United States, the professional and technical societies that govern ABET nominate theirmembers to serve as program evaluators.16 ABET requires that these evaluators should meet thefollowing minimum qualifications: a. demonstrated interest in improving education, b. current member (or willing to join) one of ABET's technical and professional societies, c. formal education and degree appropriate to the field, d. experience with accreditation processes and/or quality improvement processes, e. proficiency using word processing programs, spreadsheets, and PDF files, f. be willing to take the required program evaluator training courses, and g. meet any additional society-specific requirements.17ABET has also built a
engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. 118 (National Academies Press, 2004).20 Santiago, M. M In progress21 de Graff, E., & Kolmos, Management of Change: Implementation of Problem-based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering Rotterdamn: (Sense Publishers, 2007).22 Fadiman, A. The spirit catches you and you fall down: A Hmong child, her American doctors, and the collision of two cultures. (Macmillan, 2012)23 Chödrön, P. When things fall apart: Heart advice for difficult times. (Shambhala Publications Inc., 1997).24 Enos, S., & Morton, K. Developing a Theory and Practice of Campus-Community Partnerships. In B. Jacoby (Ed.), Building Partnerships for Service-Learning. (Jossey-Bass, 2002)25 Matthew
aspects of the flipped and blended learning environments.Ms. Jacquelyn E. Borinski, Georgia Institute of Technology Jacquelyn E. Borinski will receive a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2014. She is the External Vice President for the Georgia Tech Chamber Choir and volunteer with the Georgia Aquar- ium. Her research interests include pediatric device design and human-robot interaction. She is an Under- graduate collaborator with Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta designing interactive teaching modules for math and science using the patient’s condition as motivation. She was awarded a Women in Engineering Scholarship from Axion BioSystems.Kimberly Danielle Haight, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMs
Ethics 13: 463-487.17. Seely, B. (2005). “Patterns in the history of engineering education reform: A brief essay.” In Educating the Engineer of 2020 (pp. 114–30). Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering.18. Borrego, M. and Bernhard, J. (2011). “The Emergence of Engineering Education Research as an Internationally Connected Field of Inquiry,” Journal of Engineering Education 100: 14-4719. Jesiek, B., Newswander, L. and Borrego, M. (2009). “Engineering Education Research: Discipline, Community, or Field?,” Journal of Engineering Education 97: 39-52. Page 24.807.1320. Downey, G. (2009). “What is Engineering Studies For?: Dominant
). Experiments with writing in the engineering classroom. In 1997 Page 24.1130.13 Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1564–1567). Pittsburgh, PA.12. Gunnink, B., & Bernhardt, K. L. S. (2002). Writing , critical thinking, and engineering curricula. In Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. F3H2–F3H7). Boston, MA.13. Garvey, A. (2010). Writing in an upper-level CS course. Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE ’10, 209. doi:10.1145/1734263.173433714. Hoffman, M. E., Dansdill, T., & Herscovici, D. S. (2006). Bridging writing to
engineering education. Proceedings of the 118th ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver BC, (2011).8. Pryor, J. H., et. al. The American Freshman: National Norms Fall 2011. UCLA Higher Education Research Institute Report, (2011).9. Duval-Couetil, N., et. al. Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes. Intl. J. Eng. Edu., 28(2), 425-435, (2012).10. Peterfreund, A. R. Epicenter baseline survey report. https://www.dropbox.com/s/7z9hgp67t0mr9sk/Epicenter- Baseline-Survey-Report-FINAL315.pdf. Last accessed February 2014.11. Yoder, B, L. Engineering by numbers. http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college- profiles/2011-profile-engineering-statistics.pdf. Last
Paper ID #9471Organizing a Student Poster Session in an ASEE Section ConferenceDr. Steve E. Watkins, Missouri University of Science & Technology DR. STEVE E. WATKINS is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology, formerly the University of Missouri-Rolla. His interests include educational innovation. He is active in IEEE, HKN, SPIE, and ASEE including service as the 2009 Midwest Section Chair and the 2012 Midwest Section Conference General Chair. His Ph.D. is from the University of Texas at Austin (1989). Contact: steve.e.watkins@ieee.orgProf. Les Kinsler, Kansas
