Paper ID #6277”Impact! Exploring Innovation Across Disciplines” - Engaging the Univer-sity Innovation Ecosystem Through a University-Wide CourseDr. Steven B. Shooter, Bucknell University Steve Shooter is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University where he has taught for 18 years. He teaches classes such as senior design, exploring innovation, mechanical design, and mecha- tronics. His research is in information management in design, managing innovation and robotics. As a registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania he has consulted with dozens of companies on new product ventures and production
demanding, to achieve it all in one single three credit course. Thisbecomes clearer when described in the context of the taxonomy for educational objectivesprepared by Anderson et al.7. They use a 2 dimensional noun-verb matrix to identify the level ofa given objective, in terms of the required knowledge (A. Factual; B. Conceptual; C. Procedural;and D. Meta-Cognitive) and cognitive process (1. Remember; 2. Understand; 3. Apply; 4.Analyze; 5. Evaluate; and 6. Create). The higher alphanumeric value represents a higher level ofcomplexity7. The mapping for our course is as follows: High School course to levels (A and B,6); Undergraduate course to levels (B and C, 5 and 6); and Graduate course to levels (C and D,3). A business team to be successful, our
main components: a) thestudent’s computing-related major program; b) the entrepreneurship minor; and c) the culminatingentrepreneurship practicum. The requirements of the student’s major program, of course, varydepending on the particular major. For example, the CSE major consists of required and electivecourses in a range of topics from software design principles and practices to algorithms, fromcomputer systems and architectures to computer networking, from AI to computer graphics andvideo game design; and a culminating capstone project course which may, for example, consist ofdesigning and implementing a set of web services to meet the requirements of a real client.The entrepreneurship minor, offered in the business school, specialized for
park model, Technovation, 12: 161-175.4. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B. and Feldman, M.P. (1994) R&D spillovers and innovative activity, Managerial and Decision Economics, 15: 131-138.5. Anselin, L., Varga, A. and Acs, Z. (1996) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Paper presented at the Forty-Third North American Meeting of the Regional Science Association International, Washington DC, November.6. Eicher, T. S. (1996) Interaction between endogenous human capital and technological change, Review of Economic Studies, 63: 127-144.7. Feldman, M.P. and Florida, R. (1994) The geographical sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and
Paper ID #6178Development and Initial Validation of an Innovation AssessmentDr. Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University Dr. Geoffrey A. Wright is an assistant professor of Technology and Engineering Education in the College of Technology and Engineering at Brigham Young University.Mr. Paul T Skaggs, Brigham Young UniversityMr. Jacob Dean Wheadon, Purdue UniversityDr. Clifton B. Farnsworth, Brigham Young University Clifton Farnsworth received B.S. and M.S. degrees in civil engineering from Brigham Young University and a Ph.D. in civil engineering from the University of Utah. He worked as a geotechnical engineer for eight
Connection C Data Store Connection B Data Collection/Processing Connection D Connection F Client Receiver/Transmitter Website Connection G Sprinkler Controller Figure 3. Smart Sprinkler System overview Initial implementation This implementation helped students understand a system level approach to the projectand to experience the creation of a rapid prototype in a multidisciplinary environment. The initial implementation of the Smart Sprinkler System was built around an Arduino
formal interivews Semi-structured Group 1 Individual interivew Students (5 in total): A, B, C, D, E; Academic staff (2 in total): K, L Interviews Group 2 Individual interivew Students (5 in total): F, G, H, I, J; Academic staff (2 in total): M, N Additional Data Check list for observation Selective Observation occasions checklist Chekclist for seeing and hearing Researcher’s relfection Observation ☐Group formualtion ☐Conflicts (what) ☐ What’s new today? ☐Group meeting ☐Facilitation (who) ☐ Students’ change on behaviors ☐Supervison meeting ☐Facilitation (How
, together with innovative design practices, need to be an essential part of thelearning experience in undergraduate engineering technology programs. The proposed integratedapproach teaches the basic theoretical knowledge and hands-on practices of the aforementionedsubjects embedding modules in a sequence of courses across the curriculum. The mainobjectives are: (a) introduce the entrepreneurial process and practice in a multidisciplinaryenvironment, (b) emphasize energy efficiency, environmental friendliness, and long-termsustainability in fundamental engineering courses, and (c) apply the proposed approach in thecontext of human-powered transportation systems, a topic that has great interest and potential inunderdeveloped countries. The work
., “Social identity and intergroup behavior.” Social Science Information Vol. 13(1974) pp. 65-93.[7] Smith, K. et al., Connecting and expanding the engineering education research andinnovation special session. FIE, Oct. 14, 2011.[8] Wankat, P., Felder, R., & Smith, K., The scholarship of Teaching and Learning inEngineering. 2002.[9] Saxenian, A. L., The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. HarvardUniversity Press. 2006 Page 23.13.16[10] Stefik, M. & Stefik, B., Breakthrough: Stories and Strategies of Radical Innovation: MITpress, 2004.[11] Brown, B., Dare to be Great: How the Courage to be Vulnerable transforms the Way
