grading, and Taylor shows that theyare typically ill-trained and supervised.20 However, Smith points out that technical faculty areconsistently more effective than communication instructors at identifying technical errors instudent reports.21 Further complicating the authority problem, Cho explores the way peopledeliver communication feedback and the ways that students respond to it.22 Cho finds thatstudents respond best to feedback that is (A) positive and (B) directive—so long as the directivesare non-trivial. In order to deliver non-trivial directive feedback, communication instructors Page 22.1687.7must either be well-versed in the technical
AC 2011-975: ENGINEERING FOR AMERICAN COMMUNITIES: EN-GAGING ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY ALTRU-ISTIC ENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECTSMalinda S Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder MALINDA SCHAEFER ZARSKE is a doctoral candidate at the University of Colorado Boulder in engi- neering education. Her research interests include engineering student learning, diversity and recruitment. Her current research is centered on the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, recruitment, and retention in engineering. She is a Co-Director of the Engineering for American Commu- nities student organization, on the development team as well as a content editor for the TeachEngineer- ing.org digital
AC 2011-842: A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF USING WRITINGAS A CRITICAL THINKING TOOLN. Jean Hodges, VCUQatar Since Fall 2004, N. Jean Hodges has been an Assistant Professor of Writing at Virginia Commonwealth University Qatar (VCUQatar) in Doha, Qatar. She earned her degrees in North Carolina: a Master of Science in Technical Communication from North Carolina State University and a Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration, magna cum laude, from Queens College (now Queens University). Her work experiences in legal, medical, executive, and academic positions and her business training have informed her understanding of writing in the workplace and in different fields. Her interdisciplinary Master’s pro- gram
AC 2011-1432: A SUCCESSFUL PLAN FOR FACULTY DEVELOPMENTTHAT HAS A LASTING IMPACTStephen W. Crown, University of Texas, Pan American Dr. Crown is a professor of mechanical engineering in south Texas. He has been actively involved in a number of grants supporting innovative and effective teaching methods for engineering education. Dr. Crown is director of the faculty development component of a large Department of Education grant that supports Challenge Based Instruction and is the director of the Texas Pre-Freshman Engineering Program in Edinburg.Arturo A Fuentes, University of Texas, Pan AmericanRobert A. Freeman, University of Texas-Pan American Dr. Robert A. Freeman has been on the faculty of The University of
Implementing Hands-on Laboratory Exercises and Design Projects for First Year Engineering Students", American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2001.2. Allam, Y., Tomasko, D.L., Trott, B., Schlosser, P., Yang, Y., Wilson, T.M., Merrill, J., "Lab-on-a-chip Design- Build Project with a Nanotechnology Component in a Freshman Engineering Course", Chemical Engineering Education, Volume 42, Number 4, 2008.3. Freuler, R.J., Hoffmann, M.J., Pavlic, T.P., Beams, J.M., Radigan, J.P., Dutta, P.K., Demel, J.T., Justen, E.D., "Experiences with a Comprehensive Freshman Hands-On Course 0 Designing, Building, and Testing Small Autonomous Robots", American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
“light” this second circuit, and how does store this electrical energy generatedenergy) this relate to the plan that you came through the movement of the magnet up with to improve the through the coil “flashlight’s” usability. • Disconnect the coil from the circuit board. • When the coil wires are connected • Shake the flashlight for two cases together the overall displacement of the (a) connect the two wires of the magnet within the coil is less than whenExperiment #3 coil together, and (b) disconnect the coil wires are
implementation. Bibliography1. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.2. Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (2000). Designing Mildred: Scaffolding Students’ Reflection and Arguemntation Using a Cognitive Software Guide. In B. Fishman & O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 142-149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.3. Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126.4. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility
ddesigned for UPF. The R Rockn’ Bowleer allows a person with partial p quadrriplegia to boowl. This devvice is a “high-end”attachmeent for the Un niversal Playy Frame, giv ving the userr a great deall of control oover the spinn andplacemen nt of the balll. Perhaps th he most uniqu ue feature off the Rock nn’ Bowler is the powereddspinning rail system that can be used u to add spin s to the b all. As the bball rolls dow wn the ramp,, itcomes inn contact with h two rails spinning