Paper ID #10394A Math-Based System to Improve Engineering Writing OutcomesMr. Brad Jerald Henderson, University of California, Davis Brad Henderson is a faculty in writing for the University Writing Program (UWP) at University of Cali- fornia, Davis. Henderson holds a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Cal Poly State University San Luis Obispo and a Masters in Professional Writing (MPW) from University of Southern California. Currently focusing his career on engineering communication and professionalism, he has worked as a design engineer and technical education specialist for Parker-Hannifin Aerospace and Hewlett
Paper ID #8981What’s in the Soup? Auto-ethnograhies from an Engineer, a Physicist, andan English Professor Regarding a Successful Multidisciplinary Grand Chal-lenge ProgramDr. Anneliese Watt, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Anneliese Watt is Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She teaches and re- searches technical and professional communication, rhetoric and composition, medicine in literature, and other humanities elective courses to engineering and science students. Her graduate work in rhetoric and literature was completed at Penn State, and her recent research often focuses on engineering and
underlie the National Academy ofEngineering’s “habits of mind”2, empathy and care. Niewoehner and Steidle (2009) suggestedone of the goals of engineering education must be to instill “habits of mind and principles ofaction that the student can portage to the circumstances of their professional lives” (p. 9).3 Theseauthors suggested habits of mind may be understood as certain intellectual virtues which include(a) intellectual humility, (b) intellectual courage, (c) intellectual empathy, (d) intellectualintegrity, (e) intellectual perseverance, (f) confidence in reason, (g) intellectual autonomy, (h)fair-mindedness, and (i) intellectual curiosity. They describe intellectual empathy as follows: Intellectual empathy is awareness of the need to
of project students.The proposed project addressed the following research questions:a. Is the level of audience awareness and interaction (aai) higher for the project students than forthe control group?b. Is the level of message coherence and focus (mcf) higher for the project students than for thecontrol group?c. Is the level of message delivery effectiveness (mde) higher for the project student than for thecontrol group?These questions generated the criteria by which we would evaluate the students’ oralpresentations. Both the questions and the criteria were generated in a July 2011 meeting, duringwhich, after much discussion, the faculty team determined that audience awareness andinteraction, message coherence and focus, and message
” activities, while social events, including those with asustainability focus (e.g. trips to the downtown Farmer’s Market) that were designed primarily tobuild community were designated “extra-curricular” activities. In other years, the course hasbeen team taught with slightly different content, although the basic design of the course and itsintegration into the LLC were similar.Our learning assessment is based on several survey instruments administered during the fall 2012semester. Specifically, the paper draws on a) the results of a pre/post survey; b) instructorevaluation of student work; c) a separate, blind review of student work evaluated according to aquantitative metric and standardized evaluation rubric (based on a modified Bloom’s taxonomy
), and a volume feedback device for a girl with hearingimpairment. Projects have been completed for more than five different collaboratingorganizations in two states and two countries. Figure 2: Project examples. Photographs of projects completed for persons with disabilities. A) Compression vest for Max, who has sensory-seeking behavior. B) Communication board for Emanuelle, who has cerebral palsy. C) Wheelchair desktop with communication icons for Manuel, who has muscular dystrophy. Page 24.873.6Assessment of student learningDespite additional challenges associated with virtual teams, quality of final devices
formulate it”, (b) “solutions to wicked problems are not computable throughoptimization calculations”, (c) problems are non-repeatable, and (d) wicked problems areaddressed in an open-ended temporal space (p. 133).2 Because wicked problems are by definitionnever solved, we discuss ‘responses’ rather than ‘solutions’ in this paper.Traditional examples of wicked problems include social issues such as homelessness or K-12education in the U.S. Most people would agree that a problem exists in these areas, but theappropriate response to that problem shows a large variation depending on individual values (e.g.charter schools, merit pay, increased public funding). Many challenges within the engineering
society. He also places thisunderstanding in the context of ABET criterion (b), “an ability to design and conductexperiments, analyze and interpret data” [6, p. 2], in that such ability is part of the scientificmethod, which has its foundations in the philosophy of science, and which together alsoconstitute one of the primary components of the course design for IDM and SMR.Splitt [7] interprets the demand on engineers as the “solution of problems involving humanvalues, attitudes, and behavior, as well as the interrelationships and dynamics of social, political,environmental, and economic systems on a global basis” [7, p. 182], restated in the conclusion interms of “problems involving … world cultures, religions, ethics, and economics” and
