1 $45.99 Hosyond 7 Inch IPS LCD Touch Screen Display Panel 1024×600 Capacitive Screen HDMI Monitor for Raspberry Pi, BB Black, Windows 10 8 7 Cable 1 $8.99 USB-C to USB A Cable 3.1A Fast Charging [2-Pack 6.6ft], JSAUX USB Type C Charger Cord Screen case holder 1 $13.99 Longruner 7-inch Raspberry Pi Touch Screen Case Holder for Raspberry Pi 3 2 Model B and RPi 1 B+ A BB Black PC Various Systems LSC7B-1Computer Vision Application DesignRoboflow, a tool for building computer vision applications that utilizes open-source computervision models, was used to recognize the color of candy [6]. The Python
, Greenwich, CT, 2020. [6] J. M. Lang. Small teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of learning. Jossey-Bass, London, England, 2nd edition, 2021. [7] M. C. Lovett, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, S. A. Ambrose, and M. K. Norman. How learning works: Eight research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass, London, England, 2nd edition, 2023. [8] R. McDaniel. Active learning, Jun 2016. [9] Baskin School of Engineering. End of course survey on student experience in experiential design courses, 2023. Unpublished data.[10] M. T. Owens and K. D. Tanner. Teaching as brain changing: Exploring connections between neuroscience and innovative teaching. CBE Life Sci. Educ., 16(2), Summer 2017.[11] D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman
ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[10] N. M. Trellinger, B. Sattler, and J. Turns, "“I realized that I myself am on the path to being a pioneer”: Characterizing the experiences of graduate students in an innovative interviewing experience.," in 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA., 2015.[11] L. Stone, "Kuhnian science and education research: Analytics of practice and training," in Educational Research: Why ‘What Works’ Doesn't Work: Springer, 2006, pp. 127-142.[12] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein, "Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature," Journal of
on this positive interest from students, a committee of faculty who taught in math andsciences was convened to develop the program. Because of the institution’s historical strengths inthe sciences, the committee recommended that the institution offer a B. S. in EngineeringScience, which was subject to the same ABET criteria as B.S. programs in Engineering andEngineering Physics.[7] It was also believed that the program named Engineering Sciencewould be better accepted at a liberal arts institution where a degree such as engineering might beviewed by some as a strictly vocational major. The intent of the degree to equip students with abroad and general engineering background also reflected key principles of the liberal artsapproach.The
–584, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0042085911431472.[16] D. Carter-Andrews, “Preparing teachers to be culturally multidimensional: Designing andimplementing teacher preparation programs for pedagogical relevance, responsiveness, andsustenance,” Educ. Forum, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 416–428, 2021, doi:10.1080/00131725.2021.1957638.[17] A. Ishimaru, “New rules of engagement: From conventional partnerships to equitablecollaborations,” in Just Schools: Building Equitable Collaborations with Families andCommunities, J. A. Banks, Ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2020.[18] L. A. Mooney and B. Edwards, “Experiential learning in sociology: Service learning andother community-based learning initiatives,” Teaching Sociology, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 181, 2001,doi
W. Buchanan, “Circuit Simulators and Computer Algebra: An IntegratedCurriculum for Electronics Students,” Proceedings of the1996 ASEE Annual Conference,Washington, D.C., June, 1996.[13] P. Gharghouri, “Integrating a Computer Algebra Software into the Engineering Curriculum:Problems and Benefits,” Proceedings of the 1998 Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington, June,1998.[14] T.J. Murphy, R. Goodman, M. Hofer, J. White, E. Black, and B. Kline, “Using MathematicaWith Multivariable Calculus,”, Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Conference, Charlotte, NorthCarolina, June, 1999.[15] J. Parker, “Symbolic Algebra in Dynamic Systems and Controls Classes,” Proceedings ofthe 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June, 2001
other similar courses (college-wide,introductory, multiple sections/instructors, significant redesign).References[1] K. Salyards, B. Wheatley, and K. Wakabayashi, “Redesigning an Introduction to EngineeringCourse as an Interdisciplinary Project-Based Course,” Presented at 2022 First-Year EngineeringExperience, East Lansing, Michigan. Available: https://peer.asee.org/42246[2] S. Velegol, R. Ziemian, R. Zaccone, R. Kozick, J. Baish, and M. Vigeant, “ExploringEngineering At Bucknell University: A Seminar Approach To The First Year EngineeringExperience,” in 2003 Annual Conference Proceedings, Nashville, Tennessee: ASEEConferences, Jun. 2003, p. 8.561.1-8.561.14.[3] M. Vigeant, K. Marosi, and R. Ziemian, “Evaluating The Seminar Model For First