] Rowell, G. H., Perhac, D. G., Hankins, J. A., Parker, B. C., Pettey, C. C., and Iriarte-Gross, J. M. 2003.Computer-related gender differences. Proceedings from SIGCSE’03, Reno, Nevada, February 19-23.[5] Backnak, R., Chappa, E. and De La Rosa, K. 2009. Exposing K-12 students to science and engineering.Proceedings from 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, Texas, October 18-21.[6] Cantrell, P. and Ewing-Taylor, J. 2009. Exploring STEM career options through collaborative highschool seminars. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3): 295-303.[7] Heersink, D. and Moskal, B. 2010. Measuring high school students’ attitudes toward computing.Proceedings from SIGCSE’10, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.[8] Maxim, B. R. and Elenbogen, B. S
central database. Students whowere absent on the day of the assessment were not included in the database. No attempts weremade to return to the schools and give make-up assessments to these students.Data AnalysisAnalysis utilized comparisons of frequency statistics and nonparametric hypothesis testing. Priorto analysis, survey data within the central database were cleaned to fit the analysis process. Thesurvey and bubble sheets prompted students for responses A-E, therefore these alpha-responseswere converted into numeric-responses; A=1, B=2, …, E=5. Once the data were converted, thedatabase was checked for inappropriate or missing responses for the question that promptedstudents to identify their current grade. Resulting errors were checked
increases to the Pre105-Pos202 pairing, suggesting that there are other forces effecting SE. This “excess” SE increase represented ~40% of the total increase in SE. (b) The Math, MST and Art/Music majors exhibited the highest levels of SE, with Page 22.1044.13 these three populations exhibiting statistically significant higher SE levels compared to all other majors. A t-test between the Math and MST majors gave p(2-tail) = 0.095, indicating that there is no significant difference (to the α=0.05 level). Our hypothesis that the MST major eventually achieved the same SE as the Math major was valid, although there is certainly less difference
steel is used in the B-pillars of the Super Crew model of the F-150? _______________________________________________________________________ 3. What was the name of the “laminate steel panel” used in the F-150 that helped reduce noise? _______________________________________________________________________3-Leadership in Truck Game Starts Up Front (2:25): 4. The narrator states that the up-front structure can do a number of things for the truck: a. Stiffens up the ______________________________. b. Makes it more _____________________________________________________ c. ________________________ the cab. d. Helps win at the ___________________ game. 5. The F-150 received
robust web-based tools to repeatedly measure theirexplicit and implicit attitudes toward self, math, engineering, and careers. Our objectives were:(a) Measure the implicit biases of freshman engineering men and women regarding STEM.(b) Determine whether engineering students and professionals are implicitly self-associated with engineering.(c) Determine whether project-based learning increases freshman students’ self-association with engineering.MethodsWe employed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) 20 and a recent variant, the Brief ImplicitAssociation Test (BIAT) 21, to measure association strengths between concepts (e.g., math andlanguages) and evaluations (e.g., good or bad) or attributes (e.g., male or female). In the IAT,participants
, No. 7, p. 38.2. Sarasin, L., 1998, “Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom.” Madison, WI: Atwood.3. Gardner, H., 1999. “Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century.” New York: Basic Books.4. Joyce, B., and Weil, M., 2000, “Models of Teaching.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.5. Brandford, J.D., et al., Eds., “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,” Expanded Edition, National Academy of Sciences, 2000.6. Klingbeil, N., Newberry, B., Donaldson, A. and Ozdogan, J., 2010, "The Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: Highlights from a CCLI Phase 3 Initiative," Proceedings 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, June 2010.7. Klingbeil, N
wind turbine Coherent Application Thread woven through Boston University Mechanical Engineering curriculum Page 22.770.8 CATs COHERENT A! PPLICATION THREADS ! "#$! %&!!!!'("!#)*+,+-.+*/01,+2345!-41.+326! ! 784!9:;(-,1545!:+35!9*.-+34!68;:3!+3!984! 6<49=8!+6!+3!984!>,;=<45?!;.!>-.1<45?! =;35+9+;3@!98;*28!984.4!1.4!69+,,!14.;5A31/+=! B;.=46!;3!984!-,1546@!16!68;:3@!5*4!9;!984! :+35&!!784!-.1<4!B;.=4!9819!<44C6!984!.;9;.! ,;=<45!+6!D
