faculty will be assigned a technical mentor. Additionallythe regular CREATE meetings will rotate meeting locations to highlight best practices in lab useand curriculum delivery.2.A.2. Content Dissemination and Training: CREATE faculty will enrich teaching content areasthrough workshops including—Fundamentals of Wind and SolarTechnologies; SCADA; Beginning and Advanced Renewable Energies2.B.1. Pedagogical Facilitator Training: The facilitator trainers will continue to instruct interestedfaculty who wish to be trained as facilitators and open training to other faculty with emphasis onthe CREATE region’s renewable energy need areas.2.B. 2. Pedagogical Training: faculty members will continue to offer traveling TeachingAmbassador Workshops to full
and Computer Engineering from Kettering University. She worked for Delphi from 1997 to 2009 in various positions, most recently focusing in applications engineering and project management. Michelle is doing project management support activities and assisting with software development for the Green Mobility Laboratory.Kevin (Hua) Bai, Kettering Univ Kevin Bai received B S and PHD degree in Department of Electrical Engineering of Tsinghua University., Beijing, China in 2002 and 2007, respectively. He was a post-doc fellow and research scientist in Univ of Michigan-Dearborn, USA, in 2007 and 2009, respectively. Now he is an assistant professor in Department of Electrical and Compurter Engineering, Kettering University
. More information about NCA and its journals areavailable at http://www.natcom.org/.It is perhaps worth noting that two of three students with deficient mid-term grades were retained(See Figure 4). One student reported that being able to review the lecture notes online allowedhim to “catch up” and raise a “D” at mid-term to a low “B” final grade.We should also clarify the ENGR 315 students do not typically use a Tablet PC in the classroom.While a few students have them, tablets are not required by our College or the School and theiruse is not yet significant beyond application by a few instructors. “Live capture” of the lecturehas been accomplished through the utilization of Camtasia Studio 7.0® paired with Windows
: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.19. Lovitts, B.E. (2007). Making the implicit explicit: Creating performance expectations for the dissertation.Sterling, VA: Stylus.20. Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.21. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developinggrounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.22. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.23. Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.24. Flanagan, J.C
many manifestations. Page 22.1070.6Figure 1. (a) (Top 2 panels) The mathematics and physics of kinematics that model ballistic motion mustalso be connected to (b) (middle 2 panels) the 2D design sketch, and (c) (bottom 2 panels) theconstruction, testing, and redesign of the ballistic device. Note that the teacher attempts to connect thedesign sketch to the wood in the construction phase (left panel), but the student focuses on the wood, tothe exclusion of any cross-modal connections (right panel).Transitions between Modal EngagementsThe process by which teachers and students manage the transitions across changing contextswhile maintaining
, Developing and Assessing Global Competence in Engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 119-131. 7. Beard, D., Schwieger, D., Surendran, K. (2008). Integrating Soft Skills Assessment through University, College, and Programmatic Efforts at an AACSB Accredited Institution. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19, 229. 8. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Shuman, L. J., Wolfe, H., Atman, C. J., McGourty, J., Miller, R. L., Olds, B. M., Rogers, G.M. (2000). Defining the Outcomes: A Framework for EC-2000. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43, 100-10. 9. Gerhart, A., Grunow, M. (2009). Leadership Models and Practices Course: Student Perceptions and Development of Leadership Skills and
Sealing Figure 3: Cell Fabrication StepsDSSC Characterization The DSS cell was characterized using the simulated sun light at 1.5 AM with XeArc Lamp and power supply purchased from Newport and Parstat 2273 AdvancedElectrochemical system to measure I-V curve and the impedance plot (Nyquist plot) areshown in Figure 4. The DSSC parameters Voc, Isc and FF were extracted from the I-Vcurve to find the cell efficiency. The cell internal resistances are estimated from theNyquist plot. Page 22.857.5 Figure 4: (a) Solar Simulator (b) Advanced Electrochemical SystemInfusion of DSSC Research Results into Classroom
memory (MEM) for storing both programs and data.The complete data path is shown in Figure 1. BUS A BUS B BUS C 6 PC IR A1 A2 1 REGS 2 MUX 2 A ALU R B