Paper ID #41346Comparison of Engineering and Computer Science Student Performance andOpinions of Instruction of a Microcomputers Course Across Delivery FormatsDr. Todd Jeffrey Freeborn, The University of Alabama Todd Freeborn, PhD, is an associate professor with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The University of Alabama. Through NSF funding, he has coordinated REU Sites for engineering students to explore renewable resources and speech pathology. He is also the coordinator for an NSF S-STEM program to prepare students for gateway courses across different disciplines of engineering to support and
their development offive skills, where a grade of ‘F’ is 1 point, and a grade of ‘A’ is 5 points. These five skills areCommunication with audiences from different academic disciplines and the public,Understanding FEW stakeholders, Identify potential research partnerships, Interdisciplinaryteamwork, Understand potential career pathways: government, academia, industry. Then wecalculated mean student rating for each skill. Figure 1 offers a summative depiction of studentratings for how well the NRT program supported development of the five skills. All cohorts ratedthe NRT program similarly for each skill, with a grade at or near 4.0, which is a ‘B.'Figure 1: Students gave the NRT a grade for how well the NRT program supported trainees’development
Paper ID #43908Learning from Experience: A Faculty-Led Collaborative Inquiry ExploringEvidence-Based Strategies for Embedding Communication Skills Across EngineeringCurriculaDr. Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Ashley Taylor (she/her) is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics at Virginia Tech. Her teaching and research focus on mobilizing engineering students to solve pressing real-world challenges through community-based participatory approaches. Taylor has partnered alongside communities in rural Appalachia, Nigeria, Malawi, Tanzania
Paper ID #43286Preparing Future Semiconductor Talent in the Global Context: A ComparativeStudy of the Semiconductor Engineering Curriculum in the US and TaiwanMr. YiXiang Shawn Sun, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Shawn Sun is an Engineering Education PhD student at Virginia Tech. He is also an affiliate Non-resident Fellow (Quantum technologies and AI focused) at Research Institute for Democracy, Society, and Emerging Technology (DSET, Taiwan). His research interests include Emerging technologies-informed engineering education, Engineering ethics, Global engineering education, and Engineering policy
engineering enrollees are separated from the other STEM-basedmajors due to the course falling within the civil engineering program. Figure 5 shows the finalexam grades in the course. While it shows a degree of skewness, the distribution indicates thatthe students largely performed well on the exam. 70 60 50 40 Count 30 20 10 0 F D C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A A+ Grade Figure 5. Distribution
the National Science Foundation, under grant 2013410. Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of either organization. The authors would like to acknowledgesupport from the Center for Socially Engaged Design, especially Charlie Michaels, SaraHoffman, Tallie Ritter, and Steve Skerlos for their contributions. We additionally thank all of theC-SED staff, graduate facilitators, and instructor partners who make C-SED’s work possible. References [1] B. Amadei and W. A. Wallace, "Engineering for humanitarian development," IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 6–15, 2009. doi
. Barlow, “Developing a scale to measure student social and cognitive engagement in online science, technology, engineering, and math courses,” presented at the 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.[10] M. T. H. Chi and R. Wylie, “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 219–243, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.[11] C. R. Pace, “Recollections and reflections,” High. Educ. Handb. Theory Res., pp. 1–34, 1998.[12] A. Barlow, S. Brown, B. Lutz, N. Pitterson, N. Hunsu, and O. Adesope, “Development of the student course cognitive engagement instrument (SCCEI) for college engineering courses,” Int. J
: https://doi.org/10.1109/fie44824.2020.9274012.[3] J.B. Buckley, B. S. Robinson, T. R. Tretter, C. Biesecker, A. Hammond, and A.K. Thompson, “Belonging as a gateway for learning: First‐year engineering students’ characterizations of factors that promote and detract from sense of belonging in a pandemic,” Journal of Engineering Education, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20529.[4] J. Vaden, M. Bilec, A. Dukes, A. Nave, A. Landis, K. Parrish, “Developing and Sustaining Inclusive Engineering Learning Communities and Classrooms,” presented at the 127th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 2022[5] M. Sinclair, “Education in emergencies, learning for a future: Refugee