and tank’s automatic adjustment in this plane.References:1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Jet Propulsion LaboratoryNanorover web site http://robotics.jpl.nasa.gov/tasks/nrover/2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Mars Exploration RoversWeb Site http://marsrovers.nasa.gov3. Firat, B. (2004), Design of a Mars Rover Suspension Mechanism (Master’s thesis). Izmir Institute ofTechnology, Izmir, Turkey Page 22.387.12
AC 2011-1341: UTILIZING BRIDGES ACROSS COLLEGES TO PROPOSEA GRANT TO IMPROVE THE RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OFSTUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN STEM PROGRAMSDonald C. Richter, Eastern Washington University DONALD C. RICHTER obtained his B. Sc. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from The Ohio State University, M.S. and Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. He holds a Pro- fessional Engineer certification and worked as an Engineer and Engineering Manger in industry for 20 years before teaching. His interests include project management, robotics /automation, Energy Manage- ment and air pollution dispersion modelingWilliam R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is currently
(Electrical & Computer) Strength in Numbers (Aerospace & Civil)Seating capacity: 20 students Seating capacity: 20 students M 408C - Calculus I M 408C - Calculus I EE 302 - Intro to Electrical Engineering CH 301 - Chemistry I EE 306 - Intro to Computing FIG Seminar FIG SeminarThe Visionaries (Mechanical) The Innovators (Interdisciplinary)Seating capacity: 20 students Seating capacity: 20 students M 408C - Calculus I FIG Seminar CH 301 - Chemistry I ME 302 - Into to Mechanical Engineering FIG SeminarInfinite Momentum A (Interdisciplinary) Infinite Momentum B (Electrical &Seating capacity: 15 students
-614.5. Imbens G. & Lemieux T. (2008). “Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice,” Journal of Econometrics, 142 (2008) 615-6356. Jacob B & Lefgren L. (2004). “Remedial education and student achievement: A regression-Discontinuity Analysis,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Feb., 86(1): 226-244.7. Lalive R (2008). “How do extended benefits affect unemployment duration? A regression discontinuity approach,” Journal of Econometrics, 142, 785-806.8. Lemieux T. & Milligan K. (2007). “Incentive effects of social assistance: A regression discontinuity approach” Journal of Econometrics, Volume 142, Issue 2, Feb., 807-828.9. Matsudaira J (2008). “Mandatory summer school and student achievement
theinterviews, which we categorized as student-technology interactions. We are reconsidering theanalysis of interviews because of the wealth of information provided by teachers about computertechnology use and implementation (see information technology skills level of awareness). Thisanalysis will hopefully provide a different perspective on the effectiveness of teachers’ use ofcomputer and Internet-based technology in their classrooms. Specifically, there is preliminaryevidence that shows teachers’ use of computers as passive, productive, or as communicationtools to help students learn in the classroom (see below). (a) Passive Tools – represented by various mechanisms used to transfer science content to students such as ebooks (b
men. Although these figuresdiffer by field they have not substantially changed from 1993 to 2003. Figure 5(a) shows in of those women whoare married, more women scientists and engineers are married to full-time working spouses (US NationalAcademies, 2007)6. Figure 5(b) shows that 64% to 81% of women scientists and engineers marry fellowscientists and engineers (US National Academies, 2007)6.Figure 4. Percent of women and men doctoral scientists and engineers in tenured or tenure-track positions,by sex, marital status, and presence of children, 2003. 6 SOURCE: National Science Foundation (2003).Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2003. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation
. 391-400.[10] K. Prasad and K.B. Akhilesh, “Global virtual teams: what impacts their design and performance ?,” Team Performance Management: An International Journal, vol. 8, 2002, pp. 102-112.[11] J. Cordery, C. Soo, B. Kirkman, B. Rosen, and J. Mathieu, “Lessons from Alcoa,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 38, 2009, pp. 204-216.[12] E. Karpova, A.-paula Correia, and E. Baran, “Internet and Higher Education Learn to use and use to learn: Technology in virtual collaboration experience,” Internet and Higher Education, vol. 12, 2009, pp. 45-52.[13] L. Lee-Kelley and T. Sankey, “Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 26, 2008, pp