, especially the physics and chemistry and controllingparameters2. Model and test the materials and product (both computer and physical models)3. Create the opportunity for innovation a. What material solution will work? b. What design solutions will work? c. Quantify the relative contributions of materials and structural components to focus innovation efforts d. Exploit interrelationships between materials and structures; for example, apply knowledge of materials to take advantage of a physical mechanism. Page 23.17.104. Screen ideas to determine the best materials and designs, and the best and most cost effectivesolution5. Quickly
Paper ID #6655Developing a Marketing High-Technology Products and Innovations Course:First Year ReviewDr. James V Green, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. James V. Green leads the education activities of Mtech at the University of Maryland as the Di- rector of Entrepreneurship Education with responsibilities for the Hinman CEOs Program, the Hillman Entrepreneurs Program, and the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program. As a Senior Lecturer and Associate Director with Mtech, Dr. Green designs and teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization. Dr. Green’s research
. Richard Paul’s Taxonomy of Socratic Questions is very well knownand is reproduced in Appendix B (Paul, 1995). Some researchers have also suggested that the learners should not the held responsible forpoor quality (Saxe, 1990). Instead, the structure of the system and the mechanics ofmanagement must be blamed for inadequate knowledge acquisition and unacceptableperformance outcomes (Senge, 1990). Researchers have further indicated that a courseportfolio should be treated essentially, like a manuscript of scholarly work in progress. In otherwords, a course portfolio can be deemed as a work that explains what, how, and why studentslearn or do not learn in a course (Sims, 1992). Educators Clifford O. Young, Sr., & LauraHowzell Young of
Review. 2008 Jun;11.13. Stanford Institute of Design | d.school | home [Internet]. [cited 2009 May 23]. Available from: http://www.stanford.edu/group/dschool/14. Steinbeck R. Building Creative Competence in Globally Distributed Courses through Design Thinking. Scientific Journal of Media Literacy. 2011;27.15. Lent RW, Brown SD, Hackett G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1994;16. Lent RW, Brown SD. On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructs in career research: A measurement guide. Journal of Career Assessment. 2006;14(1):12–35.17. Lent RW, Singley D, Sheu H-B, Schmidt JA, Schmidt LC. Relation of Social-Cognitive
trying to deliver the message that design and engineering is a fast paced, never endingcycle and that a ‘good enough’ approach cannot be taken in order to be successful.” (Peter B.)Sensitive Cultural IssuesFor most part, almost all of the films listed in Table 1 show and discuss many of adult themes.To avoid any unexpected student reactions, especially in large classes, where diversity of studentbackground is high, the showings should be preceded by at least a warning about potentialexposure to controversial subjects, and better yet, by some cultural introduction (that isparticularly important to address when international students are a majority).Copyright IssuesIt is broadly believed that the use of movies for the purpose of teaching is
classexercises, homework assignments, projects, book and project presentations, and teamingactivities. Projects deal with the whole process of user based design, from observation toadvanced prototyping. The paper shares some available formal and informal preliminaryfeedback/evaluation methods (and results) of class topics, material and activities. Course gradingis based on attendance and participation in class activities, homework assignments, off-classactivities, and projects. Peer evaluation (three types, see Appendix B) and presentations play animportant role in grading as well. Resources for class material are all the books and all Raviv’spapers that are listed in the Reference section. A sample of Power Point slides is shown inAppendix A
Economics, 18(1/3), 13–40.Barringer, B. R. (2009). Preparing Effective Business Plans: An Entrepreneurial Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Barringer, B. R., & Ireland, R. D. (2010). Entrepreneurship: Successfully Launching New Ventures. Boston: Prentice Hall.Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. K & S Ranch.Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longman and Green.Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Author"The entrepreneur", said the French economist J. B. Say around 1800, "shiftseconomic resources out of an area of lower and into an area of higher Tam 6productivity and greater yield.""This juxtaposition of plain speak and econometrics (defines) entrepreneurs (aspeople who) see a need and innovate, resulting in improved economic well- Robert Solow 4being.""Entrepreneurship is the creation of organizations." Sharma 3"An entrepreneur is a person who carries out new combinations, which may takethe form of new products, processes, markets, organizational forms, or sources Schumpeterof supply.""Entrepreneurship encompasses acts of organizational creation, renewal, or