’ Intelligence Beliefs andLearning,” J of Engineering Edu, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 369–387, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20051.[8] A. M. Boelt, A. Kolmos & J. E. Holgaard (2022) Literature review of students’perceptions of generic competence development in problem-based learning in engineeringeducation, European Journal of Engineering Education, 47:6, 1399-1420, DOI:10.1080/03043797.2022.2074819[9] Kolmos, A., & de Graaff, E. (2014). Problem-based and project-based learning inengineering education: Merging models. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridgehandbook of engineeringeducation research (pp. 141–161). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.012[10] Armacost, R. and Pet-Armacost, J. 2003. “Using mastery
the culture and community. As a future civil engineer, I will make sure to look at the long-term impacts of the projects I complete. I will use this information to minimize the negative impact my projects have on the public. My goal is to finish every project leaving a positive impact on the community effected rather than a negative one as seen with the Highway 75 project.While not all the student comments were as developed as the ones above, overall, the project seemed tobe well received by the students with no negative comments. (a) (b) Figure 2. Digitized buildings from project (a) Digitized buildings over the 1955 aerial, and (b
Team- building: Effects on Team Performance,” AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 205–231, 2018, doi: 10.17705/1thci.00110.[5] K. M. Kniffin, J. Yan, B. Wansink, and W. D. Schulze, “The sound of cooperation,” Source: Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 372–390, 2017, doi: 10.2307/26610625.[6] C. Klein et al., “Does team building work?,” Small Group Res, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 181– 222, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1177/1046496408328821.[7] L. Larson, H. Wojcik, I. Gokhman, L. DeChurch, S. Bell, and N. Contractor, “Team performance in space crews: Houston, we have a teamwork problem,” Acta Astronaut, vol. 161, pp. 108–114, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.04.052.[8
interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Dr. Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr, University of Tennessee, Space Institute Jerry Dahlberg is the Director of Research at the University of Tennessee Space Institute. Prior to joining UTSI, he was an Assistant Teaching Professor and Senior Design Committee Chair at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He received a B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering Science in 2014, M.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2016 and PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2018 from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.Dr. B ”Grant” Grant Crawford P.E., Quinnipiac University Grant Crawford, PhD, P.E., F.ASEE, Colonel (retired) U.S. Army, is a Professor of
Paper ID #42816Rethinking Precalculus: A Thematic ApproachMr. Carl Boyet, Louisiana Tech University Carl Boyet is an Instructor of Mathematics who has worked for Louisiana Tech University for nine years.Dr. Jonathan Walters, Louisiana Tech University Senior Lecturer at Louisiana Tech UniversityChristian Smith, Louisiana Tech University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Rethinking Precalculus: A Thematic ApproachAbstract: Over the last decade, Precalculus at Louisiana Tech University has seen manyrevisions as needs and demands shift for the many STEM majors it services
- 1543.15. B. M. Frank, N. Simper, and J. A. Kaupp, “How We Know They're Learning: Comparing Approaches to Longitudinal Assessment of Transferable Learning Outcomes”. In Proc. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.16. W. Rashideh , O. A. Alshathry , S. Atawneh , and H.A. Bazar, “ A Successful Framework for the ABET Accreditation of an Information System Program”, Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, vol. 26, no. 4, pp 1285-1307, 2020.17. X. Gao, P. Li, J. Shen, and H. Sun, “Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary stem education,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020.18. K. E. Dugan, E. A. Mosyjowski, S. R. Daly, and L. R. Lattuca, “Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A
, Natasha 3Naz, Afrin 3Beckman, Joseph W 3Coffman-Wolph, Stephany 3Christensen, Ken 3Georgiopoulos, Michael 3Agrawal, Rajeev K 3Gross, Joshua B 3Gehringer, Edward F 3 The number of downloads had a very wide range, from a high of 27,404 for a paper from2017 to one paper which had only 3 downloads (primarily because it was published in 2023). Table4 ranks the top 10 papers based on the number of downloads, including the year in which the paperwas published and presented.Table 4: Ranking Top 10 Papers by Downloads Paper Title # of Downloads Year Fun, Innovative Computer Science