Paper ID #8495Engineers Can Interact in a Liberal Arts WorldDr. Pete Hylton, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Pete Hylton is an Assistant Professor at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). He earned his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, M.S de- grees from Purdue University (Mechanical Engienering) and IUPUI (Applied mathematics) and Ed.D. from Grand Canyon University (Organizational Leadership). Dr. Hylton is currently the Director of Motorsports Engineering at IUPUI and his interests include motorsports safety, automotive performance
Paper ID #10251Study Abroad as a Means to Achieving ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes: A CaseStudy in Course Design and AssessmentDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Department of Engi- neering and Society. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education Division of ASEE. Page 24.1136.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Study Abroad as a Means to Achieving ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes: A
outcomes (listed in Table 1 below) focus on both products and habits. Table 1. PITCH Outcomes. 1. Technical Communication Products 2. Technical Communication Habits a) Plan, design and produce letters, a) Use appropriate format and content; technical memoranda, short reports, b) Exhibit clear, precise and logical formal e-mails, reports documenting expression; experimental or simulation methods c) Demonstrate appropriate organization, and results, and formal level of detail, style and tone for a reports (proposals, analyses, progress given audience, situation and purpose; reports
Paper ID #9793Emergence of Engineering as a Discipline in Modern China: Separation ofConfucian Liberal Learning from Techniquewenjuan wang, Beihang University Wenjuan Wang, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beihang University ,beijing, PRC Wenjuan Wang is a Ph.D. candidate in School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beihang University Beijing, PRC. She received her M.Ed. in 2011 from Northwest Normal University. Her M.Ed. thesis involved the imperial examination policy of the minority nationalities of Yuan dynasty. Her primary specialty centers with the history of engineering education.Ming Li, Beihang
Paper ID #9303Effect of Student Model Presentations from a Speaking Contest on the Devel-opment of Engineering Students as SpeakersMs. Maryellen Meny OverbaughMr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering communication at Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Presentations (2nd ed.) and faculty advisor for Utree: Under- graduate teaching and research experiences in engineering.Ms. Christine Haas, Engineering Ambassadors Network
Paper ID #9549Work-in-Progress: Undergraduate Teaching and Research Experiences inEngineering (Utree): An Engineering Student Organization with a Commu-nication FocusVictoria VadyakMr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering communication at Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Presentations (2nd edition) and the faculty advisor of Utree.Dr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion UniversityMs. Christine Haas, Christine Haas Consulting
Paper ID #9931Living With Contradiction: Cultural Historical Activity Theory as a Theo-retical Frame to Study Student Engineering Project TeamsMr. Michael L Jones, Faculty of Information, University of Toronto Michael Jones is a doctoral candidate in the Faculty of Information, University of Toronto and professor of Communication, Culture, Information and Technology at Sheridan College, Oakville ON. Michael’s research interests are in project-based learning in technology education, with his dissertation looking at how Formula SAE engineering student project teams engage information management contradictions
Professional Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly, among others.Dr. Caroline Carvill, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Richard A House, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard House is Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.A. from Illinois Wesleyan University and M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of California, Irvine. In addition to engineering communication and pedagogy, he has scholarly interests in sustainability and Shakespeare.Jessica Livingston, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Jessica Livingston is an Associate Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She received a B.A. from The University of Georgia, an M.A. from the University of