the KernEntrepreneurship Education Network.Bibliography1. Palmer, B., Terenzini, P., McKenna, A., et al., “Design Context: Where do the Engineers of 2020 Learn ThisSkill?” Proceeding, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26-29, 2011.2. ____The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET): www.abet.org, acceded June 30, 2012.3. Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M. and McGoury, J., “The ABET “Professional Skills”- Can They Be Taught?Can They Be Assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 4, January 2005, pp. 41-55.4. ____The National Academy of Engineering, “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the NewCentury,” National Academic P, Washington D.C., 2004.5. ____ News and Notes
videos that performed best in the Innovation Showcase. Each of these teams wonat least $500 for their effort. The Johnson and Johnson Company sponsored two $1000 awardsfocused on recognizing high-quality Supply Chain and Health Care solutions. The videosdetailed the following solutions: Page 23.217.5 1. Vision Driving Visions: delivering low-cost eyeglasses to rural farmers (Supply Chain Solution Winner)a 2. Pennsylvania Schools for Uganda Sister Schools Program: empowering American and Ugandan students to create health education resources around the world (Health Care Solution Winner)b 3. The Reservoir Studio Ceramic Water
Paper ID #7975Designing an Introductory Entrepreneurial Thinking CourseMr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is a graduate student in the Engineering Education Program at Purdue University and the recipient of NSF awards for research in engineering education. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes
engaged in the followingcollaborative projects with industry participation and faculty from different disciplines. A. A team of NYIT Electrical Engineering and Computer Science students collaborated on various applications for the Motorola sponsored ThirdEye headset computer, under the guidance of Dr. Ziqian Dong, Assistant Professor of ECE. The project took 3rd place at the Golden-i®dea Competition and Partner Conference. After the competition, our students are continuing a collaboration with Motorola to develop additional headset applications in the construction field under the guidance of ECE and ECET faculty. B. Industry partners are working with two research faculty of NYIT’s College of Osteopathic Medicine (NYCOM
pursue commercialization ventures.The information included herein is compiled from panel members, is introductory in nature andutilized as a preliminary, enabling resource. IntroductionThis paper and corresponding panel was organized based on the premise that, while data showswomen engage in technology transfer at a lower rate than men, direct discussion of this issue willencourage and empower more women to commercialize their research. This effort bringstogether individuals with experience at all stages of the technology transfer andcommercialization process to talk about: a) The current disparities in technology transfer by gender b) Existing programs which strive to correct the disparity c) The process of moving research from the
. Page 23.191.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Analysis of Personal Attributes and Skills of Mercer Undergraduate Engineering StudentsAbstractRecent studies conducted by Target Training International, Ltd. (TTI) have discovered that asmuch as 36% of incoming freshman engineers switch to non-engineering degree programs by theend of their first semester due to lack of academic success. TTI has attributed this downfall as aresult of the lack of focus in engineering schools on the personal attributes of students. As aresult, TTI has developed a trimetric survey for participating engineering institutions affiliatedwith the Kern Family Foundation as an assessment
Paper ID #7624Designing, Developing and Implementing an Entrepreneurship ProgramDr. Monique Fuchs, Wentworth Institute of Technology Monique Fuchs is Associate Vice President, Innovation + Entrepreneurship for Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, where she oversees student development and the launch of an innovation and en- trepreneurship center. Dr. Fuchs has experience in the profit and non-profit sector, in international settings and in a variety of industries including Consulting Services, IT, Higher Education, Publishing, Engineer- ing, Biotechnology, and Architecture/Design. Dr. Fuchs is the author of
Paper ID #7007Indicators of Creative and Entrepreneurial Thinking Among Engineeringand Technology StudentsDr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Senay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education and is the Director of Assessment Research for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE) at Purdue University. Dr. Purzer is a NAE/CASEE New Faculty Fellow. She is also the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. Her expertise is on assessment and mixed-methods research.Mr. Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University
collaborative learning (ACL) and problem-based learning (PBL) have beeneffectively implemented at the college-level for many years, their widespread use in engineeringeducation is a more recent development. Research has shown that ACL and PBL allow forhigher critical thinking, reasoning, achievement, and retention in students. In addition, becauseACL and PBL typically require teamwork, communication, and tolerance for ambiguity amongother aspects, they are also an ideal vehicle for instilling the attributes of the entrepreneurialmindset in students.Lawrence Technological University implemented a six year process to modify 75% of thecourses in the engineering curriculum to include ACL and PBL. Besides traditional engineeringcourses, such as statics and