fromGlobal North/Western and developing countries as they collaborate to promote global acumen.The key takeaways from this study could be summarized as: 1. Global acumen, or global awareness, is essential for navigating diverse environments and collaborating effectively across borders. a. Ignoring cultural differences can have disastrous results in cross-cultural collaborations. b. Faculty development is necessary to guide the development of global acumen in students. 2. Establishing trust and building personal relationships between collaborators is crucial for successful collaboration. 3. Understanding and articulating the motivations and goals of the collaboration is crucial for
with higher GPAs, as no significant differences were found in students’ ability to participate in the groups, nor in students’ ability to ask and receive help [13]. Modeling Results Utilizing a two-variable linear regression with treatment status and students' incoming GPA, students in the PLSG were not observed to earn significantly higher final grades in the course relative to their peers in the control (b=1.05, p=0.108). However, utilizing a two-variable logistic regression with the same variables, they were observed to pass the course at significantly higher rates (b=0.362, p=0.021). This result shows that the odds of students passing the course in the PLSGs are about 1.3 times higher than those
Statistics Summary Statistics Mean 85.221594 Mean 83.508072 Std Dev 14.697692 Std Dev 12.861683 N 69 N 83 Minimum 28.4 Minimum 26.49 Maximum 99.7 Maximum 99.91 Median 90.05 Median 85.5 (a) (b)Figure 2: Distribution of course grades when the class was offered at (a) 8AM and (b) 12:30PMfrom Spring 2021 to Fall 2023 Summary Statistics Summary Statistics
Intro to Research: How to Read a Scientific Paper6:00 PM Dinner | Palenque by Mezcal Day 2: Bio-preservation Boot Camp Course Instruction and Conclusion8:00 AM Transportation pick-up8:30 AM Breakfast UCR | Winston Chung Hall 205/2069:00 AM Bio-preservation Lab Tours Group A - Yin Lab | ROOM 307 Group B - Mangolini Lab | MSE 25910:00 AM Bio-preservation Lab Tour Group B - Yin Lab | ROOM 307 Group A - Mangolini Lab |MSE 25912:00 PM Lunch | UCR - ATP-Bio Pillar Leadership Meeting1:30PM Scholar Panel - Trainees
.3. The 2011 ASEE annual conference featured two milestones in the emergence of theengineering education research community: a. The Main Plenary organized by Jack Lohmann and Karl Smith and facilitated by Karl Smith, featured the engineering education research and development work of Michael Prince, Khairiyah Mohd Yusof, Jacquelyn Sullivan, Arnold Pears, David Darmofal, and Anna Dollar. b. The Networking Session, titled A Celebration of the Engineering Education Research Community, included a brief report on the Rigorous Research in Engineering Education and the Collaboratory for Engineering Education Research (CLEERhub), and the National Research Council Discipline-Based Education Research
]. The arc of these changes, based onliterature review and data gathered from program participants, (also depicted in Fig. 1) hasmoved toward: A. Creating a transformative learning environment through interest-based communities in which participants have opportunities to interact with key program factors for transformative learning. Specifically and primarily, ensuring an inclusive environment where diverse participants collaborate with each other. [2] B. Identifying and increasing program elements that are particularly impactful for our underserved participant groups in order to support the transformative, inclusive, and critically-aware learning environment. [3] C. Reorganizing and re-focusing the program as a
should beable to control the victim from the attack’s VM. For this lab module, students should work withtwo deliverables: Figure 3: Session information output on the attacker’s VM. 1. In the meterpreter console, run MSF commands to control the victim VM. You should be able to see a screenshot similar to the one in Figure 3. 2. Explain why the exploit can be launched successfully.5 Evaluation Setup (a) Student Classification (b) Ethnicity (c) Majors Figure 4: Students’ ethnic and academic background at Institutions 1 and 2.5.1 Lab and Assessment SetupThe lab tasks are conducted in a physical classroom or online, following a standard process. Moststudents were
a Forum. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering, p. 45, 2013.5. C. Rottmann, R. Sacks, and D. Reeve, “Engineering leadership: Grounding leadership theory in engineers’ professional identities,” Leadership, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351–373, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1742715014543581.6. W. J. Schell, IV and P. J. Kauffmann, “Engineering leadership: Faculty perceptions and profiles,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.7. D. B. Knight and B. J. Novoselich, “Curricular and co-curricular influences on undergraduate engineering student leadership,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 44–70, 2017.8. S.-C. Wong, “Competency Definitions, Development and Assessment: A