students felt prepared to work withtheir team. Survey question topics and the corresponding program objective measured areprovided in Table 2. Because the program seeks to not only promote
small, midwestern university. While the university itself is quite small,the engineering department is even smaller, with an average of only 25-30 incoming first-yearstudents each year. These first-year engineering students all enroll in one of two sections of anintroductory engineering fundamentals course (that includes both a lecture and a lab) thatfamiliarizes them with engineering concepts and tools they will use throughout their four yearsof engineering coursework and in their engineering careers. One section of this course wastaught by a professor who has taught this course for many years (Instructor A) and the othersection of this course was taught by a new faculty member teaching it for the first time(Instructor B). Since the goal is to
skills.References[1] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.[2] Santangelo, J., Elijah, R., Filippi, L., Mammo, B., Mundorff, E., & Weingartner, K. (2022). An Integrated Achievement and Mentoring (iAM) Model to Promote STEM Student Retention and Success. Education Sciences, 12(12), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120843[3] Santangelo, J. R., Albers, L. A., Hunter, M. A., Weingartner, K., Elijah, R., Lefurgy, S. T., Agarwal, R., & Filippi, L. (2023, June). Board 213: An Expanded Integrated Achievement and Mentoring (iAM) Program to Promote Access to STEM Professions. Paper presented at 2023 American Society for Engineering
block diagram of a full adder typically includes input labels A, B, and CIN, andoutput labels Sum and COUT. Figure 1. Full adderThe following table shows the truth table of a Full Adder: Input Output A B CIN SUM Cout 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1
: una herramienta en la formación de estudiantes universitarios en el sureste de México,” RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación Y El Desarrollo Educativo, vol. 11, no. 22, May 2021, doi: 10.23913/ride.v11i22.937.[4] J. García‐Alandete, E. R. Martínez, P. S. Nohales, and B. S. Lozano, “Sentido de la vida y bienestar psicológico en adultos emergentes españoles,” Acta Colombiana De Psicología, pp. 196–216, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.14718/acp.2018.21.1.9.[5] S. Nyholm and M. Rüther, “Meaning in Life in AI Ethics—Some Trends and Perspectives,” Philosophy & Technology, vol. 36, no. 2, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13347-023-00620-z.[6] J. Fereday and E. Muir‐Cochrane, “Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach
to knowledge, academic engagement and motivation, and self-regulation.Dr. Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati Dr. Sheryl Sorby is currently a Professor of STEM Education at the University of Cincinnati and was recently a Fulbright Scholar at the Dublin Institute of Technology in Dublin, Ireland. She is a professor emerita of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering MecDr. Clodagh Reid, Technological University of the Shannon PhD in spatial ability and problem solving in engineering education from Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest. Graduated in 2017 from the University of Limerick with a B. Tech (Ed.). Member of Technology Education Research Group (TERG).Dr. Gibin Raju, University of