changes to a civil and construction engineeringenvironment.The department offers undergraduate programs in civil engineering which started in 2002 andconstruction engineering dating back to 1999. Enrollment of both undergraduate programsduring Fall 2010 was 268. Both program curriculums require a two semester course on acomprehensive design application. The courses are designed to meet specific ABET outcomesof A, C, D, F, G, H, I, J and K. Also to meet an additional program outcome: students are able toexplain basic concepts in management, business, public policy and leadership.Program Outcomes are as follows: A) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering B) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as
dialogue about the ethics of the Grand Challenges – boththe specific challenges described and the process that produced them. May the conversationcontinue.References1. Ross, P. (2010). Space Exploration: Science, Engineering and Social Impact in a Freshman Technical Communication Course. ASEE Annual Conference.2. Johnson, G. and Siller, T. (2010) A 21st Century Undergraduate Engineering Education Program. ASEE Annual Page 22.1677.9 Conference.3. Savilonis, B., Spanagel, D., and Wobbe, K. (2010). Engaging Students with Great Problems. ASEE Annual Conference.4. Bottomley, L., Lavelle, J., and Martin-Vega, L. (2010
. Butz, Gabrielle A. Bloom, Mihal E. Gross, Terrence K. Kelly, Aaron Kofner, and Helga E. Rippen, ―Is There a Shortage of Scientists and Engineers? How Would We Know?‖ Issue Paper, Rand Corporation (2003) (available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/2005/IP241.pdf ).5 Id.6 Richard B. Freeman, ―A Cobweb Model of the Supply and Starting Salary of New Engineers,‖ Industrial and Labor Relations Review 29 (January 1976), pp. 236-246.7 George J. Borjas, Labor Economics (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2005, pp. 189 – 192.8 Kenneth J. Arrow and William M. Capron, ―Dynamic Shortages and Price Rises: The Engineer-Scientist Case.‖ The Quarterly Journal of Economics (73) 2: pp. 292-308.9 Richard B. Freeman
faculty adoption of research-based instructional strategies. Basedon the change theory of Rogers, the survey measures faculty perceptions of themselves asadopters, perceived levels of adoption of research based instructional strategies and activities,and the extent to which these strategies and activities demonstrate characteristics that encourageadoption. A copy of the survey along with compiled data appears in Appendix B. Page 22.582.5IV. Managing the Effort Using Rapid Application Development (RAD)To create a demand (“pull”) for these strategies and redesigned courses while mitigating projectrisk, the team will use a software engineering
annotation capabilities, and more efficient coverage of course material with time-consuming steps preloaded in the class presentation. The single Tablet PC can also be passed around the classroom to allow students to show their work without having to “come up to the board.” b. Several-Tablet-PCs model wherein several Tablet PCs are available for student use in groups of three or four. This model is effective in collaborative problem-solving sessions because it forces students to work together using a Tablet PC to analyze problems and generate solutions. Each group can then be asked to present their solution, giving the class an opportunity to see multiple approaches to the problem, as well as identify common
behaviors. Thistraining would serve not only to improve exam performance, but to educate students in effectiveuse of resources for professional practice where open-book problem solving is the norm.Acknowledgement We wish to thank the National Science Foundation for funding the current work throughgrant # 0909976.ReferencesAgarwal, P.K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H. K., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2008). Examining the testing effect with open- and closed-book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 861-876.Baillie, C., & Toohey, S. (1997). The power test: Its impact on student learning in a materials science course for engineering. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Educaiton, 22(1), 33
AC 2011-875: LESSONS MISSED: WHERE IS THE LEARNING ABOUTTEACHING IN STUDY ABROAD?David Jan Cowan, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. Cowan is the Director of and an Associate Professor in the Architectural Technology Program within the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). He teaches courses in residential and commercial construction, facilities management, building systems and interior design. His research interests lie in the areas of disaster reconstruction, BIM (Build- ing Information Modeling), visualization, sustainable community and construction practices, international service learning and energy simulation. He is a
/presentations.htm3. Klein, Jean C., Chris Beachum and Catherine Moga. (2002). Manufacturing Layoffs: Hard Times for Rural Factories, Workers and Communities, The Rural Center, Number 11, April 2002, Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.ncruralcenter.org/pubs/mfglayoffs.pdf4. Snellenberger, J. M., D. H. Quick, I. T. Davis, J. P. Tidwell, J. O’Brien, R. M. Haynes, et al. Enabling the U.S. Engineering Workforce to Perform: Recognizing the Importance of Industrial Engagement In Professional Graduate Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2004. 5. Greenburg, J.E., Delgutte B., and Gray M.L. “Hands-On Learning in Biomedical Signal Processing: A Case Study Demonstrating