214# of responses 2 0 3 1 1 2 2 5 9 4 5 7 5 46 Figure 2. Cohort Graduates, Number of Responses and Program Begin Date2.3.2 - Instrumentation and ValidityThe survey of employed by this study evolved from two primary sources: (a) it was premisedheavily on an original Latif & Dyrenfurth study6 which addressed comparable researchquestions, and (b) a collaborative effort of the researchers and senior graduate faculty (Dr. JamesMohler) highly experienced in research methods. This development process resulted in a surveywhich is provided in Appendix B. To ensure we were measuring the content we were intendingto measure and not something else (content validity), we deliberately
learning while providing theFellows with K-12 classroom experience. A long-range goal of our project is to study the impactof the Fellows on the professional development of teachers in terms of (a) implementation ofinstructional strategies, (b) increasing teaching efficacy, (c) development of content knowledge,and (d) delivery of the SLIDER curriculum with fidelity.PurposeIn this first report of the study, we begin to investigate the impact of the Fellows on seventeachers in six classrooms in two middle school contexts—suburban and rural. We areparticularly interested in ways the Fellows help teachers implement a problem-based learningcurriculum with fidelity. In studying impact, we focused this exploratory study on determiningthe ways SLIDER
thermodynamic property data. (This requirement was abandoned by mid-semester due to the excessive time it was taking students for minimal gain in knowledge.) All Three Years: Only select problems were required to be done computationally. Refer to problems from all other tasks.Task 2: Graphing All Three Years: Refer to Task 4 and Figure 2. HW 1 in 2009: Adapted from Problems 1-133E and 1-134E in Cengel and Boles. 7 Given an equation for calculating the chilling effect of the wind, which takes into account the wind velocity and the ambient air temperature, perform the following: a) Convert the equation into USCS units. b) Plot the equivalent wind chill temperatures in ◦ F as a function of wind velocity in
understanding as well as additional educational outcomes. Theframework adopted for the activities presented in this study drew heavily on the Workshop Physicsmodel, the defining elements of which (Laws et al., 1999) are shown in Table 1. Table 1: Elements of Inquiry-Based Activity Modules (Laws et al 1999) (a) Use peer instruction and collaborative work (b) Use activity-based guided-inquiry curricular materials (c) Use a learning cycle beginning with predictions (d) Emphasize conceptual understanding (e) Let the physical world be the authority (f) Evaluate student understanding (g) Make appropriate use of technology
contribution b) Order of authorship – Typically the leader of the overall project will be senior author or last author, the student or researcher who did the most work and writing as the first author; other authors in supporting roles as 2nd, 3rd, 4th author 2. Scope of work. Agree on the scope and the “story” in advance; stay away from least publishable units. 3. Maintaining momentum is essential to completion without losing gumption. a. Reasonable turnaround on revisions – I try for returning comments within a week; one collaborator always acknowledges and sets a target date for her response – we all have ups and downs in our workloads, but it really helps your co
: Page 22.5.4 A. Sum up the argument or main point of the reading—use direct quotes where needed. B. Describe and evaluate the evidence used by the authors- you may want to lay out the key points in a short outline. C. Express what you find compelling or inadequate in the reading, and if you can make connections to other readings and topics discussed in class.To encourage everyone to participate at some level, often students were asked to share theirresponses with each other before the whole class discussion. As much as possible, the classdiscussion was structured, in Engel’s (5) terms, “ to guide students to think about the source ofinformation, entice them into constructing counterfactuals, maneuver them to take
these reforms as students will need skills for: (a)finding, organizing, and managing information; and (b) team working, oral communication, andi This material is based upon work supported by the Learning through Engineering Design and Practice, NationalScience Foundation Award# 0737616, Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings, underInformation Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) Youth-based Project. Opinions, findings, Page 22.442.2conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the National Science
course currency is called Knowledge Gold (KG). The following rules govern the use ofcurrency in the three term sequence: 1. All students start with 0 KG at the beginning of the year. Page 22.1091.10 2. KG is tracked by the instructor for each individual in the course. It is the student responsibility to make sure KG credit is properly recorded. 3. KG will be retained across quarters. 4. KG may be obtained by: a. Completing tasks as stipulated by the instructor. b. Asking good questions. c. Chapter write-ups. d. Research into a technical area related the course topics or topics directly related to