remaining engineering courses was of particularinterest. How comfortable are you solving engineering design problems that ensure biological requirements? a) They are easier than almost any other design problems. b) A bit easier than almost any other design problem. c) Can't say. d) A bit more difficult than almost any other design problem. e) Much more difficult than almost any other design problem.This question was designed to detect any change in comfort at working with design problemsthat incorporate both biology and thermodynamics. The students were given such a problem inthe 2D week, and so if the students were capable, their comfort level should
previous drafts ofthis paper.References1 Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., and Lattuca, L. R. Quality Assurance of Engineering Education through Accreditation: The Impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and Its Global Influence. Journal of Engineering Education. 2005. 94(1): 165-184.2 Cech, E., and Sherick, H. Depoliticization and the Structure of Engineering Education. In S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, and B. Newberry (Eds.), International Perspectives on Engineering Education: Engineering Education and Practice in Context, Volume I. Springer Science + Business Media B.V., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Forthcoming.3 Faulkner, W. Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering. Social Studies of
isequivalent to one 50 minute lecture period or a 30 minute lab) shared between all complementarystudies. Our accreditation board acknowledges the need for interpretation and judgement whiledistributing these units across the range of topics covered by this category, noting: While considerable latitude is provided in the choice of suitable content for the complementary studies component of the curriculum, some areas of study are essential in the education of an engineer. Accordingly, the curriculum must include studies in the following: a. Engineering economics b. The impact of technology on society c. Subject matter that deals with central issues, methodologies, and thought
in Revolutionary BrazilPSI was developed by the head of the Psychology Department at Columbia University, Fred S.Keller. Keller was a close friend and colleague of the renowned behaviorist, B. F. Skinner.Between 1928 and 1931, Skinner and Keller were part of a group of young Turks in Harvard’sPsychology Department who, as PhD students, dared to challenge the dominant introspectiveapproach in American psychology. Influenced by Freudian psychoanalysis, but keeping an arms-length from it, American academic psychologists embraced an introspective approach that stoodat one end of the spectrum of the mind-body dualism defined by Descartes. Riding on the crest ofthe historic rise of the experimental sciences, the behaviorists—Pavlov, Thorndike
.21. Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.22. Gertner, D., & Grudin, J. (1985). The Evolution of Mental Metaphors in Psychology: A 90-year Retrospective. American Psychologist, 40, 181–192.23. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. New York: Pergamon Press.24. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.25. Miller, A. (1986). Imagery in Scientific Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.26. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage, p. 250.27. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M
week. In addition, they were required tosubmit a typed, one-quarter to one-third page paragraph answering a stated question or choiceamong questions (see Appendix B). These questions were designed to overlap with the coursecontent for the week, and the nature of the questions evolved during the semester in response tostudent performance and feedback. Toward the end of the semester, we also offered studentsopportunities to re-write previous paragraphs for a higher grade. Students were given no in-classinstruction in paragraph writing, but on the course web site we provided students with resourcessuch as documents about writing, links to online writing guides, and student-produced examplesof well-written paragraphs. These materials were accessed
following way,“Uh...I did, uh, a little bit of research to just, just give people preface, and that was on theeconomic side, specifically. And then, um, involved in planned discussions, obviously gave input,and also set up the mechanism where people could ask questions via text.” He also helpedmoderate small group discussions which he described as, “[B]asically, uh, just trying to keepanybody from kind of grandstanding within the discussion and being, like I know, that somebodycan even be a professor, as a student we are kind of supposed to tamper them down and allow a lotof different voices to come out, generate questions, compile those questions, and kind of move ahandful to the top.” As a result, even though Way characterized his role as a small