AC 2011-928: USING HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY TO PROMOTE ANUNDERSTANDING OF THE IMPACT OF ENGINEERING SOLUTIONSAMONG ENGINEERING STUDENTSMichael Geselowitz, IEEE History Center Michael N. Geselowitz is Staff Director of the IEEE History Center. Immediately prior to joining IEEE in 1997, he was Group Manager at Eric Marder Associates, a New York market research firm, where he supervised Ph.D. scientists and social scientists undertaking market analyses for Fortune 500 high-tech companies. He is also a registered Patent Agent. He holds S.B. degrees in electrical engineering and in anthropology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in anthropology from Harvard University. His
, asemester-long work placement for academic credit. We wanted to compare the information-related skills they had with those they needed during their co-op assignments as a proxy forworkplace expectations. We identified gaps in student preparedness which we are using to workwith faculty and staff to address those needs strategically. This paper details three ways in whichwe are making use of what we learned: development of a teamwork workshop and a portfolioprogram as well as furthering integration of information literacy into the curriculum.IntroductionAs is true for many engineering librarians, we see a role for ourselves in producing workplace-ready engineering graduates. We focused our attention on students participating in thecooperative
coursedescription and project statement, Appendices A and B present more detail regarding a sample Page 22.904.7course topical outline, recommended course textbooks, and an outline for overall course grading.5. Course Approach and Instructional MethodologyThe course learning goals presented in Table 2 are important to keep in mind as more specificaspects of the course are further outlined below. The model of teaching best describing theinstructional approach taken here is termed a constructionist, problem-based teaching model. Thesyntax of the course is further outlined in Table 3, guided by [12]. Table 3. Specific structural elements of
the inquiry-based nature of the program, thediscussion of physical concepts such as forces and seismic energy, and the discussion of Earthprocesses. Additionally, the use of instructional technology, the discussion of the societalimplications of earthquake engineering, and background information on the historicalperspectives of seismology and engineering fulfill a large share of the Content Standards.Science Program Standards B, C, and D are also met with regard to the program being relevantand appropriate, coordinated with a study of mathematics, and involve access to appropriate andsufficient educational resources. Please refer to “National Science Education Standards” by the
damping. ii Compute the natural frequency and predict the response for a one-degree-of- freedom system undergoing torsion vibrations, with or without damping. iii Compute the natural frequency and predict the response for a machine with a rotating unbalance.2. Students will have the ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyzeand interpret data. (ABET Criterion b)Performance Criteria iv Practice vibration measurements on a structure using state-of-the-art equipment, rigor and documentation. v Analyze the data from an experiment appropriately. vi Assess the validity of the experimental results and compare with theoretical results when
literature.25-26 These criteria include having no more than twolines for the sentence assertion headlines, supporting those headlines with relevantgraphics, and having as few words as possible for the bodies of the slides. As shown inTable 2, the average number of words per slide was 19.3, and every slide in the assertion-evidence set had a relevant graphic. Appendix B presents the assertion-evidence slides.Not reflected in this collection is that some of the slides included simple animationswhich took the form of presentation of additional details of graphics on nine of the tenslides (the animations followed the choice of “Appear,” which the assertion-evidenceliterature recommends). In developing the topic-subtopic slides, we followed the
backscattered modulation technique, 1 where it is decoded and Page 22.1021.3retrieved. Figure 1, Concept of the passive UHF RFID systemExperimental Setup A two column three level simple storage model was set-up and placed on a wooden lab benchone meter above the floor. Column A has three shelves labeled from top A1, A2, and A3 andcolumn B shelves labeled B1, B2 and B3. The inventories used were empty carton boxes; eachbox labeled using a passive RFID tag with a unique assigned name written into the tag memory.The location identification process utilizes the ALIEN UHF Passive RFID system 10 consistingof one ALIEN 9900 reader
AC 2011-1368: HOW EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS CAN HANDLE MORESTUDENTS WITH FEWER FACULTY MEMBERSCarolyn Kusbit Dunn, East Carolina University Carolyn Dunn is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Systems at East Carolina Uni- versity. She teaches technical writing both face to face and online. Dunn has a PhD in English with a concentration in Technical and Professional Discourse. Her research interests are organizational communication, crisis communication and language and power.David L Batts, East Carolina University David Batts, Ed.D., is an assistant professor in the Department of Technology Systems at East Carolina University. His career experiences include industrial consulting and managing an
, some of the dyadsconsidered divergent solutions as their ideas developed later in the process. There were a total of 14 distinct design solution ideas among all dyads with (M=4.17,SEM=0.54) and ranging from two to six ideas per dyad. All dyads considered a pulley system intheir design. Four of the dyads implemented pulleys in their final design. At least two dyadsconsidered each of the following ideas: pump, lever, lubricant, wedge, jack, and ratchetingsystem. Within the pulley system, Dyad B investigated and elaborated on multiple other items,such as the cord used to connect the system, Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethelyne, thecrank, gear, and the connection of the system to the window rail. Although each dyad was uniquein their
international travel 4. I wish I had learned Swedish or Danish and be able to converse with locals f. Would you recommend this program to a friend? 1. 44 % yes 2. 44% maybe 3. 11% no (A reason why was not provided or defined by the survey)A second assessment is in process, and consists of an electronic questionnaire designed by theauthors. The survey will reflect questions in Likert Scale fashion pertaining to: a. Prioritizing reasons/motivations for selecting the course b. Extent to which interdisciplinary course model improved learning c. Extent to which other interdisciplinary courses improved learning d. Extent to which project direction changed after international experience e. Extent to which
AC 2011-734: ENGINEERING EDUCATON AND THE ENTREPRENEURIALMINDCynthia C. Fry, Baylor University Sr. Lecturer of Computer Science, Assistant Dean of the School of Engineering & Computer Science, Baylor UniversityWilliam M. Jordan, Baylor University WILLIAM JORDAN is the Mechanical Engineering Department Chair at Baylor University. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees in Metallurgical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, an M.A. degree in Theology from Denver Seminary, and a Ph.D. in mechanics and materials from Texas A & M University. He teaches materials related courses. He does work in the areas of entrepreneurship and appropriate technology in developing countries. He also writes and does research in
1Power of Two 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20then, 10110001 (binary) = 27 + 25 + 24 + 20 = 128 + 32 + 16 + 1 = 177 (decimal). Image color intensities can be represented by an 8-bit integer. This will result in 256distinct values from 0 to 255. A computer represents the intensity of red, green and blue light ineach pixel by this 8-bit integer. A value of 0 means no light and a value of 255 means thebrightest light. Since white light consists of all the colors, it is represented by the (R,G,B) value Page 22.1613.12(255, 255, 255). A black pixel would then be the absence of
writing skills.ObservationsAs the purpose of the project was to focus on the academic, advising, and library concerns,we use these areas as our assessment guidelines. The main academic concern was students’writing abilities. In the past 10 years, approximately 4,500 students have completed theE/FEWP integrated writing curriculum. The grades for the first writing assignment in the fallsemester have consistently averaged in the B- to C+ range. The final conference paper gradeshave always increased to an average grade of A-. As a result, the English department nowwaves the Seminar in Composition course for engineering students because the writingcomponent in the freshman year is meeting or exceeding the goals of a standard first-semesterwriting
tool consisted of three parts (Table 1). Part A was comprised of ten demographicquestions including questions pertaining to their participation in the Engineering LLC. Thequestions in this section required response prior to the survey respondent continuing. Part B ofthe survey had four open-ended questions pertaining to the students’ perceptions of theEngineering LLC regardless of whether they had been participants of the Engineering LLC. Thelast part of the survey, Part C, included four questions with yes/no response format. Thesequestions were targeted at upperclassman, and pertained to their freshman roommates and theirstudy groups.Table 1: LLC Study Survey ToolPart ACircle one best answer: 1. Gender: Male Female